Sellrs

sellrs

MONACO CITY, Monaco, June 21st, 2024/Chainwire/--Memereum(MEME)sold over 1 million tokens within hours of its presale, reaching a total of over 24 million tokens sold in its current presale phase. The team views this rapid progress as an indication of strong market demand and confidence in Memereum. Innovative Features of Memereum Upon launch, Memereum will introduce MemeSwap, the first decentralized insured exchange. A beta version of MemeSwap is currently live and accessible on their website. This platform aims to provide a secure trading environment, leveraging decentralized insurance mechanisms to protect users' investments. MemeSwap aspires to enhance security and user confidence in the crypto exchange market. Staking Rewards Program Memereum includes an automatic staking system with a 183% annual percentage yield (APY). This yield aims to attract participants by providing notable rewards, positioning Memereum as an option for those interested in exploring new opportunities in the crypto space. Memereum Presale With the current presale price set at $0.04 and the launch price anticipated by the team to be $0.45, Memereum offers an opportunity for early investors to enter at a low price with the potential for returns. The presale structure includes a strategic price increase every 72 hours, aiming to encourage early participation. Market Presence Already listed on three exchanges ( BitVenus, Toobit, and Azbit), Memereum is poised to make a significant impact in the cryptocurrency market. Memereum's ability to sell over 1 million tokens within hours of its presale launch marks a significant achievement and highlights its potential in the cryptocurrency market. Conclusion As the cryptocurrency market continues to recover, Memereum is strategically positioned to benefit from this momentum. The next few months are crucial as Memereum executes its plans and builds on its early achievements. With a dedicated team, robust community support, and a clear vision, Memereum aims to make a lasting impact in decentralized finance. For more details on how to participate in Memereum’s ongoing presale, users can visit Memereum’s website. About Memereum (MEME) The strong interest in Memereum (MEME) can be attributed to its innovative approach in the blockchain sector and its growing community support. Memereum is the first blockchain insurance with an integrated DEX for supported token trading. Learn more about Memereum by clicking here. Contact Bessie Cooper Memereum support@memereum.net This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here, MONACO CITY, Monaco, June 21st, 2024/Chainwire/--Memereum(MEME)sold over 1 million tokens within hours of its presale, reaching a total of over 24 million tokens sold in its current presale phase. The team views this rapid progress as an indication of strong market demand and confidence in Memereum. Innovative Features of Memereum Upon launch, Memereum will introduce MemeSwap , the first decentralized insured exchange. A beta version of MemeSwap is currently live and accessible on their website. This platform aims to provide a secure trading environment, leveraging decentralized insurance mechanisms to protect users' investments. MemeSwap aspires to enhance security and user confidence in the crypto exchange market. MemeSwap MemeSwap decentralized insurance decentralized insurance Staking Rewards Program Memereum includes an automatic staking system with a 183% annual percentage yield (APY). This yield aims to attract participants by providing notable rewards, positioning Memereum as an option for those interested in exploring new opportunities in the crypto space. Memereum Memereum Memereum Presale With the current presale price set at $0.04 and the launch price anticipated by the team to be $0.45, Memereum offers an opportunity for early investors to enter at a low price with the potential for returns. The presale structure includes a strategic price increase every 72 hours, aiming to encourage early participation. presale presale Market Presence Already listed on three exchanges ( BitVenus , Toobit , and Azbit ), Memereum is poised to make a significant impact in the cryptocurrency market. Memereum's ability to sell over 1 million tokens within hours of its presale launch marks a significant achievement and highlights its potential in the cryptocurrency market. BitVenus BitVenus Toobit Toobit Azbit Azbit Conclusion As the cryptocurrency market continues to recover, Memereum is strategically positioned to benefit from this momentum. The next few months are crucial as Memereum executes its plans and builds on its early achievements. With a dedicated team, robust community support, and a clear vision, Memereum aims to make a lasting impact in decentralized finance. For more details on how to participate in Memereum’s ongoing presale, users can visit Memereum’s website . website website About Memereum (MEME) The strong interest in Memereum (MEME) can be attributed to its innovative approach in the blockchain sector and its growing community support. Memereum is the first blockchain insurance with an integrated DEX for supported token trading. Learn more about Memereum by clicking here. Memereum (MEME) Memereum (MEME) clicking here. clicking here. Contact Bessie Cooper Memereum support@memereum.net This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here, This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here , here

Memereum Sells Over 1M Tokens Within Hours On Presale While Markets Rebound

MONACO CITY, Monaco, June 18th, 2024/Chainwire/--Memereum (MEME), a new altcoin, has demonstrated notable performance during its initial coin offering (ICO) presale, selling over 23 million tokens and nearing the 24 million mark. The project has attracted more than 8,000 users to its platform, while the Ethereum challenger Solana remains below the $150 price level. The pre-sale began at $0.01 and by a strategic move by the team, is now at $0.039. Those who invested in Memereum at the beginning have seen their investments grow almost 400%. Memereum's appeal stems from its unique position as the first blockchain insurance with its own insured decentralized exchange, MemeSwap. Memereum (MEME) is currently priced at $0.039 but will launch at $0.45 on BitVenus, Toobit, Azbit, and MemeSwap, more than 10 times its original price. The Memereum ICO also offers automatic 183% APY staking for holders and free airdrop competitions. Solana (SOL): Analysts Predict a Potential Rise To $215 Solana (SOL), one of the top altcoins in the crypto market, is experiencing mixed sentiment on the price chart, remaining under the $150 mark. According to CoinMarketCap, Solana has recorded losses of 9.71% on the weekly chart and shown losses of 14.65% on the monthly chart. Despite the mixed sentiment, some predict Solana's price could rise to $215 in the coming weeks. Furthermore, Solana aims to carve out its niche in the digital asset space and establish itself as a rival to Ethereum. About Memereum (MEME) Strong interest in Memereum (MEME) can be attributed to its innovative approach in the blockchain sector and growing community support. Similarly, Solana is currently experiencing mixed market sentiment but continues to participate in the market actively. Users can click here to join Memereum's ongoing presale. Contact Bessie Cooper Memereum support@memereum.net This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here. MONACO CITY, Monaco, June 18th, 2024/Chainwire/--Memereum (MEME), a new altcoin, has demonstrated notable performance during its initial coin offering (ICO) presale, selling over 23 million tokens and nearing the 24 million mark. The project has attracted more than 8,000 users to its platform, while the Ethereum challenger Solana remains below the $150 price level. The pre-sale began at $0.01 and by a strategic move by the team, is now at $0.039. Those who invested in Memereum at the beginning have seen their investments grow almost 400%. Memereum's appeal stems from its unique position as the first blockchain insurance with its own insured decentralized exchange, MemeSwap. Memereum (MEME) is currently priced at $0.039 but will launch at $0.45 on BitVenus, Toobit, Azbit, and MemeSwap, more than 10 times its original price. The Memereum ICO also offers automatic 183% APY staking for holders and free airdrop competitions. Solana (SOL): Analysts Predict a Potential Rise To $215 Solana (SOL), one of the top altcoins in the crypto market, is experiencing mixed sentiment on the price chart, remaining under the $150 mark. According to CoinMarketCap, Solana has recorded losses of 9.71% on the weekly chart and shown losses of 14.65% on the monthly chart. Despite the mixed sentiment, some predict Solana's price could rise to $215 in the coming weeks. Furthermore, Solana aims to carve out its niche in the digital asset space and establish itself as a rival to Ethereum. About Memereum (MEME) Strong interest in Memereum (MEME) can be attributed to its innovative approach in the blockchain sector and growing community support. Similarly, Solana is currently experiencing mixed market sentiment but continues to participate in the market actively. Users can click here to join Memereum's ongoing presale. Contact Bessie Cooper Memereum support@memereum.net This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here. This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here . here

Memereum Sells Over 23 Million Tokens In Presale As SOL Stabilizes Below $150

SOL $150 এর নিচে স্থিতিশীল হওয়ায় Memereum প্রেসালে 23 মিলিয়নেরও বেশি টোকেন বিক্রি করে

Memereum verkauft über 23 Millionen Token im Vorverkauf, während sich SOL unter 150 USD stabilisiert

Memereum vende más de 23 millones de tokens en preventa mientras SOL se estabiliza por debajo de $ 150

Memereum vend plus de 23 millions de jetons en prévente alors que SOL se stabilise en dessous de 150 $

मेमेरेम ने प्री-सेल में 23 मिलियन से अधिक टोकन बेचे, जबकि एसओएल 150 डॉलर से नीचे स्थिर हुआ

Memereum はプレセールで 2,300 万以上のトークンを販売、SOL は 150 ドル以下で安定

Memereum은 SOL이 $150 미만으로 안정화됨에 따라 사전 판매에서 2,300만 개 이상의 토큰을 판매합니다.

Memereum vende mais de 23 milhões de tokens em pré-venda enquanto SOL se estabiliza abaixo de US$ 150

Memereum продает более 23 миллионов токенов в предпродаже, поскольку SOL стабилизируется ниже $150

Memereum, SOL'un 150 Doların Altında Sabitlenmesiyle Ön Satışta 23 Milyondan Fazla Token Sattı

Memereum bán hơn 23 triệu token trong đợt bán trước khi SOL ổn định dưới 150 đô la

Memereum 在预售中售出超过 2300 万个代币，SOL 价格稳定在 150 美元以下

**MAJURO, Marshall Islands, May 27th, 2024/Chainwire/--**Multipool, a leading innovator in the blockchain and cryptocurrency industry, concludes its Fjord Foundry LBP with a sell out of all 5 million tokens. With the close of the LBP, Multipool launched their native token, $MUL, on Uniswap V3 today with a market cap of $13M. $MUL on Uniswap. “The LBP has come to a close and we’ve sold out all 5 million tokens. With the close of the LBP, we’ve now launched $MUL on Uniswap V3. A big thanks goes out to the Multipool community and Fjord Foundry for such a successful LBP. ” Steven Murray, a Core Contributor at Multipool. Following on from a successful over-subscribed LBP, $MUL launched today on Uniswap, giving enthusiasts who missed the LBP the chance to trade $MUL on Uniswap. For participants who took part in the LBP, their tokens can now be claimed on Fjord Foundry. Users can review the details here - app.fjordfoundry.com. To learn more about Multipool and its features, users can visit Multipool's Website - www.multipool.finance Telegram - t.me/multipoolfi X - www.x.com/multipoolfi About Multipool Multipool is a cutting-edge decentralized exchange (DEX) transforming the trading landscape for real-world assets (RWAs) and cryptocurrencies. Multipool is designed for fairness and equality, featuring a fully decentralized on-chain order book, deep liquidity through dynamic bracket pools, and seamless trading of RWAs and cryptocurrencies. Utilizing world-class innovations including industry-first FIX APIs, low latency networks, zero price impact auctions, trustless RFQs, peer-to-peer repo lending, and MEV bot protection, Multipool sets a new standard in DeFi trading. Experience unparalleled efficiency and security in your trading journey with Multipool – The DEX with CEX appeal. https://www.multipool.finance/ Multipool is the source of this content. This Press Release is for informational purposes only. The information does not constitute investment advice or an offer to invest. Contact Public Relations Manager Angie Hermosa Multipool press@multipool.finance This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here. **MAJURO, Marshall Islands, May 27th, 2024/Chainwire/--**Multipool, a leading innovator in the blockchain and cryptocurrency industry, concludes its Fjord Foundry LBP with a sell out of all 5 million tokens. With the close of the LBP, Multipool launched their native token, $MUL, on Uniswap V3 today with a market cap of $13M. $MUL on Uniswap. “The LBP has come to a close and we’ve sold out all 5 million tokens. With the close of the LBP, we’ve now launched $MUL on Uniswap V3. A big thanks goes out to the Multipool community and Fjord Foundry for such a successful LBP. ” Steven Murray, a Core Contributor at Multipool. “The LBP has come to a close and we’ve sold out all 5 million tokens. With the close of the LBP, we’ve now launched $MUL on Uniswap V3. A big thanks goes out to the Multipool community and Fjord Foundry for such a successful LBP. ” Steven Murray, a Core Contributor at Multipool. Following on from a successful over-subscribed LBP, $MUL launched today on Uniswap, giving enthusiasts who missed the LBP the chance to trade $MUL on Uniswap. For participants who took part in the LBP, their tokens can now be claimed on Fjord Foundry. Users can review the details here - app.fjordfoundry.com. To learn more about Multipool and its features, users can visit Multipool's app.fjordfoundry.com . app.fjordfoundry.com Website - www.multipool.finance www.multipool.finance www.multipool.finance Telegram - t.me/multipoolfi t.me/multipoolfi t.me/multipoolfi X - www.x.com/multipoolfi www.x.com/multipoolfi www.x.com/multipoolfi About Multipool Multipool is a cutting-edge decentralized exchange (DEX) transforming the trading landscape for real-world assets (RWAs) and cryptocurrencies. Multipool is designed for fairness and equality, featuring a fully decentralized on-chain order book, deep liquidity through dynamic bracket pools, and seamless trading of RWAs and cryptocurrencies. Utilizing world-class innovations including industry-first FIX APIs, low latency networks, zero price impact auctions, trustless RFQs, peer-to-peer repo lending, and MEV bot protection, Multipool sets a new standard in DeFi trading. Experience unparalleled efficiency and security in your trading journey with Multipool – The DEX with CEX appeal. https://www.multipool.finance/ https://www.multipool.finance/ https://www.multipool.finance/ Multipool is the source of this content. This Press Release is for informational purposes only. The information does not constitute investment advice or an offer to invest. Contact Public Relations Manager Angie Hermosa Multipool press@multipool.finance This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here. This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here . here here

Multipool Sells Out Fjord Foundry LBP

মাল্টিপুল Fjord ফাউন্ড্রি LBP বিক্রি করে

Multipool verkauft Fjord Foundry LBP

Multipool vende Fjord Foundry LBP

Multipool vend le LBP de Fjord Foundry

मल्टीपूल ने फजॉर्ड फाउंड्री एलबीपी को बेच दिया

マルチプールがフィヨルドファウンドリーLBPを売却

Multipool, Fjord Foundry LBP 매각

Multipool продает Fjord Foundry LBP

Multipool Fjord Foundry LBP'yi Satıyor

Multipool bán hết Fjord Foundry LBP

Multipool 售罄 Fjord Foundry LBP

Story written using the unofficial Axios Template. Featuring image generated via DALLE prompt: typical apple customer with a vision pro on a couch next to a typical facebook customer with an oculus headset on. above their heads in a shared/mixed reality world, they fight. The lead: Reality Labs, the VR subsidiary of Meta and makers of the Oculus headset, passed $1B in Q4 Revenue, according to Meta’s earning call. Zuck said, “I expect (Quest 3) to continue to be the most popular mixed reality device.” Why it matters: Meta paid $2-ish billion for Oculus / Reality Labs when it had $23M in yearly revenue. That’s 87X yearly revenue. And now ten-ish years later, here it is as $4B+ yearly revenue business. Not only do these revenue numbers show that early adopters are ready and willing to pay for a premium mixed reality interface, but also once again shows it’s hard to bet against Zuckerberg.  He consistently guesses what market will grow, buys the emerging startup in that space, and throws them into the Facebook growth engine. Flashback: CNN’s Brandon Griggs wrote: “How is this awkward marriage going to work? Maybe it won’t: Facebook moms and Millennial gamers are an uneasy mix.” Driving the news: The Apple Vision Pro also came out this week, and I’m sure folks at Apple believe it will in fact become the most popular mixed reality device. Some of the best reviews are by MKBHD, Casey,  and of course, by The Simpsons 8 years ago. Will people wear these in public? To combat this isolated astronaut vibe, Meta teamed up with Ray Ban to also offer smart glasses - as the Vision Pro evolves, I think there could be versions that look more and more like sun glasses, or we as a society may just learn to accept our fate as a heavily goggled people. Reality check: At $4k each, Apple will need to sell 1M units to reach the $4M in yearly revenue, Reality Labs 4th quarter revenue rate. In the first ten days, they sold 200k units. And Apple’s already built the infrastructure of 520 premium physical stories to distribute these devices about as fast as they can make them around the world, but am unsure how much that will matter in the future of hardware device sales. The mixed reality headset wars are on! Just think of how much money there is to be made on unique chargers! The big picture: When it comes to these mixed reality headsets, what use cases will drive adoption? Meta’s steered into gaming, and now Apple’s steering into productivity. But both want to sell on this is just a cool fucking device with the earliest access to computing’s next interface. And no one truly knows what use case will drive market share until it does. What they’re saying: Ma.tt Mullenweg blogged three paragraphs detailing a rough first experience and onboarding with the Apple Vision Pro  before concluding: “Just like I learned to type I think I’m going to need to learn to become fluent in this new interaction paradigm. I did have a before and after feeling, like the world had shifted, not unlike when you saw the first iPod or iPhone.” Be smart: Screens are not essential to the internet. We’ve been raised on them, through them we interacted with the cloud of information. Maybe it’s not flat. Maybe it’s a goggle. Maybe it’s a Google. Maybe it’s an Apple. Maybe it’s this Meta. Are you reading this from your mixed reality headset? Probably not yet. Write your own Axios Style story [template]. Story written using the unofficial Axios Template. Featuring image generated via DALLE prompt: typical apple customer with a vision pro on a couch next to a typical facebook customer with an oculus headset on. above their heads in a shared/mixed reality world, they fight. Story written using the unofficial Axios Template . Featuring image generated via DALLE prompt: typical apple customer with a vision pro on a couch next to a typical facebook customer with an oculus headset on. above their heads in a shared/mixed reality world, they fight. Story written using the unofficial Axios Template The lead: The lead: Reality Labs, the VR subsidiary of Meta and makers of the Oculus headset, passed $1B in Q4 Revenue, according to Meta’s earning call . Zuck said, “I expect (Quest 3) to continue to be the most popular mixed reality device.” according to Meta’s earning call Why it matters: Why it matters: Meta paid $2-ish billion for Oculus / Reality Labs when it had $23M in yearly revenue . That’s 87X yearly revenue. And now ten-ish years later, here it is as $4B+ yearly revenue business. Not only do these revenue numbers show that early adopters are ready and willing to pay for a premium mixed reality interface, but also once again shows it’s hard to bet against Zuckerberg.  He consistently guesses what market will grow, buys the emerging startup in that space, and throws them into the Facebook growth engine. $2-ish billion for Oculus / Reality Labs $23M in yearly revenue Flashback: Flashback: CNN’s Brandon Griggs wrote : “How is this awkward marriage going to work? Maybe it won’t: Facebook moms and Millennial gamers are an uneasy mix.” CNN’s Brandon Griggs wrote Driving the news: Driving the news: The Apple Vision Pro also came out this week, and I’m sure folks at Apple believe it will in fact become the most popular mixed reality device. Some of the best reviews are by MKBHD , Casey ,  and of course, by The Simpsons 8 years ago . Will people wear these in public? To combat this isolated astronaut vibe, Meta teamed up with Ray Ban to also offer smart glasses - as the Vision Pro evolves, I think there could be versions that look more and more like sun glasses, or we as a society may just learn to accept our fate as a heavily goggled people. Apple Vision Pro MKBHD Casey by The Simpsons 8 years ago Reality check: Reality check: At $4k each, Apple will need to sell 1M units to reach the $4M in yearly revenue, Reality Labs 4th quarter revenue rate. In the first ten days, they sold 200k units . And Apple’s already built the infrastructure of 520 premium physical stories to distribute these devices about as fast as they can make them around the world, but am unsure how much that will matter in the future of hardware device sales. The mixed reality headset wars are on! Just think of how much money there is to be made on unique chargers! Apple they sold 200k units 520 premium physical stories The big picture: The big picture: When it comes to these mixed reality headsets, what use cases will drive adoption? Meta’s steered into gaming, and now Apple’s steering into productivity. But both want to sell on this is just a cool fucking device with the earliest access to computing’s next interface. And no one truly knows what use case will drive market share until it does. What they’re saying: What they’re saying: Ma.tt Mullenweg blogged three paragraphs detailing a rough first experience and onboarding with the Apple Vision Pro  before concluding: “Just like I learned to type I think I’m going to need to learn to become fluent in this new interaction paradigm. I did have a before and after feeling, like the world had shifted, not unlike when you saw the first iPod or iPhone.” Ma.tt Mullenweg blogged Be smart: Be smart: Screens are not essential to the internet. We’ve been raised on them, through them we interacted with the cloud of information. Maybe it’s not flat. Maybe it’s a goggle. Maybe it’s a Google. Maybe it’s an Apple. Maybe it’s this Meta. Are you reading this from your mixed reality headset? Probably not yet. Write your own Axios Style story [template]. Write your own Axios Style story [template].

Headset Reality Wars: Meta @ $1B Quarterly VR Revenue & Apple Vision Pro Sells 200k Units in 10 Days

হেডসেট রিয়ালিটি ওয়ারস: মেটা @ $1B ত্রৈমাসিক VR আয় এবং Apple Vision Pro 10 দিনে 200k ইউনিট বিক্রি করে

Headset Reality Wars: Meta erzielt vierteljährlichen VR-Umsatz von 1 Milliarde US-Dollar und Apple Vision Pro verkauft 200.000 Einheiten in 10 Tagen

Headphone Reality Wars: Meta con ingresos trimestrales de realidad virtual de 1.000 millones de dólares y Apple Vision Pro vende 200.000 unidades en 10 días

Headphone Reality Wars : Meta @ 1 milliard de dollars de revenus VR trimestriels et Apple Vision Pro vend 200 000 unités en 10 jours

हेडसेट रियलिटी वॉर्स: मेटा @ $1बी त्रैमासिक वीआर राजस्व और ऐप्पल विज़न प्रो ने 10 दिनों में 200k इकाइयाँ बेचीं

ヘッドセット リアリティ ウォーズ: メタ @ 四半期 VR 収益 10 億ドル、Apple Vision Pro は 10 日間で 20 万台を販売

헤드셋 현실 전쟁: Meta @ $1B 분기별 VR 수익 및 Apple Vision Pro, 10일 만에 20만 대 판매

Headset Reality Wars: Meta @ receita trimestral de VR de US$ 1 bilhão e Apple Vision Pro vende 200 mil unidades em 10 dias

Войны реальности гарнитур: Meta с ежеквартальной выручкой в 1 миллиард долларов и Apple Vision Pro продает 200 тысяч единиц за 10 дней

Kulaklık Gerçeklik Savaşları: Meta @ 1 Milyar Dolar Üç Aylık VR Geliri ve Apple Vision Pro 10 Günde 200 Bin Birim Sattı

Cuộc chiến thực tế về tai nghe: Meta @ $1B Doanh thu VR hàng quý & Apple Vision Pro bán được 200 nghìn chiếc trong 10 ngày

耳机现实大战：Meta @ 10 亿美元季度 VR 收入 & Apple Vision Pro 10 天内售出 20 万台

FTC v. Amazon Court Filing, retrieved on Sep 26, 2023, is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 56 of 80. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here VIII. AMAZON’S CONDUCT HARMS COMPETITION AND CONSUMERS 433. Amazon’s unfair and monopolistic conduct has broken the competitive process. Amazon’s anticompetitive conduct closes off each major avenue of competition—including price, product selection, quality, and innovation—in both relevant markets. Amazon’s monopolistic conduct also harms consumers in both markets, shoppers and sellers alike, by depriving them of the benefits of open, fair competition and allowing Amazon to exploit its monopoly power without facing the competitive checks of a free enterprise system. 434. The presence of scale economies and network effects in both relevant markets means that a firm must be able to gain scale in order to compete effectively. But Amazon has artificially suppressed rivals’ ability to attract business, gain momentum, and grow. 435. Amazon’s conduct interrupts, impedes, and distorts the normal give-and-take of a healthy market by blocking off every major avenue of competition—including price, product selection, quality, and innovation—that rivals and potential rivals would ordinarily use to compete on the merits for shoppers’ and sellers’ business in the relevant markets for online superstores and online marketplace services. 436. For example, Amazon’s anti-discounting conduct leverages both its first-party Retail and its third-party Marketplace business units to suppress competition. Amazon’s firstparty anti-discounting algorithm disciplines rivals from undercutting Amazon’s prices, and Amazon punishes third-party sellers for offering lower prices on other platforms. Without the ability to attract either shoppers or sellers through lower prices, rivals are unable to gain a critical mass of customers and meaningfully compete against Amazon. At the same time, Amazon’s coercive fulfillment conduct both artificially stunts the growth of independent fulfillment providers and artificially raises the costs that sellers face when seeking to multihome. This limits seller multihoming and thereby suppresses Amazon’s rivals’ ability to compete for sellers by offering better terms and for shoppers by offering additional product selection. 437. Together, Amazon’s exclusionary course of conduct works to suppress competition in both relevant markets, foreclosing even an innovative, high-quality rival or potential rival from competing on the merits. 438. Amazon’s conduct also harms consumers in both relevant markets. For example, Amazon’s conduct has artificially inflated prices for both shoppers and sellers, degraded the quality of online superstores for shoppers and of online marketplace services for sellers, reduced output in both relevant markets, hindered shoppers from comparison-shopping for the best deals, suppressed the flow of useful price and quality information to shoppers, stifled sellers’ ability to gain additional business by offering lower prices, restricted sellers’ freedom to choose to multihome across their preferred sales channels, reduced consumer choice for both shoppers and sellers by yielding a less diverse set of competitive options, and stripped consumers in both relevant markets of the benefits of innovation. 439. Amazon’s anticompetitive conduct is not reasonably necessary to achieve any cognizable procompetitive benefits. The anticompetitive harm from those practices outweighs any procompetitive benefits, and Amazon could reasonably achieve any procompetitive goals through less restrictive alternatives. 440. Amazon’s unlawful conduct has caused cumulative and compounding harm over time. Through its years-long course of illegal conduct, Amazon has deeply entrenched its monopolies in both relevant markets and further widened the gulf between Amazon and everyone else. Particularly given the importance of scale economies and network effects in these markets, Amazon’s conduct has yielded a distorted and stunted competitive landscape. 441. Left unchecked, Amazon will continue to harm competition and maintain its monopoly power over the online superstore market and the market for online marketplace services, causing myriad and widespread harms to shoppers, sellers, and the public—and depriving Americans of the benefits of fair and free competition. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 2:23-cv-01495 retrieved on October 2, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. ftc.gov

How Amazon's Reign Leaves Shoppers and Sellers in the Shadows

FTC v. Amazon Court Filing, retrieved on Sep 26, 2023, is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 51 of 80. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here 4. Amazon’s use of Seller Fulfilled Prime underscores the harms to competition caused by Amazon’s conditioning Prime eligibility on use of FBA 397. Amazon’s fear of a world in which unrestricted seller choice leads to increased competition is grounded in experience. For a period of time, Amazon temporarily allowed sellers to use their own fulfillment solution for Prime-eligible orders. When Amazon realized it had lowered a barrier to competition, it quickly reversed course. 398. In 2015, Amazon briefly experimented with allowing a small subset of sellers to fulfill Prime-eligible orders without using FBA. That year, Amazon launched a program it later called Seller Fulfilled Prime (“SFP”), which was (redacted) SFP let sellers make Prime-eligible offers without purchasing FBA services. Though SFP was popular with sellers, Amazon shuttered SFP enrollment in 2019 (redacted). 399. From SFP’s launch, Amazon (redacted) 400. SFP was an immediate hit among sellers. In the program’s first full year, Amazon onboarded more than (redacted) sellers. At its peak, approximately (redacted) sellers had enrolled in SFP. Yet even these enrollment numbers understate seller demand for SFP, because Amazon (redacted) 401. Sellers enrolled in SFP (redacted) 402. Mr. Bezos highlighted SFP in his 2015 letter to shareholders, explaining that Amazon had “invited sellers . . . to be part of the Prime program and ship their own orders at Prime speed directly.” Mr. Bezos described SFP as a win-win for sellers and shoppers, writing, “[t]hose [enrolled] sellers have already seen a significant bump in sales, and the program has led to hundreds of thousands of additional items that are available to Prime customers via free two-day or next-day shipping.” Though SFP was benefitting at least some shoppers and sellers, internally certain Amazon executives (redacted) Amazon executives (redacted) These executives (redacted) 403. Amazon (redacted) 404. A few months later (redacted) But Amazon decided to prioritize excluding rivals and foreclosing competition, even if it came at a cost to Amazon’s customers. 405. Some Amazon employees had suggested (redacted) Amazon wanted to minimize any potential backlash from SFP sellers, so in 2019 Amazon let sellers already in SFP remain while blocking all new enrollment. Critically, Amazon communicated to those sellers who were already in SFP that it expected them to fulfill orders themselves, rather than using independent fulfillment providers. (Redacted) 406. Some sellers who still participate in SFP report frustrations with Amazon’s administration of the program, including concerns that Amazon holds SFP sellers to stricter delivery benchmarks than FBA. And despite Amazon’s promise that SFP products will receive the Prime badge, Amazon does not consistently display the Prime badge on SFP products. Amazon’s search filter that allows shoppers to view only Prime-eligible products suppresses Prime offers fulfilled through SFP. 407. Sellers continue to want Prime eligibility uncoupled from the coerced purchase of FBA services. (Redacted) 408. Conditioning Prime eligibility on FBA usage—and thus preventing sellers from using independent fulfillment providers—is not necessary to ensure Prime subscribers receive quality shipping. Amazon’s internal analyses showed that (Redacted) For example, (Redacted) Had Amazon genuinely cared about improving shipping speeds, it would have encouraged SFP sellers to use independent fulfillment providers instead of shuttering SFP to deliberately impede those providers’ growth. 409. Amazon recently announced plans to reopen SFP enrollment. According to Amazon, to enroll in the program, sellers would need to meet rigorous pre-qualification criteria to enroll in a 30-day SFP trial, after which Amazon will determine whether they may participate in SFP. Amazon’s communications about upcoming changes to the SFP program continue to indicate that sellers would need to fulfill Prime orders themselves, without using independent fulfillment providers. As of this filing, SFP enrollment remains closed. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 2:23-cv-01495 retrieved on October 2, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. ftc.gov

Amazon Fears a World where Sellers Have Real Choices

FTC v. Amazon Court Filing, retrieved on Sep 26, 2023, is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 48 of 80. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here a. Amazon raises sellers’ costs by forcing them to split their inventory to sell across multiple sales channels 368. Because Amazon forces sellers to use FBA to receive Prime eligibility, sellers who do not want to sell solely through Amazon must split their physical inventory by putting inventory for Amazon orders into FBA and inventory for non-Amazon orders in a different fulfillment network, such as one operated by an independent fulfillment provider. 369. Splitting inventory among multiple fulfillment networks raises the costs for sellers to offer products for sale through multiple sales channels by, among other things: (a) (Redacted) (b) (Redacted) (c) (Redacted) (d) (Redacted) (e) (Redacted) and (f) (Redacted) 370. For these reasons, many sellers would prefer to commit all of their inventory to a single independent fulfillment provider of sufficient scale to facilitate sales across Amazon and non-Amazon sales channels. 371. Amazon recognizes that (Redacted) 372. (Redacted) By foreclosing these sellers from using a single independent fulfillment provider, Amazon effectively forces these sellers to sell exclusively on Amazon. 373. For sellers who do offer their products across multiple online sales channels, Amazon’s tying Prime eligibility to FBA imposes unnecessary and additional costs that can lead to higher product prices, reduced seller profitability, and fewer sales. This, in turn, reduces sellers’ incentives to offer their products and invest resources into selling on multiple online superstores by purchasing services from multiple online marketplaces. 374. Because most sellers must sell Prime-eligible products on Amazon to be successful, tying Prime eligibility to FBA increases sellers’ costs by forcing them to use multiple fulfillment providers to sell off Amazon. Amazon’s conduct hinders other online marketplaces’ ability to attract sellers and impedes online superstores’ ability to offer enough product selection to compete meaningfully with Amazon. This conduct also artificially contributes to converting more shoppers into Prime subscribers. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 2:23-cv-01495 retrieved on October 2, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. ftc.gov

Amazon Raises Sellers’ Costs by Forcing Them To Split Their Inventory

FTC v. Amazon Court Filing, retrieved on Sep 26, 2023, is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 45 of 80. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here 1. Sellers who forgo Prime eligibility effectively disappear from Amazon’s storefront 358. In 2021, over (redacted) U.S. consumers, or approximately (redacted)% of U.S. households, subscribed to Amazon Prime. Prime subscribers account for an overwhelming share of all purchases on Amazon—more than (redacted)% of all purchases by dollar value in 2021. Prime subscribers also disproportionately purchase Prime-eligible offers. For example, more than (redacted)%Prime-eligible products for every one non-Prime-eligible product they purchased. 359. For many sellers, having Prime-eligible products is a prerequisite to making significant sales on Amazon. The Prime designation makes sellers’ products more discoverable—and therefore likely to be purchased—(redacted) 360. Overall, Prime eligibility alone regularly (redacted) a seller’s sales on Amazon. Meanwhile, sellers who forgo Prime eligibility effectively disappear from Amazon’s storefront. Amazon relegates non-Prime-eligible products to a near-invisible, second-rate version of Amazon’s Marketplace. Without Prime eligibility, (redacted) Ready access to online shoppers is a critical aspect of online marketplace services, but Amazon effectively conditions access to a substantial portion of its shoppers on sellers also buying FBA services. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 2:23-cv-01495 retrieved on October 2, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. ftc.gov

No Prime No Party: Sellers on Amazon Who Forgo Prime Face Expensive Consequences

FTC v. Amazon Court Filing, retrieved on Sep 26, 2023, is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 44 of 80. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here B. Amazon Maintains Its Monopolies In Both Relevant Markets By Coercing Sellers To Use Amazon’s Fulfillment Service 351. Amazon maintains its monopolies in both relevant markets by coercing sellers to use FBA, thereby denying rival online marketplace services providers and superstores the ability to gain the scale needed to compete meaningfully against Amazon in both relevant markets. 352. Prime eligibility is a basic prerequisite for sellers to fully access Amazon’s substantial base of shoppers, making it a critical aspect of the marketplace services Amazon offers to sellers. When a seller’s product is Prime eligible, it receives the Prime badge. For sellers, this designation boosts their chance of winning the Buy Box and making significant sales, while sellers who forgo Prime eligibility effectively disappear from Amazon’s storefront. For shoppers that are Prime subscribers, the Prime badge denotes that a purchase of the product will not include additional shipping and handling costs, often making these products more attractive. 353. Amazon exploits sellers’ demand for access to Prime eligibility by generally conditioning that access on use of Amazon’s proprietary fulfillment service, FBA, even though other fulfillment options could provide comparable or better service. 354. Sellers who use FBA must relinquish physical control over their products and place them in Amazon’s fulfillment centers, which principally can be used to serve only Amazon customers. As a result, a seller who wants to sell both to Amazon and non-Amazon customers must maintain a separate supply of inventory dedicated exclusively to non-Amazon customers and engage a separate fulfillment provider to serve those non-Amazon customers. 355. Absent Amazon’s restrictions, many sellers would prefer to use an independent fulfillment provider that would allow them to more easily fulfill orders placed on both Amazon and non-Amazon marketplaces. That, in turn, would increase the ability of rival online marketplace services providers to compete for sellers’ business and increase the ability of rival online superstores with marketplaces to compete by offering greater product selection to shoppers. Conditioning a product’s Prime eligibility on its seller’s use of FBA maintains Amazon’s monopoly in both relevant markets in two main ways. First, it raises the cost of multihoming, forcing sellers who sell through more than one online superstore to bear the increased costs of using multiple fulfillment providers. Second, it forecloses independent fulfillment providers from competing to fulfill Prime orders on Amazon, depriving those independent providers of an important source of business and scale needed to build out an efficient fulfillment network. Because fewer sellers can cost-effectively multihome, rivals and potential rivals to Amazon are deprived of product selection. 356. In the relevant online superstore and online marketplace services markets where scale and network effects insulate incumbents from competition, the effects of Amazon’s conduct continuously compound as it diminishes sellers’ incentive and ability to multihome. 357. Amazon’s conduct constrains its rivals’ ability to compete, harming shoppers and competition in both relevant markets and entrenching Amazon’s monopoly. By making it more expensive for sellers to sell the same product on multiple online superstores and marketplaces, Amazon artificially limits rivals’ ability to gain sufficient growth, momentum, and scale to draw a critical mass of shoppers and meaningfully compete. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 2:23-cv-01495 retrieved on October 2, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. ftc.gov

Sellers in Chains: Amazon's Unyielding Approach to Fulfilment Services 

FTC v. Amazon Court Filing, retrieved on Sep 26, 2023, is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This is part 38 of 80. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here b. Amazon continues to contractually prohibit its most important sellers from discounting elsewhere 286. Amazon places additional limits on certain sellers’ ability to sell products at lower prices on other online stores. These restrictions are embedded in the “Amazon’s Standards for Brands” (“ASB”) program. 287. Amazon applies ASB to brands, brand licensees, and brand representatives that use Amazon’s Marketplace (“ASB sellers”), regardless of whether their brand is a long-established household name or an upstart few people would recognize. (Redacted) 288. ASB sellers are an especially important type of seller to Amazon for two reasons. First, ASB sellers constitute (Redacted) In 2021, (Redacted) % of Amazon Marketplace sales were by ASB sellers, and Amazon projected they would sell more than (Redacted) of products on Amazon in 2022. 290. Amazon implemented ASB in September 2018 through an amendment to the Business Solutions Agreement. All sellers, including ASB sellers, must agree to Amazon’s Business Solutions Agreement in order to sell on Amazon’s Marketplace. The ASB restrictions are therefore binding contractual obligations that Amazon imposes on ASB sellers. 291. Through ASB, (Redacted) 292. Amazon also (Redacted) 293. (Redacted) 294. Amazon threatens an ASB seller’s “privileges”—including the “privilege” to “operate as a seller in the Amazon store altogether”—if the ASB seller violates any part of ASB. In other words, Amazon threatens not just to kick ASB sellers’ offers out of the Buy Box but to boot them out of Amazon’s Marketplace altogether if (Redacted) 295. In addition to revoking some ASB sellers’ selling privileges in full by shutting down their seller accounts, Amazon also (Redacted) under the guise of ASB policy enforcement, Amazon (Redacted) 296. (Redacted) 297. (Redacted) 298. (Redacted) 299. In 2019, Amazon (Redacted) 300. In late 2021, (Redacted) 301. Amazon (Redacted) 302. The Amazon team responsible for ASB has (Redacted) 303. (Redacted) 304. ASB—(Redacted)—are thus additional elements working across Amazon’s business in tandem with Amazon’s other strategies that punish off-Amazon discounting, stifle competition, impede the growth of potential competitors, hike prices, and degrade quality for consumers in the relevant markets. Continue Reading . Here About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case 2:23-cv-01495 retrieved on October 2, 2023, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. ftc.gov

Amazon Prohibits Top Sellers from Discounting Prices Elsewhere 

Stories, News & Mentions about SELLRS

Sellrs’s Stories on HackerNoon