Securities Fraud Allegation against SBF, the disgraced ex-CEO of FTX

Written by legalpdf | Published 2022/12/16
Tech Story Tags: sam-bankman-fried | sbf | alameda | cryptocurrency | ftx | fraud | ftx-bankruptcy | securities-fraud | hackernoon-es | hackernoon-hi | hackernoon-zh | hackernoon-vi | hackernoon-fr | hackernoon-pt | hackernoon-ja

TLDRPart 6 of 9 details Conspiracy to Commit Securities Fraud as part of the 8 counts of charges against SBFvia the TL;DR App

US v. Bankman-Fried, 22-cr-673 Court Filing, Dec 13 2022 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 6 of 9.


Feature Image: HackerNoon’s Stable Diffusion AI, Prompt “disgraced ex CEO facing criminal charges”

COUNT SIX: Conspiracy to Commit Securities Fraud

The Grand Jury further charges:

  1. From at least in or about May 2022, up to and including in or about November 2022, in the Southern District of New York, and elsewhere, SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a “SBF,” the defendant, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit an offense against the United States, to wit, securities fraud in violation of Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78j(b) and 78ff, and Title 17,. Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.10b-5.

  2. It was a part and an object of the conspiracy that SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a “SBF,” the defendant, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly would and did, directly and indirectly, by use of a means and instrumentality of interstate commerce and of the mails, and of a facility of a national securities exchange, use and employ, in connection with the purchase and sale of a security registered on a national securities exchange and any security not so registered, a manipulative and deceptive device and contrivance, in violation of Title 17, Code of Federal Regulations, Section 240.10b-5, by: (a) employing a device, scheme, and artifice to defraud; (b) making an untrue statement of material fact and omitting to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; and (c) engaging in an act, practice, and course of business which operated and would operate as a fraud and deceit upon a person, in violation of Title 15, United States Code, Sections 78j(b) and 78ff, to wit, BANKMAN-FRIED agreed with others to engage in a scheme to defraud investors in FTX.com by providing false and misleading information to those investors regarding FTX.com's financial condition.

  3. In furtherance of the conspiracy and to effect the illegal object thereof, the following overt act, among others, was committed in the Southern District of New York and elsewhere: on or about September 13, 2022, SAMUEL BANKMAN-FRIED, a/k/a "SBF," the defendant, caused an email to be sent to an FTX investor in New York, New York that contained materially false information about FTX's financial condition.

    (Title 18, United States Code, Section 371.)

Continue Reading Here


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.

This court case (US v. Bankman-Fried, 22-cr-673 (Abrams), retrieved on Dec 15 2022) is part of the public domain. The court-created documents provided by PACER are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.


Written by legalpdf | Legal PDFs of important tech court cases are far too inaccessible for the average reader... until now.
Published by HackerNoon on 2022/12/16