Introduction Whenever there is a need to choose a technology for an upcoming project or product, there is always a question about which technology/framework performs best for a certain kind of application. Imagine that we’re trying to build an I/O intensive application such as a URL shortener service. For this kind of I/O intensive application, which of these technologies/frameworks will perform best: Node.js
Go
SpringBoot (Java) Node.js Go SpringBoot (Java) Node.js is interpreted, Go is compiled, while Java is both. If the application under consideration is I/O bound, will there be any performance difference in these diverse technologies? We’ll try to find the answer in this article. Environment To save space, all the application code is located in this GitHub repo: https://github.com/mayankc1/node-vs-go-vs-springboot-performance?embedable=true https://github.com/mayankc1/node-vs-go-vs-springboot-performance?embedable=true A URL shortener application has been chosen for benchmarking, as it represents a real-world use case while remaining simple enough for controlled testing. The application logic is roughly as follows: JSON parsing from the incoming request
Request validation
Database read via an ORM
JSON response construction JSON parsing from the incoming request Request validation Database read via an ORM JSON response construction Node.js, by default, runs on a single core. This makes it unfair because Go and SpringBoot, by default, use all cores. To utilize the CPU to the fullest, Node.js application runs in cluster mode (4 workers). Both Go and SpringBoot utilize all cores by default. A PostgreSQL database is used for storing shortened URLs. The table structure is as follows: urlshortener=> \d shortenedurls
                        Table "public.shortenedurls"
    Column    |            Type             | Collation | Nullable | Default 
--------------+-----------------------------+-----------+----------+---------
 id           | character varying(255)      |           | not null | 
 srcurl       | character varying(255)      |           | not null | 
 created      | timestamp without time zone |           |          | 
 lastaccessed | timestamp without time zone |           |          | 
Indexes:
    "firstkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id) urlshortener=> \d shortenedurls
                        Table "public.shortenedurls"
    Column    |            Type             | Collation | Nullable | Default 
--------------+-----------------------------+-----------+----------+---------
 id           | character varying(255)      |           | not null | 
 srcurl       | character varying(255)      |           | not null | 
 created      | timestamp without time zone |           |          | 
 lastaccessed | timestamp without time zone |           |          | 
Indexes:
    "firstkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id) To ensure high-quality load generation, the widely recognized Bombardier tool was used. The tool was customized to send a random and unique URL in the request body, formatted as a JSON string. Bombardier Before each test, the table is truncated so that the index doesn’t get oversized and slow down the application running later in the test cycle. Results Each test is conducted with a total of 1 million requests. The following performance metrics are recorded for each test run: Total time to complete 1 million requests
Requests per second (RPS)
25th percentile latency
Mean latency
Median latency
75th percentile latency
Maximum latency
CPU usage
Memory usage Total time to complete 1 million requests Requests per second (RPS) 25th percentile latency Mean latency Median latency 75th percentile latency Maximum latency CPU usage Memory usage It is important to note that resource consumption—specifically CPU and memory usage—is as critical as raw performance. A  faster runtime that incurs significantly higher resource costs may not provide practical value in real-world scenarios. As Node.js is running in cluster mode, the CPU and memory usage are cumulative for all processes in the cluster. The results are as follows: The same results in a concise tabular form are as follows: Analysis The conclusion is a bit tricky. First, Node.js (in cluster mode) works slightly better than Go for this application. Unfortunately, SpringBoot (with virtual threads) is quite slow. However, we might argue that SpringBoot is a very heavy framework compared to minuscule Express and Gin. this The CPU usage for the Node.js application confirms that cores are getting utilized correctly. The CPU usage of the Go application is the lowest of all. The place where Go truly excels is memory usage. It uses a mere 31M compared to 740M of Node.js and 315M of SpringBoot. The overall winner is undoubtedly Go. Go

GitHub

Node.js vs Go vs SpringBoot: Performance Comparison for I/O Bound App

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

A Formal Analysis of Agentic AI Protocols: A2A, ACP, and AGUI

104 Stories To Learn About Go

The Noonification: How to Use React to Replace useEffect (12/31/2022)

3 Golang Pitfalls Every Developer Needs to Know

207 Stories To Learn About Golang

2 Error-Free Options for Decimal handling in Golang

A Formal Analysis of Agentic AI Protocols: A2A, ACP, and AGUI

104 Stories To Learn About Go

The Noonification: How to Use React to Replace useEffect (12/31/2022)

3 Golang Pitfalls Every Developer Needs to Know

207 Stories To Learn About Golang

2 Error-Free Options for Decimal handling in Golang

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps