Distributed Governance and Anonymity: A Bad Ideaby@GraceR
112 reads

Distributed Governance and Anonymity: A Bad Idea

by Grace Rachmany5mSeptember 8th, 2020
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

One of the big debates in the Genesis DAO started by DAOstack was the question of anonymity. At almost all stages of governance, you need to know some information about the person. Knowing people’s name isn’t particularly important, but in each stage of the process, some identifying information is helpful to democracy. We are completely normalized to a situation in which, as long as we feel fairly treated inside our organization, the external people's feelings are irrelevant to what we call fair process.

Companies Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
Mention Thumbnail
featured image - Distributed Governance and Anonymity: A Bad Idea
Grace Rachmany HackerNoon profile picture
Grace Rachmany

Grace Rachmany

@GraceR

DAO leadership and decentralized governance expert.

About @GraceR
LEARN MORE ABOUT @GRACER'S
EXPERTISE AND PLACE ON THE INTERNET.

Share Your Thoughts

About Author

Grace Rachmany HackerNoon profile picture
Grace Rachmany@GraceR
DAO leadership and decentralized governance expert.

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

Permanent on Arweave
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
 Terminal
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript
 Lite
L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!