Jaunais raksts par AI kontrolētu kodolenerģiju nav tikai par saplūšanu.Tas ir lauka ceļvedis jaunajai, būtiskajai lomai dziļajās tehnoloģijās: AI Orchestrator. Google DeepMind un Šveices plazmas centra komanda publicēja par to, kā izmantot Reinforcement Learning (RL) aģentu, lai kontrolētu plazmas magnētisko sašaurināšanos tokamak fūzijas reaktora iekšienē. Būsim skaidri par to, ko tas nozīmē. Viņi mācīja AI, lai pārvaldītu miniatūru, 100 miljonu grādu zvaigzni. Šī ir viena no grūtākajām inženiertehniskajām problēmām uz planētas, un tas ir dziļš ieskats mūsu profesijas nākotnē. Grāmata nav tikai uzvaras par fūzijas enerģiju; tā ir detalizēta plāns jaunam tehniskā līdera veidam: AI Orchestrator. Ikvienam, kas būvē AI telpā, viņu panākumi nodrošina skaidru spēļu grāmatu. Let's break it down, un tad ļaujiet mums veidot rotaļlietas versiju Darbs The Real Product is the , Not Just the Model. The DeepMind team didn't just train a neural network. They created a synthetic expert—an agent with a specialized, learned skill in plasma physics that can operate at a superhuman level (10 kHz). This is the fundamental shift. We're moving beyond building general-purpose models and into the business of creating highly specialized, autonomous agents. The value isn't in the model; it's in the specialized skill it has acquired. Synthetic Expert is Just a Fancy Term for Good Leadership. This is the most crucial part of the paper for any builder. They didn't just throw data at it. They acted as AI Orchestrators. The core of Reinforcement Learning is the reward function, the signal that tells the agent if it's doing a good job. The DeepMind team's real genius was in their reward shaping. They designed a curriculum, starting the agent with a forgiving reward function (Just don't crash the plasma) and then graduating it to a more exacting one (Now, hit these parameters with millimeter precision). This is good leadership, codified. It's about designing the curriculum for AI. Reward Shaping The : Adding an agent with the courage to ask the stupid question. They break through groupthink and expose hidden assumptions. In an AI crew, we can build this role directly into the system. This Man off the Street agent is the ultimate check against the esoteric biases of other expert agents. Secret Weapon Let's Build It: A Synthetic Fusion Research Team with CrewAI. Let's put these principles into practice. We'll build a simple crew to simulate a high-level research meeting about the DeepMind paper itself. Our mission: Analyze the DeepMind fusion paper and propose a novel, cross-disciplinary application for its core methodology. Vispirms izveidojiet savu vidi: pip install crewai crewai[tools] langchain_openai # Make sure you have an OPENAI_API_KEY environment variable set Tagad apvienosim mūsu komandu kodā: import os from crewai import Agent, Task, Crew, Process from crewai_tools import SerperDevTool # Initialize the internet search tool search_tool = SerperDevTool() # --- 1. Define Your Specialist Agents --- # Agent 1: The Reinforcement Learning Researcher rl_researcher = Agent( role='Senior RL Scientist specializing in real-world control systems', goal='Analyze the DeepMind fusion paper and extract the core methodology of "reward shaping" and "sim-to-real" transfer.', backstory=( "You are a deep expert in Reinforcement Learning. You understand the nuances of reward functions, " "policy optimization, and the challenges of deploying simulated agents into the physical world. " "Your job is to find the 'how' behind the success." ), verbose=True, allow_delegation=False, tools=[search_tool] ) # Agent 2: The Cross-Disciplinary Innovator innovator = Agent( role='A creative, multi-disciplinary strategist and founder', goal='Take a core technical methodology and propose a bold, novel application for it in a completely different industry.', backstory=( "You are a systems thinker. You see patterns and connections that others miss. Your talent is in " "taking a breakthrough from one field (like nuclear fusion) and seeing its potential to revolutionize another " "(like drug discovery or climate modeling)." ), verbose=True, allow_delegation=False ) # Agent 3: The "Man off the Street" (The Ultimate Sanity Check) pragmatist = Agent( role='A practical, results-oriented businessperson with no AI expertise', goal='Critique the proposed new application for its real-world viability. Ask the simple, common-sense questions.', backstory=( "You are not a scientist. You are grounded in reality. You hear a grand new idea and immediately " "think, 'So what? How does this actually make money or solve a real problem for someone?' " "You are the ultimate check against techno-optimism and hype." ), verbose=True, allow_delegation=False ) # --- 2. Create the Tasks --- research_task = Task( description=( "Find and analyze the Google DeepMind paper titled 'Towards practical reinforcement learning for tokamak magnetic control'. " "Extract and summarize the key techniques they used for 'reward shaping' and 'episode chunking'. " "Explain in simple terms why these methods were crucial for their success." ), expected_output='A bullet-point summary of the core RL techniques and their importance.', agent=rl_researcher ) propose_task = Task( description=( "Based on the summarized RL techniques, propose ONE novel application for this 'learn-in-simulation-then-deploy' methodology " "in a completely different high-stakes industry, such as drug discovery, autonomous surgery, or climate modeling. " "Describe the 'synthetic expert' agent that would need to be created and what its 'reward function' might be." ), expected_output='A 2-paragraph proposal for a new application, detailing the synthetic expert and its goal.', agent=innovator ) critique_task = Task( description=( "Review the proposed new application. From a purely practical standpoint, what is the single biggest, most obvious flaw or challenge? " "Ask the one simple, 'stupid' question that the experts might be overlooking. For example, 'If you simulate a drug on a computer, how do you know it won't have a rare side effect in a real person?' or 'Is the simulator for this new problem even possible to build?'" ), expected_output='A single, powerful, and pragmatic question that challenges the core assumption of the proposed application.', agent=pragmatist ) # --- 3. Assemble the Crew and Kick It Off --- # This Crew will run the tasks sequentially research_crew = Crew( agents=[rl_researcher, innovator, pragmatist], tasks=[research_task, propose_task, critique_task], process=Process.sequential, verbose=2 ) result = research_crew.kickoff() print("\n\n########################") print("## Final Strategic Brief:") print("########################\n") print(result) Ko tas mums māca par orķestri Šī koda darbība ir augsta līmeņa stratēģijas sesijas mini-simulācija.Orķestratora vērtība ir sistēmas dizainā: Inovators ņem to un jautā: Kas, ja? pragmatisms ņem to, kas, ja un jautā: Tātad, kas? Naiva jautājuma spēks: pragmatiskais aģents ir vissvarīgākais komandā. tas novērš pārējos divus ekspertu aģentus no pazušanas tehniskā žargona un nepierādītu pieņēmumu spirālē. Rezultāts ir sintēze: galīgais rezultāts nav tikai viena aģenta atbilde. Tas ir sintezēts dokuments, kas satur pētījumu, jauno ideju un kritisko pretargumentu. Iemaņas, kas mūs atveda šeit, nebūs tās, kas nosaka nākamās paaudzes augsta līmeņa inženierus.Nākotne nav par to, lai būtu cilvēks, kurš var rakstīt visgudrāko algoritmu.Tas ir par to, lai būtu līderis, kurš var orķestrēt simfoniju no tiem, lai atrisinātu problēmu, kas reiz tika uzskatīta par neiespējamu. Laiks sākt praktizēt savu vadību.
