X Corp. v. Center for Countering Digital Hate, INC. Court Filing, retrieved on March 25, 2024 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This part is 18 of 19. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here E. Doe Defendants CCDH’s last argument is that X Corp. fails to state a claim against the Doe defendants. MTD&S at 26. X Corp. alleges that “one [unnamed] United States senator referred to CCDH as ‘[a] foreign dark money group,’” and that “[o]ther articles have claimed that CCDH is, in part, funded and supported by foreign organizations and entities whose directors, trustees, and other decision-makers are affiliated with legacy media organizations.” FAC ¶ 62. It further alleges that “CCDH is acting . . . at the behest of and in concert with funders, supporters, and other entities.” Id. ¶ 63. These allegations are vague and conclusory, and do not state a plausible claim against the Doe defendants. See Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678 (claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged.”). Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on March 25, 2024, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. storage.courtlistener

Too Long; Didn't Read

Questions about cloud security? Get answers here.

Doe Defendants in Elon Musk's X Lawsuit Against the Center for Countering Digital Hate

Too Long; Didn't Read

Legal PDF

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

Doe Defendants in Elon Musk's X Lawsuit Against the Center for Countering Digital Hate

Too Long; Didn't Read

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

RELATED STORIES