The EU has struck again with yet another layer of red tape. Providers of AI models are now compelled to disclose the data used to train their systems, complete with a mandatory template. It goes by the sexy name: “Approval of the content of the draft Communication from the Commission – Explanatory Notice and Template for the Public Summary of Training Content for general-purpose AI models required by Article 53 (1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act)” 13 pages full of small-print. The idea? Transparency and accountability. The reality? A bureaucratic nightmare that raises more questions than answers. “Approval of the content of the draft Communication from the Commission – Explanatory Notice and Template for the Public Summary of Training Content for general-purpose AI models required by Article 53 (1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act)” As someone who’s consistently witnessing the EU’s love affair with (over)regulation, this move feels like a classic case of good intentions paving the road to inefficiency. The template is meant to ensure providers detail their training datasets and justify any claims of trade secrets. But let’s break this down: •  Who’s Reading This Stuff? With countless AI firms submitting these forms, who’s got the manpower to sift through them? Are we imagining an army of underpaid bureaucrats drowning in paperwork, or will this just gather digital dust in some forgotten database? The EU’s track record suggests the latter. Who’s Reading This Stuff? •  Company Secrets on Display: Forcing disclosure of training data opens a Pandora’s box. Companies pour millions into proprietary datasets, trade secrets that give them a competitive edge. Now, they’re supposed to lay it all bare? This could stifle innovation, as firms might hesitate to share or risk leaks that benefit rivals. Company Secrets on Display: •  Truthfulness Check - Good Luck! How are bureaucrats supposed to verify the accuracy of these submissions? Without deep technical expertise, they’re ill-equipped to challenge a provider’s claims. Will they hire AI experts? Audit every dataset? Or just nod and stamp “approved” without a clue? The lack of a clear enforcement mechanism screams inefficiency. Truthfulness Check - Good Luck! This push for transparency in the name of the initiative sounds noble, but in practice, it’s a logistical mess. The delineation between public disclosure and protecting business and trade secrets is a tightrope walk, and the EU’s one-size-fits-all approach risks tripping over itself.

EU’s Latest AI Bureaucratic Overreach: Mandatory Templates for AI-Model Training Data Disclosure

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

Autonomy: Embrace It, Don’t Fear It

The Noonification: How Often Do NFTs Pass The Howey Test? (1/13/2023)

Darwin's Hybrid Intelligence to Align AI & Human Goals for Startups & VCs

The Noonification: White Man (11/26/2022)

The Noonification: The Metaverse is a Sh*tshow (11/2/2022)

Autonomy: Embrace It, Don’t Fear It

The Noonification: How Often Do NFTs Pass The Howey Test? (1/13/2023)

Darwin's Hybrid Intelligence to Align AI & Human Goals for Startups & VCs

The Noonification: White Man (11/26/2022)

The Noonification: The Metaverse is a Sh*tshow (11/2/2022)

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps