paint-brush
North Carolina Sues Meta Over Violations of Trade Practices Actby@metaeatsbrains
252 reads

North Carolina Sues Meta Over Violations of Trade Practices Act

by Save the Kids From MetaDecember 23rd, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

North Carolina alleges that Meta committed unfair and deceptive trade practices, targeting young users and exploiting psychological vulnerabilities in violation of N.C.G.S. § 75-1.1. The state claims Meta violated public policy by failing to comply with the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act and made false representations regarding the safety of its Social Media Platforms. Meta's alleged actions are deemed to have affected commerce in North Carolina, sparking a legal battle with potential repercussions.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail

Company Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - North Carolina Sues Meta Over Violations of Trade Practices Act
Save the Kids From Meta HackerNoon profile picture

The United States v Meta Platforms Court Filing October 24, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 84 of 100.

COUNT XXXIX: VIOLATIONS OF THE NORTH CAROLINA UNFAIR OR DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT, N.C.G.S. § 75-1.1 (BY STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA)

1085. The State of North Carolina incorporates and re-alleges paragraphs 1 through 850 as if they were fully set forth herein.


1086. The North Carolina Unfair or Deceptive Trade Practices Act prohibits “unfair or deceptive acts or practices in or affecting commerce.” N.C.G.S. § 75-1.1(a).


1087. Meta has committed unfair or deceptive acts or practices in violation of N.C.G.S. § 75-1.1(a) as described in this Complaint, including but not limited to:


a. Targeting its Social Media Platforms to young users, despite understanding the risks of psychological and physical harms, including compulsive and unhealthy use of or addiction to its Social Media Platforms.


b. Designing its Social Media Platforms to exploit young users’ psychological vulnerabilities with engagement-inducing features including but not limited to infinite scroll, ephemeral content display, autoplay, and disruptive audiovisual and vibration notifications, producing compulsive, prolonged, or unhealthy use by young users.


c. Failing to comply with the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6501 et seq., as alleged in Count I, in violation of public policy.


d. Falsely, deceptively, or misleadingly representing, directly or indirectly, expressly or by implication, that:


i. Meta’s Social Media Platforms are not psychologically or physically harmful for young users, while Meta knew young users experienced such harms.


ii. Meta’s Social Media Platforms are not designed to induce young users’ compulsive, prolonged, or unhealthy use, when they are in fact so designed.


iii. The incidence of negative or harmful user experiences on Meta’s Social Media Platforms is low, while omitting Meta’s knowledge regarding the heightened extent users encountered such experiences.


iv. Meta prioritized young users’ health and safety, when in fact Meta subordinated young users’ health and safety to the goal of maximizing profits by prolonging time spent on its Social Media Platforms.


v. Users under 13 are excluded from Meta’s Social Media Platforms, when Meta knew that its policies and practices were insufficient to exclude such users.


1088. Meta’s above-described unfair or deceptive acts and practices have been in or affecting commerce in North Carolina.



Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case 4:23-cv-05448 retrieved on October 25, 2023, from Washingtonpost.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.