Today’s companies have central data storage infrastructure, and while this approach is beneficial for easy data management, it is somewhat problematic because the security foundation can come apart from a single failure point. Our current identity and access management landscape is chaotic.
QAs we become more connected and things become more digitized, our identities become more susceptible to identity theft, spamming, and more. These are happening because these attacks happen behind the scenes, where no one can see them.
Web 3.0 is not immune to this—in fact, it’s starting to set the pace for how malicious actors will carry out these attacks in the future due to the
In the Web 3.0 world, traditional IAM software would be replaced by distributed ledger technologies (DLT), otherwise known as the blockchain. The decentralized architecture of such systems ensures that there is no single point of failure since identity authentication and verification would be performed across the network rather than from a central authority.
As described by
With decentralized identity management, the personal data itself does not go on the blockchain because this leads to obvious problems. Data on the blockchain is immutable, and this is not compatible with access management where identity attributes are dynamic.
Therefore, criticizing blockchain-based identity management as inefficient personal data storage is moot. What is stored on the blockchain are public
The blockchain system also stores credential definitions, proof of consent for data sharing, schemas, and so on, all of which attest to a verified credential.
In this way, identity authentication moves from a zero-trust approach to
This conviction model, despite zero-knowledge, is enabled through advanced cryptography, not unlike our current encryption models.
Digital identity credentials are tied to the devices on which they are stored. Therefore, possessing an authorized person’s password is not enough for a hacker to breach access.
What if the person’s device was stolen? In that case, that device authorization can be immediately revoked, and that would take effect throughout the blockchain to ensure that a hacker cannot fraud their way to illegal access.
Organizations in the Web 3.0 will need to be more agile, flexible, and efficient than they are now. To advance their business goals, they need secure and compliant identity solutions that are simple to deploy, manage, and integrate with enterprise applications.
The private blockchain or
The growing popularity of blockchain and the emergence of decentralized applications have necessitated an overhaul of the traditional identity management system, which is usually built around centralized databases. This challenge is non-existent when discussing network communication models like OSI.
What is OSI model? It is used to describe a networking system, and it has been instrumental in cloud computing. That kind of framework is, in fact, necessary for facilitating multi-blockchain communications.
In Web 2.0, identity and access management (IAM) is an administrative job, ensuring that the right users get the proper privileges for accessing information most appropriately. In Web 3.0, IAM has become a business process.
It involves managing identities and facilitating secure transactions between parties that don't necessarily trust each other. As a result, IAM solutions have to be radically redesigned to support this new paradigm cost-effectively.
One of the best ways to protect passwords is by using
For example, suppose you are using plain-text passwords in your database. In that case, you might be vulnerable to hackers that try just entering common dictionary words into login forms, which can easily give them access to accounts. However, when you have a hashed version of passwords stored in the database, hackers will have a much harder time guessing a user's password because they would have to go through an expensive brute-force attack on all possible combinations until they find the correct one.
The identity and access management (IAM) infrastructure of Web 2.0 is not sufficient for the next generation of decentralized applications. The current centralized IAM model is not scalable for Web 3.0, which will require an advanced decentralized IAM infrastructure that can support millions of users in a blockchain network.
The technology industry is currently experiencing the most radical transformation since the dot-com era. In many ways, it's better: the internet is faster and more secure than ever before.