Suvit

suvit

Startups Of The Year 2023: Asia Winners

Qubetics is breaking new ground with its cutting-edge technology and practical applications that promise to reshape the blockchain industry and digital economy. As a layer-1 project, Qubetics leads the way with four standout applications equally appealing to developers, users, businesses, and investors. Qubetics is already making splashes in the crypto world, with its presale hitting the $1 million mark in less than 24 hours. The Qubetics presale has risen to $0.01452 in stage four from its first-stage price of $0.01. No wonder crypto analysts believe Qubetics is the project to watch in 2024. Here is how you can join its presale before the price skyrockets in the next stage. Before you know how to ensure wealth generation with Qubetics, look at its four applications that solve the real-life problems associated with the digital economy. Experience the Power of Fractional Ownership with Qubetics Real-World Asset Tokenisation Marketplace Qubetics offers Real-World Asset Tokenisation Marketplace that changes ow the world invests and trades high-value items like real estate, fine art, and precious metals. Here’s how it works in a real-life scenario: Let’s say someone owns a property worth $500,000, but instead of selling the entire property, the owner wants to access some of its value while keeping ownership. Qubetics allows everyone to tokenise the property—meaning you divide it into digital tokens, each representing a fraction of its value. For example, if you issue 1,000,000 tokens, each token would represent a small share of the property’s worth. These tokens can then be sold on the Qubetics platform to investors across the globe. A real-life example of how this benefits the public is in property ownership. Traditionally, investing in real estate requires significant capital, making it inaccessible to many people. Through tokenisation, everyday investors can buy tokens representing small shares in multiple properties worldwide, allowing them to invest in real estate without needing the full capital to buy a property outright. It also allows property owners to access liquidity without selling the entire asset. In addition, tokenisation can apply to other valuable assets. Suppose you have a rare piece of art or gold. By tokenising these items, you allow multiple people to own a share and create a more flexible, liquid market where buyers and sellers can trade these digital tokens securely on Qubetics’ blockchain. For the general public, this means access to investment opportunities previously limited to the wealthy or large institutions. It also means greater flexibility in managing assets, with blockchain's security and transparency. AI-Powered Development Available to Everyone with Qubetics’ QubeQode IDE The QubeQode IDE brings the power of blockchain development to the general public by making it easier for anyone, from beginners to experts, to create decentralised applications (dApps) and smart contracts. Imagine a small business owner who runs an online marketplace. He wants to integrate blockchain technology to make his business more secure and transparent. He’s heard that smart contracts could automate payments and manage disputes without the need for middlemen, but he has no coding experience. In the past, the business owner would have had to hire a specialised developer to build these blockchain tools, which would be expensive and time-consuming. With the QubeCode IDE, however, anyone can create their own smart contracts and dApps with the help of Artificial Intelligence. The platform guides users step-by-step, offering suggestions, automating code where needed, and ensuring that the created contract is secure and functional. For example, a person could use the QubeCode IDE to create a smart contract that automatically releases funds to a seller once a buyer confirms receipt of goods. If a dispute arises, the smart contract could hold the payment in escrow until resolved. Thanks to the AI-powered guidance in QubeQode, all of this could be created without the requirement of deep coding knowledge. People who want to innovate or integrate blockchain technology into their businesses or projects can do so without learning complicated programming languages. This lowers the barrier to entry, empowering more creators, entrepreneurs, and developers to build their blockchain-based solutions and driving the adoption of decentralised technologies. Feel Secure and Earn with Qubetics' Decentralised VPN Qubetics’ Decentralised VPN offers two-fold benefits: enhanced privacy and the opportunity to earn extra income. Imagine a university student who uses the internet daily for his studies, streaming, and social media. Like many others, this student is concerned about his online privacy and wants to protect his personal information from hackers or third-party trackers. Traditional VPNs require users to trust a central provider. Still, a decentralised VPN, like Qubetics, distributes the network across many users, making it more secure and less vulnerable to single points of failure. The decentralised VPN ensures that users’ online activity is encrypted and their privacy remains intact. However, Qubetics goes a step further by allowing users to earn rewards by sharing their unused internet bandwidth. Let’s say a user has a high-speed internet connection with excess bandwidth that he doesn’t use while studying or sleeping. By joining Qubetics' decentralised VPN, users can contribute their unused bandwidth to the network. In return, they earn $TICS tokens for sharing their bandwidth. So, while a user enjoys a more secure and private internet experience, he also makes money by leaving his device connected to the network. For the general public, this creates an opportunity to make extra income without any active effort, just by utilising what they already have — spare bandwidth. It’s particularly helpful for people who may not have access to traditional earning methods, such as students, retirees, or individuals in remote areas. At the same time, users benefit from more secure, private internet browsing that protects their data, making it a win-win for privacy and earnings. Buy, Sell, and Trade it All at a Single Platform with Qubetics’ Non-Custodial Wallet Qubetics' Non-Custodial Multi-Chain Wallet empowers users to trade cryptocurrencies across different platforms without giving up control over their assets. Crypto investors who buy exposure in multiple crypto projects, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, have to use multiple wallets and exchanges to trade them. They also have to rely on centralised platforms to store their funds, which means risking their assets being frozen or hacked. With Qubetics' non-custodial wallet, anyone can manage their assets in one place and trade across multiple blockchains from a single interface. For example, suppose an investor wants to swap some Ethereum for Bitcoin. In that case, they can do so directly within the wallet without needing to transfer funds between exchanges or worry about giving up control of their assets. The wallet allows them to interact with various platforms and perform trades while retaining full ownership of their private keys. A real-life benefit of this is enhanced security and convenience. Because investors keep custody of their funds, no centralised entity can block or freeze their assets, and they are protected from exchange hacks or closures. The wallet also allows them to trade across different blockchains seamlessly, eliminating the hassle of moving assets between multiple wallets or platforms. For laymen, this means that people can easily and securely manage diverse crypto portfolios, trade across various platforms, and always maintain control over their assets.This wallet simplifies the trading process, making it easier for beginners and experienced traders to manage and grow their crypto investments. The Final Thoughts With its real-world asset tokenisation marketplace, AI-powered developer tools, decentralised VPN, and multi-chain wallet, Qubetics is set for the mass adoption of blockchain technology. The time to invest is now—while the price is still low. Visit the presale website today and position yourself to earn massive ROI by the end of the presale. Invest early, and watch your assets grow as Qubetics continues to develop and revolutionise the blockchain space. For More Information: Qubetics: https://qubetics.com Telegram: https://t.me/qubetics Twitter: https://x.com/qubetics This story was distributed as a release by Btcwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here. Qubetics is breaking new ground with its cutting-edge technology and practical applications that promise to reshape the blockchain industry and digital economy. As a layer-1 project, Qubetics leads the way with four standout applications equally appealing to developers, users, businesses, and investors. Qubetics is already making splashes in the crypto world, with its presale hitting the $1 million mark in less than 24 hours. The Qubetics presale has risen to $0.01452 in stage four from its first-stage price of $0.01. No wonder crypto analysts believe Qubetics is the project to watch in 2024. Here is how you can join its presale before the price skyrockets in the next stage. Before you know how to ensure wealth generation with Qubetics, look at its four applications that solve the real-life problems associated with the digital economy. Experience the Power of Fractional Ownership with Qubetics Real-World Asset Tokenisation Marketplace Qubetics offers Real-World Asset Tokenisation Marketplace that changes ow the world invests and trades high-value items like real estate, fine art, and precious metals. Here’s how it works in a real-life scenario: Let’s say someone owns a property worth $500,000, but instead of selling the entire property, the owner wants to access some of its value while keeping ownership. Qubetics allows everyone to tokenise the property—meaning you divide it into digital tokens, each representing a fraction of its value. For example, if you issue 1,000,000 tokens, each token would represent a small share of the property’s worth. These tokens can then be sold on the Qubetics platform to investors across the globe. A real-life example of how this benefits the public is in property ownership. Traditionally, investing in real estate requires significant capital, making it inaccessible to many people. Through tokenisation, everyday investors can buy tokens representing small shares in multiple properties worldwide, allowing them to invest in real estate without needing the full capital to buy a property outright. It also allows property owners to access liquidity without selling the entire asset. In addition, tokenisation can apply to other valuable assets. Suppose you have a rare piece of art or gold. By tokenising these items, you allow multiple people to own a share and create a more flexible, liquid market where buyers and sellers can trade these digital tokens securely on Qubetics’ blockchain. For the general public, this means access to investment opportunities previously limited to the wealthy or large institutions. It also means greater flexibility in managing assets, with blockchain's security and transparency. AI-Powered Development Available to Everyone with Qubetics’ QubeQode IDE The QubeQode IDE brings the power of blockchain development to the general public by making it easier for anyone, from beginners to experts, to create decentralised applications (dApps) and smart contracts. Imagine a small business owner who runs an online marketplace. He wants to integrate blockchain technology to make his business more secure and transparent. He’s heard that smart contracts could automate payments and manage disputes without the need for middlemen, but he has no coding experience. In the past, the business owner would have had to hire a specialised developer to build these blockchain tools, which would be expensive and time-consuming. With the QubeCode IDE, however, anyone can create their own smart contracts and dApps with the help of Artificial Intelligence. The platform guides users step-by-step, offering suggestions, automating code where needed, and ensuring that the created contract is secure and functional. For example, a person could use the QubeCode IDE to create a smart contract that automatically releases funds to a seller once a buyer confirms receipt of goods. If a dispute arises, the smart contract could hold the payment in escrow until resolved. Thanks to the AI-powered guidance in QubeQode, all of this could be created without the requirement of deep coding knowledge. People who want to innovate or integrate blockchain technology into their businesses or projects can do so without learning complicated programming languages. This lowers the barrier to entry, empowering more creators, entrepreneurs, and developers to build their blockchain-based solutions and driving the adoption of decentralised technologies. Feel Secure and Earn with Qubetics' Decentralised VPN Qubetics’ Decentralised VPN offers two-fold benefits: enhanced privacy and the opportunity to earn extra income. Imagine a university student who uses the internet daily for his studies, streaming, and social media. Like many others, this student is concerned about his online privacy and wants to protect his personal information from hackers or third-party trackers. Traditional VPNs require users to trust a central provider. Still, a decentralised VPN, like Qubetics, distributes the network across many users, making it more secure and less vulnerable to single points of failure. The decentralised VPN ensures that users’ online activity is encrypted and their privacy remains intact. However, Qubetics goes a step further by allowing users to earn rewards by sharing their unused internet bandwidth. Let’s say a user has a high-speed internet connection with excess bandwidth that he doesn’t use while studying or sleeping. By joining Qubetics' decentralised VPN, users can contribute their unused bandwidth to the network. In return, they earn $TICS tokens for sharing their bandwidth. So, while a user enjoys a more secure and private internet experience, he also makes money by leaving his device connected to the network. For the general public, this creates an opportunity to make extra income without any active effort, just by utilising what they already have — spare bandwidth. It’s particularly helpful for people who may not have access to traditional earning methods, such as students, retirees, or individuals in remote areas. At the same time, users benefit from more secure, private internet browsing that protects their data, making it a win-win for privacy and earnings. Buy, Sell, and Trade it All at a Single Platform with Qubetics’ Non-Custodial Wallet Qubetics' Non-Custodial Multi-Chain Wallet empowers users to trade cryptocurrencies across different platforms without giving up control over their assets. Crypto investors who buy exposure in multiple crypto projects, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, have to use multiple wallets and exchanges to trade them. They also have to rely on centralised platforms to store their funds, which means risking their assets being frozen or hacked. With Qubetics' non-custodial wallet, anyone can manage their assets in one place and trade across multiple blockchains from a single interface. For example, suppose an investor wants to swap some Ethereum for Bitcoin. In that case, they can do so directly within the wallet without needing to transfer funds between exchanges or worry about giving up control of their assets. The wallet allows them to interact with various platforms and perform trades while retaining full ownership of their private keys. A real-life benefit of this is enhanced security and convenience. Because investors keep custody of their funds, no centralised entity can block or freeze their assets, and they are protected from exchange hacks or closures. The wallet also allows them to trade across different blockchains seamlessly, eliminating the hassle of moving assets between multiple wallets or platforms. For laymen, this means that people can easily and securely manage diverse crypto portfolios, trade across various platforms, and always maintain control over their assets.This wallet simplifies the trading process, making it easier for beginners and experienced traders to manage and grow their crypto investments. The Final Thoughts With its real-world asset tokenisation marketplace, AI-powered developer tools, decentralised VPN, and multi-chain wallet, Qubetics is set for the mass adoption of blockchain technology. The time to invest is now—while the price is still low. Visit the presale website today and position yourself to earn massive ROI by the end of the presale. Invest early, and watch your assets grow as Qubetics continues to develop and revolutionise the blockchain space. For More Information: Qubetics: https://qubetics.com Telegram: https://t.me/qubetics Twitter: https://x.com/qubetics https://qubetics.com https://t.me/qubetics https://x.com/qubetics This story was distributed as a release by Btcwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here. This story was distributed as a release by Btcwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here . here here

Qubetics Makes Digital Economy Accessible To Everyone With a Suite of Futuristic Innovations

Qubetics maak digitale ekonomie toeganklik vir almal met 'n reeks futuristiese innovasies

Qubetics hace que la economía digital sea accesible para todos con un conjunto de innovaciones futuristas

Qubetics tekee digitaalitaloudesta kaikkien ulottuvilla futurististen innovaatioiden avulla

A Qubetics futurisztikus innovációk csomagjával mindenki számára elérhetővé teszi a digitális gazdaságot

Qubetics rende l'economia digitale accessibile a tutti con una serie di innovazioni futuristiche

Qubetics は、一連の未来的なイノベーションにより、誰もがデジタル経済にアクセスできるようにします。

Qubetics ធ្វើឱ្យសេដ្ឋកិច្ចឌីជីថលអាចចូលដំណើរការបានសម្រាប់មនុស្សគ្រប់គ្នាជាមួយនឹងឈុតនៃការច្នៃប្រឌិតនាពេលអនាគត

Qubetics torna a economia digital acessível a todos com um conjunto de inovações futurísticas

Qubetics sprístupňuje digitálnu ekonomiku každému pomocou balíka futuristických inovácií

Qubetics Hufanya Uchumi wa Kidijitali Kupatikana kwa Kila Mtu Mwenye Mfumo wa Ubunifu wa Kijamii

Qubetics ทำให้เศรษฐกิจดิจิทัลเข้าถึงได้สำหรับทุกคนด้วยชุดนวัตกรรมแห่งอนาคต

Qubetics giúp nền kinh tế số có thể tiếp cận với mọi người bằng một loạt các cải tiến mang tính tương lai

The hype for Gen AI has settled as organizations have begun to lay the groundwork for seamless adoption. But there are decisions that must be made, dilemmas to be solved, and questions to be answered. We list the top 10 Enterprise Gen AI dilemmas facing the C-suite leaders. Open or Closed Gen AI models The world came to know about Gen AI only through licensed models such as Open AI’s GPT or Google’s Bard. These systems shared very little details about the underlying code or how their systems were trained. But the Geminis and ChatGPTs indeed helped end-users understand Gen AI’s immense possibilities for the larger public. But soon came the emergence of open-source models such as Meta’s Llama. These models are built on a shared architecture, reveal the underlying codebases, and are pretty much transparent about the data being trained. So which way Enterprises would sway when it comes to embracing these foundation models? Open-sourced or licensed - which would really benefit enterprises in the long run. Various aspects related to performance, accuracy, ethics, explainability, and IP protection would enable stakeholders to decide whether to go with closed or open-sourced models. LLM or LMs Large language models (LLMs) are known for their high performance, comprehensive understanding, and versatility. However, they are lavish energy spenders, which means only the largest companies have the funds to train and maintain energy-hungry models with billions of parameters. Could it be that these enterprises are better off adopting smaller language models that are comparatively energy-efficient,  cost-effective, and even privacy-friendly? Among these smaller models, domain-specific LM is fast getting traction because of the obvious advantages - you can run your small model on modest hardware yet build powerful customized models trained on proprietary data. Industries such as healthcare, legal, and finance could immensely benefit from these domain-specific smaller language models. Explainable AI or Black Box AI Have you ever asked ChatGPT as to how it arrived at a decision? While the outputs of ChatGPT can be evaluated for their relevance and accuracy, the inner workings of how specific responses were generated were never transparent. This could be a challenge for enterprises when they work with LLMs as these models given their vast architecture with several layers of neurons, make it hard to trace the decision path. For any input, the model may not be able to tell how it arrived at a particular output.  This is what we call a Black Box AI. Again on this front, smaller language models (SLMs) are better poised to allow human users to comprehend and trust the results created by their algorithms. This explain ability provided by smaller language models can help developers ensure that the system is working as expected. SLMs may go even further to help enterprises meet regulatory standards. Don’t overlook the Enterprise layer The enterprise layer is crucial to building successful Gen AI applications. Remember one can’t take the-box foundation models such as Open AI’s GPT or Anthopic’s Claude, and instantly create Gen AI applications for their enterprise. They have to manually build an enterprise orchestration layer that enables the infusion of Gen AI into their normal applications. Would organizations invest considerable resources into building this layer? This is where Enterprises must work with effective partners to create a customized business layer that truly connects enterprise applications with Gen AI models. ROI dilemma Enterprise leaders emphasize that Gen AI offerings must demonstrate a clear business value proposition. But for a technology that is in its nascent stages, yet with tremendous transformative potential - how can enterprises measure value? Should organizations overlook ROI in the initial stages and instead focus on how Gen AI infuses innovation and helps them in strategic positioning and differentiation? Or should enterprises be shrewd enough to prioritize investing in areas that can bring easy wins, and gradually get into complex projects? Garbage in Garbage out The adage cannot be truer in the age of generative AI where the reliability of Gen AI output majorly depends on the quality of data being sent as input. How can organizations ensure the highest data quality standards when training Gen AI models? How seamless/difficult would it be for organizations to ensure that their custom AI abides and operates based on their internal data? This situation is further compounded when we realize that on average, organizations only capture 56% of the data they create. Even more alluding is that about 77% of the data collected is either obsolete or trivial. So, Organizations, if at all, if they wish for seamless large-scale Gen AI deployments, must thoroughly capture, classify, and clean data before feeding into their AI systems. Trust issues On one side, enterprises are concerned about the accuracy of Gen AI outputs. On the other side, employees have an inherent fear of technology potentially replacing them or making their jobs obsolete. Together, this cumulative mistrust could pose a barrier to Gen AI enterprise adoption. But fortunately, these concerns have not stopped organizations from embracing Gen AI in their Pilots or small-scale experiments. But if these pilots are to be scaled, then organizations have to build trust in numerous dimensions across worker empathy, transparency, input/output quality, etc. Sophisticated Virtual Agents Can Chatbots go all the way to completing the task apart from making sensible conversations? The ChatGPTs and Geminis have shown us how their question-and-answer systems can give rich contextualized answers. But can the chatbot help us complete a task altogether? For example, can it make reservations for us? Can it plan a trip or even book a ticket? The dawn of sophisticated virtual agents is not far and that would transform customer experience in ways never seen before. Ambiguous regulations The ambiguity in the regulatory environment continues to prevail. However, the EU has taken a more conservative approach to AI-generated content. In Dec 2023, a provisional agreement on the Artificial Intelligence Act was reached, prohibiting indiscriminate scraping of images to create facial recognition databases, biometric categorization systems (with potential for discriminatory bias), "social scoring" systems, and the use of AI for social or economic manipulation. Because of the impending election, there is still time for America to decide on AI governance and security, but that could only do little to stop the stellar developments continuing to happen in the country. Yet organizations cannot afford to be complacent when it comes to implementing guardrails for trust and security. Shadow AI Shadow AI typically arises when a seemingly enthusiastic employee, in the desire to learn or complete an action through an AI application, feeds sensitive information to a public-facing model and thus exposes business secrets. In another case, the employee could train the model with copyrighted material, potentially exposing the company to legal consequences. Conclusion In conclusion, the potential benefits of Gen AI are immense, but realizing them requires a delicate balance of technological innovation, ethical considerations, and strategic foresight. As the technology matures, organizations must navigate these challenges proactively to harness Gen AI's power while mitigating risks. The road ahead is undoubtedly complex, but with careful planning and execution, enterprises can position themselves at the forefront of this transformative era. The hype for Gen AI has settled as organizations have begun to lay the groundwork for seamless adoption. But there are decisions that must be made, dilemmas to be solved, and questions to be answered. We list the top 10 Enterprise Gen AI dilemmas facing the C-suite leaders. Open or Closed Gen AI models Open or Closed Gen AI models The world came to know about Gen AI only through licensed models such as Open AI’s GPT or Google’s Bard. These systems shared very little details about the underlying code or how their systems were trained. But the Geminis and ChatGPTs indeed helped end-users understand Gen AI’s immense possibilities for the larger public. But soon came the emergence of open-source models such as Meta’s Llama. These models are built on a shared architecture, reveal the underlying codebases, and are pretty much transparent about the data being trained. So which way Enterprises would sway when it comes to embracing these foundation models? Open-sourced or licensed - which would really benefit enterprises in the long run. Various aspects related to performance, accuracy, ethics, explainability, and IP protection would enable stakeholders to decide whether to go with closed or open-sourced models. LLM or LMs LLM or LMs Large language models (LLMs) are known for their high performance, comprehensive understanding, and versatility. However, they are lavish energy spenders, which means only the largest companies have the funds to train and maintain energy-hungry models with billions of parameters. Could it be that these enterprises are better off adopting smaller language models that are comparatively energy-efficient,  cost-effective, and even privacy-friendly? Among these smaller models, domain-specific LM is fast getting traction because of the obvious advantages - you can run your small model on modest hardware yet build powerful customized models trained on proprietary data. Industries such as healthcare, legal, and finance could immensely benefit from these domain-specific smaller language models. Explainable AI or Black Box AI Explainable AI or Black Box AI Have you ever asked ChatGPT as to how it arrived at a decision? While the outputs of ChatGPT can be evaluated for their relevance and accuracy, the inner workings of how specific responses were generated were never transparent. This could be a challenge for enterprises when they work with LLMs as these models given their vast architecture with several layers of neurons, make it hard to trace the decision path. For any input, the model may not be able to tell how it arrived at a particular output.  This is what we call a Black Box AI. Again on this front, smaller language models (SLMs) are better poised to allow human users to comprehend and trust the results created by their algorithms. This explain ability provided by smaller language models can help developers ensure that the system is working as expected. SLMs may go even further to help enterprises meet regulatory standards. Don’t overlook the Enterprise layer Don’t overlook the Enterprise layer The enterprise layer is crucial to building successful Gen AI applications. Remember one can’t take the-box foundation models such as Open AI’s GPT or Anthopic’s Claude, and instantly create Gen AI applications for their enterprise. They have to manually build an enterprise orchestration layer that enables the infusion of Gen AI into their normal applications. Would organizations invest considerable resources into building this layer? This is where Enterprises must work with effective partners to create a customized business layer that truly connects enterprise applications with Gen AI models. ROI dilemma ROI dilemma Enterprise leaders emphasize that Gen AI offerings must demonstrate a clear business value proposition. But for a technology that is in its nascent stages, yet with tremendous transformative potential - how can enterprises measure value? Should organizations overlook ROI in the initial stages and instead focus on how Gen AI infuses innovation and helps them in strategic positioning and differentiation? Or should enterprises be shrewd enough to prioritize investing in areas that can bring easy wins, and gradually get into complex projects? Garbage in Garbage out Garbage in Garbage out The adage cannot be truer in the age of generative AI where the reliability of Gen AI output majorly depends on the quality of data being sent as input. How can organizations ensure the highest data quality standards when training Gen AI models? How seamless/difficult would it be for organizations to ensure that their custom AI abides and operates based on their internal data? generative AI This situation is further compounded when we realize that on average, organizations only capture 56% of the data they create. Even more alluding is that about 77% of the data collected is either obsolete or trivial. So, Organizations, if at all, if they wish for seamless large-scale Gen AI deployments, must thoroughly capture, classify, and clean data before feeding into their AI systems. Trust issues Trust issues On one side, enterprises are concerned about the accuracy of Gen AI outputs. On the other side, employees have an inherent fear of technology potentially replacing them or making their jobs obsolete. Together, this cumulative mistrust could pose a barrier to Gen AI enterprise adoption. But fortunately, these concerns have not stopped organizations from embracing Gen AI in their Pilots or small-scale experiments. But if these pilots are to be scaled, then organizations have to build trust in numerous dimensions across worker empathy, transparency, input/output quality, etc. Sophisticated Virtual Agents Sophisticated Virtual Agents Can Chatbots go all the way to completing the task apart from making sensible conversations? The ChatGPTs and Geminis have shown us how their question-and-answer systems can give rich contextualized answers. But can the chatbot help us complete a task altogether? For example, can it make reservations for us? Can it plan a trip or even book a ticket? The dawn of sophisticated virtual agents is not far and that would transform customer experience in ways never seen before. Ambiguous regulations Ambiguous regulations The ambiguity in the regulatory environment continues to prevail. However, the EU has taken a more conservative approach to AI-generated content. In Dec 2023, a provisional agreement on the Artificial Intelligence Act was reached, prohibiting indiscriminate scraping of images to create facial recognition databases, biometric categorization systems (with potential for discriminatory bias), "social scoring" systems, and the use of AI for social or economic manipulation. Because of the impending election, there is still time for America to decide on AI governance and security, but that could only do little to stop the stellar developments continuing to happen in the country. Yet organizations cannot afford to be complacent when it comes to implementing guardrails for trust and security. Shadow AI Shadow AI Shadow AI typically arises when a seemingly enthusiastic employee, in the desire to learn or complete an action through an AI application, feeds sensitive information to a public-facing model and thus exposes business secrets. In another case, the employee could train the model with copyrighted material, potentially exposing the company to legal consequences. Conclusion In conclusion, the potential benefits of Gen AI are immense, but realizing them requires a delicate balance of technological innovation, ethical considerations, and strategic foresight. As the technology matures, organizations must navigate these challenges proactively to harness Gen AI's power while mitigating risks. The road ahead is undoubtedly complex, but with careful planning and execution, enterprises can position themselves at the forefront of this transformative era.

Top 10 Enterprise Gen AI Dilemmas Confronting the C-suite

Elon Musk v OpenAI, Court Filing, retrieved on April 30, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part of this filing here. This part is 3 of 29. JURISDICTION, VENUE, AND DIVISIONAL ASSIGNMENT 32. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, as this is a civil case arising under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1965, Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1121, and Declaratory Judgment Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2201, and has supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367 because all claims herein form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. This Court also has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, as the matter in controversy well exceeds $75,000 in value and is between citizens of different states. 33. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that jurisdiction over Samuel Altman is proper because he is domiciled in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 34. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that jurisdiction over Gregory Brockman is proper because he is domiciled in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 35. Jurisdiction over OpenAI, Inc. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 36. Jurisdiction over OpenAI, L.P. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 37. Jurisdiction over OpenAI, L.L.C. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 38. Jurisdiction over OpenAI GP, L.L.C. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 39. Jurisdiction over OpenAI OpCo, LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 40. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Global, LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 41. Jurisdiction over OAI Corporation, LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 42. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Holdings, LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 43. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Investment LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 44. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund Management, LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 45. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund GP I, L.L.C. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 46. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund I, L.P. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 47. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV GP I, L.L.C. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 48. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV GP II, L.L.C. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 49. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV GP III, L.L.C. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 50. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV GP IV, L.L.C. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 51. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV I, L.P. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 52. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV II, L.P. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 53. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV III, L.P. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 54. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV IV, L.P. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 55. Jurisdiction over Aestas Management Company, LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 56. Jurisdiction over Aestas, LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 57. Upon information and belief, venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1) because all Defendants are residents of the State of California and at least one of the Defendants is a resident of this District, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) because a substantial part of the events giving rise to this action occurred in this District. 58. This action is properly assigned to the San Francisco Division of this District under Civil Local Rule 3-2(c) because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims occurred, and a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is situated, in San Francisco County, which is served by the San Francisco Division. Continue Reading Here. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved on August 05, 2024, deadline.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. Elon Musk v OpenAI, Court Filing, retrieved on April 30, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part of this filing here. This part is 3 of 29. Elon Musk v OpenAI, Court Filing, retrieved on April 30, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series . You can jump to any part of this filing here . This part is 3 of 29. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here JURISDICTION, VENUE, AND DIVISIONAL ASSIGNMENT 32. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, as this is a civil case arising under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1965, Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1121, and Declaratory Judgment Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2201, and has supplemental jurisdiction over all other claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367 because all claims herein form part of the same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution. This Court also has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, as the matter in controversy well exceeds $75,000 in value and is between citizens of different states. 33. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that jurisdiction over Samuel Altman is proper because he is domiciled in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 34. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that jurisdiction over Gregory Brockman is proper because he is domiciled in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 35. Jurisdiction over OpenAI, Inc. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 36. Jurisdiction over OpenAI, L.P. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 37. Jurisdiction over OpenAI, L.L.C. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 38. Jurisdiction over OpenAI GP, L.L.C. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 39. Jurisdiction over OpenAI OpCo, LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 40. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Global, LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 41. Jurisdiction over OAI Corporation, LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 42. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Holdings, LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 43. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Investment LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 44. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund Management, LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 45. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund GP I, L.L.C. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 46. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund I, L.P. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 47. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV GP I, L.L.C. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 48. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV GP II, L.L.C. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 49. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV GP III, L.L.C. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 50. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV GP IV, L.L.C. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 51. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV I, L.P. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 52. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV II, L.P. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 53. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV III, L.P. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 54. Jurisdiction over OpenAI Startup Fund SPV IV, L.P. is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 55. Jurisdiction over Aestas Management Company, LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 56. Jurisdiction over Aestas, LLC is proper because it has its principal place of business in the State of California and in this District, and because a substantial portion of the relevant acts complained of herein occurred in the State of California and in this District. 57. Upon information and belief, venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(1) because all Defendants are residents of the State of California and at least one of the Defendants is a resident of this District, and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) because a substantial part of the events giving rise to this action occurred in this District. 58. This action is properly assigned to the San Francisco Division of this District under Civil Local Rule 3-2(c) because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to Plaintiff’s claims occurred, and a substantial part of the property that is the subject of the action is situated, in San Francisco County, which is served by the San Francisco Division. Continue Reading Here. Continue Reading Here . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on August 05, 2024, deadline.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on August 05, 2024, deadline.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. deadline.com

Jurisdiction and Venue in Musk's OpenAI Suit 

By Nenad Zaric, Co-founder and CEO at Trickest Every industry generates massive amounts of data, which is now being used for better decision-making — tech giants understand this. For example, streaming powerhouse Netflix implements data analytics to study viewers’ visual preferences and adjusts content thumbnails to similar content its users have liked to increase viewership. The rise of AI is further influencing this trend, helping companies make sense of their datasets to uncover weaknesses and predict outcomes. However, these advancements are no longer exclusive to engineers, managers, and IT teams who grapple with data daily. This information is increasingly climbing the ladder and knocking on executive’s doors. In fact, one of today’s most pressing challenges for executives is data privacy concerns and cybersecurity. It has never been more important to make key decisions toward better data governance, and data skills are necessary to understand the specific risks and demands a company faces. So, reading reports an engineer crafted with dedicated software programs is no longer enough. A concerning report revealed that only half of C-suite executives were confident in their data literacy, and 45% made decisions based on their gut feeling instead of data-backed facts. Modern executives must have data skills to understand the flow of valuable data in their company and know how to make it work for them, not the other way around. From crucial decision-making to infusing data culture and enabling democratization, positive company changes stemming from data analysis must start at the top. Spot pain points in minutes, not days When a company decides to change directions, these choices begin at the executive level and trickle down to managers and workers — nothing new there. But, while an exceptional leader has always been crucial in driving change, it’s how they do it that is shifting. C-suite directors are in charge of crafting better strategy, financial performance, risk management, and corporate governance, and data is becoming increasingly connected to all of these activities. Imagine you’re meeting with the Head of Sales to discuss the sudden performance drop of a fan-favorite item in your online store. You can’t seem to connect the dots from the sales report you’ve received, and it becomes a hurdle to decode the issue. One skill that can help executives and department heads easily uncover patterns for weak performance is data visualization. Tableau, Microsoft Power BI, and Looker Studio are some of the most prominent data visualization tools. They are easily accessible from popular corporate programs (Salesforce, Office 365, and Google Studio) and help analyze massive amounts of data in visually appealing ways. While you don’t need to be a data scientist to use them, setting up and building charts requires certain data skills and tech acumen, or at least prior training. Whether from a data science and visualization course at Harvard, or self-taught online classes, a few hours and hands-on practice will be time well spent to hone your data visualization skills. With this newfound talent, you can aid and guide department leaders to the answers to their performance questions. In this case, you would pivot to the online sales data in the company database using visualization to track downtime and realize the fan-favorite item’s link has been down, leading to that drop in sales. Expertise in data visualization tools allows executives to stay ahead of the curve in every business vertical by quickly analyzing pain points and understanding what their verticals need. This leads to improved strategies and more accurate decision-making at a fraction of the time it takes to crunch vital datasets. KYC: Know Your Cybersecurity While data management isn’t an executive’s role in itself, knowing its ins and outs allows them to understand the company's successes and areas for improvement. When data increasingly plays a vital role in a business, ensuring that it is being properly managed and secured can save leaders major headaches in the future. Does your company practice master data management? Does it have an outdated data lake that’s slowing down processes? How is sensitive data access managed? These are governance questions investors, stakeholders, and partners might ask, and you must be ready to understand and navigate these concepts. Moreover, adopting good cybersecurity practices starts at the top — especially when 63% of security professionals say users with access to critical business data are their biggest data risk. Knowing the basics of cybersecurity and current trends not only allows top-level roles to mitigate risks from their end but also helps them foresee their IT teams’ needs, like allocating a budget for better endpoint security and enforcing staff training. Beyond courses and academic work, data governance and cybersecurity at a C-suite level are more easily learned through conversations with experts. You can resort to networking and approaching other industry leaders and even your own staff to gauge these concepts and what they mean for your company. As a result, instead of wrestling to understand the demands of security professionals, data-savvy executives will know when needs are pressing or if they can wait, making wiser and more objective business choices alongside their team leaders. Make data work for you — not the other way around There was a time when data was only one of many business assets, something you generate but store for audits or other compliance purposes. Those days are gone, especially as we move toward data-driven solutions that thrive primarily on how a company can implement data for other use cases. Data is no longer a stagnant asset — it can make you money if you derive the right value from it. Knowing the value of your data is only possible if you’re well-informed about it and know its potential. Executives with data skills will be able to take the lead and inject their data into better risk management strategies, extract customer data to improve marketing, and further implement it into AI tools to speed up business processes. Grasping these concepts also impacts the way you communicate with stakeholders. Expressing the importance of data security, governance, and even democratization for your company must come across as more than numbers and graphs — they wish to know the real value of these practices. By clearly explaining the importance of safeguarding data and placing it front and center of your operations, stakeholders will be on the same page about business decisions. Simply put, skipping the data-related courses will do nothing for future executives. In fact, nowadays, being able to run a successful company is directly linked to your data knowledge. So, prioritize these skills if you don’t have them, and make sure to pitch them as a worthwhile talent when climbing the ladder; they will be key to your success. By Nenad Zaric , Co-founder and CEO at Trickest Nenad Zaric Nenad Zaric Trickest Trickest Every industry generates massive amounts of data, which is now being used for better decision-making — tech giants understand this. For example, streaming powerhouse Netflix implements data analytics to study viewers’ visual preferences and adjusts content thumbnails to similar content its users have liked to increase viewership. Netflix Netflix The rise of AI is further influencing this trend, helping companies make sense of their datasets to uncover weaknesses and predict outcomes. However, these advancements are no longer exclusive to engineers, managers, and IT teams who grapple with data daily. This information is increasingly climbing the ladder and knocking on executive’s doors. In fact, one of today’s most pressing challenges for executives is data privacy concerns and cybersecurity . data privacy concerns and cybersecurity data privacy concerns and cybersecurity It has never been more important to make key decisions toward better data governance, and data skills are necessary to understand the specific risks and demands a company faces. So, reading reports an engineer crafted with dedicated software programs is no longer enough. A concerning report revealed that only half of C-suite executives were confident in their data literacy, and 45% made decisions based on their gut feeling instead of data-backed facts. only half of C-suite executives only half of C-suite executives Modern executives must have data skills to understand the flow of valuable data in their company and know how to make it work for them, not the other way around. From crucial decision-making to infusing data culture and enabling democratization, positive company changes stemming from data analysis must start at the top. Spot pain points in minutes, not days When a company decides to change directions, these choices begin at the executive level and trickle down to managers and workers — nothing new there. But, while an exceptional leader has always been crucial in driving change, it’s how they do it that is shifting. C-suite directors are in charge of crafting better strategy, financial performance, risk management, and corporate governance, and data is becoming increasingly connected to all of these activities. Imagine you’re meeting with the Head of Sales to discuss the sudden performance drop of a fan-favorite item in your online store. You can’t seem to connect the dots from the sales report you’ve received, and it becomes a hurdle to decode the issue. One skill that can help executives and department heads easily uncover patterns for weak performance is data visualization. Tableau, Microsoft Power BI, and Looker Studio are some of the most prominent data visualization tools. They are easily accessible from popular corporate programs (Salesforce, Office 365, and Google Studio) and help analyze massive amounts of data in visually appealing ways. While you don’t need to be a data scientist to use them, setting up and building charts requires certain data skills and tech acumen, or at least prior training. Whether from a data science and visualization course at Harvard, or self-taught online classes, a few hours and hands-on practice will be time well spent to hone your data visualization skills. With this newfound talent, you can aid and guide department leaders to the answers to their performance questions. In this case, you would pivot to the online sales data in the company database using visualization to track downtime and realize the fan-favorite item’s link has been down, leading to that drop in sales. Expertise in data visualization tools allows executives to stay ahead of the curve in every business vertical by quickly analyzing pain points and understanding what their verticals need. This leads to improved strategies and more accurate decision-making at a fraction of the time it takes to crunch vital datasets. KYC: Know Your Cybersecurity While data management isn’t an executive’s role in itself, knowing its ins and outs allows them to understand the company's successes and areas for improvement. When data increasingly plays a vital role in a business, ensuring that it is being properly managed and secured can save leaders major headaches in the future. Does your company practice master data management ? Does it have an outdated data lake that’s slowing down processes? How is sensitive data access managed? These are governance questions investors, stakeholders, and partners might ask, and you must be ready to understand and navigate these concepts. master data management master data management Moreover, adopting good cybersecurity practices starts at the top — especially when 63% of security professionals say users with access to critical business data are their biggest data risk. Knowing the basics of cybersecurity and current trends not only allows top-level roles to mitigate risks from their end but also helps them foresee their IT teams’ needs, like allocating a budget for better endpoint security and enforcing staff training. 63% 63% Beyond courses and academic work, data governance and cybersecurity at a C-suite level are more easily learned through conversations with experts. You can resort to networking and approaching other industry leaders and even your own staff to gauge these concepts and what they mean for your company. As a result, instead of wrestling to understand the demands of security professionals, data-savvy executives will know when needs are pressing or if they can wait, making wiser and more objective business choices alongside their team leaders. Make data work for you — not the other way around There was a time when data was only one of many business assets, something you generate but store for audits or other compliance purposes. Those days are gone, especially as we move toward data-driven solutions that thrive primarily on how a company can implement data for other use cases. Data is no longer a stagnant asset — it can make you money if you derive the right value from it. Knowing the value of your data is only possible if you’re well-informed about it and know its potential. Executives with data skills will be able to take the lead and inject their data into better risk management strategies, extract customer data to improve marketing, and further implement it into AI tools to speed up business processes. value of your data value of your data AI tools AI tools Grasping these concepts also impacts the way you communicate with stakeholders. Expressing the importance of data security, governance, and even democratization for your company must come across as more than numbers and graphs — they wish to know the real value of these practices. By clearly explaining the importance of safeguarding data and placing it front and center of your operations, stakeholders will be on the same page about business decisions. Simply put, skipping the data-related courses will do nothing for future executives. In fact, nowadays, being able to run a successful company is directly linked to your data knowledge. So, prioritize these skills if you don’t have them, and make sure to pitch them as a worthwhile talent when climbing the ladder; they will be key to your success.

Why C-Suite Executives Won’t Cut it Without Data Skills Anymore

কেন C-Suite এক্সিকিউটিভরা ডেটা দক্ষতা ছাড়া এটিকে আর কাটবে না

Warum Führungskräfte auf oberster Führungsebene ohne Datenkenntnisse nicht mehr weiterkommen

Por qué los ejecutivos de C-Suite ya no lo lograrán sin habilidades de datos

Pourquoi les cadres supérieurs ne réussiront plus sans compétences en données

सी-सूट के अधिकारी अब डेटा कौशल के बिना काम क्यों नहीं कर पाएंगे

経営幹部がデータスキルなしでは役に立たない理由

최고 경영진이 더 이상 데이터 기술 없이는 성공하지 못하는 이유

Por que os executivos C-Suite não vão mais trabalhar sem habilidades em dados

Почему руководители высшего звена больше не справятся без навыков работы с данными

Üst Düzey Yöneticiler Neden Artık Veri Becerileri Olmadan İşini Kesmiyor?

Tại sao các nhà điều hành C-Suite sẽ không làm việc nếu không có kỹ năng dữ liệu nữa

为什么高管们不再需要具备数据技能

UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Verizon Communications Inc., Court Filing, retrieved on January 29, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part of this filing here. This part is 4 of 11. PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR COPYRIGHTED SOUND RECORDINGS 16. Plaintiffs are the copyright owners of, and/or control exclusive rights with respect to, millions of sound recordings, including many recorded by some of the most prolific and well-known recording artists throughout the world. 17. Plaintiff UMG Recordings, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 2220 Colorado Avenue, Santa Monica, California 90404. 18. Plaintiff Capitol Records, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 2220 Colorado Avenue, Santa Monica, California 90404. 19. Plaintiff ABKCO Music & Records, Inc. is a New York corporation with its principal place of business at 85 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10003. 20. Plaintiff Asylum Records LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 21. Plaintiff Atlantic Recording Corporation is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 22. Plaintiff Atlantic Records Group LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 23. Plaintiff Bad Boy Records LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 24. Plaintiff Big Beat Records Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 25. Plaintiff Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 26. Plaintiff Elektra Entertainment LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 27. Plaintiff Fueled by Ramen LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 28. Plaintiff Lava Records LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 29. Plaintiff Maverick Recording Company is a California general partnership with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 30. Plaintiff Nonesuch Records Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 31. Plaintiff Rhino Entertainment Company is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 32. Plaintiff Rhino Entertainment LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 33. Plaintiff Roadrunner Records, Inc. is a New York corporation with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 34. Plaintiff Rykodisc, Inc. is a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 35. Plaintiff Warner Music Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 36. Plaintiff Warner Music International Services Limited is a limited liability company, organized and existing under the laws of England and Wales, with its principal place of business at 27 Wrights Lane, London, England. 37. Plaintiff Warner Music Latina Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 555 Washington Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida 33139. 38. Plaintiff Warner Music Nashville LLC is a Tennessee limited liability company with its principal place of business at 20 Music Square East, Nashville, Tennessee 37203. 39. Plaintiff Warner Records Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 40. Plaintiff Warner Records LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 41. Plaintiff Warner Records/QRI Venture, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 42. Plaintiff Warner Records/SIRE Ventures LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 43. Plaintiff Arista Music is a New York partnership with its principal place of business at 25 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10010 44. Plaintiff Arista Records, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 25 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10010. 45. Plaintiff LaFace Records, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 25 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10010. 46. Plaintiff Sony Music Entertainment is a Delaware general partnership, the partners of which are citizens of New York and Delaware. Sony Music Entertainment’s headquarters and principal place of business are located at 25 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10010. 47. Plaintiff Sony Music Entertainment US Latin LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 3390 Mary Street, Suite 220, Coconut Grove, Florida 33133. 48. Plaintiff Ultra Records, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 25 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10010. 49. Plaintiff Volcano Entertainment III, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 25 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10010. 50. Plaintiff Zomba Recording LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 25 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10010. 51. Plaintiffs own and/or control in whole or in part the copyrights and/or exclusive U.S. rights in innumerable popular sound recordings, including at the time of the infringements at issue here, and including the sound recordings listed on Exhibit A, which are illustrative and nonexhaustive. All of the sound recordings listed on Exhibit A have been registered with the U.S. Copyright Office or, for sound recordings fixed before February 15, 1972, identified on schedules filed with the U.S. Copyright Office pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 1401. Continue Reading Here. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved on July 12, 2024, storage.courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Verizon Communications Inc., Court Filing, retrieved on January 29, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part of this filing here. This part is 4 of 11. UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Verizon Communications Inc., Court Filing, retrieved on January 29, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series . You can jump to any part of this filing here . This part is 4 of 11. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here here PLAINTIFFS AND THEIR COPYRIGHTED SOUND RECORDINGS 16. Plaintiffs are the copyright owners of, and/or control exclusive rights with respect to, millions of sound recordings, including many recorded by some of the most prolific and well-known recording artists throughout the world. 17. Plaintiff UMG Recordings, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 2220 Colorado Avenue, Santa Monica, California 90404. 18. Plaintiff Capitol Records, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 2220 Colorado Avenue, Santa Monica, California 90404. 19. Plaintiff ABKCO Music & Records, Inc. is a New York corporation with its principal place of business at 85 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10003. 20. Plaintiff Asylum Records LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 21. Plaintiff Atlantic Recording Corporation is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 22. Plaintiff Atlantic Records Group LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 23. Plaintiff Bad Boy Records LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 24. Plaintiff Big Beat Records Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 25. Plaintiff Elektra Entertainment Group Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 26. Plaintiff Elektra Entertainment LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 27. Plaintiff Fueled by Ramen LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 28. Plaintiff Lava Records LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 29. Plaintiff Maverick Recording Company is a California general partnership with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 30. Plaintiff Nonesuch Records Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 31. Plaintiff Rhino Entertainment Company is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 32. Plaintiff Rhino Entertainment LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 33. Plaintiff Roadrunner Records, Inc. is a New York corporation with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 34. Plaintiff Rykodisc, Inc. is a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 35. Plaintiff Warner Music Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 36. Plaintiff Warner Music International Services Limited is a limited liability company, organized and existing under the laws of England and Wales, with its principal place of business at 27 Wrights Lane, London, England. 37. Plaintiff Warner Music Latina Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 555 Washington Avenue, Miami Beach, Florida 33139. 38. Plaintiff Warner Music Nashville LLC is a Tennessee limited liability company with its principal place of business at 20 Music Square East, Nashville, Tennessee 37203. 39. Plaintiff Warner Records Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 40. Plaintiff Warner Records LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 41. Plaintiff Warner Records/QRI Venture, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business at 777 S. Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90021. 42. Plaintiff Warner Records/SIRE Ventures LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 1633 Broadway, New York, New York 10019. 43. Plaintiff Arista Music is a New York partnership with its principal place of business at 25 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10010 44. Plaintiff Arista Records, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 25 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10010. 45. Plaintiff LaFace Records, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 25 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10010. 46. Plaintiff Sony Music Entertainment is a Delaware general partnership, the partners of which are citizens of New York and Delaware. Sony Music Entertainment’s headquarters and principal place of business are located at 25 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10010. 47. Plaintiff Sony Music Entertainment US Latin LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 3390 Mary Street, Suite 220, Coconut Grove, Florida 33133. 48. Plaintiff Ultra Records, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 25 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10010. 49. Plaintiff Volcano Entertainment III, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 25 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10010. 50. Plaintiff Zomba Recording LLC is a Delaware limited liability company with its principal place of business at 25 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10010. 51. Plaintiffs own and/or control in whole or in part the copyrights and/or exclusive U.S. rights in innumerable popular sound recordings, including at the time of the infringements at issue here, and including the sound recordings listed on Exhibit A, which are illustrative and nonexhaustive. All of the sound recordings listed on Exhibit A have been registered with the U.S. Copyright Office or, for sound recordings fixed before February 15, 1972, identified on schedules filed with the U.S. Copyright Office pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 1401. Continue Reading Here. Continue Reading Here . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on July 12, 2024, storage.courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on July 12, 2024, storage.courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. storage.courtlistener

Universal Music, Warner, Sony Among Plaintiffs in Verizon Copyright Suit

UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Verizon Communications Inc., Court Filing, retrieved on January 29, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part of this filing here. This part is 3 of 11. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 11. This is a civil action in which Plaintiffs seek damages for copyright infringement under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq., and the Music Modernization Act, 17 U.S.C. § 1401. 12. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ copyright infringement claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). 13. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Verizon pursuant to New York Civil Practice Law and Rule (“CPLR”) 301. Verizon’s official headquarters and Board of Directors are located in New York, it has consented to jurisdiction in the state in a tolling agreement entered into between the parties, and it has pervasive corporate ties to the state that are sufficient to justify the imposition of general jurisdiction here. 14. This Court also has personal jurisdiction over Verizon pursuant to CPLR 302. Verizon transacts business within New York to supply Internet service to customers in this state. In addition, Verizon has deliberately exploited the New York market, establishing network operations in this district, selling its services to New York residents, and advertising its Internet service to potential subscribers in the state. Verizon has committed tortious acts within New York, including providing Internet service to New York subscribers who used Verizon’s network to directly and repeatedly infringe Plaintiffs’ copyrights; continuing to provide Internet service to, and failing to suspend or terminate the accounts of, New York customers, even after receiving multiple notices of their infringing activity; advertising its high-speed Internet service in New York to serve as a draw for subscribers who sought faster download speeds to facilitate their direct and repeated infringements; and/or responding or failing to respond to repeated notices of copyright infringement directed to infringing subscribers located in the state. Verizon also has caused injury to Plaintiffs in this state by allowing its customers to use Verizon’s network to systematically infringe Plaintiffs’ copyrights, all while deriving billions of dollars in revenue (including over $130 billion in 2023 alone)[1] from interstate commerce. 15. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400. Continue Reading Here. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.
This court case retrieved on July 12, 2024, storage.courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. Lead image by Marques Thomas on Unsplash [1] Verizon Communications Inc., Form 10-K (Feb. 9, 2024), available at https://quotes.quotemedia.com/data/downloadFiling?webmasterId=104600&ref=318048243&ty pe=HTML&formType=424B2&formDescription=Prospectus+%5BRule+424%28b%29%282%2 9%5D&dateFiled=2024-06-17&cik=0000732712. UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Verizon Communications Inc., Court Filing, retrieved on January 29, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part of this filing here. This part is 3 of 11. UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Verizon Communications Inc., Court Filing, retrieved on January 29, 2024, is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series . You can jump to any part of this filing here . This part is 3 of 11. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here here JURISDICTION AND VENUE 11. This is a civil action in which Plaintiffs seek damages for copyright infringement under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq., and the Music Modernization Act, 17 U.S.C. § 1401. 12. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction over Plaintiffs’ copyright infringement claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). 13. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Verizon pursuant to New York Civil Practice Law and Rule (“CPLR”) 301. Verizon’s official headquarters and Board of Directors are located in New York, it has consented to jurisdiction in the state in a tolling agreement entered into between the parties, and it has pervasive corporate ties to the state that are sufficient to justify the imposition of general jurisdiction here. 14. This Court also has personal jurisdiction over Verizon pursuant to CPLR 302. Verizon transacts business within New York to supply Internet service to customers in this state. In addition, Verizon has deliberately exploited the New York market, establishing network operations in this district, selling its services to New York residents, and advertising its Internet service to potential subscribers in the state. Verizon has committed tortious acts within New York, including providing Internet service to New York subscribers who used Verizon’s network to directly and repeatedly infringe Plaintiffs’ copyrights; continuing to provide Internet service to, and failing to suspend or terminate the accounts of, New York customers, even after receiving multiple notices of their infringing activity; advertising its high-speed Internet service in New York to serve as a draw for subscribers who sought faster download speeds to facilitate their direct and repeated infringements; and/or responding or failing to respond to repeated notices of copyright infringement directed to infringing subscribers located in the state. Verizon also has caused injury to Plaintiffs in this state by allowing its customers to use Verizon’s network to systematically infringe Plaintiffs’ copyrights, all while deriving billions of dollars in revenue (including over $130 billion in 2023 alone)[1] from interstate commerce. 15. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1400. Continue Reading Here. Continue Reading Here . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on July 12, 2024, storage.courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on July 12, 2024, storage.courtlistener is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. storage.courtlistener Lead image by Marques Thomas on Unsplash Lead image by Marques Thomas on Unsplash Marques Thomas on Unsplash [1] Verizon Communications Inc., Form 10-K (Feb. 9, 2024), available at https://quotes.quotemedia.com/data/downloadFiling?webmasterId=104600&ref=318048243&ty pe=HTML&formType=424B2&formDescription=Prospectus+%5BRule+424%28b%29%282%2 9%5D&dateFiled=2024-06-17&cik=0000732712.

Verizon's New York Ties Come into Play in UMG's Copyright Infringement Suit

Integration with blockchain still remains a mystery for many engineers, even for those who might be familiar with it as end users. While smart contract development often attracts most of the attention and coverage in technical write-ups, developers are often left to their own devices when it comes to figuring out how to integrate blockchain technology with the rest of their application. The Casper Ecosystem thankfully offers solutions that eliminate  problems around getting started and deploying live dApps on Casper in one complementary product suite, making it one of the most developer-friendly blockchain ecosystems. Developed by MAKE and granted by Casper Association, CSPR.click, CSPR.cloud and CSPR.build address user interactions with the blockchain and provide tools to read and observe the network activity in real time. ** ** CSPR.click elegantly solves the end user authentication problem by welcoming users with a familiar-looking Single-Sign-On experience where they can connect to any Casper-enabled application using their preferred wallet. Users who are entirely new to the blockchain can enjoy a smooth onboarding experience by using self-custodial wallets linked to social logins, their email address or cell phone number. When it comes to being able to pay for contract calls, integration with multiple on-ramps guarantees that all users will be able to obtain tokens quickly and easily, regardless of their geographical region. Developers can quick-start their CSPR.click integration, and complete customization is also possible using the lower-level SDK. Mobile Casper Wallet is automatically supported, making your Casper-enabled application truly cross-platform out of the gate. Most developers, regardless of their prior experience with blockchain integrations, can bootstrap a functional front-end application with CSPR.click in a matter of minutes. REST APIs, WebSockets and Node RPC with CSPR.cloud Applications, including those integrated using CSPR.click, can rely on CSPR.cloud to observe on-chain activity on the Casper Network. CSPR.cloud is an enterprise-grade middleware platform that can be used separately from CSPR.click, and equips developers with highly available and scalable REST APIs that provide low-latency access to normalized and indexed blockchain data, fungible and non-fungible token activity, historical pricing data, and related off-chain metadata. Real-time WebSocket streams make it possible to granularly subscribe to the data you are interested in, allowing your application to react immediately whenever your smart contracts emit an event or when an on-chain entity you observe changes its state. Both the REST API and the Real-time WebSocket streams rely entirely on widely used internet standards, making it exceedingly easy to integrate with existing and new applications without the need to know or learn any new technologies. This unlocks Casper blockchain development to the tens of millions of software engineers at businesses and enterprises who’ve never  interacted with a blockchain before.  And for those applications that need direct access to the native Casper Node RPC API, CSPR.cloud provides a cache-enabled, high-performance and highly-available managed node infrastructure for maximally performant access without the associated overhead. Both CSPR.click and CSPR.cloud come with comprehensive documentation and examples. Developers can start building on the Casper network with CSPR.click and CSPR.cloud by registering on CSPR.build and generating their access keys for instant access. Casper is Solving Real World Problems For Builders In most environments, to be able to interact with smart contracts, end users must possess blockchain accounts with sufficient token balances to cover smart contract execution costs. Getting users through the process of creating and managing private and public keys, keeping their recovery phrases safe, as well as funding their accounts with tokens, already represents a serious UX challenge. And this corresponds to a significant bounce rate of new users, and lower retention of existing ones. For developers, the underlying technical integration with multiple crypto wallets and fiat on-ramps adds another layer of complexity, demanding considerable initial engineering effort and time, as well as ongoing maintenance and up-keep with ever- and rapidly evolving standards, regulatory constraints, APIs and SDKs of third party wallet and on-ramp providers. CSPR.click solves all this for application developers. Casper also helps developers address that smart contracts are executed on-chain asynchronously, i.e. the end user submits a transaction to the network, the transaction gets processed when a new block is created, and that results in a change of state. Applications must constantly monitor network activity to properly respond to the contract logic and any state changes it may produce that are relevant to their overall application. This requires not only an in-depth understanding of how the blockchain works but also a reliable and scalable infrastructure. While theoretically, the application can connect to any public node, in practice, the reliability of these nodes remains uncertain. A serious application or business will certainly not want to rely on just any public node, without assured redundancy, maintenance, uptime and disaster recovery processes in place, and without dedicated domain experts to ensure their application always runs smoothly. The suite of building tools in CSPR.build, CSPR.click and CSPR.cloud ensures developers do not have to worry about the integration process, and can exclusively focus on their creativity and core business. Build with Casper by registering on CSPR.build and generate your access keys for instant access. This story was distributed as a release by Btcwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here. Integration with blockchain still remains a mystery for many engineers, even for those who might be familiar with it as end users. While smart contract development often attracts most of the attention and coverage in technical write-ups, developers are often left to their own devices when it comes to figuring out how to integrate blockchain technology with the rest of their application. The Casper Ecosystem thankfully offers solutions that eliminate  problems around getting started and deploying live dApps on Casper in one complementary product suite, making it one of the most developer-friendly blockchain ecosystems. Developed by MAKE and granted by Casper Association, CSPR.click, CSPR.cloud and CSPR.build address user interactions with the blockchain and provide tools to read and observe the network activity in real time. MAKE MAKE ** ** CSPR.click elegantly solves the end user authentication problem by welcoming users with a familiar-looking Single-Sign-On experience where they can connect to any Casper-enabled application using their preferred wallet. CSPR.click CSPR.click Users who are entirely new to the blockchain can enjoy a smooth onboarding experience by using self-custodial wallets linked to social logins, their email address or cell phone number. When it comes to being able to pay for contract calls, integration with multiple on-ramps guarantees that all users will be able to obtain tokens quickly and easily, regardless of their geographical region. Developers can quick-start their CSPR.click integration, and complete customization is also possible using the lower-level SDK . Mobile Casper Wallet is automatically supported, making your Casper-enabled application truly cross-platform out of the gate. Most developers, regardless of their prior experience with blockchain integrations, can bootstrap a functional front-end application with CSPR.click in a matter of minutes. quick-start quick-start lower-level SDK lower-level SDK REST APIs, WebSockets and Node RPC with CSPR.cloud Applications, including those integrated using CSPR.click, can rely on CSPR.cloud to observe on-chain activity on the Casper Network. CSPR.cloud is an enterprise-grade middleware platform that can be used separately from CSPR.click, and equips developers with highly available and scalable REST APIs that provide low-latency access to normalized and indexed blockchain data, fungible and non-fungible token activity, historical pricing data, and related off-chain metadata. CSPR.cloud CSPR.cloud REST APIs REST APIs Real-time WebSocket streams make it possible to granularly subscribe to the data you are interested in, allowing your application to react immediately whenever your smart contracts emit an event or when an on-chain entity you observe changes its state. Both the REST API and the Real-time WebSocket streams rely entirely on widely used internet standards, making it exceedingly easy to integrate with existing and new applications without the need to know or learn any new technologies. Real-time WebSocket streams Real-time WebSocket streams This unlocks Casper blockchain development to the tens of millions of software engineers at businesses and enterprises who’ve never  interacted with a blockchain before.  And for those applications that need direct access to the native Casper Node RPC API, CSPR.cloud provides a cache-enabled, high-performance and highly-available managed node infrastructure for maximally performant access without the associated overhead. node infrastructure node infrastructure Both CSPR.click and CSPR.cloud come with comprehensive documentation and examples. Developers can start building on the Casper network with CSPR.click and CSPR.cloud by registering on CSPR.build and generating their access keys for instant access. registering on CSPR.build registering on CSPR.build Casper is Solving Real World Problems For Builders In most environments, to be able to interact with smart contracts, end users must possess blockchain accounts with sufficient token balances to cover smart contract execution costs. Getting users through the process of creating and managing private and public keys, keeping their recovery phrases safe, as well as funding their accounts with tokens, already represents a serious UX challenge. And this corresponds to a significant bounce rate of new users, and lower retention of existing ones. For developers, the underlying technical integration with multiple crypto wallets and fiat on-ramps adds another layer of complexity, demanding considerable initial engineering effort and time, as well as ongoing maintenance and up-keep with ever- and rapidly evolving standards, regulatory constraints, APIs and SDKs of third party wallet and on-ramp providers. CSPR.click solves all this for application developers. Casper also helps developers address that smart contracts are executed on-chain asynchronously, i.e. the end user submits a transaction to the network, the transaction gets processed when a new block is created, and that results in a change of state. Applications must constantly monitor network activity to properly respond to the contract logic and any state changes it may produce that are relevant to their overall application. This requires not only an in-depth understanding of how the blockchain works but also a reliable and scalable infrastructure. While theoretically, the application can connect to any public node, in practice, the reliability of these nodes remains uncertain. A serious application or business will certainly not want to rely on just any public node, without assured redundancy, maintenance, uptime and disaster recovery processes in place, and without dedicated domain experts to ensure their application always runs smoothly. The suite of building tools in CSPR.build, CSPR.click and CSPR.cloud ensures developers do not have to worry about the integration process, and can exclusively focus on their creativity and core business. Build with Casper by registering on CSPR.build and generate your access keys for instant access. registering on CSPR.build registering on CSPR.build This story was distributed as a release by Btcwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here. This story was distributed as a release by Btcwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here . here here

Casper Blockchain Lightning Fast dApp Deployment With The CSPR.build Suite

How to Build and Deploy a Decentralized Crowdfunding Smart Contract on the Linea Blockchain

Running Cisco pyATS on Windows 11 Really Helped Me Brush Up My Python Fundamentals

Stories, News & Mentions about SUVIT

Suvit’s Stories on HackerNoon