The United States v Meta Platforms Court Filing October 24, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 79 of 100.
1055. The Attorney General of the State of New York realleges and incorporates by reference each and every allegation in the paragraphs above as if the same were fully set forth herein.
1056. New York General Business Law (GBL) § 349 provides that “[d]eceptive acts or practices in the conduct of any business, trade or commerce or in the furnishing of any service in [New York] are . . . unlawful.”
1057. At all relevant times, Meta has been engaged in business, trade or commerce in New York within the meaning of GBL § 349.
1058. Meta engaged in deceptive practices in providing its Social Media Platforms, as set forth above.
1059. The Attorney General of the State of New York timely provided Meta with the pre-litigation notice required by GBL § 349(c).
1060. By engaging in the acts and practices described above, all of which were material, Meta has engaged in and continues to engage in deceptive practices in violation of GBL § 349(a).
Continue Reading Here.
About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case 4:23-cv-05448 retrieved on October 25, 2023, from Washingtonpost.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.
Lead image by Michael Discenza on Unsplash