In this blog post, I will explain the tech behind – a dev tool that uses to code an entire, production-ready app. GPT Pilot GPT-4 The primary premise here is that AI has reached a point where it can autonomously generate a substantial portion of code for an application, potentially up to 95% That sounds great, right? How can this be achieved? This post is a component of my research project, aimed at assessing whether AI can effectively handle 95% of developers' coding tasks. My approach involves utilizing GPT-4 as a tool to assist in crafting scalable applications under the guidance of developers. Well, an app won’t work unless all the code works completely. To continue, I'll share the core idea behind GPT Pilot, the concepts underpinning it, and the workflow leading up to the coding phase. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUj9DbMRYhA&embedable=true Currently, the project is still in its early stages and can create only simple web apps. Still, I will cover how it works, how much real coding work it can do, and required oversight from the developer. Here are some apps that I created with it: Real-time chat app Markdown editor Timer app Ok, let’s dive in. How does GPT Pilot work? First, you enter a description of an app you want to build. Then, GPT Pilot works with an (currently GPT-4) to clarify the app requirements, and finally, it writes the code. It uses many AI Agents that mimic the workflow of a development agency. LLM After you describe the app, the breaks down the business specifications and asks you questions to clear up any unclear areas. Product Owner Agent Then, the breaks down the technical requirements and lists the technologies that will be used to build the app. Software Architect Agent Then, the sets up the environment on the machine based on the architecture. DevOps Agent Then, the breaks down the app development process into development tasks where each task needs to have: Tech Team Lead Agent (this is the main description upon which the Developer agent will later create code) Description of the task that will need to be written so that GPT Pilot can follow TDD principles Description of automated tests , which is basically how you, the human developer, can check if the task was successfully implemented Description for human verification Finally, the and the Agents take tasks one by one and start coding the app. The Developer breaks down each task into smaller steps, which are lower-level technical requirements that might not need to be reviewed by a human or tested with an automated test (eg. install some package). Developer Code Monkey In the next blog post, I will write in more detail about how Developer and Code Monkey work ( that shows the coding workflow), but now, let’s see the main pillars upon which the GPT Pilot is built. here’s a sneak peek diagram 3 Main Pillars of GPT Pilot I call these the pillars because, since this is a research project, I wanted to be reminded of them as I work on the GPT Pilot. I want to explore the extent to which AI can boost developers’ productivity. As such, every improvement I make needs to lead to that goal. Pillar #1. The developer needs to be involved in the app creation process As I mentioned above, I think that we are still far away from an LLM that can just be hooked up to a CLI and work by itself to create any app by itself. Nevertheless, works really well when writing code. I use ChatGPT all the time to speed up my development process – especially when I need to work on some new technology or an API or if I need to create a standalone script. The first time I realized how powerful it can be was a couple of months ago when it took me 2 hours with ChatGPT to create a proxy that would usually take 20 hours to develop from scratch. I wrote a whole post about that . GPT-4 Redis here So, to enable AI to generate a fully working app, we need to allow it to work closely with the developer who oversees the development process and acts as a tech team lead while AI writes most of the code. The developer needs to be able to change the code at any moment, and GPT Pilot needs to continue working with those changes (eg. add an API key or fix an issue if the AI model gets stuck). Here are the areas in which the developer can intervene in the development process: , the developer should review it and make sure it works as expected (this is the point where you would usually commit the latest changes) After each development task is finished – it might be easier for the developer to debug something (eg. if a port on your machine is reserved but the generated app is trying to use it – then you need to hardcode some other port) After each failed test or command run – eg. in case you need to get and add an API key to the environment If the AI doesn’t have access to an external service Pillar #2. The app needs to be coded step by step Let’s say you want to create a simple app, and you know everything you need to code and have the entire architecture in your head. Even then, all the issues at once. Instead, . This way, you can fix issues as they arise. you won’t code it out entirely, then run it for the first time and debug you will split the app development into smaller tasks, implement one (like adding routes), run it, debug, and then move on to the next task The same should be the case when AI codes. Like a human, it will make mistakes for sure, so for it to have an easier time debugging and for the developer to understand what is happening in the generated code, the AI shouldn’t just spit out the entire codebase at once. Instead, the app should be generated and debugged step by step just like a developer would do – eg. setup routes, add database connection, etc. Other code generators like Smol Developer and GPT Engineer work in a way that you write a prompt about the app you want to build, they try coding out the entire app and give you the entire codebase at once. While AI is great, So these tools give you a codebase that is really hard to get into and, more importantly, one that’s infinitely harder to debug. it’s still far from coding a fully working app on the first try. I think that , and the entire development process will flow much more smoothly. if GPT Pilot creates the app step by step, both AI and the developer overseeing it will be able to fix issues more easily Pillar #3. GPT Pilot needs to be scalable GPT Pilot must have the capability to develop extensive, production-ready applications, not limited to small apps that can fit within the context of a language model. The challenge lies in the fact that an LLM (Large Language Model) learns exclusively within the context it's provided. While it's conceivable that in the future, LLMs could be fine-tuned for each unique project, currently, this process appears to be time-consuming and repetitive. The way that GPT Pilot addresses this issue is with , and . context rewinding, recursive conversations TDD Let’s discuss these: Context Rewinding The idea behind context rewinding is relatively simple – . For example, the context size of the first LLM message while implementing development task #5 has to be more or less the same as the first message while developing task #50. Because of this, the conversation needs to be rewound to the first message upon each task. for solving each development task, the context size of the first message to the LLM has to be relatively the same For GPT Pilot to solve tasks #5 and #50 in the same way, it has to understand what has been coded, so far, along with the business context behind all code that’s currently written. With this, it can create the new code only for the task that it’s currently solving and not rewrite the entire app. I’ll go deeper into this concept in the next blog post, but essentially, when GPT Pilot creates code, it makes the that it writes, as well as it needs to create. So, when we need to implement each task, in a separate conversation, we show the LLM the current folder/file structure; it selects only the code that is relevant to the current task, and then, we add only that code to the original conversation that will write the actual implementation of the task. pseudocode for each code block descriptions for each file and folder Recursive conversations Recursive conversations are conversations with the LLM that are set up in a way that they can be used “recursively”. For example, if GPT Pilot detects an error, it needs to debug it, but let’s say that another error happens during the debugging process. Then, the GPT Pilot needs to stop debugging the first issue, fix the second one, and then get back to fixing the first issue. This is a crucial concept that, I believe, needs to work to make AI build large and scalable apps. It works by rewinding the context and explaining each error in the recursion separately. Once the deepest level error is fixed, we move up in the recursion and continue fixing errors until the entire recursion is completed. TDD (Test Driven Development) For GPT Pilot to scale the codebase, improve it, change requirements, and add new features, it needs to be able to create new code without breaking previously written code. There is no better way to do this than working with TDD methodology. For all code that GPT Pilot writes, it needs to write tests that check if the code works as intended so that whenever new changes are made, all regression tests can be run to check if anything breaks. I’ll go deeper into these three concepts in the next blog post, where I’ll break down the entire development process of GPT Pilot. Next up In this first blog post, I discussed the high-level overview of how GPT Pilot works. In posts 2 and 3, I show you: How do Developer and Code Monkey agents work together to implement code (write new files or update existing ones). How and work in practice. recursive conversations context rewinding How can we rewind the app development process and restore it from any development step. How are all agents structured – As you might’ve noticed, there are GPT Pilot agents, and some might be redundant right now, but I think these agents will evolve over time, so I wanted to build agents in a modular way, just like the regular code. But while you are waiting, head over to GitHub, clone the , and experiment with it. Let me know if you are successful, and while you’re there, don’t forget to star the repo – it would mean a lot to me. GPT Pilot repository Thank you for reading 🙏, and I’ll see you in the next post! Also published . here If you have any feedback or ideas, please let me know in the comments or email me at zvonimir@pythagora.ai.

This story contains new, firsthand information uncovered by the writer.

This post provides insights into new product. 

How GPT Pilot Codes 95% of Your App

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

After 6 Months of Working on a CodeGen Dev Tool (GPT Pilot), This Is What I Learned

The Noonification: How Often Do NFTs Pass The Howey Test? (1/13/2023)

Darwin's Hybrid Intelligence to Align AI & Human Goals for Startups & VCs

The Noonification: White Man (11/26/2022)

The Noonification: The Metaverse is a Sh*tshow (11/2/2022)

After 6 Months of Working on a CodeGen Dev Tool (GPT Pilot), This Is What I Learned

The Noonification: How Often Do NFTs Pass The Howey Test? (1/13/2023)

Darwin's Hybrid Intelligence to Align AI & Human Goals for Startups & VCs

The Noonification: White Man (11/26/2022)

The Noonification: The Metaverse is a Sh*tshow (11/2/2022)

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps