Meta blames a &#x27;technical issue.&#x27; YouTube also reports &#x27;loading issues.&#x27;

Meta Confirms Widespread Instagram, Threads, Facebook Outage | PCMag

Find breaking business news, financial news, stock market updates, technology, clean tech, blogs, local business for the San Francisco Bay Area

Outage takes out Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and Threads

Users of Meta&#x27;s Facebook, Instagram, Threads and Messenger platforms are experiencing login issues in what appears to be a widespread outage.

Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and Threads down in widespread outage | WOODTV.com

If you were getting errors when logging into Meta&#x27;s apps, it wasn&#x27;t just you.

Facebook, Instagram, and Threads are back from a major outage: Here's what happened | ZDNET

A technical issue caused widespread login issues for a few hours across Meta&#x27;s Facebook, Instagram, Threads and Messenger platforms Tuesday.

Facebook, Instagram, Messenger and Threads Logins Restored After Widespread Outage

It&#x27;s not just you: Meta&#x27;s Facebook, Instagram and Threads were all having issues Tuesday morning. The popular social media services all appeared to be suffering from an outage, with monitoring service Downdetector showing spikes for Facebook and Instagram.

Instagram, Facebook, Threads Are All Having Issues Tuesday - CNET

People around the world reported that Meta’s social platforms Facebook, Instagram, and Threads suffered outages for about two hours this morning.

Facebook, Instagram, and Threads Are Coming Back Online After a 2-Hour Outage | WIRED

Meta previously said users were &quot;having trouble accessing our services.&quot;

Facebook, Instagram and Threads outage: 'We resolved the issue' - ABC News

Meta suffered a huge outage earlier today with Facebook, Instagram, and Threads all experiencing technical issues.

Facebook, Instagram, and Threads Were Down For Two Hours as Meta Suffered a Massive Outage - IGN

A Meta spokesperson acknowledged reports of outages on Tuesday for Facebook, Instagram and Threads, preventing some U.S. users from logging on to the sites, Meta told ABC News in a statement. More than 300,000 reports of an outage at Facebook were received on Tuesday morning by DownDetector, ...

Facebook, Instagram and Threads outage: 'We're aware people are having trouble accessing our services,' Meta says

As your team scales, it gets harder to keep everyone on the same page

Threads

Social media has always been a hotly contested space, but the battle between Threads and X represents a clash of the Titans. Meta's Threads took direct aim at X, Twitter's rebranded successor. While the two share similarities, key differences have emerged in features, user reception, and the networks' diverging philosophies. This comprehensive overview analyzes how Threads stacks up against the social media juggernaut X. A Tale of Two Networks Threads entered the ring in late 2022 as Meta's latest attempt to divert users, especially younger generations, away from competitors. The Instagram-centric app lets users post text, photos, videos, and more in a scrolling feed format nearly identical to X. X arose from Twitter's ashes after Elon Musk acquired the company in 2022 and promptly nuked the familiar blue bird logo. While the core Twitter experience remains intact, X represents Musk's grand vision for an everything app with premium features. However, monumental challenges around content moderation, revenue models, and user trust plague X's rocky rebirth. As a nimble newcomer, Threads sought to provide an ad-free, community-driven alternative. But X boasts the brand recognition, network effects, and feature set Threads can't yet rival. The two remain embroiled in an ongoing battle for the soul of social media. Features Face Off Despite the similar scrolling feed interfaces, a close examination reveals key differences in Threads and X's capabilities: - Threads restricts posts to 10 items max, while X allows up to four natively with more for X Blue subscribers. Media limits - X gives 280 characters for text posts. Threads cap messages at 500 characters to encourage brevity. Length - X enables keyword, hashtag, location, and advanced searches. Threads only allow account lookups. Search - Direct messaging is available on X but absent on Threads. Message - X supplies user analytics, but Threads does not provide metrics. Analytics - Only X lets creators monetize follower access via subscriptions. Subscriptions Threads deliberately pare down features to create a more minimalist, user-focused feel. However, X's broader feature set gives more options for personalization and reach. The X Factor X's main advantage lies in network effects accrued over its decade-plus existence. Its high public awareness and massive preexisting user base hands X an insurmountable edge. Rebranding from Twitter to X changed little about core functionality. Users retained their followers, profiles, and settings. This inertia makes migration frictionless versus starting fresh on a new platform. However, X's strong brand simultaneously proves a liability under Musk's chaotic leadership. His capricious changes and moves like the $8 X Blue verification fee spurred backlash. Restoring user trust stands as X's greatest challenge. The Threads of the Web3 Vision Threads promotes itself as an antidote to closed, corporate-controlled networks like X. It envisions bringing the "fediverse" concept to reality. In a fediverse, different social platforms connect as nodes in a decentralized web. This allows diverse services to communicate while retaining independence. Posts made on one node surface across the others, creating an open ecosystem. Threads wants to facilitate this federated approach in contrast to X's more closed, centralized structure. Its Instagram integration seeds cross-platform posting capabilities laying the groundwork for a fediverse future. Reviewing Reception User reception provides another angle for evaluating how Threads and X compare. Both witnessed early growth spurts followed by dropoffs. Threads exploded out the gate with 10 million signups in its first week. But it shed over 70% of daily active users within a month. Critics mainly praise its clean, ad-free experience while lamenting its limited capabilities. X continues dominating the social space but has struggled to expand beyond Twitter's existing base. Its maligned X Blue verification service saw only 180,000 initial subscribers - a tiny fraction of users. Still, X's immense reach makes it hard for alternatives like Threads to gain meaningful share. The Battle Rages On In the fight for social media supremacy, X retains its advantage thanks to the strong network effects of Twitter. But cracks in user trust have emerged under Musk's helter-skelter leadership. Meanwhile, Threads offers a refuge for those seeking a stripped-down, community-first social experience. Its innovative fediverse ideals could pioneer a new paradigm for open social networking. Ultimately, the savage Threads vs X struggle comes down to what users value most. Those wanting expansive connections, analytics, and reach lean X. But folks prioritizing simplicity and decentralization favor Threads. For now, the veteran X remains champion of the social media ring. However, the scrappy upstart Threads may someday transform how networks operate altogether.

The Great Social Media Showdown: Threads vs. X

You might have heard about the storm brewing in the realm of microblogging, and its name is Threads! Meta, the brains behind Facebook and Instagram, recently unleashed this new platform, sending waves of excitement through the internet. But what exactly makes Threads a formidable rival to Twitter? With its sleek black and white feed, Threads bears a striking resemblance to Twitter, and it's not just a coincidence. This platform allows users to post tweets, or should we say "threads," that followers and the public can see, respond to, and share. In less than 20 days, Threads attracted a staggering 130 million users! And with Meta's colossal two billion Instagram users ready to jump on board, With Thread's attractive theme, its user base is set to skyrocket. So, why is Threads a real contender against ? One word: community. Twitter Threads take this community-driven aspect to the next level by allowing users to link their Threads accounts to their existing Instagram profiles. This means users can retain their usernames and bring their Instagram followers along. Who doesn't want to keep "their people" intact while exploring a fresh platform? However, Meta's decision not to launch Threads in the European Union due to regulatory concerns poses potential obstacles. Despite the challenges, Threads' explosive start proves it's not to be taken lightly. The battle for social media supremacy is on, and Threads has its sights set on the crown! The Battle for Social Media Supremacy: Threads Having an Edge Threads and Twitter, each vying for the throne of microblogging supremacy. In one corner, we have Twitter, the reigning champion with a massive user base and a history of shaping online discourse. In the other corner, the challenger, Threads, is backed by Meta's vast resources and a fresh approach to community building. Threads has an advantage over Twitter due to its close ties with Instagram and Meta. But let's not forget about Elon Musk's take on this whole saga. When asked about the possibility of legal action against Meta for Threads, Musk's response was classic. Musk: " " It's a reminder that healthy competition is crucial for innovation, but crossing ethical boundaries is a no-go zone. Competition is fine, cheating is not. Threads has also struck gold by tapping into people's desire for a strong sense of community and authenticity. Remember those early Twitter days when the platform served as a home for journalists, governments, academics, and the public to share information and support one another during crises? Threads aim to replicate that sense of community and engagement while adding its unique touch of Instagram flavor. The question remains: will Threads be the one to finally unseat Twitter from its throne? Only time will tell, but the stage is set for a social media battle of epic proportions. What Elon Musk's Take on Threads Elon Musk – the Number one tech billionaire and Twitter's controversial CEO. Love him or hate him, one thing is for sure: he's not one to shy away from expressing his thoughts, especially when it comes to . Threads When Meta, formerly Facebook, launched Threads as a competitor to Twitter, the internet was abuzz with speculation and curiosity. In the heat of the time, Musk himself took over Twitter and said, " " That equally reflects Musk wasn't happy with Threads. Threads is just Instagram minus pics, which makes no sense, given that thirst pics are the main reason people use that app While many praised Threads for its community-centric approach and ease of use, others voiced concerns about data privacy. Let's not forget the legal drama! Just hours after Threads' release, Twitter's lawyer accused Meta of "unlawful misappropriation" of trade secrets. Threads' Explosive Start: 130+ Million Users in 20 Days What's the secret behind Threads' meteoric rise? The trust factor! First and foremost, it's all about timing. Threads entered the scene when Twitter users were searching for an escape route from the turbulent reign of Elon Musk. It was like a lifeboat amidst the Twitter storm, ready to rescue those who felt adrift in a sea of controversies. Secondly, Threads' ingenious move to link itself with Instagram was pure genius. Zuckerberg played cleverly in this regard. But, of course, Threads has its challenges. Concerns about data privacy and Meta's decision not to launch in the European Union have raised eyebrows. But for now, Threads is basking in its triumph, proudly waving its flag of simplicity, community, and engaging features. Elon Musk's Reign of Twitter Turmoil Musk is nothing short of an entertainer besides being a multi-billionaire. From rocket launches to flamethrowers, his tweets have become the stuff of internet legend. But what happens when the CEO of a social media platform becomes its biggest disruptor? When Musk took the reins of Twitter, the platform was already a bustling hub of information and discussions. However, his unconventional and sometimes controversial approach shook things up like never before. Mastodon, a decentralized , emerged as the first escape plan for users seeking refuge from Musk's digital disruption. But while Mastodon offered some respite, it wasn't the seamless alternative users were hoping for. alternative to Twitter Musk's decisions to lay off Twitter staff, alter the verification system, and impose tweet view limits were like sparks that ignited the search for alternatives. Many users, including prominent brands, found themselves questioning whether they should continue investing in a platform marred by instability and controversy. So, in a twist of fate, Musk's actions inadvertently set the stage for Threads' rise as a potential contender for Twitter's crown. The search for a new, community-focused, and authentic platform had begun, and Threads was there to catch the wave of change. Threads' Community Advantage: A Key Factor in Dethroning Twitter The sense of belonging, the camaraderie, the support during rough patches – it's what keeps users coming back for more. Twitter had its glory days, but as Elon Musk's reign brought waves of change, users sought a new haven to recreate that sense of community. Threads recognized the value of a thriving community and decided to leverage it to its advantage. It was like hosting a family reunion at a new, hip location! The result? Threads managed to capture the hearts of those yearning for a platform that prioritizes community and authenticity. Users found solace in the familiar Twitter-like experience while preserving their cherished circles. After all, Threads' clever community-focused strategy became a key factor in its quest to dethrone Twitter. The battle for supremacy was not just about features and aesthetics but about the power of genuine connections in an increasingly digital world. social media Threads and Instagram Mutual Profiling Concerns Users Ah, the wonders of data – a goldmine for tech giants, a source of user concern. When it comes to social media, the question of data privacy is always lurking in the background. As Threads emerged on the scene, users couldn't help but wonder about the implications of its integration with Instagram. The idea of " " raised some eyebrows. If users link their Threads and Instagram accounts, Meta might obtain access to a greater amount of user data than before. mutual profiling While it might seem like a convenience, some users weren't too keen on the idea of their information being used to " " across both platforms. personalize ads and other experiences But let's be real – data privacy concerns are no strangers to the tech world. Many platforms walk a fine line between personalization and intrusion. It's like trying to share a cookie without revealing the recipe. Threads' mutual profiling approach may have its pros and cons, but users are ever watchful. They want transparency, reassurance, and control over how their data is used. It's a delicate process, and Threads has to navigate it with grace if it wants to gain users' trust and loyalty. Remember, data privacy is like the secret code – handle it with care, and you'll win over hearts. Threads and Instagram have their work cut out for them, but with the right balance of community, authenticity, and data protection, they just might become the duo that sets the social media world on fire. Threads: A Copycat or a Competitor? If Threads were a movie, it would be a gripping tale of a newcomer aiming to dethrone the reigning champion. But let's clear the air – Threads is no mere copycat. It's a contender with a flair for innovation and a touch of familiarity. When you look at Threads and Twitter side by side, the similarities are transparent. Threads' sleek black and white feed, the ability to post "threads" (resembling tweets), and engaging features like replies, loves, quotes, and comments – it's like they were cut from the same cloth. Let's give credit where credit is due. Threads recognize the essence of what made Twitter a beloved platform for many – the sense of community, real-time support during emergencies, and the freedom to share information. However, Threads takes it up a notch with its powerful partnership with Instagram. Users don't have to abandon their followers or rebuild their communities from scratch; they can simply carry them over to Threads. Future of Threads and Twitter (X): Challenges and Expectations Peering into the future of Threads and Twitter is like trying to predict the next viral meme – it's exciting and full of surprises! As these two platforms continue their battle for dominance, they'll undoubtedly face a host of challenges and opportunities. Let's dive into the looking glass and explore what lies ahead. Sustaining Growth Linking Threads and Instagram accounts could give Meta more user data. Data Privacy Data privacy is a top concern as Threads and Instagram merge. Users want assurance that their personal information is secure. Competition Ahead Twitter is a resilient giant in social media. Threads must bring their best effort to surpass it. User Experience To ensure the success of Threads, it's crucial to prioritize user experience by addressing any issues and making necessary adjustments to the platform based on user feedback. Expanding Beyond the Instagram Umbrella Threads needs to expand beyond just Instagram to succeed in the long run. Now, let's shift our focus to Twitter. The future isn't all rainbows and unicorns for the platform, either. It must contend with its own set of challenges: Regaining User Trust Regaining trust from Twitter users under Musk's leadership requires consistent effort toward transparency and authentic communication, not just a simple tweet. Evolving to Meet User Needs The social media landscape is ever-changing and evolving. Twitter must be agile and responsive to user demands and preferences to remain relevant. Facing Competition from Threads and Others Threads might be the current contender, but it's not the only player in the game. Twitter must be vigilant and keep a watchful eye on emerging competitors. Conclusion So, what lies ahead for Threads and Twitter in the ever-shifting world of social media? The future is broad, filled with excitement, challenges, and endless possibilities. Threads have shown promise with its explosive start and community-focused approach, while Twitter has proven its resilience time and again. As users, we're in the driver's seat. Our feedback, engagement, and support will shape the destiny of these platforms. Whether Threads leads or Twitter retains its popularity, our work is to enjoy. So, let's raise our virtual glasses to the future of Threads and Twitter! Here's to exciting adventures, thriving communities, and endless possibilities in the captivating world of social media. Cheers to the future!

How Meta's Threads is a Threat to Twitter (now X): Elon Musk's Take on This

কিভাবে মেটা'স থ্রেডস টুইটারের জন্য একটি হুমকি (এখন এক্স): ইলন মাস্কের এটি নিয়ে

Wie Metas Threads eine Bedrohung für Twitter (jetzt X) darstellen: Elon Musks Meinung dazu

Cómo Meta's Threads es una amenaza para Twitter (ahora X): la opinión de Elon Musk sobre esto

Comment les fils de Meta constituent une menace pour Twitter (maintenant X) : le point de vue d'Elon Musk à ce sujet

कैसे मेटा के थ्रेड्स ट्विटर (अब एक्स) के लिए खतरा हैं: इस पर एलोन मस्क की राय

メタがいかにして Twitter (現 X) に脅威を与えるか: これに対するイーロン・マスクの見解

Meta의 스레드가 Twitter(현재 X)에 대한 위협인 이유: Elon Musk의 견해

Como o Meta é uma ameaça ao Twitter (agora X): a opinião de Elon Musk sobre isso

Meta'nın Konuları Twitter'ı Nasıl Tehdit Ediyor (şimdi X): Elon Musk'un Bu Konudaki Görüşü

Cách Meta tạo mối đe dọa cho Twitter (nay là X): Elon Musk đảm nhận việc này

Meta 如何对 Twitter（现在是 X）构成威胁：埃隆·马斯克对此的看法

Let’s start with a trick question — Think about that for a second. I will come back to that question because it is the most important piece in all of what is happening. But first, let me show you why Threads is only having a “Clubhouse moment” right now. what is the most important thing to Zuckerberg right now? Why Would Anyone Use Threads? The only reasons anyone is using Threads right now fall into three categories: You can easily get an account through your Instagram or Facebook (and you won’t exactly be starting from scratch) People want to get the first to arrive advantage to build authority on the platform. (The kind that people who jumped on TikTok early got) People who are unhappy after Elon’s takeover of Twitter finally have a place they can fomo to If the platform was launched by a startup that was just getting started, it would not even get a lift-off, except if they did something really magical. Clubhouse was the last sharp-rise platform we witnessed recently. Clubhouse rose in popularity during the lockdowns because people missed in-person meetings. A video call seems like something people had to prepare for. Clubhouse was the beautiful in-between where you can be casual and still hear the voice of other people. You could be in the toilet and be in on a conversation. It was fun as people couldn’t go out. The moment the lockdowns eased, the popularity of Clubhouse went down the tubes. Of course, the platform still exists and probably doing fine. But no one can call Clubhouse a top today. All that evaporated. social media platform I fomo-ed into Clubhouse too. I had to upgrade my iPhone then. (I am usually a late adopter of new trends). But I have not opened my Clubhouse app in months, most likely over a year now. I know people who have built something on Clubhouse like a breakfast meeting or something. And they still have that today. But that is just it. There is no real-world relevance that drives it anymore. Exit Clubhouse, Enter Zoom What about Zoom, you may ask? Why has Zoom sustained the momentum? This is because Zoom also got a surge during the lockdowns. But this is because . Zoom is part of something greater The lockdowns made a lot of people realize that they can actually work from home. And once people tasted that, they were reluctant to go back. The working experience of many people was forever changed during that period. They realize that they can do a lot more from wherever they are, and they have Zoom to stay connected with colleagues. This is why Zoom continued to boom after the lockdowns. People still wanted to work from wherever they were. And yes, when the lockdowns ended, Zoom suffered a bit of a downtrend. But it wasn’t as bad as Clubhouse because the psychology that drove their sudden relevance is one that people want to keep. This point is very important as we dissect Threads. But first, let’s talk about Zuckerberg. Zuckerberg’s Latest Blunders First, I am not anti-Zuckerberg. I respect him as a leader and businessman. He is very ruthless and focused. He has proven himself many times already in the business world. He is very intelligent. But I am no fan of him either. In a cage match between him and Musk, I would bet on him. Not because I like him, but because I think he is younger and more ruthless than Musk (who I like personally slightly more). So, this is not a hit piece on the man — and he probably won’t read this anyway. Zuckerberg has been making lots of blunders lately. In my opinion, the last smart decision he made was . And that was quite a long time ago. All the big bets he has made since then have not been as good. acquiring WhatsApp I think he should have continued with his system of acquisition instead of trying to build things in-house. Acquiring both Instagram and WhatsApp was a legendary move. I know there might be the issue of running out of quality businesses to acquire. But he could have built a system around that model to keep it going. This is because the company needs true huge growth to justify its valuation on the stock market. The rebrand to Meta was a massive error. I shared it with the people around then too. Everybody was praising him, but I was critical even though I was also into crypto. Facebook is too big for that kind of bold move. Yes, a rebrand was necessary, but the metaverse was just the wrong place to look toward. The metaverse should have just been a major project in the R&D department that will keep growing over time. But because they surged into it too fast (for a company of that size), now they are trying to pretend it didn’t happen. People don’t even think of the metaverse anymore when they mention Meta. Why? Those three platforms — Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp are big enough to assert their own identity without trying to cling to any concept. Watch out for my final recommendation at the conclusion. But before then, let’s talk about Threads. Let’s Talk About Threads Why would anyone in their right mind want to create a competitor to Twitter? Don’t they see what came out during Elon’s forced acquisition? The company is barely alive financially. Even after Elon trimmed the company massively, it is still barely getting by. It is not a money maker at all. It is nowhere close to the revenue generation machine of Facebook and Instagram. Nowhere close. So why would anyone copy it? The only reason Twitter is what it is today is because of the information you can get from it. You can get stuff on Twitter that you can’t get anywhere. Twitter is where all the angry people of the world get together to insult themselves, which can be very much fun to watch. . And Elon acquiring the platform is one of the best things that happened to that platform. That contributed to the unique information dissemination stance of the platform. Twitter is special because of what it has evolved to be Threads didn’t make Twitter special. Twitter was special before it was possible to write in threads. Twitter has been special when the character limit was 140. Then later, 280. If Zuckerberg thinks he is going to steal Twitter’s audience with this new app he calls Threads, then he has horrible advisers on this issue. The only thing Threads will do is split the amount of time people spend on Facebook and Instagram. He is playing himself, not Twitter. People will still go to Twitter for what they can get from Twitter. And time spent on IG and Facebook will split further into Threads. Is that a good thing? Well, maybe. If the is to further understand the user and get more data to be able to send more targeted ads, then Zuckerberg is an absolute genius. And he wins with this app. But if that is not the case, I don’t know if there is any other scenario where this is a win for Meta. purpose of Threads Will Threads Fail? Nope. I don’t think Threads will fail. But I think it will fade soon into oblivion. First, Zuckerberg has a very short attention span. Remember that during the height of Clubhouse, Facebook added a similar feature. How far has that gone now? Not too far, I guess. But it is still a good feature on Facebook. Just not a blockbuster. I guess anymore. There will always be a next thing. And you will forget about Threads too. Well, you can be among the very few people who will be using Threads for the long term. But I am not even getting an account unless my social media team deems it useful to create one for me. (I still have to delete my Clubhouse account). you don’t even think of the metaverse anytime you hear the name “Meta” This brings us back to the question I started with. What is the most important thing to Zuckerberg and Meta right now? Remember that this is a publicly-traded company. During the stock boom of the lockdowns (fueled by money printing), Meta reached incredible highs by announcing the rebrand to Meta and hedged on the Metaverse craze. But that bubble went down because investors finally started to ask the right questions when the free money was going out the window. Meta reached over $1 trillion in valuation during that time. But now, the company is way below $1 trillion in (July) 2023. And you know what stock market valuations are built on? Investor confidence. My guess is that Threads is just a move by Zuckerberg to gain the investor confidence to get the company back to the trillion dollar valuation This is the play for me. The moment Meta is back chasing Apple, Threads has achieved its purpose. And maybe in 2 years, Meta will drop another thing that will draw attention like this again. So, this is just another “Metaverse” moment. I don’t see or sense any lasting fundamental idea backing threads other than the fact that it is a copy of Twitter. And platforms are not built like that nowadays. But hey, Meta can get away with anything! After a very short while, people who use Facebook and Instagram will realize why they are not using Twitter in the first place. And those using Twitter will keep going to Twitter for those hot discussions. Conclusion & Recommendation If you know me, you know I wish success to all. But the lack of innovative thinking from Meta makes me cringe; I won’t lie. Nothing close to an original concept. Just blatant copies every time. At least, pretend for once to make something innovative. Even “meta” wasn’t innovative. They were jumping on a trend. In my own opinion, I think Facebook needs a President. Yes, that he is. But he needs a President. He needs a true creative by his side. Not someone with the right qualifications to be a “creative director.” Instead, someone raw with original perspectives. Zuckerberg should keep being the kickass CEO I think if Meta wants one, they should look into the art world — music, poetry, fiction, philosophy, writing, etc. They need someone whose job will be to come up with ideas. Meta needs a President and a creative team to come up with good ideas for two billion+ people. In conclusion, Threads is just another copycat idea of Meta that they will soon shift focus from. The goal for Zuckerberg is to get that investor confidence back again. I think he will get that. But as always, it will be short-lived. That’s because Threads really has no place in his heart. If it did, he would have done it years ago. I rest my case. Notes: I wrote this article the weekend after Threads launched. And today, about three weeks later, reality has shown that my insight was spot on in more ways than not. Also published . here

Meta's Threads: Yet Another Zuckerberg Blunder in the Making

In this article, we will be building the Threads UI using Flutter. You can find a video below with my step-by-step process. youtube https://youtu.be/nXbLgN6LwSI Results 😀 files inside lib in order to use images create asset folder inside the project and add the images below are the images that you have to add in asset folder img1 img2 img3 img4 img5 img6 img7 img8 img9 Let’s dive straight into the code. pubspec.yaml name: testapp
description: A new Flutter project.
# The following line prevents the package from being accidentally published to
# pub.dev using `flutter pub publish`. This is preferred for private packages.
publish_to: "none" # Remove this line if you wish to publish to pub.dev

# The following defines the version and build number for your application.
# A version number is three numbers separated by dots, like 1.2.43
# followed by an optional build number separated by a +.
# Both the version and the builder number may be overridden in flutter
# build by specifying --build-name and --build-number, respectively.
# In Android, build-name is used as versionName while build-number used as versionCode.
# Read more about Android versioning at https://developer.android.com/studio/publish/versioning
# In iOS, build-name is used as CFBundleShortVersionString while build-number is used as CFBundleVersion.
# Read more about iOS versioning at
# https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/documentation/General/Reference/InfoPlistKeyReference/Articles/CoreFoundationKeys.html
# In Windows, build-name is used as the major, minor, and patch parts
# of the product and file versions while build-number is used as the build suffix.
version: 1.0.0+1

environment:
 sdk: ">=2.19.0 <3.0.0"

# Dependencies specify other packages that your package needs in order to work.
# To automatically upgrade your package dependencies to the latest versions
# consider running `flutter pub upgrade --major-versions`. Alternatively,
# dependencies can be manually updated by changing the version numbers below to
# the latest version available on pub.dev. To see which dependencies have newer
# versions available, run `flutter pub outdated`.
dependencies:
 flutter:
 sdk: flutter

 # The following adds the Cupertino Icons font to your application.
 # Use with the CupertinoIcons class for iOS style icons.
 cupertino_icons: ^1.0.2
 animated_notch_bottom_bar: ^1.0.0
 buttons_tabbar: ^1.3.6

dev_dependencies:
 flutter_test:
 sdk: flutter

 # The "flutter_lints" package below contains a set of recommended lints to
 # encourage good coding practices. The lint set provided by the package is
 # activated in the `analysis_options.yaml` file located at the root of your
 # package. See that file for information about deactivating specific lint
 # rules and activating additional ones.
 flutter_lints: ^2.0.0

# For information on the generic Dart part of this file, see the
# following page: https://dart.dev/tools/pub/pubspec

# The following section is specific to Flutter packages.
flutter:
 # The following line ensures that the Material Icons font is
 # included with your application, so that you can use the icons in
 # the material Icons class.
 uses-material-design: true

 # To add assets to your application, add an assets section, like this:
 assets:
 - assets/

 # An image asset can refer to one or more resolution-specific "variants", see
 # https://flutter.dev/assets-and-images/#resolution-aware

 # For details regarding adding assets from package dependencies, see
 # https://flutter.dev/assets-and-images/#from-packages

 # To add custom fonts to your application, add a fonts section here,
 # in this "flutter" section. Each entry in this list should have a
 # "family" key with the font family name, and a "fonts" key with a
 # list giving the asset and other descriptors for the font. For
 # example:
 # fonts:
 # - family: Schyler
 # fonts:
 # - asset: fonts/Schyler-Regular.ttf
 # - asset: fonts/Schyler-Italic.ttf
 # style: italic
 # - family: Trajan Pro
 # fonts:
 # - asset: fonts/TrajanPro.ttf
 # - asset: fonts/TrajanPro_Bold.ttf
 # weight: 700
 #
 # For details regarding fonts from package dependencies,
 # see https://flutter.dev/custom-fonts/#from-packages main.dart import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
import 'package:testapp/landing_page.dart';

import 'home_page.dart';

void main() {
 runApp(MyApp());
}

class MyApp extends StatelessWidget {
 // This widget is the root of your application.
 @override
 Widget build(BuildContext context) {
 return MaterialApp(
 title: 'Flutter Demo',
 theme: ThemeData(
 // This is the theme of your application.
 //
 // Try running your application with "flutter run". You'll see the
 // application has a blue toolbar. Then, without quitting the app, try
 // changing the primarySwatch below to Colors.green and then invoke
 // "hot reload" (press "r" in the console where you ran "flutter run",
 // or simply save your changes to "hot reload" in a Flutter IDE).
 // Notice that the counter didn't reset back to zero; the application
 // is not restarted.
 primarySwatch: Colors.blue,
 ),
 debugShowCheckedModeBanner: false,
 home: LandingPage(),
 );
 }
} landing_page.dart import 'package:flutter/material.dart';
import 'package:testapp/home_page.dart';

class LandingPage extends StatefulWidget {
 const LandingPage({super.key});

 @override
 State<LandingPage> createState() => _LandingPageState();
}

class _LandingPageState extends State<LandingPage> {
 @override
 Widget build(BuildContext context) {
 double height = MediaQuery.of(context).size.height;
 double width = MediaQuery.of(context).size.width;
 return Scaffold(
 body: Column(
 children: [
 Image.asset(
 'assets/img1.png',
 height: height * 0.75,
 width: width,
 ),
 SizedBox(
 height: 20,
 ),
 InkWell(
 onTap: () {
 Navigator.of(context)
 .push(MaterialPageRoute(builder: (context) => HomePage()));
 },
 child: Container(
 padding: EdgeInsets.all(20),
 height: 78,
 width: 380,
 decoration: BoxDecoration(
 color: Colors.white,
 borderRadius: BorderRadius.circular(10),
 ),
 child: Row(
 mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.spaceBetween,
 children: [
 Column(
 crossAxisAlignment: CrossAxisAlignment.start,
 children: [
 Text(
 'Log In With Instagram',
 style: TextStyle(
 color: Colors.black54,
 ),
 ),
 Row(
 children: [
 Text(
 'zuck',
 style: TextStyle(
 fontWeight: FontWeight.bold,
 ),
 ),
 SizedBox(
 width: 5,
 ),
 Image.asset(
 'assets/img2.png',
 height: 13,
 width: 13,
 ),
 ],
 ),
 ],
 ),
 Image.asset('assets/img3.png'),
 ],
 ),
 ),
 ),
 SizedBox(
 height: 15,
 ),
 Center(
 child: Text(
 'Switch Account',
 style: TextStyle(
 color: Colors.black38,
 ),
 ),
 ),
 ],
 ),
 );
 }
} home_page.dart import 'package:flutter/material.dart';

class HomePage extends StatefulWidget {
 const HomePage({super.key});

 @override
 State<HomePage> createState() => _HomePageState();
}

class _HomePageState extends State<HomePage> {
 @override
 Widget build(BuildContext context) {
 double height = MediaQuery.of(context).size.height;
 double width = MediaQuery.of(context).size.width;
 return Scaffold(
 body: Column(
 children: [
 Container(
 height: height * 0.8,
 decoration: BoxDecoration(
 image: DecorationImage(
 image: AssetImage("assets/img4.png"),
 fit: BoxFit.cover,
 ),
 ),
 child: Column(
 mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.center,
 children: [
 Center(
 child: Container(
 decoration: BoxDecoration(
 color: Colors.white,
 borderRadius: BorderRadius.circular(10),
 ),
 padding: EdgeInsets.all(20),
 height: 250,
 width: 329,
 child: Column(
 children: [
 Row(
 mainAxisAlignment: MainAxisAlignment.spaceBetween,
 children: [
 Row(
 children: [
 CircleAvatar(
 backgroundImage:
 AssetImage('assets/img5.jpg'),
 ),
 SizedBox(
 width: 15,
 ),
 Text(
 'zuck',
 style: TextStyle(
 fontWeight: FontWeight.bold,
 ),
 ),
 SizedBox(
 width: 5,
 ),
 Image.asset(
 'assets/img2.png',
 height: 13,
 width: 13,
 ),
 ],
 ),
 Image.asset(
 'assets/img6.png',
 height: 20,
 width: 20,
 ),
 ],
 ),
 SizedBox(
 height: 10,
 ),
 Row(
 children: [
 SizedBox(
 width: 8,
 ),
 Container(
 height: 110,
 child: VerticalDivider(
 color: Colors.black38,
 thickness: 1,
 ),
 ),
 Column(
 crossAxisAlignment: CrossAxisAlignment.start,
 children: [
 Text('Let\'s do this. Welcome to Threads. 🔥'),
 SizedBox(
 width: width * 0.6,
 child: Text(
 'The visison for Threads is to create an open and friendly public space for conversation.',
 style: TextStyle(),
 ),
 ),
 SizedBox(
 height: 10,
 ),
 Row(
 children: [
 IconButton(
 onPressed: () {},
 icon: Icon(
 Icons.favorite_border,
 ),
 ),
 IconButton(
 onPressed: () {},
 icon: ImageIcon(
 AssetImage("assets/img9.png"),
 size: 24,
 ),
 ),
 IconButton(
 onPressed: () {},
 icon: ImageIcon(
 AssetImage("assets/img7.png"),
 size: 24,
 ),
 ),
 IconButton(
 onPressed: () {},
 icon: ImageIcon(
 AssetImage("assets/img8.png"),
 size: 24,
 ),
 ),
 ],
 )
 ],
 ),
 ],
 ),
 ],
 ),
 ),
 ),
 SizedBox(
 height: 10,
 ),
 Text(
 'via Threads',
 style: TextStyle(
 fontWeight: FontWeight.bold,
 ),
 ),
 ],
 ),
 ),
 ],
 ),
 );
 }
}

Flutter Project: Building the Threads UI Using Flutter

It’s been quite a while since I wrote about specific products. Today, I am going to write about Threads, Instagram’s Twitter counterpart, or in other words, the content generator for meme creators for the next few days. There are numerous amazing articles that did a great job of covering Threads. Adding one of the best articles I came across — . Link I had some interesting thoughts and facts I could think of immediately after reading the article and using the product. Twitter threatening to sue Meta for stealing its “trade secrets?” I wonder how Twitter came up with the idea of Twitter Spaces. Hi Clubhouse 👋🏼 There were other Twitter alternatives that came up like Mastodon and Bluesky, but they weren’t able to achieve mass adoption. How did Threads go about 70 million (and counting) downloads so quickly? It’s simple. Other apps are actual downloads, and they were acquiring new users, but these were funneled users from Instagram. This is so stupid to compare how many days Facebook or WhatsApp took to reach 1 million users as the user base with smartphones and internet connections was so low when those products came into the market. Unfortunately, there is no inflation adjustment that can be done for these numbers. As someone who loves numbers, if you take a look at your Instagram profile after you installed Threads, you would be able to see which user you are. I am user #4,653,803. Let’s be honest, Twitter is a disaster after Elon Musk’s takeover. Especially limiting the posts to 600 tweets per day for free users but also premium users (who pay $8/month for Twitter Blue) to 6000 tweets per day. Feature comparison: Source: Twitter and Meta *Not applicable to Twitter Blue users. Verification is only for paid members on Twitter but it’s for both verified and paid members on Instagram. I started using Twitter only because I did not have many followers, and I followed only a few pages or people. My feed used to be clean, but Threads is definitely chaotic for me right now. Can’t delete Threads account Moving into the product perspective of these two products by digging into their company mission, vision, problems they try to solve, etc. Twitter : To give everyone the power to create and share ideas and information instantly, without barriers. Twitter’s mission Vision: We believe in free expression and think every voice has the power to impact the world. Twitter focuses on providing a real-time, public platform for users to share their thoughts, opinions, and news and engage in conversations. This enables users to connect with a broader audience, stay updated on current events, trending topics, and hashtags and follow accounts of interest or celebrities of interest. Basically, it helped amplify the voices of everyday people and built a community that engaged on a global scale. Threads (Instagram/Meta) : Giving people the power to build community and bring the world closer together. Meta’s mission Vision: People use Meta products to stay connected with friends and family, discover what’s going on in the world, and share and express what matters to them. Instagram’s mission statement is the same as above, but the statement is slightly a modified version of the above: We bring you closer to the people and things you love, and the of Threads is to take what Instagram does best and expand that to text, creating a positive and creative space to express your ideas. vision vision If we analyze the mission statements above, it does seem very clear that Threads definitely is helping Meta achieve their mission and vision. As Instagram’s CEO, Adam Mosseri mentioned in an : “The goal isn’t to replace Twitter. The goal is to create a public square for communities on Instagram that never really embraced Twitter and for communities on Twitter (and other platforms) that are interested in a less angry place for conversations, but not all of Twitter.” interview So technically, the problem Threads is solving is the same as Twitter, and it also helps them with their goals. But why now? Instagram’s user base is 2 billion while Twitter’s is around 300 million (rough estimate based on Google search). While we can give full credit to Twitter for what it has achieved so far, it’s not easy for new competitors in the space to reach this user base as they need to start right from scratch. Whereas Instagram can utilize its existing userbase and also given the current situation at Twitter with no real product people to lead the vision, Meta is taking full advantage and increasing their market share. While this may go either way given Meta’s reputation in data and security, they are making hay while the sun shines. It’s too early to say if it’s a Twitter killer, but if Elon keeps taking decisions similar to today, Threads might actually become a Twitter killer. But what scares me the most is the monopolization of Meta in the social media space. Feature Image Source: AI-generated from https://gencraft.com/generate using the prompt Twitter bird on fire.

Threads — From the Perspective of a Product Manager

I don't know why. They "trust me" Dumb fucks. - 19-year-old Mark Zuckerberg in correspondence with a Harvard friend after launching “The Facebook” ( Business Insider ) Introduction to Threads On Wednesday, expanded its social media empire (which includes , Messenger, , and WhatsApp) with the Instagram-based text app, Threads. , Threads looks very similar to Twitter with a few minor adjustments –unsurprisingly,  when considering Meta’s . Most of the time , but with like Stories and Reels which imitated distinctive features from Snapchat and TikTok. Meta Facebook Instagram Reportedly long tradition of copycatting competitors unsuccessfully important exceptions says that “ The Guardian journalist, Kari Paul using Threads felt like a fever dream in which Twitter and Instagram had a more usable brainchild.” is a bit more skeptical and says that “ Rebecca Jennings from Vox Logging onto Threads is like logging on to the internet roughly a decade ago. I have now seen two strangers share their “hot take” that actually, pineapple on pizza is good, a sentiment copied and pasted from all the world’s most boring Hinge profiles.” is to challenge Twitter’s position as the world’s conversation app. And so far, so good. By leveraging Instagram's +2 billion user base, Threads achieved the highest overnight growth of any web application, ever. Within 24 hours after its launch, Threads amassed 30 million users. , and by the time you are reading this, the number likely exceeds 100 million. It took ChatGPT two months to achieve 100 million users, for TikTok it took nine months, and for Instagram, it took two and half years to achieve this milestone that Threads has achieved in less than a week. The explicit mission of Threads Yesterday, Threads had 90 million users Whether you like them or not, Meta is better positioned than anyone else to be the new dopamine provider for disgruntled Twitter users. Privacy Concerns At this point, the Threads app is rolled out in more than 100 countries, but not any of them is in the EU zone. From a privacy perspective, as it unnecessarily collects a lot of sensitive information from users such as health and financial data, precise location, browsing history, contacts, purchases, and search history. In addition, Meta is under heavy scrutiny by the European privacy powers and was recently faced (the largest fine in GDPR’s history) for importing data to the US about European Facebook users. Threads is a nightmare with a monstrous fine of €1.2 billion from the European Data Protection Board GDPR is not the only EU legislation Threads is at odds with. set out strict boundaries for how tech monopolies referred to in the law as “gatekeepers” can process data about EU citizens across different platforms. For example, under Article 5 (2) (b) and (c), the gatekeeper is not allowed to: EU’s Digital Market Act “(b) combine personal data from the relevant core platform service with personal data from any further core platform services or from any other services provided by the gatekeeper (..) (c) cross-use personal data from the relevant core platform service in other services provided separately by the gatekeeper (..)” The restrictions make a lot of sense. To illustrate: A user accepts data collection separately from Service A and Service B. Both services are offered by the same provider, and the user is aware of this fact. However, if the provider can combine and cross-use the data collection from Service A and Service B, the provider may be able to deduce highly sensitive information about the user which they could not have anticipated when they accepted the data collection from Service A and Service B individually. For example, an Instagram user may share some photos from a vacation on Instagram. Shortly thereafter, the same user shares their thoughts about something on Threads. Meta’s AI systems may now be capable of interpreting the link between certain events the user is experiencing and simultaneously how these experiences shape the user’s thoughts and opinions. Over time, the AI systems aggregate more and more data about what makes the user tick, and how their life circumstances shape their behavior and thoughts, and there is no way the user could have expected this by accepting the data terms of Service A and Service B. As a result, Meta becomes more powerful, the AIs become better at predicting user behavior and better at subtly manipulating the users with targeted advertising. This is a frightening, nightmarish scenario, and I don’t think Meta’s intentions are as dark. To the contrary, a key point of was that the company is planning to make Threads compatible with the standard protocol ActivityPub which powers Mastodon. David Pierce from The Verge wrote an excellent deep dive on ActivityPub . quite Meta’s announcement here By integrating ActivityPub, Threads users would be able to transfer their content away from Threads and interact with users on other platforms that support the technology. Importantly, the concerns surrounding compliance with the EU's Digital Market Act could be alleviated to some extent, since the users retain ownership of their data. Right now, a more practical concern is that a user cannot deactivate their account on Threads This effectively lock-in most users, once they are signed up - unless the users are willing to wipe out their digital memory books and hard-earned follower counts on Instagram. without deleting their Instagram account as well. My thoughts The internet needs secure and trustworthy communication and information channels. Gathering the entire world’s population on a proprietary-owned common square is not the answer - despite what Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, or Twitter’s new CEO is trying to sell us. Over time, the stream of information always – as a rule of nature - becomes corrupted by bad actors and bots as long as the platform’s key metric of success is for how long it can retain user attention. The revenue-seeking approach is beneficial for advertisers, but a negative-sum game for the social community on the platform.  Cory Doctorow coined the term “ ” which encapsulates how tech platforms deteriorate over time as the companies’ priorities gradually shift away from the users towards the shareholders. enshitification Additionally, social media algorithms are purposed to keep users engaged, and unfortunately, users are strongly engaged by content that enrages them or invokes other strong emotional reactions.  In this way, the centralized social media platform accidentally rewards antisocial behavior. This is where and that the network becomes more and more unpleasant to participate in over time. basic game theory tells us that Moloch dictates On this background, I can only applaud Meta’s decision to integrate ActivityPub with Threads and I hope that they follow through. I believe that a “decentralized internet” consisting of “federated platforms” where social apps and social networks are completely separated is the future. In the longer run, whether the time will be counted in years or decades, the social media landscape will likely be shaped in the spirit of ActivityPub, the , and . In 75 years, I suspect we will look at today’s endorsement of centralized social media along the same lines as we now look at cigarette commercials from the 50s. AT protocol that powers BlueSky Nostr which supports Bitcoin micro-payments Also published . here

Stitching Together My Thoughts on Threads

থ্রেডের উপর আমার চিন্তা একসাথে সেলাই করা

Meine Gedanken zu Fäden zusammenfügen

Uniendo mis pensamientos sobre hilos

Assembler mes réflexions sur les fils

धागों पर मेरे विचार एक साथ सिलना

糸についての私の考えをつなぎ合わせる

스레드에 대한 내 생각을 하나로 묶기

Juntando meus pensamentos sobre tópicos

Konular Üzerindeki Düşüncelerimi Bir Araya Getiriyorum

Ghép lại những suy nghĩ của tôi về chủ đề

将我对线程的想法缝合在一起

Do We Need Another Twitter Clone? My followers on and don’t overlap. But my friends on IG and FB do. And so, Threads was intriguing for me. 🤔 Twitter Instagram Could this be “the one” I was looking for? Can this stitch my distressed social media attention together? PSA: Get ready for reams of textile puns along the way. So, when was released earlier this week I thought maybe here’s an alternative that may help retire my Twitter account to the recycle bin. Threads Perhaps the bird can, maybe not immediately but over the course of time, fly into the sunset of repressed memory. Even though I don’t consider Threads and Twitter to be direct competitors for my attention at this point in time, I can see a future where, if Zuck plays it right, I could completely move off of Twitter. Not because I am an active tweeter. I am more of a consumer than a producer. I’ve tried Twitter Threads. But my thread count barely reaches the Egyptian Cotton Sheets standard. And that is the reason. precisely I don’t need to increase the levels of my attention fragmentation. As an aspiring social media user, I need to consolidate it and be more productive with it than anything else. I want to be able to produce through re-use. As in, . one thread of thought that can be molded to its most appropriate form for any given channel Am I Giving Up On Twitter? I believe the majority of Twitter users are like me. In fact, I am willing to bet the majority of all Social Media users are like me. Mostly consuming, and sometimes producing content. The platforms are designed specifically for this type of user behavior in aggregate, so I get it. Attention is currency and you’d want the majority of users to be consumers of content, spending their attention currency on these platforms Despite the crazy user numbers. As folks in the business know, Total Users means squat in this business. What counts is engagement - MAU. We don’t know anything about engagement yet. To be clear - I don’t think Threads is ready to replace Twitter just yet. I have very little control over my Thread Spool as oppossed to my Tweet Stream. The algorithm is driving me a bit crazy with its seemingly random idea of what I might like to see (more on that later). 😖 But I see the potential. The Net Of It What no one seems to be talking about is the roadmap item of fediverse connectivity. If Threads can become the connecting thread to Mastadon and other federated services, then Threads can truly become the connecting fabric of my micro-blogging time. For now, though, Twitter is for consumption and Thread is for engagement (for me). And so… the is on! 🥊 Cage Match And it’s happening on my phone. 📲

48 Hours of Meta Threads

Feature Image: Zuck announcing Threads’ several first milestones on Threads itself As of 2:15pm Indochina Time on Friday July 7, Threads, the Instagram’s “Twitter-killer” app, has passed 60 Million downloads. I signed up & connected one of my secondary Instagram accounts to it just now to confirm, and that account was user # 60,614,427. In comparison, when I set up t at around 11am ICT Thursday July 6, about 5 hours after it officially launched in Asia, we were user #6,519,297. Our number would have been a bit lower if we were still in the US, the first region to roll out Threads. Zuck, of course, was . That means, in just over 48 hours since launch, the app had passed 60 Million users, officially crowning it the fastest app that reached this milestone. The fastest growing app in recent consciousness that was able to do something even close to it, was , which amassed . the official HackerNoon Threads accoun user #1 ChatGPT 1M users within a week post launch There will be more stories on HackerNoon about Threads soon, but I want to jot down a few thoughts on this high growth app, while it’s still new(ish). Twitter sucks (bad) right now; and people have been desperate for an alternative since Musk’s reign Twitter wasn’t perfect pre Elon Musk, but it wasn’t . The latest straw that broke the camel’s back for many people was Musk’s erratic decision to . Specifically, he rate limits the number of tweets not just for regular users to 600 tweets/day; but also for paid users (who pay Musk $8/month to get a verified checkmark next to their name) to 6000 tweets/day. His rationale was that this rate limit but I think it’s much simpler than that: he needs the money. “Free speech”, but only if you give me $8/month. Among Musk’s many terrible decisions that make Twitter the hellscape it is today, we have: the disaster it is today limit access to all Twitter & non Twitter users alike prevents AI companies from scraping Twitter data; Firing close to 75% of its staff (in multiple waves) in a largely undignified, cold-hearted manner Making the site unstable, largely unmoderated, and buggy, possibly due to the firing of many key staff with institutional knowledge Not paying many employees whom he let go, including In April of this year, they ex CEO Parag Agrawal, ex CLO Vijaya Gadde, and ex CFO Ned Segal. filed a joint lawsuit against him Scaring off enough advertisers due to the (in the name of free speech) that advertising revenue is reportedly unmoderated nature of Twitter 2.0 content down at least 59% Not making enough money on , after the disastrous first launch attempt that generated so many scams and impersonation attempts, . Since , it reportedly made under $50 Million. Together with advertising hovering around $1,8 Billion, . Twitter Blue subscription costing valuable advertisers & brands real money the relaunch Twitter’s YoY revenue post Elon is down 40%, from around $5 Billion pre-Elon Oh yes, . He was forced into it because he made a bad calculation . A “0 % interest rate” phenomenon you might say. . he wasn’t even going to buy the site in the first place overvaluing his Tesla stock $44 Billion USD isn’t cheap, even for the richest man on earth Reading stories about Musk’s handling of Twitter felt alarmingly similar to reading stories about the Trump’s presidency. Scandals after scandals. Bad decisions followed by worse decisions. It was anxiety and fatigue-inducing. So, naturally, people have been looking for a viable alternative ever since Elon Musk took over Twitter. But no platform ( , , , to name a few) was able to achieve mass adoption, until… Mastodon BlueSky Cohost Threads is not run by Elon Musk Look, I get it, a Twitter alternative from Zuck ( with of his own) sounds a little lame. It’s not due to just that, all of Zuck’s fraud history with European regulators. BUT. The bar is so low right now. And love him or hate him, Zuck WHILE AND . Simply put, the bar for people to like a social media app in 2023 is just, “not run by Elon Musk.” That’s why some people rekindled their hope for Twitter after learning that its new CEO will be , who is very respected in the advertising industry. Others go to great length to set up a server for their Mastodon instance (I haven’t). another billionaire multiple baggages even available in the EU right now knows how to run social media firing a lot of his staff not scaring over half of his advertisers Linda Yakarino Lately, Zuck has been entertaining the idea of challenging Musk in (lol). I think that was the first time since Cambridge Analytica that a meaningfully larger number of people might actually root for Zuck instead of Musk. It does take a worse billionaire like Musk to make Zuck look civil and worth rooting for. a cage fight The Metaverse is still a long shot Zuck, too, was fueled by desperation. made it clear that gone are the days of Instagram’s purchase (imho, Zuck’s best acquisition to date). With intesifying regulators’ scrutiny from all sides, it seems that he’s no longer allowed to gain monopoly on social media by simply buying up competitions. . He needed to hedge new bets, considering Facebook growth was severely capped, with no end in sight. The UK’s decision to block Meta’s acquisition of Giphy The UK specifically cited the fact that Meta already controlled over 50% of the advertising market in the UK as the reason to block Giphy acquisition In October 2021, Zuck announced the relaunch of Facebook as Meta (our parody ), . Ever since, he has burned billion of dollars into this pipedream ( , $10 billions in 2022, and planning to be about $100 billions over the next couple of years). here announcing that Facebook Instagram, and Whatsapp, are just products belonging to the parent company Meta reportedly Unfortunately, the Metaverse had not yet to pan out the way he hoped. . People’s avatars look awkward, cartoonish, and limited, nothing like the person they attempted to represent (see some ). The remains quite niched and largely unfriendly to the general public. Unlike the cash counter that is advertising money from Facebook, Instagram and Whatsapp, Zuck’s Metaverse vision seemed to be quite far-off, and not exactly what the people want, or need, right now. At some point, none of the people in there had legs here Oculus Quest To add salt to the wound, earlier this year, Apple announced that it will . Expensive though it seemed, this move by Apple might effectively one-up and undercut Meta’s market share into AR/VR. And of course, the growth of generative AI, most notably with chat GPT, has very little to do with Zuck’s metaverse pipe dream. launch the Apple Vision Pro Threads is shamelessly Twitter-like, and the people running it are the first to admit it If you are one of the that are reportedly active on Instagram in 2023, signing up for threads literally takes 3 seconds, as you can sign in with your existing Instagram handle. Once there, you have the option to import your Instagram bio, profile picture, and link. You also have the option to follow anyone whom you already followed on Instagram, even before they join Threads. That way, once they do join, you would already be one of their followers. A “pre-follow” if you will. 1,4 billions users From there, it’s basically Twitter, without the baggage and all the added features. Adam Moserri, , and multiple public threads on , accredits Twitter for pioneering the “reply format”, which gives the same design treatment for comment as it does for the original post, creating a natural "public conversation”. This is vastly different than commenting on Youtube, Facebook, or Instagram, which gets a “second tiered” design treatment. in an interview his own account The things Threads does have: 500 character limit for each post Ability to retweet (called “repost”), and quote tweet (called “quote”) Ability to comment/reply A like counter, and a reply counter (both can be hidden) Search for users’ handle Way to go back and forth seamlessly between Threads and Instagram. My favorite is the “add to story” button that shares Tweet in a beautiful pre-designed manner As mentioned above, ability to bring most of your Instagram followers with you And of course, a lot of users already, since it’s basically Instagram but “not Twitter” Twitter The things it doesn’t have (I shared these in my first threads ): here A personalized or even just chronological newsfeed that surface only the people you follow An inbox (post all on main, i guess, lol) Ability to switch between multiple accounts Ability to search for anything else that’s not a handle Elon Musk =)) The weird quirks: Threads algorithm seems very random and buggy right now. I was reading an interesting thread, and the feed just refreshes itself. Since I cannot search and don’t remember the handle, that content is now gone forever from my feed. Annoying buzzing and endless notifications as default for some users Owned by . Meta In general, I don’t think it’s perfect, but I already like and use it way more than Twitter. And I assume a non-trivial percentage of Instagram avid userbase will feel the same. Threads might save Zuck. But it’s too early to tell. (or, in Musk’s word, “ ”). We’ll see how the case go. But at first glance, this is one of the clearest signs of Musk feeling threatened by this app in a real way that he never did with Mastodon or BlueSky (cofounded by Jack Dorsey, who remains a Twitter/X Corp ). Twitter Lawyer Alex Spiro already threatened to sue Zuck over stealing its “trade secrets” cheating is not okay shareholder But the true test will be users’ retention, and eventually monetization. In both Zuck’s and Monserri’s public statements, they emphasized the word “friendly”, implying their strong focus & commitment on content moderation. They also claimed that the platform is “decentralized,” as it will implement a protocol called ActivityPub. This means, users of Mastodon could potentially migrate back & forth between the two platforms, as well as users of any other platform that implements ActivityPub. It definitely is a smart move for optic. But given the history of Facebook/Meta’s handling of users’s data, I don’t think it will win over enough users for whom decentralization and privacy are their top concerns. The app will probably pass 100M users any day now. But a large percentage of the userbase will probably leave after the initial honeymoon period. What they do then, how careful they are with users data & integration (under extreme scrutiny from both regulators and reporters), what features they will add or kill, and most importantly, what users will they be able to convert to long term users, will determine the future of this app, and by extension, the legacy of Zuck. For now, I know that I have nothing to lose by posting on Threads directly to my Instagram stories, as I’m already too addicted to Instagram.

THREADS

threads.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

THREADS

EVERGREEN INDEX #10216

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Threads WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

THREADS

threads.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

THREADS

EVERGREEN INDEX #10216

RELATED COMPANIESRANK

STORIES ABOUT THREADS

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Threads WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!