paint-brush
On Galileo’s Crazy Life (And Why Science & Tech Are Never Straightforward)by@brookslockett
387 reads
387 reads

On Galileo’s Crazy Life (And Why Science & Tech Are Never Straightforward)

by Brooks LockettApril 19th, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

This is an article describing the complex, roundabout story of how Galileo Galilei helped shape our modern world & technology.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - On Galileo’s Crazy Life (And Why Science & Tech Are Never Straightforward)
Brooks Lockett HackerNoon profile picture

400 years ago, supporting the idea that the earth revolves around the sun could earn you house arrest for the rest of your life.


If your name is Galileo Galilei, that belief did earn you house arrest for the rest of your life.


…how’d that happen?


It's tempting to imagine Galileo's journey as a straightforward path of brilliance.


But reality is complex and extremely annoying. And we’re digging into the real story here.


Galileo, a brilliant Italian astronomer and physicist, catalyzed the Scientific Revolution with his insatiable curiosity. It all began with his fascination for pendulums, when as a young student, he observed a hanging lamp in Pisa's cathedral.


Discovering that a pendulum's period remains constant, regardless of its swing, he inadvertently laid the groundwork for the pendulum clock.


Defying his father's wishes for a medical career, Galileo pursued his passion for math, ultimately returning to the University of Pisa as a professor. It was there that he challenged Aristotle's long-held belief that heavier objects fall faster than lighter ones.


His audacious Leaning Tower of Pisa experiment demonstrated that objects of different masses fall with the same acceleration, but his defiance cost him his position.


Inspired by news of a Dutch telescope, Galileo built his own, unveiling celestial secrets—the moon's rugged surface, Jupiter's moons, and Venus's orbit around the Sun, not the Earth.


This pitted empirical evidence against the dogmas of the day, as the Catholic Church believed Earth was the center of the universe.


The Roman Inquisition – whose aim was to preserve power & doctrine rather than pursue new knowledge – loomed like a storm.


Pope Urban VIII (Maffeo Barberini), initially a supporter of Galileo, found his relationship soured after Galileo's Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems seemingly mocked the Pope's views on the geocentric model.


Consequently, Urban VIII allowed the Roman Inquisition to proceed with Galileo's trial.


Cardinal Francesco Barberini, the nephew of Pope Urban VIII and Secretary of the Holy Office, oversaw the Inquisition's proceedings against Galileo.


Despite his reported sympathy for Galileo, he had to balance personal feelings with loyalty to his uncle and the need to protect the Church's authority.


Amidst the whirlwind of the early 16th century, Galileo's clash with the Catholic Church intensified as the Protestant Reformation, led by the likes of Martin Luther, shook the foundations of religious authority.


In a desperate bid to maintain control, the Catholic Church launched the Counter-Reformation, heightening tensions and making Galileo's ideas all the more contentious.

Accused of Heresy in 1633, Galileo Was Interrogated, Threatened With Torture, and Eventually Placed Under House Arrest for Life.

It took the Vatican more than 350 years to admit its mistake and apologize.


Galileo's work cast a long shadow, inspiring scientific giants like Isaac Newton. Today, Jupiter's four moons proudly bear the name "Galilean satellites," and ever-advancing telescopes continue to unlock cosmic secrets that would have left Galileo awestruck.


As I researched for this article, I found myself grateful that human history is rich with thinkers like Galileo.


Without them, we might’ve remained tethered to a quagmire of outdated ideas and beliefs. Like a ship anchored by the weight of centuries-old dogma, unable to explore the vast ocean of knowledge right in front of us.


Who knows? All I can say is I’m happy Galileo cut the anchor, setting the ship of progressive development free to sail into uncharted waters.


“A knowledge of the historic and philosophical background,” Einstein once wrote, “gives that kind of independence from prejudices of his generation from which most scientists are suffering” (see this article by Don Howard, Physics Today).


Einstein believed that understanding the historical context of scientific & technological breakthroughs granted independence from contemporary prejudices that most scientists lacked. He lamented that many scientists often treat accepted ideas as immutable givens.

This Is Precisely Why It’s Important to Study the History of How These Ideas Came to Be

History unveils alternate paths and untold tales of scientific discoveries, which reminds us that knowledge is fluid.


Historical thinking makes you ask yourself:


  • Why did people in the past believe that to be true?


  • Why do I believe the opposite to be true?


  • How does my historical context influence my perspective?


As a modern individual in the 21st century, you may wonder how Galileo's life is relevant to yours amid the rapid advancements of fields like Quantum Computing, Bitcoin, Generative AI, Data Science, and countless others.


As we forge ahead into the digital frontier, Galileo's legacy serves as a guiding light, reminding us that progress thrives on open-mindedness and stagnates on dogma.

I Took Several Lessons From Studying Galileo’s Crazy Life:

  • Galileo was acutely aware of the limits of his knowledge. If science and technological development are complete, why pursue anything within them? Adding the final touches to an almost-complete structure may not be exhilarating, but expanding an unconstrained structure presents an invigorating challenge. The realization that not everything has been discovered is a source of inspiration.


  • History, like science and tech, is not merely a collection of facts, names, and dates. It’s a mode of thinking; a tapestry woven by individuals with political views, perspectives, egos, and dogma that can hinder progress. It’s tempting to examine history through the lens of hindsight, but we should recognize the cumulative evolution of knowledge.