By Nikolas Vogt
Founder, Growth Academy | Ex-Growth Lead, Google Assistant | Guest speaker, Santa Clara University
Growth Hacking is not just a buzzword in Silicon Valley. It is a core competence that leading tech companies have developed to systematically grow their customer base. I have worked in several global growth roles at Google over the last 7 years. During that time I realized there is a fundamental difference in how successful tech companies in Silicon Valley approach growth challenges compared to the rest of the world. Here are five powerful Growth Hacking lessons that you can learn from leading growth experts of Silicon Valley:
Most of Silicon Valley’s marketing and product organizations understand the importance of Growth Hacking or, how they call it, Growth. It is an essential part of it; basically the DNA of the most successful tech companies. In Europe, most internet companies do not know what Growth Hacking is, nor do many use it. Our recent Growth Academy research showed that 74% of digital professionals have not heard of the term “Growth Hacking” or have not had experience with it.¹
Many people promote Growth Hacking as a silver bullet or a collection of secret growth hacks or quick fixes. This view is too short-sighted. So what does Growth Hacking actually mean? Based on the most popular definitions, Growth Hacking is a structured approach to customer acquisition and retention that involves (often free) tactics which allow your product to market itself. It is grounded in rapid experimentation and leverages big platforms.
Here are some examples of typical Growth Hacking approaches:
To uplevel your career with Growth Hacking, join our remote growth strategy programs. Growth leaders from Silicon Valley and the European Tech Scene teach how Google, Amazon, Project A, Netflix, TikTok, N26, and other tech giants acquire and retain customers.
The most successful businesses in Silicon Valley learned that relentless experimentation is key for growth. A fellow Google growth expert summed it up as follows:
“Traffic that does not contribute to experiments is a lost learning opportunity. Always be experimenting.”
This illustrates how Growth Hacking is all about learning and how experimentation is intertwined with that. Nevertheless, how do solid growth experiments look like? A crucial part of growth experimentation is data-driven hypotheses. Based on data points you basically think about product or marketing changes that could improve performance.
You try to formulate this in a concise statement: “If ___, then ___, because of ___.”. Then ‘translate’ this change into an adjusted variant of your current experience, for example, different landing pages or app flow variants.²
Finally, you have to ‘A/B test’ these variants against your control group — usually a holdback or your current experience — by randomly assigning real users to different test arms. The goal is to find significant differences that allow you to reject or confirm a hypothesis.
Hypotheses are at the core of the “Growth Experimentation Process” ³
This “Growth Experimentation Process” can be learned and common pitfalls avoided if you know about them. Here are two experiment pitfalls you should know about:
1) Hypotheses should be formulated before the test and should be based on data.
You might ask yourself: “Why do I need experiments if I have data from market research or customer analysis?” It is tempting to misuse these sources for causal implications, and either fish for data points that support what you suspect, or if you cannot find corroborating data simply modify your suspicion. Be more systematic about it and build a foundation in the form of a hypothesis before looking for evidence.
That being said, these sources are crucial for experimentation, but more so for generating speculations than drawing causal conclusions. Another good idea is to use them for pre-validation of your hypotheses which will increase your success rate tremendously.
2) Do not change many variables at once.
Probably, the most common pitfall during Growth Hacking experiments is changing too many variables at once. Ideally you alter only one variable per test, for example only pricing, and keep everything else the same. This way the disparity in performance can be explained by different prices. If you change, for example, the value proposition and price at the same time you most likely have a problem of determining what caused the performance change.
Testing too many variants in one experiment needs more traffic and usually also more time to get significant results. To avoid both issues most companies with less traffic apply phased testing plans that systematically test and optimize one variable after the other.
Experiments and data analytics are also a key module taught at the Growth Academy. Join us and discover how well-known growth experts implement experimentation in their Growth Hacking processes.
Another nascent trend in Silicon Valley is the infusion of Behavioral Economics insights into Growth to create products that are valuable to customers and their needs. This seems like a logical extension once you learn how Growth Hacking is rooted in experimentation and data analytics. Made popular by influential researchers like Nobel Prize winner Daniel Kahneman⁴ or Wall Street Journal columnist Dan Ariely, Behavioral Economics is at the intersection of psychology and economics. Compared to standard economics, this school of thought explains how choices like buying decisions are actually made without assuming that people are rational.⁵
Insights from Behavioral Science allow you to improve the user experience and tackle Growth Hacking challenges from a completely different angle. This is especially useful for creative parts of Growth like hypothesis generation or landing page optimization. Taking into account powerful concepts such as “Social Proof”⁶ or the “Endowment Progress Effect”⁷ have accelerated the growth of numerous tech companies while providing additional value to their customers.
One good example of “Social Proof” as a growth tactic is LinkedIn’s user experience: Their sign-up page for new users features pictures of people similar to them and allows them to “find your colleague”. Seeing that other like-minded professionals have already joined helps new customers decide whether to join or not because people are heavily influenced by their peers. The skills section of their profile page is a feature built on the premise of a user’s social proof. It leverages the idea that your credibility as an expert is enhanced through endorsements by your peers.
LinkedIn also utilizes the “Endowment Progress” to motivate individuals to complete their LinkedIn profile. Users are more likely to follow through the closer they are to a goal or the closer they perceive it. So showing them their progress increases profile completion versus just reminding them.
Navigating these Behavioral Economics nuances requires a specific skill set that involves not only subject matter expertise but also strong ethical judgment. To amplify business growth in the long run, Behavioral Economics has to be considered in a systematic and ethical way. Consequently, startups and innovative established players have started to form specialized Behavioral Economics teams or they tap into expert services like Behavioral Consultancies such as BEWorks co-founded by Dan Ariely.
The Growth Academy features industry experts from the fields of Psychology and Behavioral Economics and will give a solid understanding how leading tech companies apply Psychology and Behavioral Economics.
Tech businesses in Silicon Valley learned that thinking big goes hand in hand with an aggressive target setting. Product and marketing teams have to drastically rethink their approaches to growth in order to achieve these targets. That is why growth experts in Silicon Valley started to think about exponential Acceleration Loops rather than traditional activities that evaporate shortly after implementation. Let’s look closer to why Acceleration Loops are such an essential part of Growth Hacking:
Most European tech companies have not tapped into such innovative approaches and tend to focus on traditional upper funnel activities. Contrary to Acceleration Loops, traditional efforts can be defined as activities that imply a ‘dead end’ without multiplying the loop effect (for example, display ads usually bring only a single visit per click and do not generate additional visits). This isn’t necessarily wrong since you need a solid and steady stream of visitors to feed and kickstart your loops. But focussing most of your efforts on traditional activities rather than thinking about implementing Acceleration Loops leaves a huge growth potential untapped.
Join the Growth Academy waitlist if you want to become an expert in Growth Modeling and Acceleration Loops. The industry’s leading growth experts show you how they do it in companies like Google, Amazon, Project A, Netflix, TikTok, N26, and other tech giants.
It struck me how quickly Silicon Valley businesses ship their products. Several times, I have personally witnessed that things have been launched although they were not 100% there. At first, this seems counterintuitive and it confused a European like me who culturally seems to care a bit more about quality and excellence. It makes more sense once you have learned about the three dominant characteristics of most technology and internet products:
If you want to learn such Growth Hacking strategies, sign-up for Growth Academy. We teach the growth frameworks of leading experts and provide step-by-step guidance on how to amplify the growth of your product and business model. Join our highly satisfied alumni network - we received a superb Net Promoter Score¹² of 58 in 2019 (50+ = excellent) - and uplevel your career: www.growth-academy.com.
By Nikolas Vogt
Ex-Growth Marketing Lead, Google Assistant | Founder, Growth Academy | Guest speaker, Santa Clara University