Americans purchase nearly $30b of pet food per year, the vast majority of which is generic, mass-manufactured product sold through traditional retailers

Nom Nom

Hey Hackers! I’m Yan Tsishko and I’m the Chief Software Engineer at Oxagile. First of all, a huge thank you to the HackerNoon community and staff for nominating me for a 2021 Noonies award! I’ve been nominated in the following categories, please do check out these award pages and vote: JAVASCRIPT: Vote here JAVASCRIPT-DEVELOPMENT: Vote here FRONTEND: Vote here FRONT-END-DEVELOPMENT: Vote here As someone in the frontend industry, I believe that the most exciting technology of the present is JavaScript/TypeScript because you can use it for Frontend and Backend development and for different platforms like Web, Mobile, Smart TV, STB. Learn more about my thoughts and opinions on Frontend and my journey in the tech industry via the interview below. 1. What do you do and why do you do it? Currently, I’m a Chief Software Engineer and manage 25 JS developers. Another part of my work is engineering. I like to take part in projects with challenges, especially for the Smart TV platform, because we have limited resources (memory, CPU) and we should implement a solution that can work fast on these devices. I have had an opportunity to try ML in browsers on mobile devices and I shared my investigation and implementation in the articles . How We Implemented Face and Mask Recognition in Google Chrome I like to share my experience in articles, meetups and conferences. 2. Tell us more about the things you create/write/manage/build! If we speak about public contributions, I can say that I have a repository on GitHub with an example of how to create SSR for React.js with Express.js. When I started to implement this feature Next.js was not production-ready for our project (which was in production at that moment) and I researched how to do it manually. The results of best practices from the internet are presented in my repository. Also, you can find out how to blur objects in real-time on video with code examples. How to use ML in browser for face and mask detection. 3. How did you end up on your current career path? Do you like it? I became interested in programming at the age of 14 and independently studied new things for myself. Then I graduated from a technical university and started my first job at a startup remotely with no strong skills in any programming language. I studied HTML, CSS, PHP and created several web applications at school and university and had the chance to improve my knowledge. I had a lot of challenges, and every day I had to learn something new. When I wanted to become a Frontend software developer, I found an opportunity at another company, where with the minimal knowledge of JavaScript, my first task was to write treeview. I didn’t understand the task or know how to start. Nevertheless, I had a mentor and google search. And after 5 days I  gladly submitted the code for review. Since then, I have continued to self-study and have not been afraid of challenging tasks. When I started to share my experience and improve my soft skills, my current company noticed this and offered me a promotion to Chief Software Engineer. This is the result of many years of experience and self-improvement. 4. What tech are you most excited or passionate about right now and why? I like Frontend and JavaScript/TypeScript. When you receive feedback from millions of users about the results of your work, it motivates me. I like JavaScript because it’s a powerful language and you can do almost anything you want, starting from a simple website to programming robots. 5. What tech are you most worried about right now and why? All techs have pros and cons. JavaScript is not an exception. 6. If we gave you 10 million dollars to invest in something today, what would you invest in and why? The best investment is investing in yourself. Your education. 7. What are you currently learning? Currently, I am diving deeper into the performance of applications and project architecture. I have been given the opportunity to test optimization hypotheses on a real project for SmartTV. 8. What’s the best advice you’ve ever given someone? Google knows almost all, try googling for 30 minutes and then ask your colleague for help. 😃 When you search for answers, you read different points of view and practices. In case you can’t find an answer, at least you read a lot of information around this theme. 9. What’s the best advice you’ve ever received? If you have a goal, you can reach it. About HackerNoon’s 2021 Noonie Awards The annual Noonie Awards celebrate the best and brightest of the tech industry, bringing together all who are making the Internet and the world of tech what it is today. Please be sure to , nominate, and vote for the people and companies who you think are making the biggest impact on the tech industry today. check out our award categories The 2021 Noonies are sponsored by: , , and . Thank you so much to these sponsors who are helping us celebrate the accomplishments of all our nominees. bybit Dottech Domains Avast

"If You Have a Goal, You Can Reach it" Nominee Nominee Yan Tsishko

Nominations for Noonies 2021 have been extended! If you haven’t had a chance to nominate your favourite person, you still have the chance. Visit noonies.tech to cast your vote. How to Nominate Nominees Visit noonies.tech Find the award for which you would like to submit a nominee. Scroll to the bottom and find where it says: “Suggest a Nominee.” 4.Type the name. option will pop up that says: “Suggest ‘yourNomineeName.” Click that. 5.An 6.Fill out details. 7.Submit. Who can you Nominate? It could be your favourite lecturer, your favourite DIY couple, your favourite life hacks TikTok star, your strange family member, teacher, friend, pet, or honestly maybe it’s you. You are allowed to inspire yourself. It’s called motivation. Good luck and may the best Rick Sanchez of the Year win! Disclaimer: The above voting images are just a sample, you don’t have to write ‘TEST.’

How to Nominate Nominees in the HackerNoon Noonies 2021 Awards #Noonies2021

116 Stories To Learn About Noonies2021

311 Stories To Learn About Noonies

Welcome to the Smackdown! Three powerful contenders - Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, and Nomad - are vying for the spotlight as demand soars for efficient container management solutions. Container Orchestration The global Container Orchestration Market is skyrocketing, projected to hit USD . Streamlining and automating container deployment, scaling, and management have become crucial. 11.3 billion by 2032 with a remarkable CAGR of 22.4% In this article, we'll explore the key features and strengths of each platform to guide you on your container orchestration journey. Kubernetes , often abbreviated as K8s, s an open-source platform by Google for orchestrating containers. Kubernetes It handles containerized apps with ease, automating deployment, scaling, and operations across host clusters, empowering modern app development. Its core boasts a - the master node oversees the cluster, while worker nodes handle tasks. Key components include an API server for communication, an etcd key-value store for config data, and a controller manager to maintain desired states. Not to forget the scheduler, placing workloads on apt nodes, and kubelet, managing containers within. master-slave architecture Kubernetes shines with features like automated container deployment, load balancing, self-healing, and storage orchestration. Its declarative config system guarantees app states, enabling auto-scaling and version rollback. Also, it excels in service discovery and easy cloud provider integration. Pros: Seamless orchestration for complex apps Highly scalable and reliable Vendor-agnostic with abundant tools Vibrant community support Cons: Steeper learning curve Needs dedicated resources Complexity may lead to config errors Designed for high performance, Kubernetes excels in scheduling containers across nodes, optimizing resources. Whether startups or enterprises, it thrives with thousands of nodes and tens of thousands of containers. Docker Swarm Docker Swarm, a lightweight and user-friendly container orchestration tool developed by which simplifies managing containerized applications. With a decentralized architecture, multiple nodes collaborate as one entity, ensuring high availability and fault tolerance. Docker, Its key features include service scaling, load balancing, and rolling updates, leveraging Docker Compose files for easy service definition. The beauty lies in its user-friendly setup and minimal learning curve, ideal for smaller teams and projects prioritizing simplicity. Although lacking some advanced features of thrives in scenarios demanding simple yet performant orchestration. It excels in rapid deployment, scaling, and load balancing for web apps, content management systems, and continuous integration pipelines. Kubernetes, Docker Swarm While Kubernetes reigns in complexity, Docker Swarm shines for newcomers to container orchestration, providing an intuitive, streamlined experience that often outperforms Kubernetes for smaller deployments and teams. Nomad Nomad, an under-the-radar gem in the container orchestration space, simplifies deploying and managing containers and non-containerized applications across machine clusters. Developed by HashiCorp, Nomad's minimalist architecture centers on a central server for job management and client agents on nodes. This distinctive platform natively supports both containers and non-containerized workloads, offering virtual machines and stand-alone binary application compatibility with an efficient distributed job scheduler. Embracing simplicity and ease of configuration, Nomad stands out as a lightweight and cross-platform solution. It enables seamless transitions from traditional to containerized applications, making it ideal for organizations seeking versatile options. Its strengths lie in easy installation, low resource consumption, and integration with existing infrastructure. While lacking some advanced features found in Kubernetes and Docker Swarm, Nomad suits smaller-scale deployments. Appealing to various use cases, from microservices to batch processing, Nomad attracts developers and operators alike with its user-friendly approach to managing diverse workloads. While not as popular as other platforms, Nomad steadily gains popularity among pragmatic organizations seeking effective container orchestration. Comparison and Evaluation Are you undecided on which container orchestration platform to choose? Here's a brief comparison and evaluation of Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, and Nomad to help you make an informed decision: Ease of Installation and Setup Kubernetes: A complex setup, that demands effort, suitable for seasoned users. Docker Swarm: User-friendly, simple installation with Docker at its core. Nomad: Seamlessly installed, perfect for beginners. Management and User Interface Kubernetes: Extensive dashboard, feature-rich, might overwhelm. Docker Swarm: Intuitive UI, effortless management, great for small teams. Nomad: Simple UI, strikes a balance between ease and functionality. Scaling and Auto-scaling Capabilities Kubernetes: Industry-leading auto-scaling, precise resource management. Docker Swarm: Straight forward scaling, lacks advanced auto-scaling of Kubernetes. Nomad: Good scaling, not as granular as Kubernetes. High Availability and Fault Tolerance Kubernetes: Exceptional self-healing, efficient large cluster management. Docker Swarm: Adequate HA, faces challenges with larger clusters. Nomad: Basic fault tolerance, suitable for smaller setups. Performance and Resource Utilization Kubernetes: High performance, resource-intensive due to feature richness. Docker Swarm: Efficient resource usage, ideal for resource-constrained environments. Nomad: Lightweight, optimized resource utilization, competitive performance. Community Support and Ecosystem Kubernetes: Massive community, diverse ecosystem, extensive documentation. Docker Swarm: Solid community, ecosystem growing but not as diverse as Kubernetes. Nomad: Emerging community, growing ecosystem, catching up to Kubernetes. Security and Access Control Kubernetes: Advanced security with RBAC, and network policies, ensures secure containers. Docker Swarm: Good security, may require extra configuration for advanced cases. Nomad: Improving security, may need more effort for parity with Kubernetes. Integration with Other Tools and Platforms Kubernetes: Seamless integration, widely adopted, compatible with various tools. Docker Swarm: Integrates well with Docker's ecosystem, with some third-party challenges. Nomad: Decent integrations, may need tweaks for specific tools and services. Decision Factors Synchronize your organization's unique needs and priorities. Analyze factors like deployment complexity, container management, and resource allocation. Ascertain the necessity for advanced features such as auto-scaling, load balancing, and hybrid cloud support. Scrutinize the essence of your projects and their distinct requirements. Are you operating microservices or monolithic applications? Do you need compatibility with multiple container runtimes? Select a platform that harmonizes perfectly with your applications and can meet the demands of your projects. Evaluate your existing infrastructure and toolchain. If you have already invested in a container ecosystem or specific monitoring/logging tools, opt for a platform that seamlessly integrates, avoiding unnecessary disruptions and complexities. Look ahead to anticipate your applications' future growth. Opt for a platform that scales with your organization and adapts to changing demands. Consider community support, vendor backing, and ongoing development to ensure long-term support for your chosen platform. Conclusion The container orchestration smackdown highlights the strengths and weaknesses of Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, and Nomad. Choose based on your specific needs, infrastructure, and scalability goals. Container orchestration remains vital for modern applications, providing efficiency and scalability for development teams in the fast-paced containerized world.

NOM NOM

nomnomnow.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

NOM NOM

EVERGREEN INDEX #7955

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Nom Nom WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

NOM NOM

nomnomnow.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

NOM NOM

EVERGREEN INDEX #7955

RELATED COMPANIESRANK

STORIES ABOUT NOM NOM

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Nom Nom WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!