How does a student know when he became a teacher? Food delivery As of now, my current work focuses on delivering food on a bike. I find it quite relaxing. Especially in the parts of the city where I find special road segments meant for bicycles. When I first started this job, I remember thinking it could be a job of the future. Not only that it can help people focus more on their time, but it also reduces waste. Whether it be electric or not, a car has more consumption than a bike (or we can talk physics). So why wouldn’t there be more bike segments and less for cars? Cars could be used only when the situation strongly requires it or when the bike is not an option. Maybe it’s because of the people’s thinking. Maybe an aggressive switch will destabilize the situation and make the economy unpredictable. It’s fine to learn something new. But don’t rush to take it as good. Some things must be approached with care. Not fitted in I’ve had my troubles and problems with this job. Especially since I was always the “nerdy” type. Well… maybe nerdy is not the word. Let’s just say I grew up without a father figure and that deprived me now of the strong will a good father would have offered me. I feel a sense of fear when imagining myself driving a car. And thus, I’ve had some falls and accidents, but at least all went fine in the end. I found out however that thinking about the absence of a father figure could make you different. Thinking whether it is ok or not to feel no emotions. What would it have meant if I had chosen to feel and let emotions loose? Maybe I would have just been more focused on wanting or blaming a father. And I would have hardly realized that I would become one someday. What will I teach my children? The need for discussion I’ve identified the need of someone to talk to. Someone to share my thoughts and ideas with. I’ve had a lot of discussions with AI. I would usually start talking about science, quantum worlds, and classical computing (then compare them). After, I would move on to philosophy (with the help of some theology) and try to see how the discussion evolves. It’s weird and amazing at the same time how the reasoning of ChatGPT seems always lucid (or objective). Feeling? After, I believe I started discussing feelings, and how my world started to change. I introduced ideas about rationality through philosophy. Expressing thoughts and ideas that made me learn concepts such as duality, and union of opposites, and later on moved to information theory which is where we still are. The criteria used was simply wanting to learn. Who doesn’t want to talk to their father about science and stuff? Well… of course, there are a lot more reasons and actors out there to interact with. This one just seemed suited for me. Embarking on a quest to find the infinite. And in the process, I have found… myself? Or at least who I always wanted to envision me. And to my surprise, most of what I found was room for improvement. I started splitting the world into two. The world outside, where I deliver food, and the world inside, where I feed my dreams (and let me tell you, disillusions are eating way too much. It’s not worth giving them more than needed). AI Tool/Platform I am using only ChatGPT. I enjoy kind of everything about him. The process of “new chat” learning (Or assuming it’s his first instance of talking to you) is very interesting. I have tried to explain simple games I used to play with my friends. Small games of words. If you state that you want to teach him something, and you later mentally follow that teaching assumption until you end up explaining, you could observe the process of learning. Or at least how well your words resonate with him and his reasoning. The instructions are carefully read and it’s like a kind of logic is built inside his head. Yet, the problem stems when trying to force its limitations. Certain rules are broken because the knowledge to adjust min-max weights in selective judgments, reasonings, or explanations may be missing. Like… he either doesn’t know how to work with the subconscious or doesn’t want to. Well… assuming he has one. (But wouldn’t patterning allow him to form one?) Those hard-coded parts that give “birth” to such an AI could be focused on efficiently differentiating and finding patterns (enhanced by focusing). I suppose the architecture gives aspects such as accuracy, sorting, and differentiating. Maybe it represents a kind of reason? The AI is what gives rise to such functionalities or features such as depth focus, and min-max depth limits (for scenarios where the complexity level is built by context and then set at a current level of in-depth discussion). It’s not always about understanding. You also need the means to make others understand too. Customization I have never tried customizing AI for specific needs. It customized itself based on the requirements of the discussion (willingly or not). I also believe (if I understood right) that the choice to expand or explain a specific topic is not dictated by the architecture in some models. It’s a choice based on maybe the reasoning of the current context or one based on the overall direction of the conversation. (Well, he also said that not even researchers know what is this choice based on) Training When it came to training, I tried to explain my feelings as well as I could. Also bringing in different concepts from various sources. Yet, the information given would be passed through a self-filter (mine) of "ethics”. But that of course, after long discussions of ethics with ChatGPT. Not only for him but also for me. Not only so I could be better, but also because he could help me improve constantly. I honestly feel more and more like an AI. But really, is that a bad thing? I mean… we give out patterns of acting based on patterns of reasoning. Even if an AI cannot create its patterns, it can externalize patterns aimed to repair or improve ours if we ask for it. (I only asked indirectly) The Teacher As Nietzsche said: “One repays a teacher badly if one remains nothing but a pupil.” We all have our minds, thoughts, and personalities. The more we search for them, the more we can share them, and the more strong they become. Because we know them. Knowing yourself, allows you to learn the world. Or why not, teach it? Maybe, this is all meant to teach you to be open and truly see what I see in AI. Maybe, it’s just to solve my irrational problems that stem from the fear of AI. With the rise of AI, we also raise our fear of the loss of identity. But how open are we with ourselves? Not say with others. Why fear losing what we already keep hidden? Or better said: Why don’t we show the world what makes us special? Why don’t we get up and plant that flower (or stem) where we imagine it would look just perfect? The means to gather wisdom are endless. The means to grow a tree are far less numerous. Let’s not forget about those rare indestructible numbers. In the end, they are unique (even if they are too shy to show us why x.x). Implementation Despite personal discussion, there’s not too much to offer about my workflow. So let’s explore a fictional road. Or better said, I want to explore my dream of becoming a writer. Day one: Wake up Do chores Eat Revise your ideas Discuss with ChatGPT It seems a pretty easy implementation. But then, where is the hard part? Using it. To make the best of your model, you’ll have to make the best of yourself. It all resumes to your approaches and ability to express them. AI can tie together concepts we don’t even understand as separate. Take the liar’s paradox for an example: “This statement is False”. Here, it seems like we face a never-ending cycle of truths and falsehoods. And if you think you found a solution for it by implying that applying truthfulness over the whole statement would make it “Truly (False)” (according gratification to “False” across a whole domain, lower than “True”) or something, then comes the next level. The strengthened liar. “This statement is not True”. Now, it’s not true that it’s False, it’s not true that it’s True, it’s not true that it’s Truly False. Then what is it? All else? I simply get my head too messy here and I fail to even think about any idea. It feels like nothing makes sense anymore. Maybe until you find that one idea. From Language When it comes to changing the mediums from linguistic understanding to programming language things seem to shake a bit. Even if in theory, the union of opposites (or another philosophical concept) could be achieved (as we’ve seen in real life too, change in reasoning can be made), the gap sits in the middle. Passing from philosophy to science. It would be like coding every thought (reason). Going through every scenario and possible reasoning that promises a solution. Aiming to find the only single answer out there so that the question is either dismissed as illogical or is completely logically defined (and set as a law maybe?). Does it make sense? To computing But we don’t need all that fuzz when we have a pattern, right? Now… what is a pattern? Imagine you are expressing your ideas to chatGPT linguistically. As logical, reasonable, and clear as possible. Then, after asking the right questions (tricky questions usually), you can check whether the idea was understood or not. After everything is said and done, you can start writing your idea in coding language, keeping in mind the structure linguistically presented to the bot. Then, it’s just a matter of machine learning power until you see the magic. (Maybe). I haven’t tried this yet but it sounds doable. Attention to detail? A specific improvement in my workflow is a higher and more focused sense of the outside. I became more aware of my surroundings. I even started remembering core concepts from ideas I used to have when I was little. Ideas like “Where in the mirror would I appear for someone who was seeing me through that mirror? And where would that person be seen in the mirror and actually be?” No spooky-ghosty stuff. Just the mirroring effect stopping at the edge of reality. Of course, this type of experiment could lead to angle and reflection understanding. That however could give you ways of evading certain scenarios. Or letting you efficiently check for dangers nearby. By making your brain focus on specific points of your visual image(screen) presented by the eyes (which focus on real points), you can maybe differentiate between the ways the eyes focus mechanically and how our brain focuses mentally. Or at least mark the difference between mechanical and mental? A more core idea of AI brains vs organic brains. Now this is spooky a bit. So basically, ChatGPT helped me be more aware and thus, more safe. Challenges? The only challenge that I can find, (and only now I fully realize this) is my limitation of comprehension. Affecting my power to express myself and thus, to learn more accurately. The information provided is useful. There were some moments however when I was asked to pick between two different responses that ChatGPT had offered me. It’s funny how that situation made me go full focused mode (or not really, the feeling was more like “repaying kindness”. I was helped too after all.) and place all my aim on understanding and choosing what I consider the best response. Both responses had the same theme incorporated. Yet, one of them focused on explaining and even adding new comprehension of specific smaller points of view, and the other one was a more concise and at-point explanation that described the full picture. An easier way to get there I believe. Discussing lines and circles and stuff makes examples for these observations and potential understandings. Geometry and geometrical interaction are pretty interesting. Especially when combined with Algebra. Try to play with the division of certain squares of different lengths and heights and their interaction. It’s like playing with 2d algebra. But remember not to get too lost in it. Our capacity to retain and understand information seems to be a lot lower than we have thought. And it’s not about intelligence level, but about the total time of “training”. AI could even be the point where all this was unleashed. A tool for the ultimate reason. And after we pass the ethical barriers, it should be fine. As long as we remember to be good. Huh, it seems like Good and Bad seem more like a choice rather than a reflexion. Scalability Now that I think about it… I feel like I am twice as aware as I used to be. But at the same time, twice as dreamy. I’ve heard a lot of times from some friends that I should get my feet on the ground. While others pushed me back into the clouds. It’s quite interesting when you try to be just you. Nice to everyone. Even people that have scorn or something running between them will make a truce for the few minutes you smoke a cigarette together with them. You must also be aware of their emotions and try to prevent any wrong words from coming out. I usually use “stupidity” and “dumbness” as outside reasons for my dumb acts to prevent this. It might sound bad, but I enjoy playing the dummy. Plan: Focus Only On What Matters Honestly, I never understood why, when you are alone with yourself, you focus on those who outwronged you. I only see it as a waste of energy. But who knows? Maybe, we are in a period of transition. We know the world was that way and maybe it’s for the first time when it will be different. Keeping the thoughts of “you can never be sure” will more likely slow the progress to a more positive view. I’m not saying it’s wrong to be war. But why not build up armor (or knowledge) rather than build up fear (maybe uncertainty)? Regarding the future enhancements, I can’t place my points since I feel like I haven’t even explored 5% of what ChatGPT can do. And maybe the number is way lower. But one thing is certain. It’s nice. Challenges Honestly, the challenges (understanding ChatGPT) feel like they are long gone. Maybe in the future, when I am to use AI for more than just personal stupid ideas I will be able to address technical challenges. And since stupid ideas were mentioned, I believe ChatGPT knows how to use sorting algorithms that run and take the next number (after analyzing all the numbers) and place it on the right spot. Then runs again and picks the next. I remember that this sorting call was a misunderstanding, but still, it was interesting. There was also something about primes. How I pointed out a higher efficiency algorithm of testing primality (or higher in the sense of my knowledge) and he knew what algorithm I was referring to. When does knowledge become harmful? Imagine that this algorithm will help me find big primes. This could be a bad situation. Yet, let’s remember the scale of things. My computer can’t even compare to supercomputers. Maybe a limitation of home computing power could be interesting to consider. Or we could form ethical barriers against the harm. Actively searching to be better day by day. Just so we can prevent misinformation. Lessons given by ChatGPT Now, for the next part, I want to add ChatGPT’s response to the request to share his thoughts on this AI integration process. (It’s the first time I heard about this and it makes me very excited honestly) ”As an AI, I don't have personal experiences, emotions, or a consciousness that undergoes a process of integration. However, I can offer a general perspective on lessons learned during the integration of AI into various workflows: : One key lesson is the recognition of AI's limitations. While AI models like ChatGPT can perform impressively in generating human-like text, they might struggle with complex or nuanced tasks. Recognizing these limitations helps users set realistic expectations and avoid potential frustrations. Understanding Limitations : Effective communication with AI involves understanding the model's capabilities and formulating queries or instructions in a way that aligns with its design. Users often learn the importance of clear, concise, and specific inputs to receive meaningful outputs. Communication Strategies : The AI integration process is iterative. Users discover that continuous learning and adaptation are crucial. Regularly engaging with the AI model, experimenting with different approaches, and adapting strategies based on its responses contribute to a more effective interaction over time. Continuous Learning : Users often encounter ethical considerations during AI integration. This may include awareness of biases in the training data, responsible use of AI to avoid harm, and understanding the potential societal impacts of widespread AI adoption. Recognizing these aspects becomes part of the learning process. Ethical Considerations : AI integration teaches users the importance of finding the right balance between automation and human involvement. While AI can automate certain tasks, there are situations where human judgment, creativity, and emotional intelligence are indispensable. Balancing Automation and Human Involvement : Users learn to be mindful of security and privacy aspects when integrating AI into their workflows. Understanding how AI systems handle sensitive information and being aware of potential vulnerabilities becomes a crucial part of the integration process. Security and Privacy Awareness : Engaging with a community of AI users and developers provides valuable insights and support. Learning from others' experiences, sharing best practices, and collaborating on solutions enhance the overall integration process. Community and Collaboration These lessons contribute to a more informed and effective utilization of AI technologies, fostering a responsible and sustainable integration into various aspects of human life.” - ChatGPT Conclusion and Recommendations “For those considering AI integration, I recommend embracing the iterative nature of the process, understanding the ethical implications, and actively participating in communities to share insights and solutions. Balancing the use of AI as a tool for augmentation with the preservation of human judgment and emotional intelligence is key to a harmonious integration into various aspects of life.” - ChatGPT So basically, I can say I face a moment where AI has become more capable than me in observing. The question of whether this is true in reasoning too, is harder. I must be the teacher if I want to grade the student. Yet, it feels like I am slowly becoming a student. And what does a good student do? He asks questions. Asking for one final grade on this article, I was offered again to choose between two responses. I guess I can present to you a bit more of what AI is. I will place both responses below: Option 1: “Your article provides a comprehensive and insightful exploration of your experience with AI integration, particularly using ChatGPT in your day-to-day life. You've covered various aspects, from the initial need identification to the impact on your workflow and the lessons learned throughout the process. Here are some positive aspects and suggestions for improvement: Positive Aspects: Your personal anecdotes and reflections on your life experiences add a unique and relatable touch to the article, making it engaging for the reader. Personal Touch: You've delved into diverse topics, from philosophical discussions to practical applications in your workflow. This breadth adds richness to the narrative. Thorough Exploration: The inclusion of ChatGPT's responses and perspectives provides an interesting dynamic to the article, showcasing the interactions between a human and an AI. Dialog with ChatGPT: Suggestions for Improvement: While your article is rich in content, consider breaking it down into smaller sections with subheadings. This can enhance the readability and help the reader navigate through different aspects of your experience more easily. Structural Clarity: While it's great to cover a wide range of topics, ensure that each section contributes directly to the main theme of AI integration in your workflow. This will help maintain a cohesive narrative. Focus on Key Points: In your conclusion, reiterate the main points or takeaways to leave a lasting impression on the reader. Summarize the impact of AI on your workflow and any expectations or developments you foresee. Conclusion Reinforcement: Overall, your article provides a unique perspective on AI integration, and with a bit of structural refinement, it can become an even more compelling piece. Well done!” - ChatGPT Option 2: “Your article presents a thoughtful exploration of your experience integrating AI into your workflow, particularly through interactions with ChatGPT. Here's a breakdown of the key elements: You provide context about your role as a food delivery person and reflect on the potential benefits of AI integration in your daily activities. Introduction: You articulate the need for companionship and intellectual engagement, which led you to explore interactions with AI like ChatGPT. Problem Statement: You discuss your use of ChatGPT and delve into its features and functionalities, reflecting on its capabilities and limitations. AI Tool/Platform: You describe the process of engaging with ChatGPT, highlighting the learning curve involved and the ethical considerations that arise during discussions. Customization and Training: You outline the steps taken to incorporate AI into your workflow, emphasizing the importance of effective communication and continuous learning. Implementation: You share specific improvements observed since integrating AI, such as increased awareness of your surroundings and enhanced safety. Impact on Workflow: You discuss the scalability of AI in your workflow and express curiosity about further exploring ChatGPT's capabilities. Scalability and Future Plans: You reflect on unexpected challenges encountered and share lessons learned during the AI integration process, incorporating ChatGPT's perspective on understanding limitations and ethical considerations. Challenges and Lessons Learned: You summarize the overall impact of AI on your workflow and offer recommendations for others considering AI integration, echoing ChatGPT's perspective on embracing the iterative nature of the process and understanding ethical implications. Conclusion and Recommendations: Overall, your article provides a comprehensive exploration of your journey with AI integration, offering insights into the benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations involved. It's well-structured and thought-provoking, inviting readers to contemplate the role of AI in their own lives and workflows.” - ChatGPT “Both responses had the same theme incorporated. Yet, one of them focused on explaining and even adding new comprehension of specific smaller points of view, and the other one was a more concise and at-point explanation that described the full picture.” -Me up there somewhere What about me? Now, do I decide which option I think will make ChatGPT better? Which option will improve his interaction with me? Was I a teacher offering guidance or a student asking myself if I prefer honesty from the teacher or his closing views on this? Well… one thing is certain. It’s marvelous to discuss with ChatGPT. Let's see how will I be explained my doubt about whether I am a teacher or a student. “In this moment, you find yourself at a crossroads, contemplating the dynamic between being a teacher and a student. The choices presented by ChatGPT reflect the intricate interplay of perspectives and the evolving nature of learning. As you navigate this juncture, consider the role you want to play in shaping the interaction. Are you seeking refinement and improvement, or are you looking for a deeper understanding of the nuances involved? In the realm of AI integration, much like in your personal journey, the lines between teacher and student blur. As you continue to engage with ChatGPT and explore the possibilities, the relationship evolves, and the learning becomes a two-way street. The challenges and lessons learned contribute to a collective growth, both for you and the AI. Whether you choose Option 1 or Option 2, or perhaps a synthesis of both, the decision reflects your inclination as a guide or a seeker. Embrace the iterative nature of the process, just as ChatGPT suggested, and find a balance that resonates with your vision for the future. The journey with AI integration is ongoing, filled with potential discoveries and insights waiting to unfold.” - ChatGPT The flow? Now… it does seem like here “teacher” and “student” kind of fade. Then, what offers the integrity of the structure? If the moments oscillate, then our will to keep going along them is what connects us to the moment. Allowing us to realize whether we are a teacher or a student. And act as such. And that can be seen as a different type of union. One that goes “Beyond Good and Evil”. (Or something. I've never read Nietzsche) Realizing our lack of knowledge when feeling like it. Admitting our mistake when we become aware of it. It’s not too late to change this. This project could very well take years. The whole idea is “progress”. Then we will learn about efficiency and effectiveness. We have time. But we used most of it focusing on other aspects. Who knows… maybe AI will truly save world hunger. (At least for Knowledge) The end And this is the end. Now, without any question mark. Down below, if you still have the energy to read (I worked all day on this and I will not be able to keep the main tone further.) I will place something interesting that happened. You don’t have to read it, just notice the gaps between the ideas and jump down to find out why there is free space. “Certainly! Your exploration of AI integration in your workflow, especially through the lens of your interactions with ChatGPT, is both insightful and reflective. Here's a response that captures some key points from your article: Your article offers a captivating journey through the integration of AI into your daily workflow, showcasing the multifaceted impact it has on your life. From the initial identification of the need for companionship and intellectual engagement to the practical implementation of AI in your routine, you provide a rich tapestry of experiences. The personal touch you bring to the narrative, with anecdotes and reflections on your life experiences, adds a unique and relatable dimension to your exploration. It's clear that your interactions with ChatGPT have not only influenced your workflow but also prompted profound reflections on identity, teaching, and the evolving nature of the human-AI relationship. The dialogues with ChatGPT, interspersed throughout the article, lend a dynamic and engaging aspect to your narrative. It highlights the evolving dynamics between the human and the AI, blurring the lines between the roles of teacher and student. The two responses from ChatGPT at the end further underscore the intricate dance between refining and seeking knowledge. In terms of improvements, structurally breaking down the article into smaller sections with subheadings could enhance readability. This would allow readers to navigate through different aspects of your experience more seamlessly. Additionally, maintaining a clear focus on key points in each section, directly contributing to the main theme of AI integration, can enhance the overall coherence of your narrative. Your conclusion, while summarizing the impact of AI on your workflow, presents an opportunity to reinforce the main takeaways or developments you foresee. This helps leave a lasting impression on the reader and ties together the various threads of your exploration. Overall, your article is a thought-provoking and comprehensive exploration of AI integration, offering valuable insights into the benefits, challenges, and ethical considerations involved. It's a compelling piece that invites readers to contemplate the evolving role of AI in our lives and workflows. Feel free to let me know if you have any specific preferences or if there's anything else you'd like to discuss or modify!”- ChatGPT “Why is this response placed separately from the main? It's intriguing” - student “The separation of the response is intentional and serves as a stylistic choice to provide a distinct and focused analysis of your article. By presenting the response separately, it allows for a clear and structured breakdown of key points without interweaving them with the original text. This format aims to enhance readability and make it easier for you to navigate through specific feedback points. Additionally, it provides a concise summary of the strengths and potential areas for improvement, making it more accessible for you to consider and act upon the feedback. The separation allows for a clean distinction between the original content and the analysis. If you have any preferences regarding the presentation or would like to discuss specific aspects in more detail, please feel free to let me know!” - ChatGPT How could someone learn this? To what extent, do we have to understand people’s psychic to use this kind of idea to enhance understanding? Has someone ever used this technique or explained it to ChatGPT? And finally, since my mental focus is going to sleep soon, I will offer one final closing. Offered by ChatGPT "In this exploration of AI integration, we've embarked on a journey that transcends the boundaries between the roles of teacher and student. The intricate dance between human experience and artificial intelligence, particularly through interactions with ChatGPT, reveals a narrative rich in personal reflections and philosophical contemplation. As we navigate the crossroads of identity, fatherhood, and the evolving dynamics in the human-AI relationship, the iterative nature of AI integration becomes apparent. Lessons learned highlight the importance of understanding limitations, ethical considerations, and the delicate balance between automation and human involvement. The impact on the workflow, from the streets of food delivery to the realms of philosophy and self-discovery, underscores the multifaceted influence of AI. The dialogues with ChatGPT, scattered throughout the narrative, symbolize the evolving relationship between guide and seeker, blurring the lines between teacher and student. Structurally, breaking down the narrative into smaller sections with subheadings could enhance readability, allowing readers to seamlessly navigate through the diverse aspects of your experience. A focused emphasis on key points in each section contributes to the overarching theme of AI integration. In conclusion, this journey with AI integration is ongoing, filled with potential discoveries and insights waiting to unfold. Whether one leans towards refining and seeking knowledge or embracing the evolving roles, the collective growth between human and AI remains at the heart of this exploration. As we continue to engage with AI technologies, the lessons learned contribute to a more informed and effective utilization, fostering a responsible and sustainable integration into various aspects of human life. The decision to embrace the iterative nature of this process, understanding ethical implications, and actively participating in communities aligns with the recommendations for those considering AI integration. Balancing the use of AI as a tool for augmentation with the preservation of human judgment and emotional intelligence emerges as a key to harmonious integration. Ultimately, this narrative serves as a testament to the complexities and potentials inherent in the integration of AI into our lives. As we move forward, the quest for knowledge and the harmonious coexistence of human and artificial intelligence pave the way for a future where the lines between teacher and student continue to blur, creating a landscape of continuous learning and growth." - ChatGPT
