DOE v. Github (original complaint) Court Filing, retrieved on November 3, 2022 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 28 of 37. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here VIII. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF COUNT V FALSE DESIGNATION OF ORIGIN—REVERSE PASSING OFF 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (GitHub and OpenAI) 196. Plaintiffs and the Class hereby repeat and incorporate by reference each preceding and succeeding paragraph as though fully set forth herein. 197. GitHub and OpenAI have used or made, and will continue to use or make, in commerce throughout the United States, including in California, one or more words, terms, names, symbols, or devices, or any combination thereof, or any false and/or misleading designation of origin, false and/or misleading description of fact, or false and/or misleading representation of fact that is likely to cause consumer confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of Plaintiffs’ and the Class’s Licensed Materials and Copilot, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of Plaintiffs’ and the Class’s Licensed Materials and Copilot. 198. As a result, GitHub and OpenAI have intentionally violated 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(A). 199. As an actual and proximate result of GitHub’s and OpenAI’s acts, Plaintiffs and the Class have suffered and continue to suffer harm. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 3:22-cv-06823-KAW retrieved on September 5, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. Storage.Courtlistener

DOE v. Github: Defendants Will Continue to Mislead Consumers on the Source of Copilot

Too Long; Didn't Read

People Mentioned

@legalpdf

RELATED STORIES