DOE v. Github: Other Class Considerations

Written by legalpdf | Published 2023/09/06
Tech Story Tags: doe-vs-github | github-lawsuit-explained | details-of-the-github-trial | details-of-github-lawsuit | copilot-lawsuit-explained | details-of-copilot-lawsuit | programming-lawsuit | openai-lawsuit

TLDRDefendants have acted on grounds generally applicable to the Class.via the TL;DR App

DOE v. Github (original complaint) Court Filing, retrieved on November 3, 2022 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 13 of 37.

VI. CLASS ALLEGATIONS

F. Other Class Considerations

40. Defendants have acted on grounds generally applicable to the Class, thereby making final injunctive relief appropriate with respect to the Class as a whole.

41. This class action is superior to alternatives, if any, for the fair and efficient adjudication of this controversy. Prosecuting the claims pleaded herein as a class action will eliminate the possibility of repetitive litigation. There will be no material difficulty in the management of this action as a class action.

42. The prosecution of separate actions by individual Class members would create the risk of inconsistent or varying adjudications, establishing incompatible standards of conduct for Defendants.

Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.

This court case 3:22-cv-06823-KAW retrieved on September 5, 2023, from Storage.Courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.


Written by legalpdf | Legal PDFs of important tech court cases are far too inaccessible for the average reader... until now.
Published by HackerNoon on 2023/09/06