1.0 Introduction: The Challenge of Predicting an Uncertain Future We've all been there: checking the weather app, planning our day around a sunny forecast, only to be caught in an unexpected downpour. The atmosphere is a chaotic system, making perfect prediction impossible. This is why the most advanced forecasts don't just give you a single "average" outcome; they provide a probabilistic forecast; a range of possible futures. These probabilistic forecasts are critical for high-stakes decisions. For emergency planners, knowing there's a 10% chance of a catastrophic hurricane making landfall is far more useful than an "average" forecast that misses the storm entirely. Now, a new AI weather model from Google DeepMind, named FGN, is setting a new standard in this vital field. And its most powerful trick is a masterclass in counter-intuitive design. 2.0 Takeaway 1: A New State-of-the-Art in Weather Prediction It's the New State-of-the-Art, Especially for What Matters Most It's the New State-of-the-Art, Especially for What Matters Most In the world of AI weather modeling, the previous champion was a powerful model named GenCast. The new FGN model doesn't just edge it out; it significantly outperforms it across the board. In a head-to-head comparison, FGN proved to be more accurate, better at forecasting extremes, and dramatically faster. More Accurate Forecasts: When measured by the Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS)—a key metric for judging probabilistic forecasts; FGN achieved a better score than GenCast in an incredible 99.9% of tested scenarios.
Better Extreme Weather Warnings: For predicting extreme events, such as temperatures that exceed the 99.99th percentile, FGN shows equal or better performance, giving forecasters a more reliable tool for issuing critical warnings.
A 24-Hour Leap in Cyclone Tracking: The model's accuracy in predicting the path of tropical cyclones is so high that its ensemble mean provides roughly a 24-hour advantage over GenCast. In practical terms, FGN's 3-day forecast is as accurate as GenCast's 2-day forecast. While part of this gain comes from the model’s higher-frequency 6-hour output, which reduces tracker errors, the researchers confirmed that most of the improvement comes from FGN’s fundamental accuracy; even a 12-hour version of the model still significantly outperformed GenCast.
Dramatically Faster: Despite being a larger model with more parameters, FGN can generate a full 15-day forecast 8 times faster than GenCast. More Accurate Forecasts: When measured by the Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS)—a key metric for judging probabilistic forecasts; FGN achieved a better score than GenCast in an incredible 99.9% of tested scenarios. More Accurate Forecasts: Better Extreme Weather Warnings: For predicting extreme events, such as temperatures that exceed the 99.99th percentile, FGN shows equal or better performance, giving forecasters a more reliable tool for issuing critical warnings. Better Extreme Weather Warnings: A 24-Hour Leap in Cyclone Tracking: The model's accuracy in predicting the path of tropical cyclones is so high that its ensemble mean provides roughly a 24-hour advantage over GenCast. In practical terms, FGN's 3-day forecast is as accurate as GenCast's 2-day forecast. While part of this gain comes from the model’s higher-frequency 6-hour output, which reduces tracker errors, the researchers confirmed that most of the improvement comes from FGN’s fundamental accuracy; even a 12-hour version of the model still significantly outperformed GenCast. A 24-Hour Leap in Cyclone Tracking: Dramatically Faster: Despite being a larger model with more parameters, FGN can generate a full 15-day forecast 8 times faster than GenCast. Dramatically Faster: 3.0 Takeaway 2: It Learns the "Big Picture" by Only Looking at the "Pixels" It Learns the "Big Picture" by Only Looking at the "Pixels" It Learns the "Big Picture" by Only Looking at the "Pixels" Here is the core, surprising insight from the research. FGN is trained on a deceptively simple objective: get the forecast for each individual grid point on the map (the "pixels") as accurate as possible. This is known as optimizing the "marginals." This is deeply counter-intuitive. In theory, a model trained this way should not be guaranteed to learn the joint spatial structure of weather; the physically coherent shapes of massive systems like storms, atmospheric rivers, and fronts (the "big picture"). A model could, hypothetically, get the average temperature and pressure right for every single pixel over thousands of forecasts without ever learning the tell-tale spiral shape of a hurricane. Against all expectations, FGN succeeds brilliantly at capturing this big picture. As evidence, the researchers show that it has improved skill on metrics that "pool" large spatial areas together. It also shows greater accuracy on derived quantities like 10m wind speed, which can only be calculated correctly if the model understands the physical relationship between different variables in the same location. This remarkable feat isn't just a product of its training goal; it's a direct consequence of the model's unique and highly constrained architecture. 4.0 Takeaway 3: The Secret is a Tiny Dose of Creative Randomness The Secret is a Tiny Dose of Creative Randomness The Secret is a Tiny Dose of Creative Randomness So, how does focusing on the pixels teach the AI to see the whole storm? The secret lies in a radical constraint. To generate its range of possible forecasts, the FGN model doesn't start with random noise scattered across the map. Instead, its entire range of creative possibilities is generated from a single, tiny source of randomness: a 32-dimensional noise vector. To put this in perspective, that tiny vector must dictate the variability for an entire forecast that contains 87 million different values. It’s like an artist being given a palette of just 32 microscopic dots of color and being told to paint a mural the size of a building, with all the complexity and texture of the real world. This extreme constraint is the key. The researchers speculate that because the model is so heavily constrained, the simplest and most efficient path to getting all the individual "pixels" right is to learn the true, underlying physical patterns and inter-dependencies of weather. Instead of memorizing local statistics, it's forced to learn the physics. As the authors state in the paper: We speculate that under such heavy distributional constraints and with the inductive biases of FGN’s architecture, the easiest way for the model to jointly optimize the CRPS of all marginals is to try to model their inter-dependencies as well. We speculate that under such heavy distributional constraints and with the inductive biases of FGN’s architecture, the easiest way for the model to jointly optimize the CRPS of all marginals is to try to model their inter-dependencies as well. 5.0 Takeaway 4: Even Groundbreaking Models Have Quirks Even Groundbreaking Models Have Quirks Even Groundbreaking Models Have Quirks In a refreshing display of transparency, the researchers are also direct about the model's current limitations. FGN is a major step forward, but it's not perfect. Providing this balance gives us a realistic view of the cutting edge of AI development. The researchers note that "subtle artifacts" can sometimes appear in the forecasts. These manifest as "visible ‘honeycomb’ patterns" that correspond to the underlying grid-like mesh structure the AI uses for its calculations. According to the paper, these artifacts appear most often in higher-frequency variables that were given less importance during training, such as specific humidity at low pressure levels. Furthermore, they note the need for careful evaluation before deploying any new version of the model to screen for "poor model seeds"; random initializations during training that could lead to unstable or unreliable forecasts down the line. 6.0 Conclusion: A Powerful Lesson in elegant Design The success of FGN delivers a powerful and profound message that extends beyond weather forecasting. By imposing an elegant but heavy constraint on a powerful AI, the researchers forced it to discover a more robust, efficient, and physically plausible model of a complex system. It learned the rules of the game not because it was taught them directly, but because learning them was the only viable path to success under the constraints it was given. This proves that sometimes, the best way to make an AI smarter is to put it in a very elegant straitjacket. The question now is: what other complex puzzles, from climate science to drug discovery, are waiting for us to find the right constraints to solve them? Podcast: Podcast: Podcast: Apple: HERE
Spotify: HERE Apple: HERE Apple: HERE HERE Spotify: HERE Spotify: HERE HERE

The is an opinion piece based on the author’s POV and does not necessarily reflect the views of HackerNoon.

Google DeepMind's New AI Sees the Storm by Staring at a Pixel

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

3 Experiments That Reveal the Shocking Inner Life of AI Introduction: Is Anybody Home?

The Noonification: How Often Do NFTs Pass The Howey Test? (1/13/2023)

Darwin's Hybrid Intelligence to Align AI & Human Goals for Startups & VCs

The Noonification: White Man (11/26/2022)

The Noonification: The Metaverse is a Sh*tshow (11/2/2022)

100 Days of AI Day 1: From Newsletter to Podcast, Leveraging AI for Audio Transformation

3 Experiments That Reveal the Shocking Inner Life of AI Introduction: Is Anybody Home?

The Noonification: How Often Do NFTs Pass The Howey Test? (1/13/2023)

Darwin's Hybrid Intelligence to Align AI & Human Goals for Startups & VCs

The Noonification: White Man (11/26/2022)

The Noonification: The Metaverse is a Sh*tshow (11/2/2022)

100 Days of AI Day 1: From Newsletter to Podcast, Leveraging AI for Audio Transformation

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps