The Case for Lagrange Points As Ideal Locations for Space Clocks

Written by exoplanetology | Published 2025/02/25
Tech Story Tags: space-exploration | space-navigation-clocks | earth-moon-time-difference | cislunar-navigation-system | lagrange-point-clock-rates | einstein-relativity-in-space | relativistic-time-dilation | time-transfer-in-space

TLDRClocks at Earth-Moon Lagrange points tick at different rates due to gravity and motion. L4 and L5 offer stability, while L1 and L2 are metastable. Precise timekeeping at these points is crucial for synchronizing space clocks and improving lunar navigation systems.via the TL;DR App

Table of Links

Abstract and 1. Introduction

  1. Clock in Orbit

    2.1 Coordinate Time

    2.2 Local Frame for the Moon

  2. Clock Rate Differences Between Earth and Moon

  3. Clocks at Earth-Moon Lagrance Points

    4.1 Clock at Lagrange point L1

    4.2. Clock at Lagrange point L2

    4.3. Clock at Lagrange point L4 or L5

  4. Conclusions

Appendix 1: Fermi Coordinates with Origin at the Center of the Moon

Appendix 2: Construction of Freely Falling Center of Mass Frame

Appendix 3: Equations of Motion of Earth and Moon

Appendix 4: Comparing Results in Rotating and Non-Rotating Coordinate Systems

Acknowledgments and References

4. CLOCKS AT EARTH-MOON LAGRANGE POINTS

The Lagrange points offer a cost-effective and low-noise environment for stationing spacecraft with clocks because there is no net acceleration. As a result, the orbits of clocks at these points with respect to the Earth-Moon barycenter are well-determined and the corresponding frequency offsets are precisely determined. Therefore, the proper times of clocks at Lagrange points can be related to the proper times of clocks on the Earth and Moon with high precision. This information is crucial for synchronizing remote clocks in cislunar space. Both L4 and L5 are stable points, but L1 and L2 are only metastable locations.

4.1 Clock at Lagrange point L1

In this section, we consider a clock at L1 and compare its rate to a clock on Earth’s surface. It is most convenient to use a freely falling inertial frame centered at the center of mass of the Earth-Moon system for this calculation. First, we need the precise position of L1; most treatments assume circular motion, but this is inadequate for our purposes. We assume Keplerian elliptical orbits for the Earth and Moon about the center of mass, for which the Earth-Moon distance is given by Eq. (19). The radial velocity is then

and the radial acceleration of the Moon relative to Earth is

Assume that L1 is between the Earth and Moon and at a distance x1D from the Moon, the net gravitational force towards the Moon supplies the radial acceleration of L1, diminished by the centripetal acceleration due to rotation of the Earth-Moon line. This gives the condition

Solving Eq. (39) for x1 gives

x1 = 0.15093428(1).

The metric, neglecting solar tides, is

The motion is so slow that the potential terms in the last line can be neglected. The transverse and radial velocities of the clock due to the rotation of the Earth-Moon line are

So, the total velocity squared is

4.2. Clock at Lagrange point L2

4.3. Clock at Lagrange point L4 or L5

The clock is equidistant from Earth and the Moon. The total velocity squared is the sum of the radial velocity squared and the transverse velocity squared:

Authors:

(1) Neil Ashby, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO 80305 (Neil.Ashby@Colorado.Edu);

(2) Bijunath R. Patla, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO 80305 (bijunath.patla@nist.gov).


This paper is available on arxiv under CC0 1.0 license.


Written by exoplanetology | What's out there? Aliens, water, or just a big empty nothingness? Monumental research about the vastness of our cosmos.
Published by HackerNoon on 2025/02/25