I actually have been thinking about this for many years, and up until it has been confirmed. This is nothing new, as cosmologist and thermonuclear physicist have discussed this nearly half a century ago. recently Yakov Zeldovich Many people think that Nuclear Fusion might be the biggest milestone in terms of ever abundant energy for mankind. It is certainly one of the hardest, isn't it? Imagine if we took that a step further. Technologically, it may seem unfeasible. The closest black-hole is probably around 1000 light years away. How can we solve such a problem right now? Would we need to build some sort of Quantum simulator? Would we need in our team? For the algorithmic capabilities, would one need to look into parallel Qubit based processing mechanisms? This is a question that goes beyond the traditional realm of all of science, physics and engineering. this guy This is because in theory, practically it can happen. In terms of feasibility and where we are now, it seems like not a chance. Forget finding a needle in a haystack, you may have better luck turning the haystack into a needle. That said, there may actually be some angles technologically to go through.  I thought of this as perhaps a problem of complexity. I myself, have been wondering that instead of trying to reach the blackhole, what if one was able to create their own mini self-contained blackhole as a source of energy? The question relies on containment, harvesting methods, gravity, atom placement and optics. It would be a much bigger step for mankind over nuclear fusion. Infact any horrid thing we did to our planet or ecosystem can easily be reversed perhaps in a matter of few months to a year with that much energy sustainability. This extremely large sci-fi problem that seems improbable would be a bigger milestone in areas outside of clean energy. Everything from space exploration to how life is on earth would change perhaps even bigger than discovering aliens. The question is whether creating a self contained black hole or reaching one, when can the technology be there and what can speed it up? There is a huge fine line between few years and a thousand years if that would even be a possibility at all at that point. Given where we are heading, it is more likely civilization would either lead to its own utter destruction or world peace prior to such a thing happening. However, I been thinking of this problem for a while. I been thinking of alot of problems for a while. You never know what a bunch of scientist can come up with when they think. The limits are there, now we just need to try reaching them.

BUNCH

Why You Should Source Your Software Under the Open Innovation License

Tracking H1N1pdm09, the Hantavirus, and G4 EA H1N1 w/ Data Mining

I might not be that important

Read My Stories

Too Long; Didn't Read

Boost your HackerNoon story @ $159.99! 🚀

Lets Go Beyond Nuclear Fusion and Extract Energy from Blackholes

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

2B or to B3? That Is The Question... Blake 2B vs 3 for Siacoin

The False Hype Around Nuclear Fusion

The Story of Nuclear Energy: Neutron Bombardment

US, China Engaged in Nuclear Fusion Space Race

23/08/2018: Biggest Stories in the Cryptosphere

2B or to B3? That Is The Question... Blake 2B vs 3 for Siacoin

The False Hype Around Nuclear Fusion

The Story of Nuclear Energy: Neutron Bombardment

US, China Engaged in Nuclear Fusion Space Race

23/08/2018: Biggest Stories in the Cryptosphere

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps