paint-brush
Musk Wants It All: Damages, Injunction, and More from OpenAIby@legalpdf
159 reads

Musk Wants It All: Damages, Injunction, and More from OpenAI

by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesAugust 12th, 2024
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Elon Musk seeks a comprehensive range of relief in his lawsuit against Defendants, including compensatory, consequential, and statutory damages, restitution, and disgorgement of ill-gotten gains. He requests a constructive trust on assets traceable to his contributions, an accounting of gains derived from these contributions, and a judicial ruling on the validity of OpenAI’s license to Microsoft. Musk also seeks specific performance of contractual promises, injunctive relief against unlawful conduct, treble and punitive damages, and coverage of legal costs and attorneys’ fees.
featured image - Musk Wants It All: Damages, Injunction, and More from OpenAI
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture

Elon Musk v OpenAI, Court Filing, retrieved on April 30, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part of this filing here. This part is 28 of 29.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Musk respectfully prays for judgment against Defendants as follows:


  1. For compensatory, consequential, and statutory damages, restitution, and non-restitutionary disgorgement, and any other relief that may be permitted by law or equity, according to proof in an amount to be determined at trial, together with interest thereon as provided by law;


  2. For a constructive trust on Defendants’ ill-gotten gains, property, and assets traceable to Musk’s significant contributions to OpenAI, Inc.;


  3. For an accounting of all gains, profits, and advantages Defendants have derived from their solicitation, receipt, use, and expenditure of Musk’s contributions to OpenAI, Inc., including the intellectual property and derivative works funded by the same and from Defendants’ use of the same for their benefit or the benefit any third party;


  4. For a judicial determination that OpenAI, Inc.’s license to Microsoft is null and void, or to the extent it is deemed valid, that GPT-4, GPT-4T, GPT4o, and/or other OpenAI next generation large language models constitute Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) and are therefore outside the scope of OpenAI’s license to Microsoft;


  5. For an order compelling specific performance of Defendants’ contractual promises to Musk, as alleged herein;


  6. For a preliminary and permanent injunction enjoining Defendants from the unlawful, unfair, and unjust conduct alleged herein;


  7. For treble damages pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c);


  8. For punitive and/or exemplary damages as provided by law;


  9. For costs of suit;


  10. For attorneys’ fees pursuant to Cal. Civ. Proc. § 1021.5, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), 18 U.S.C. § 1964(c), and as otherwise permitted by law; and


  11. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and appropriate.




Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case retrieved on August 05, 2024, deadline.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.