 ( ) Fractal Designs, Simple to Complex Source Complex systems emerge from simple parts. Bits form bytes, letters form words, and basic arithmetic builds into entire mathematical models. In software, microservices become platforms like Netflix. This pattern, small components combining into powerful wholes, is the foundation of complexity itself. The great gift to the world that technologies like Apache Kafka gave us was decoupling: it broke monoliths into independent services and teams that could scale.Kafka didn’t just change how data moved, it reshaped how we design systems: modular, loosely coupled, and easier to evolve. Multi-agent systems (MAS) offer a similar shift for AI. MAS introduces a way of structuring intelligence, breaking down complex AI tasks into simpler, focused agents that work together to solve harder problems. It’s a design shift that brings clear benefits: better testing, more reliable behavior, and scalable systems. तर विगतको आन्दोलनको समीक्षा, वर्तमान राजनीतिक स्थितिको विश्लेषण र भावी नीतिबारे तीन खण्डमा चर्चा गरेका प्रचण्डले अन्तिम घडिसम्म संविधानसभा जोगाउने प्रयत्न गरिरहने प्रतिबद्धता भने दोहर् याउन छाडेका छैनन्। Emergence: Complexity from Simplicity नेपालमा विद्युत क्षमता ८६ हजार मेगावाट छ भनेर ‘थेसिस’ मात्रै आएको छ, सरकारले आधिकारिक रुपमा यति नै आवश्यक हो भन्ने कुनै तथ्यांक निकालेको छ कि त्यही थेसिसलाई आधार मानिरहेको अवस्था हो ? आपातकालको आपातकालको The Biological Levels of Organization From an Atom to a Multicellular Organism (Source:  ) Biological Macromolecules बायोलॉजिकल माइक्रोमोलेक्स Biological Macromolecules We see this bottom-up complexity in countless domains. When I first studied  मेरो विचारमा सबै विश्वविद्यालय लगभग त्रिविका कार्बन कपी हुने कि नहुने द्वन्द्वमा काम गरेको इतिहास हो, पछिल्लो । Conway’s Game of Life Conway’s Game of Life Tetromino Patterns from Conway’s Game of Life (Source:  ) Cornell University’s Math Explorer Club Cornell University’s Math Explorer Club Cornell University’s Math Explorer Club With only four simple rules, you could simulate behaviors that looked like movement, reproduction, and even computation itself. That lesson stuck with me: you don’t need to engineer complexity directly. You can build small parts with clear behaviors and let them interact. Complexity emerges. Another example is ant colonies. Each ant follows basic instructions: lay pheromones, follow trails, pick up food. There’s no leader, no central coordination, yet the colony exhibits intelligent, adaptive behavior. It organizes itself. Ant Colony Behavior (Source:  ) Insect Lore, Ant Colony Behaviors Insect Lore, Ant Colony Behaviors Insect Lore, Ant Colony Behaviors This is the essence of emergence. Intelligence isn’t always about the smartest part, it’s about the smartest system. This is how we need to think about AI and this is the principle that multi-agent systems bring to AI. Instead of building one all-knowing model, MAS encourages you to design multiple simple agents, each focused on a narrow task. Like ants or Conway’s gliders, they interact to form a system that can solve problems much larger than any one part could handle alone. The Trouble with Generative AI The Trouble with Generative AI Generative AI is powerful, but it can also be chaotic. The same foundation model that can summarize a document can also write code, explain a joke, or draft an email. That flexibility is impressive, and it’s in part what drives the interest but it also introduces a problem: we’ve packed too much complexity into a single prompt-shaped interface. This is the opposite of how purpose-built AI models are designed. Traditional models are scoped: fraud detection, recommendation, and churn prediction. The inputs and outputs are known, the evaluation metrics are clear, and testing is straightforward. They lack generality, but that’s exactly what makes them reliable, testable, and deployable at scale. Generative AI flips this. It's like giving an employee fifteen unrelated tasks at once, with no prioritization, no clear inputs, and no defined outputs. It’s hard to evaluate their work, not because they’re bad at it, but because we’ve defined the problem in a way that resists structure. From a systems perspective, this is the opposite of emergence. Instead of building complexity through interaction between simple components, we’re injecting complexity all at once and hoping for coherence. It’s brittle, hard to debug, and nearly impossible to test reliably. इन्जिनियरिङ सिस्टमको समस्या : 
 
 
 
  – The input space is infinite, and the output space is open-ended. How do you assert correctness in a system that can say anything? Testing difficulties  – Small changes to prompts can produce wildly different results. You don’t know what you're going to get. This makes designing and testing these systems more challenging than their conventional alternatives. Poor predictability of outputs  –  Complex overloaded prompts don’t scale well organizationally. Everything becomes entangled in the prompt and the model gets confused. Scalability limits These challenges aren’t just inconvenient, they make generative AI systems hard to engineer, scale, and trust in production. But there’s another way to approach the problem. A way that embraces complexity   structure, not despite it. One that draws from emergence, modularity, and clear system boundaries. through That’s where  यहाँ आओ । multi-agent systems From Models to Agents From Models to Agents प्रहरी थप अनुसन्धानका लागि ब्याङ्कक जान लागेको थियो, तर प्राविधिक कारणले सकेन। An   is more than just a model. It’s a goal-directed entity with memory, tools, and autonomy. Instead of asking a model to respond to a prompt, you give an agent a task and let it decide how to achieve it. It can plan, call APIs, retrieve information, interact with other agents, and adapt based on context. agent Agent Architecture (Inspired by  ) https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.03442 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.03442 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2304.03442 एल्यूनिको पोंटो मा ला ईएयू ले यस संस्कृत र ट्रेडिसनियस को रूप मा र अधिक देखि अधिक एक पेशेवर या अन्य सामानों को उपयोग गर्न को लागि, र यस मा उनको अधिक मार्शल मा प्रयोगशाला मा माहिर को रूप मा, कोदरल्यान्ड्स भोजनालय को अनुमति दिनुहोस। . what’s happening with the revenue forecast This is where agents become more than just clever wrappers around LLMs. They can connect probabilistic reasoning (language) with deterministic systems (code and data), a fusion that gives language models real-world leverage. Even more powerful is when you connect multiple agents together. That’s the idea behind multi-agent systems: a framework where each agent is designed with a narrow focus, but collectively they coordinate to solve complex problems. Planning, routing, executing, refining, all handled by different agents working in concert. As , agents offer a clean separation of concerns.   explored in this article explored in this article You get modular components with defined responsibilities, interfaces, and scopes. That makes them easier to test, scale, and evolve independently, just like well-designed microservices in software architecture. And just like in ant colonies or Conway’s Game of Life, the intelligence isn’t embedded in one massive entity. It emerges from the interaction of smaller, purpose-driven units. This is where MAS mirrors nature: small agents following simple rules can collectively generate sophisticated, reliable behavior. In the next section, we’ll dig into the advantages of this approach and why it might be the most practical path to building complex, trustworthy AI systems. Why Multi-Agent Systems Work One of the key conceptual shifts MAS enables is moving from open-world to closed-world problem framing. A general-purpose foundation model operates in an open world, it can be asked anything, in any way, and is expected to respond appropriately. That’s powerful, but it also makes the system unbounded and unpredictable. In contrast, an agent operates in a closed world: it has a specific goal, access to known tools, and clear success criteria. This boundedness makes agents testable, observable, and composable, exactly what’s needed for real-world reliability. 1. Testability When each agent has a narrow scope, you can test it like any traditional software component. A retrieval agent can be validated on recall and precision. A summarizer can be benchmarked against expected outputs. You no longer have to treat the system like a black box with infinitely many valid responses, you can probe and improve each piece in isolation. 2. Observability In a monolithic LLM interaction, you get input, output, and not much else. With MAS, every agent step is visible: what data was fetched, what reasoning was applied, what decision was made. That makes debugging tractable, auditing possible, and failure modes easier to understand and fix. 3. Composability Agents are building blocks. Once you’ve built a reliable planner or a summarizer, you can reuse them across different workflows. This aligns perfectly with how modern software is built, through reusable, composable services, and opens the door to faster iteration and lower operational overhead. 4. Scalability Different agents can be developed and maintained by different teams. Each can be versioned, monitored, and deployed independently. That’s crucial in a growing organization or product where responsibilities need to be distributed. You scale the system by scaling the team without increasing the complexity for any single contributor. 5. Alignment with Real-World Constraints Real-world tasks are not free-form language problems, they’re structured workflows with known inputs, outputs, constraints, and goals. MAS allows us to encode that structure into the system itself. You can insert guardrails, fallback logic, human-in-the-loop checks—all within a coherent architecture. MAS doesn’t eliminate complexity. But it organizes it. It gives you the ability to engineer AI systems with the same rigor and reliability we expect from modern software. MAS doesn’t eliminate complexity. But it organizes it. It gives you the ability to engineer AI systems with the same rigor and reliability we expect from modern software. An Example: Revenue Forecasting with MAS An Example: Revenue Forecasting with MAS Imagine a company wants to forecast revenue across regions and product lines. Doing this well requires data retrieval, trend analysis, anomaly detection, and narrative reporting. Trying to prompt a single foundation model to do all of that in one shot is brittle and opaque, hard to test, hard to trust, and hard to scale. With MAS, we decompose the problem: 
 
 
 
 
 
 A   pulls sales and financial data from internal systems. retriever agent An   applies deterministic logic or invokes a forecasting model. analysis agent A   checks for missing data, outliers, or violations of business rules. QA agent नेपाली भाषाको सन्दर्भमा पारसमणि प्रधानको प्रत्यक्ष र परोक्ष गरी दुई प्रकारको सेवा देखिन्छ । A   orchestrates the workflow and handles errors or retries. planner agent प्रत्येक व्यक्तिका हातमा परीक्षण, परीक्षण र पुनः प्रयोग हुन्छ । As a system, it produces a more reliable and explainable result. And because the interface is natural language, a non-technical user can ask a high-level question like  , and get an answer grounded in structured data and deterministic logic. “How are we tracking against Q2 targets?” This approach aligns AI with how businesses operate: modular systems, clear ownership, and verifiable outcomes. Closing Thoughts Closing Thoughts Building intelligent systems isn’t just about having powerful models, it’s about how we structure and compose them. Complex behavior doesn’t require complex parts. It requires well-designed, simple parts working together, guided by clear boundaries and interactions. That’s the essence of emergence and the core design principle behind multi-agent systems. By breaking down monolithic prompts into smaller, testable agents, we regain control. We shift AI from an experimental black box into an engineered system, observable, scalable, and aligned with real business workflows. Foundation models gave us a powerful interface. MAS gives us the architectural pattern to make it useful, dependable, and extensible. The future of AI isn't just bigger models, it's better system design. Good ol’ practical computer science.  Sean Falconer Written by  Sean Falconer Written by Written by Sean is an AI Entrepreneur in Residence at Confluent where he works on AI strategy and thought leadership. Sean’s been an academic, startup founder, and Googler. He has published works covering a wide range of topics from AI to quantum computing. Sean also hosts the popular engineering podcasts Software Engineering Daily and Software Huddle. You can connect with Sean on  . LinkedIn

This story contains new, firsthand information uncovered by the writer.

यो अडियो कथाको मौलिक भाषामा निर्माण गरिएको हो!

धेरै लामो; पढ्नकाे लागि

Make resilience your competitive advantage

दक्ष इन्जिनीयर, आर्किटेक्चर, बिल्डर र कन्ट्र्याक्टर कर्णालीमा भित्र्याउन आवश्यक छ ।

About Author

टिप्पणीहरू

ह्याङ्ग ट्यागहरू

यो लेख मा प्रस्तुत गरिएको थियो

Related Stories

The HackerNoon Newsletter: The Tekken 3 Virtual Arena Was Real (2/9/2025)

Feel the Tailwind: HackerNoon’s new look is ready to take off!

The HackerNoon Newsletter: So.. How Does One REALLY Determine AI Is Conscious? (2/8/2025)

The HackerNoon Newsletter: AI Coding Tools Are Still in the RD Stage (2/11/2025)

The HackerNoon Newsletter: The Tekken 3 Virtual Arena Was Real (2/9/2025)

Feel the Tailwind: HackerNoon’s new look is ready to take off!

The HackerNoon Newsletter: So.. How Does One REALLY Determine AI Is Conscious? (2/8/2025)

The HackerNoon Newsletter: AI Coding Tools Are Still in the RD Stage (2/11/2025)

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps