Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction 1.1 State of the art 1.2 Some remarks on dynamics and initial condition 1.3 Outline of the paper 1.4 List of notations 2 Large Deviation Principle 2.1 Establishing the LDP for the SID 2.2 Results related to the LDP 2.3 Compactness results 3 Exit-time 3.1 Auxiliary results 3.2 Proof of the main theorem 3.3 Proofs of auxiliary lemmas 4 Generalization and References 1.2 Some remarks on dynamics and initial condition Let us introduce some notation and notions that will be useful to describe laconically later derivations in this paper. As before, we define marginal deterministic system that corresponds to the equation (1.7) as Hereafter, we will drop one part of the subscript or both (initial conditions and σ) if it is clear which one of the equations is meant. Though, to avoid confusion we will always use the subscript 0 to emphasize that we consider specifically the deterministic system. For x such that Tx = ∞ we naturally extend the definition of the processes (1.7) and (1.8) as This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED license. Authors:
(1) Ashot Aleksian, Université Jean Monnet, Institut Camille Jordan, 23, rue du docteur Paul Michelon, CS 82301, 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2, France;
(2) Aline Kurtzmann, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, Institut Elie Cartan de Lorraine UMR 7502, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, F-54506, France;
(3) Julian Tugaut, Université Jean Monnet, Institut Camille Jordan, 23, rue du docteur Paul Michelon, CS 82301, 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2, France. Table of Links Abstract and 1 Introduction Abstract and 1 Introduction 1.1 State of the art 1.1 State of the art 1.2 Some remarks on dynamics and initial condition 1.2 Some remarks on dynamics and initial condition 1.3 Outline of the paper 1.3 Outline of the paper 1.4 List of notations 1.4 List of notations 2 Large Deviation Principle 2 Large Deviation Principle 2.1 Establishing the LDP for the SID 2.1 Establishing the LDP for the SID 2.2 Results related to the LDP 2.2 Results related to the LDP 2.3 Compactness results 2.3 Compactness results 3 Exit-time 3 Exit-time 3.1 Auxiliary results 3.1 Auxiliary results 3.2 Proof of the main theorem 3.2 Proof of the main theorem 3.3 Proofs of auxiliary lemmas 3.3 Proofs of auxiliary lemmas 4 Generalization and References 4 Generalization and References 1.2 Some remarks on dynamics and initial condition Let us introduce some notation and notions that will be useful to describe laconically later derivations in this paper. As before, we define marginal deterministic system that corresponds to the equation (1.7) as Hereafter, we will drop one part of the subscript or both (initial conditions and σ) if it is clear which one of the equations is meant. Though, to avoid confusion we will always use the subscript 0 to emphasize that we consider specifically the deterministic system. For x such that Tx = ∞ we naturally extend the definition of the processes (1.7) and (1.8) as This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC BY-SA 4.0 DEED license. available on arxiv Authors: (1) Ashot Aleksian, Université Jean Monnet, Institut Camille Jordan, 23, rue du docteur Paul Michelon, CS 82301, 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2, France; (2) Aline Kurtzmann, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, Institut Elie Cartan de Lorraine UMR 7502, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, F-54506, France; (3) Julian Tugaut, Université Jean Monnet, Institut Camille Jordan, 23, rue du docteur Paul Michelon, CS 82301, 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2, France. Authors: Authors: (1) Ashot Aleksian, Université Jean Monnet, Institut Camille Jordan, 23, rue du docteur Paul Michelon, CS 82301, 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2, France; (2) Aline Kurtzmann, Université de Lorraine, CNRS, Institut Elie Cartan de Lorraine UMR 7502, Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, F-54506, France; (3) Julian Tugaut, Université Jean Monnet, Institut Camille Jordan, 23, rue du docteur Paul Michelon, CS 82301, 42023 Saint-Étienne Cedex 2, France.

Part of HackerNoon's growing list of open-source research papers, promoting free access to academic material.

Abstract

What We Mean By the Large Deviation Principle (LDP)

Exit-Problem for a Class of Non-Markov Processes With Path Dependency: State of the Art

Read My Stories

Too Long; Didn't Read

Make resilience your competitive advantage

Dynamics and Initial Condition: A Quick Rundown

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

A Generalization of Our Exit-problem for a Class of Non-Markov Processes With Path Dependency Paper

Episode 50: Refreshing React (Part 2):

Exit-Problem for a Class of Non-Markov Processes With Path Dependency

Exit-Problem for a Class of Non-Markov Processes With Path Dependency: State of the Art

What We Mean By the Large Deviation Principle (LDP)

A Generalization of Our Exit-problem for a Class of Non-Markov Processes With Path Dependency Paper

Episode 50: Refreshing React (Part 2):

Exit-Problem for a Class of Non-Markov Processes With Path Dependency

Exit-Problem for a Class of Non-Markov Processes With Path Dependency: State of the Art

What We Mean By the Large Deviation Principle (LDP)

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps