SBF blamed market conditions for Alameda's insolvency

Sam Bankman-Fried’s Written Testimony Notes Dec 12, 2022, is part of . SBF was scheduled to testify before Congress a day before his on Dec 12, 2022 in the Bahamas. So, these are the notes that he would have presented in front of Congress that we never actually got to hear. You can jump to any part . HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series arrest here This is part 3 of 11. Feature Image: HackerNoon’s Stable Diffusion AI, prompt “classic hedge fund risks” What went wrong? A large number of things had to go wrong for this to happen. Because I was not running Alameda, I was not aware of some of the critical events at the time. But I running FTX, and that means it was ultimately my responsibility to do right by FTX’s customers. was Alameda Research became insolvent when the economic environment changed. Alameda put on a margin position that was sustainable in the economic environment of late 2021, with roughly 10% leverage. As tightening monetary policy, a war, and supply chain problems hit throughout 2022, asset prices crashed: I believe that Alameda’s assets fell by roughly 90% over the course of the year, and so even 10% leverage was too much. A run on the bank forced immediate liquid delivery from FTX. i) This meant that FTX had only a few days to margin call a substantial, fairly illiquid margin position. A failure of hedges. As best as I can reconstruct looking back, in late 2021, Alameda Research was not sufficiently hedged; I believe that it had a total margin position, much of which was not on FTX, that was roughly $8b in size, and likely had on roughly $2b of hedges. By the fall of 2022, I believe that Alameda Research had a margin position of roughly $8b, and likely had roughly $8b of hedges. However, the crash that occurred in November 2022 was not a broad market crash, or even a broad crypto market crash. From November 7th to November 9th, Bitcoin was down roughly 17% and equities markets were roughly flat, but many of Alameda’s assets were down more than 50%. And so Alameda’s hedges didn’t work. This is the classic ‘hedge fund risk’--that all of a firm’s positions can become highly correlated, even if some are thought to be hedges, as happened with e.g. Long-Term Capital Management and in the 2008 financial crisis. Uses of capital: Piecing together what data I can, in retrospect, Alameda Research’s roughly $8 billion net short margin position in liquid assets lined up with the following approximate expenditures: (1) Interest payments to lenders: ~$1b (2)VC investments: ~$4b (3) Buying back Binance’s stake in FTX: ~$3b Continue Reading Here

SBF blamed market conditions for Alameda's insolvency

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

According to SBF, Binance CEO CZ caused the bank run & never intended to acquire FTX

4 silos, 103 subsidiaries, 13 entities in-debt: That is the Corporate Structure of FTX

According to SBF, Binance CEO CZ caused the bank run & never intended to acquire FTX

Alameda Loaned 1 Billion to Sam Bankman-Fried and 2.3 Billion to 'Paper Bird Inc' (aka SBF also)

At SBF's direction, Caroline materially misled investors that Alameda was fine. It was not.

'Balances of customer crypto assets deposited are not presented'

According to SBF, Binance CEO CZ caused the bank run & never intended to acquire FTX

4 silos, 103 subsidiaries, 13 entities in-debt: That is the Corporate Structure of FTX

According to SBF, Binance CEO CZ caused the bank run & never intended to acquire FTX

Alameda Loaned 1 Billion to Sam Bankman-Fried and 2.3 Billion to 'Paper Bird Inc' (aka SBF also)

At SBF's direction, Caroline materially misled investors that Alameda was fine. It was not.

'Balances of customer crypto assets deposited are not presented'

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps