IPLocation.net Under Fire for Selling Do-Follow Links In Ethical Guest Post Scandal

In a surprising turn of events, the popular IP geolocation service provider IPLocation.net faces backlash after being accused of selling do-follow links in exchange for payment. The controversy erupted after it was discovered that the company, which is often praised for its accurate IP tracking services, allegedly engaged in unethical practices involving paid guest posts and do-follow hyperlinks.

The scandal came to light when a reputable guest blogger and content marketing professional submitted a legitimate and ethical guest post pitch to IPLocation.net, only to receive a troubling response.

Instead of the expected professional engagement, IPLocation.net asked the blogger to pay $100 for SEO-friendly do-follow hyperlinks—a practice that many in the digital marketing world consider to be a violation of search engine guidelines.

According to sources close to the situation, the response emails from IPLocation.net suggested that contributors could enhance the visibility of their content by purchasing these hyperlinks.

SEO experts have long debated the impact of do-follow links on search engine rankings, with many arguing that the sale of such links undermines the integrity of search engine algorithms and contributes to an uneven playing field.

The practice of selling do-follow links, especially in the context of guest posts, is widely viewed as a breach of Google's Webmaster Guidelines, which prohibit the buying and selling of links that pass PageRank.

In response to the allegations, IPLocation.net has issued a statement denying any wrongdoing. It said it takes time to review your document, edit promotional content, and add feature photos to publish your article on our platform. “We charge editorial fee to cover our cost and we waive this charge if you’re okay with nofollow links,”

Well Well Well - It still takes the same time to read and review the document, edit promotional content and add feature photos and then publish it regardless of any outbound hyperlink attributes. (Exactly the same time and effort)

The Response Email To An Ethical Guest Post Email Pitch

1:20 AM- Sunday, July 28th, 2024 at 1:20 AM

To Tech Publisher Outreach Desk

*A guest post with dofollow links will incur $100, while nofollow links will be posted for free. We will publish your article with nofollow links. Please let us know if this is okay with you.
*

Regards,

Scott

As the situation develops, many will be watching closely to see how IPLocation.net addresses the issue and what, if any, long-term effects the controversy will have on its business.

Alright, let’s get real for a moment. If you’re still entertaining the idea of link schemes, it’s time for a serious wake-up call. Don’t. Do. It. Link schemes are not just a bad idea—they’re a blatant violation of Google’s guidelines, and diving into them is like signing up for an express ticket to SEO purgatory.

Let’s break this down. Google isn’t some clueless giant. It’s a tech behemoth with an algorithm so advanced it practically has a sixth sense for spotting when you’re trying to game the system.

Think you can outsmart Google with your shady link practices? Think again. Google’s algorithms are constantly evolving to sniff out these schemes, and when they do, it’s not just a slap on the wrist. Oh no. Your entire SEO strategy, along with all the time and money you’ve poured into it, could go up in smoke.

Consider this: every dollar you spend on manipulating link profiles is a dollar wasted. Every hour you spend chasing down those “easy” backlinks is time you could be investing in genuine, value-driven content. The reality is, link schemes don’t just fail to deliver long-term results—they can actively harm your site’s credibility. You’re not just risking a drop in rankings; you’re risking your entire online reputation.

If you’ve ever encountered a website that demands you fork over cash just to feature your perfectly good content or guest post pitch, here’s a no-nonsense rant for you. The practice is not just infuriating—it’s a blatant cash grab and an insult to anyone who actually values the integrity of digital content.

Here’s the deal: when you create top-notch content and pitch it to a website, the expectation is that your contribution will be rewarded in kind—usually with something valuable like a do-follow hyperlink. That’s the whole point of guest posting: you provide great content that benefits their audience, and in return, they give you a do-follow link to acknowledge your work and boost your visibility.

It’s a fair exchange, and it’s what builds real, genuine relationships in the digital space.

But what’s happening instead? More and more websites are flipping the script. Instead of reciprocating with valuable backlinks, they’re hitting you up with a bill. Yes, you read that right—after putting in the effort to craft and submit quality content, they’re asking you to pay for the privilege of having your work published. This isn’t just frustrating; it’s a complete perversion of the guest posting concept.

Let’s get real for a second. Paying for the opportunity to have your content featured undermines the whole point of content marketing and SEO. When you provide valuable content, you’re contributing to their site’s reputation and enriching their audience’s experience.

The reasonable and expected return for that should be a do-follow link—a tangible acknowledgment of the value you’ve delivered. Instead, you’re being asked to shell out cash, which completely devalues your work and the integrity of the publishing process.

This practice is not only unfair; it’s a blatant cash grab. Websites asking for money instead of offering a do-follow link in exchange for quality content are treating your work as a commodity rather than a contribution. It’s a scam dressed up as a business model, and it’s ruining the principles of honest, reciprocal digital engagement.

Let’s set the record straight: when you deliver high-quality content, you should be rewarded with something of value, like a do-follow link. If a site’s response to your well-crafted pitch is to demand payment, that’s a major red flag. It means they’re not genuinely interested in your contribution but are more focused on exploiting it for financial gain.

So here’s the bottom line: refuse to engage with platforms that fail to recognize the true value of quality content and try to turn your creative work into a transaction. Seek out reputable sites that understand the value of a fair exchange and are committed to maintaining the integrity of the guest posting process. Your content deserves to be rewarded appropriately—not treated as a cash cow.

For now, the incident serves as a cautionary tale for companies involved in content and link-building strategies, emphasizing the importance of transparency and adherence to established guidelines.