Over the course of a year, I embarked on a project, initially uncertain about its nature and significance. It began with an attempt to solve the Collatz "3x+1" conjecture, a mathematical game involving the transformation of numbers. If a number is odd, you multiply it by 3 and add 1; if even, you divide it by 2. For example, starting with 3: 3 = 3*3+1 = 10 = 5 = 16 = 8 = 4 = 2 = 1, and so on. This sequence forms a loop (4 = 2 = 1) that repeats indefinitely, and similar loops exist for numbers like 7, though my memory of this is somewhat uncertain. The central notion is that mathematics cannot definitively prove whether there exists a number x that perpetually grows towards infinity, given the intricacies of infinity and related concepts. The very idea of infinity can be fragmented into various categories, some tangible and others abstract. While my mathematical knowledge and ability to articulate it are limited, I dedicated most of my time to pondering the philosophical aspects of these problems. After nine months, I have arrived at a conclusion. The connection between my initial project and the thoughts I want to convey is somewhat intricate. In February, when I initiated this project, I was openly proclaiming my interest in psychology. Despite my lack of recent formal studies in psychology, my past knowledge was extensive, especially compared to those I conversed with. While the concepts I discussed were not novel, their historical depth and significance remained intact. With this background, let's delve into a seemingly simple yet deeply controversial notion: "The Earth is flat." On the surface, this idea may appear unsophisticated or even foolish, yet it has persisted through the years. How could such a concept exist in a world of science, mathematics, and quantum physics? The answer lies in philosophy. Our unique ability to create and explore the uncharted realms of imagination by blending bits of information from various sources, incorporating ideas from Euclidean geometry, spherical geometry, and hyperbolic geometry, allows us to engage in profound philosophical contemplation. We can explore new facets of our world by contemplating possibilities such as a reversed universe's geometry. What if we are not at the center of a sphere but positioned outside it, offering a primordial perspective that encompasses all? These musings open doors to understanding how a being could be so powerful in facing a sphere and simultaneously embodying the two opposing aspects. At this juncture, religion could interject, asserting that spheres cannot exist, thereby transforming our existence into something akin to Minecraft (though, of course, I jest). My fascination with these ideas led to numerous conversations with ChatGPT, delving deeply into philosophical discussions. One topic that emerged from these dialogues was the concept of primitive humans, beings capable of consciousness yet hindered by their lack of physical tools for exploration. How did they interpret the nature of reality? One example of such interpretation is the philosophical and esoteric tradition known as Hermeticism, which draws wisdom from ancient texts attributed to Hermes Trismegistus. Hermeticism encapsulates several core principles: Everything is fundamentally mental, suggesting that the mind is the primary source of reality. The Principle of Mentalism: As above, so below; as below, so above, implying a connection between the universe and individuals. The Principle of Correspondence: Everything is in constant motion, with varying vibration levels corresponding to different forms of energy and matter. The Principle of Vibration: Everything has its opposite, and these dualities create balance. The Principle of Polarity: Everything follows natural cycles, offering insights into harmony with the universe. The Principle of Rhythm: Known as the Law of Karma, this principle highlights personal responsibility for one's actions. The Principle of Cause and Effect: Recognizes gender at all creation levels, suggesting masculine and feminine energies contribute to the creative process. The Principle of Gender: Explores the presence of both masculine and feminine aspects within an individual's mind. The Principle of Mental Gender: These principles can be found in texts like the "Emerald Tablet," attributed to Hermes Trismegistus, and have influenced various esoteric and spiritual traditions, including alchemy, astrology, and the Western magical tradition. This interplay of ancient philosophical concepts and modern science is particularly engaging. Despite my limited scientific knowledge, I ponder ideas that bridge the gap between quantum and Newtonian physics. From a higher vantage point, we might interpret the probabilities and chaos within the subatomic realm. Imagine this chaos as akin to the interactions of cells (and our immune systems particularly), with some perishing while others engage in conflicts. This perspective posits that the universe could be teeming with viruses. Building upon an idea suggesting life on Earth originated from space. Each creature possesses a specific DNA length, with viruses potentially disrupting it to establish replication factories, spreading themselves further. While the existence of extraterrestrial viruses remains uncertain, this line of thought is nonetheless intriguing. The concept of DNA ladders traveling through space, carrying the knowledge of unconsciously combatting viruses, and ultimately regaining their previous level of consciousness to fully understand their bodies, presents a fascinating perspective that bridges the gap between evolutionism and creationism. It suggests a common origin for all Earthly creatures, featuring shared body parts like eyes, ears, and mouths. These may have derived from a central DNA structure that gradually evolved in complexity over time, eventually leading to the development of higher cognitive functions. Cognition, in this context, might be a product of complex interplays within the brain. Such complexity could be intricately tied to a specific DNA length and the information required to guide the body. In a scenario where a virus threatens the existence of intelligent beings on a planet, these beings may decide to replicate segments of their DNA using repetition as a space-saving mechanism. This would ensure the continued existence of their genetic code, even in the face of potential devastation. Through this replication process, they would preserve the repetitive instructions necessary to restore the original guiding principle that initiated their evolutionary journey. Frequently, following the same path results in collapse, emphasizing the importance of not adhering to this path unless one seeks failure. Now, to anchor to reality, repetition serves to maintain space and initiate the cycle of life's evolution and self-development. In this context, these beings are akin to gods, with the struggle between matter and antimatter now manifesting as a conflict between viruses and our internal systems, revealing their underlying similarities. In conclusion, my intention was to capture the attention of individuals interested in contributing to a better future. While the concepts and theories discussed are captivating, tangible progress necessitates a solid grounding in the real world. We must embark on the creation of revolutionary inventions to prepare for an array of potential scenarios, from nanobots capable of predicting diseases to small drones collecting excess sunlight to prevent overheating. The scope of work is vast, requiring collaborative efforts. While some might perceive these ideas as delusional, I'd rather dwell in a world colored by optimism than one marred by war, pain, and suffering. The cognitive revolution occurred approximately 70,000 years ago, marking the inception of ideological conflicts. The advent of agriculture 12,000 years ago led to further conflicts, often unintentional, which took a toll on our species. The scientific revolution, dating back 500 years, has provided us with powerful instruments, including destructive ones. Two hundred years ago, the Industrial Revolution made these tools readily accessible to all. I propose that we pause intermittently, looking beyond our immediate concerns to contemplate the broader picture. What might we discover when we shift our perspective? Will we encounter a reflection of ourselves, or will we encounter something entirely new? My hope is that the next revolution will prioritize the future's well-being.
