Indorse is a skills validation platform which helps candidates validate their tech skills and helps companies match with better candidates

Indorse

It is no secret that social networking is an integral part of many people’s lives. If you are like most people, you are likely to be on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, LinkedIn and many other social networks. While these platforms are free and offer untethered access to their services, they are plagued with many problems. Issues such as privacy, data harvesting and content censorship are a great concern to many users. In this post, we shall explore the primary bottlenecks associated with these conventional social networks and how Blockchain technology can fix it all. Image: rawpixel.com So, what is the problem? Control over data Social network users currently have no control over their data. Once a user has an account on a social network it is as if they relinquish their right to their personal information and control over content. Total control is in the hands of social network owners who dictate what is to be viewed by users and what is not. And with such control, the social network platform owners are able to profit from their users without the users’ consent. Privacy If the recent is anything to go by, then the current social networks are proving to have poor security. Users are susceptible to attacks which are known to expose their personal information. Facebook data breach Single Point of Failure Because of their centralized nature, conventional social networks are vulnerable to attacks that often lead to costly losses. Hackers only have one point of attack, which ones breached they can get access to a flood of users’ information. For example, in 2012 and got away with some 6.5 million encrypted passwords and posted them on a Russian hacker forum. Four years later another hacker who goes by the name Peace was selling more of LinkedIn hacked user information. He claimed that the total count of data stolen from LinkedIn reached 167 million and not 6.5 million as thought before. Of which 117 million had both email and encrypted passwords. a hacker broke into LinkedIn network Why Blockchain is the solution Blockchain technology is the long-awaited cure to issues affecting the current breed of social networks. The following features are what make Blockchain technology so groundbreaking. Transparency Blockchain distributed nature eliminates the control of platforms by a single entity. And since every transaction on the Blockchain-based platform is tracked and audited by several servers and developers, it becomes impossible for anyone to tamper with the data. Control over data By eliminating intermediaries, users on decentralized social networks will own and control their data. Blockchain technology ensures that whatever you post on the social network can be traced anywhere it goes and never be duplicated. And the best part is that if you delete it, it is deleted in the whole system and no unauthorized third parties can access and benefit from it. Relevant content Once control of your social network platforms is in your hands, you get to dictate the type of content you would like to see. Therefore you don’t get unwanted advertisements on your platforms that only benefit the advertisers and not you. Earning from social media activity Blockchain-based platforms enable you and your viewers, listeners, readers, depending on the content you create, to build a direct relationship that is monetarily beneficial to you. Which Blockchain Social Networking Platform can you use? One platform utilising Blockchain technology to create a revolutionary social network platform is . Indorse Indorse is a decentralized, Blockchain-powered social network platform that aims to change the way professionals interact. By incorporating Blockchain technology, Indorse has fortified itself from the vulnerabilities associated with centralized social networks. Therefore, individuals can be assured of a safe and reliable environment of association. Using the platform, professionals will be able to share their skills and experiences and still be rewarded for it. Indorse platform model Currently, the following is the logic used in the platform: Indorse First, you join the platform Then you create your personal profile Now you are eligible to make a claim for your profile to be indorsed The system will randomly choose another user to indorse your claim The Indorse Dapp will allow other Indorsers to send in their decisions Indorsers get rewarded with Indorse tokens (IND) based on the maximum consensus reaching a threshold. But the user who gave a malicious indorsement will lose his reputation therefore likely impacting his credibility score on the platform Now that you have a little know-how of the Indorse platform model, let’s dive deeper into how it actually works. How Indorse works The platform offers members two main roles of participation. You are either a claimant or a validator. Now the first step is for the claimant to make a “claim” associated with his/her profile. The claim can either be that of a personal or professional skill (for example I am a software developer). As a claimant, every claim you make needs to be attached to one or more proofs of information (e.g., GitHub Repository, Bitbucket, etc.) The second step is for the validator to verify the claims outside the Blockchain platform and either flag or indorse it. Practical example Let’s simplify the explanation further by choosing an example of members already using the Indorse platform. In this case, we shall use Jane and Mike, Jane being the claimant and Mike being the validator. So Jane joins the Indorse network. Once she has successfully registered, Jane will be able to post one claim to her profile. The first step she will need to take is to create a unique profile identity, where she adds a claim. In her claim, Jane states that she has a programming skill that is substantiated with a public Git repository and a certificate of where she earned that skill. Finally, she submits her claim. Now , using the Anonymous Indorsement Protocol (AIP), will randomly select a few validators to indorse Jane’s claim. At this point, Jane’s claim will enter a gestation period, which will end with a consensus of indorsements. Indorse The randomly selected Indorse member chosen to indorse Jane’s claim (Mike), receives a notification that shows him that Jane has placed a link to her personal GitHub repository and to the verification page of her certificate. He, therefore, verifies the validity of the claim and indorses it, locking up his Indorse score. Finally, Jane is rewarded with Indorse tokens (IND). Similarly, Mike is also rewarded with Indorse tokens. What if a member makes wrong indorsements? A member who makes frivolous claims (claimant) or is flagging in a dishonest way (validator), will see his/her Confidence Score reduced. However, this same member will have a chance to earn back the lost score by making correct indorsements. Validation of a Skill As a member, when you make a claim you will have two options for indorsements: Using the Anonymous Indorsement Protocol (AIP), a random indorsement will be given — here the platform will choose a group of random indorsers based on the degrees of separation from the member. In order for the claimant to get their skill validated, the pool of random validators will need to achieve a certain percentage of consensus to pass off the claimant’s skill as verified. Indorse Interact with an AI Chatbot and answer a series of questions where the bot will determine your level of proficiency in the specified programming language! Anonymous Indorsement Protocol just as the name suggests is for choosing the random indorsers from the platform and keeping them anonymous Use case The following are avenues that can use : Indorse — employers won’t have to rely on just the prospective candidate’s word of mouth experience and documents, but on indorsements too. The indorsements will help cement the credibility of the prospective candidate. Companies looking to hire — This is through attaching an individual’s identity, profile, and achievements to an Ethereum address in a decentralized manner. KYC — the data collected on Indorse will be for targeted advertising, which includes both the individual viewing the profile and the creators of the profiles too. Advertising — having credentials indorsed on the platform, members of the community will be able to fill contract work and jobs requests posted. Freelance service Final word Blockchain technology will indeed be at the forefront of re-shaping the social network industry. The possibility of making it more interactive, trustworthy and one that offers a unique experience is simply too good to pass up. Being the trailblazer, aims to give ownership of data back to members & reward them for showcasing and sharing their skills to the network. Indorse However, there is still one question that goes unanswered in this fast changing industry. Will companies like Indorse be the ones to usher in the new age of social networking or will our existing traditional networks quickly adapt their model to one that is blockchain enabled? Only time will tell. Keen to find out more about FundYourselfNow? Join our crowdfunding revolution conversation on our Telegram group, or follow us on Twitter.

How Blockchain is Solving the Biggest Problems in Social Networking

BUSINESS COLLEGES

Scientific American, Volume XXXVI., No. 8, February 24, 1877 by Various, is part of the HackerNoon Books Series. You can jump to any chapter in this book . PAPIN'S STEAM ENGINE. here PAPIN'S STEAM ENGINE. BY PROFESSOR CHARLES A. JOY. It is a matter of history that, as early as 1688, Denis Papin, Professor of Physics and Mathematics at the University of Marburg, proposed to substitute steam for powder in the engine invented by Huyghens, and that in 1695 he published a description of several new inventions, in which steam played an important part. The Elector Carl, of Hesse-Cassel, was anxious to be free from the annoyances and impositions practised upon his boatmen by the authorities at Münden, and he proposed to avoid that city by constructing a canal connecting the Weser with the river that flowed through Cassel. Much of the work was accomplished, and the half finished line of the canal can be traced even at the present day. Papin was authorized to build a powerful steam pump by which the supply of water was to be regulated. A working model of this pump was completed; and the Elector was on the point of visiting the laboratory to witness its operation, when a fearful explosion frightened the workmen, and afforded an opportunity for enemies to intrigue for the expulsion of Papin from the country. The model was preserved for a long time in Cassel; but at the time of the French invasion, it disappeared, and no trace of it has since been found. In writing about his inventions, Papin says, in 1695: "It would occupy too much space for me to describe in what manner this principle could be applied to removing water from mines, throwing bombs, sailing against the wind, and for many other similar purposes; everyone according to his wants can imagine the constructions that could be made. I cannot, however, refrain from remarking how much preferable this power would be to oars for those whose business calls them to the sea." And further on he says: "The steam cylinders could be employed for a great variety of purposes." One of the cylinders, which was to form a part of the pump, was cast at the foundry in Cassel, and after various vicissitudes has finally become the property of the Historical Museum in that city, where it will be preserved, with jealous care, from any further injury. During the recent exhibition of philosophical instruments in London, this remnant of Papin's invention played an important part, it having been generously loaned by the authorities for that occasion. After the flight of Papin from Germany, the cylinder was used as a receptacle for iron turnings and borings in the royal works; and after the destruction of those works by fire, it came into the possession of Henschel, the founder of one of the most extensive locomotive works in Germany. This man fully appreciated the value of the historical relic; and when I visited him at the works, twenty-five years ago, he pointed out with pride to me the inscription on its side, "Papin's Cylinder," and said that he intended to have it placed upon a solid pedestal near the gate. His grandson has since presented it to the city, and its preservation from destruction or sale is now secured. A copy of the drawing made by Papin of the pump of which this cylinder was to form a part, and which was published in 1695, has recently appeared in Dingler's , and I send it to you, hoping that you will have it engraved and perpetuated in your valuable paper. It is a peculiar combination of Savery's invention and Papin's piston engine, suggested for another purpose, and is a decided improvement on Huyghens' powder engine. Journal A is the boiler for the generation of the steam, provided with a safety valve (an invention of Papin). On opening the stopcock, C, the steam passes through B into the cylinder, D, and by its expansion drives the plunger, E, against the water contained in the cylinder, D, which is thus forced into the chamber, F, compressing strongly the air, which in turn expels the water through the pipe, G, to the height desired. K is a funnel for the fresh supply of water, and at I and H are valves opening upwards and downwards. After the condensation of the steam in D, a renewed supply of water, through K, forces the plunger, E, to the top of the cylinder, ready for the next action of steam. The strokes of such a pump could not be frequent, and it would not compare very favorably with the wonderful machinery exhibited in Philadelphia last summer; but it contains the germ of the idea, and is worthy of all honor. Having often seen it stated that Papin had invented a steamboat, I resolved during a recent visit to Germany to investigate the matter, and especially to search for the correspondence between Papin and Leibnitz in the library at Hanover. It will be borne in mind that two hundred years ago, on December 4, 1676, Leibnitz was appointed to take charge of the library in Hanover, and that he remained in this position until his death in 1716. He bequeathed his manuscripts to the library; and as he had the habit of writing upon all manner of loose scraps of paper, it has cost much labor to assort and classify them. On making my application to the librarian to be permitted to see the correspondence between Papin and Leibnitz, my request was at once granted; and a table having been assigned me, I was able to examine these precious relics at my leisure. I was also shown a copy of an original treatise on the steam engine by Papin, which contained numerous marginal notes by Leibnitz. In one place, Leibnitz criticized Papin's method for condensing steam, and makes a drawing on the margin, showing a piston and valve which he thought would be more practical. It is somewhat remarkable that the Germans have not caused a fac-simile of this little volume to be published. After considerable search, I found a copy of the original letter addressed by Papin to Leibnitz in 1707, asking Leibnitz to assist him in obtaining the consent of the Hanoverian Government to navigate the river Weser with a sidewheel steamboat. The letter was dated July 7, 1707, and contained among other interesting passages the following sentence: "The new invention will enable one or two men to accomplish more effect than several hundred oarsmen." It is evident that Leibnitz was deeply impressed by Papin's letter, and he supported the simple and reasonable request contained in it by the following petition addressed to the Councillors of State. This communication from Leibnitz bears two indorsements, one by the clerk of the council, " respectfully, in reference to the passage of a ship from the river Fulda into the Weser;" the other is in the handwriting of Leibnitz: "Papin's sidewheel ship." This last indorsement is of great value, as indicating the fact that Papin proposed to apply side wheels for the propulsion of his new invention. The following is a translation of Leibnitz' letter, the original of which I saw in the library: pro memoria "Dionysius Papin, Councillor and Physician to his royal highness the Elector of Cassel, also Professor of Mathematics at Marburg, is about to dispatch a vessel of singular construction down the river Weser to Bremen. As he learns that all ships coming from Cassel, or any point on the Fulda, are not permitted to enter the Weser, but are required to unload at Münden, and as he anticipates some difficulty, although those vessels have a different object, his own not being intended for freight, he begs most humbly that a gracious order be granted that his ship may be allowed to pass unmolested through the electoral domain, which petition I most humbly support. G.W. Leibnitz. "Hanover, July 13, 1707." This letter was returned to Leibnitz with the following indorsement: "The Electoral Councillors have found serious obstacles in the way of granting the above petition, and, without giving their reasons, have directed me to inform you of their decision, and that in consequence the request is not granted by his Electoral Highness. H. Reiche. "Hanover, July 25, 1707." This failure of Papin's petition was the deathblow to his effort to establish steam navigation. A mob of boatmen, who thought they saw in the embryo ship the ruin of their business, attacked the vessel at night and utterly destroyed it. Papin narrowly escaped with his life, and fled to England, where he endured great hardships and poverty, and all traces of him were soon lost, so that it is uncertain in what country he finally died or where he was buried. This remarkable man was driven out of France on account of his Protestant faith, and found a refuge in Germany; here he was again persecuted on account of the injury that ignorant and jealous people believed his inventions would inflict upon the industries of the country; and when the climax of steam engines for pumping water and propelling ships was reached, the enlightened government of the period "found serious obstacles" in the way of granting him protection, and, without condescending to state what those "objections" were, secretly instigated the mob to make an end of the trouble. It is another instance, unfortunately too often repeated in history, of the mischief men dressed up in a little brief authority can work upon their generation. If Papin had been permitted to navigate the Weser with his ship, and to carry it to London, as was his intention, it is possible that we should have had steamboats one hundred years earlier than they were given to us by Fulton. The plan proposed by Papin was highly impracticable; but a knowledge of what Savery had done in the way of steam machinery, aided by the shrewd suggestions of Leibnitz, combined with the practical assistance of Englishmen, would, no doubt, have enabled him to improve upon his invention until it had obtained sufficient credit to be secure against the misfortune of being totally forgotten. After the lapse of 100 years from the date of Papin's invention, when the first steamboat was put upon the river Rhine, the vessel was fired into by concealed marksmen on shore, and navigation was more dangerous than it is now on the upper waters of the Missouri in times of Indian hostility. It was only after stationing troops along the banks of the river to protect the boatmen that the government, fortunately more enlightened than in the days of Leibnitz, was able to establish steam navigation on a secure footing. I have thought it worth while to make this contribution to the history of steam navigation, particularly as I have been able to authenticate a portion of it by reference to original documents. Columbia College, New York city, January, 1877. About HackerNoon Book Series: We bring you the most important technical, scientific, and insightful public domain books. This book is part of the public domain. Various (2006). Scientific American, Volume XXXVI., No. 8, February 24, 1877. Urbana, Illinois: Project Gutenberg. Retrieved https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/19406/pg19406-images.html This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at , located at www.gutenberg.org https://www.gutenberg.org/policy/license.html

PAPIN'S STEAM ENGINE

Scientific American, Volume XXXVI., No. 8, February 24, 1877 by Various, is part of the HackerNoon Books Series. You can jump to any chapter in this book . Planing Mill Machinery. here Planing Mill Machinery. The planing machine, next to the saw, is perhaps the most important agent for the conversion and manipulation of wood in use; and before proceeding to consider it, in its present form, says the author of this article, Mr. F.H. Morse, in the , it may not be out of place to notice briefly its origin and history. Northwestern Lumberman The first man to employ power in the operation of smoothing the surface of wood was Sir Samuel Bentham, of London, England, and to him belongs the honor of having discovered the principle upon which all planing machines operate. A brief personal notice of this remarkable inventor will serve to show under what circumstances the planing machine originated. His education was secured at the Westminster school of London, and, as far as can be ascertained from the meager records of his life that have come down to us, was of the most thorough kind, both classical and scientific, that could be obtained at that time (1770). When his education was finished, he was bound to the master shipwright of the Woolwich dockyard, to whom he served an apprenticeship of seven years, acquiring in that time a practical knowledge of the methods of working in both wood and iron then in vogue, and receiving the best scientific instruction that the development of that period afforded. After his term of apprenticeship had expired, he spent about two years in looking up the local peculiarities of other shipyards whose methods of working differed in some respects from those of the Woolwich mechanics. In 1779 he was ordered by the government to examine into the progress of shipbuilding in Northern Europe, and in carrying out this commission he repaired to Russia, where he invented the first machine for planing wood. Its mode of operation, whether reciprocating or rotating, it is impossible to ascertain positively, but the conclusion arrived at, after referring to the specifications of his first patent, which was issued in 1791, is that it worked upon the former principle by means closely analogous to the operation of planing by hand. He seems to have made no use of his venture in Russia, though he resided there several years and filled several important positions under the Russian Government. He returned to his native country in 1791 and joined his brother, Jeremy Bentham, who had at that time just received an appointment from the government to introduce industrial prisons in England. To utilize the unskilled labor of the convicts, the talents of Sir Samuel were called into use, and he devised a number of new machines, the greater part of which were for working wood. For want of a more suitable place, these machines were constructed at the residence of Jeremy Bentham, which was thus converted into the first manufactory for woodworking machines. This factory was established in 1794, but was soon found to be too small for the purpose, and another building was occupied. In a lecture before the Society of Arts, in 1853, Professor Willis, referring to the shops of the Benthams, stated that "there were constructed machines for all general operations in woodwork, including planing, molding, rebating, grooving, mortising, and sawing, both in coarse and fine work, in curved, winding, and transverse directions, and shaping wood in complicated forms; and further, as an example, that all parts of a highly finished window sash are prepared, also all parts of an ornamented carriage wheel were made so that nothing remained to be done by hand but to put the component parts together." In 1797 the Admiralty consented to the introduction of such of these machines as could be used to advantage in the different dockyards, and they were manufactured under the direction of Jeremy Bentham, and forwarded from time to time to Portsmouth and Plymouth, where they were used with good results, performing all that was claimed for them. Bentham was joined in 1810 by another genius (formerly in the employ of the brothers) by the name of Brunel, who had invented several valuable machines, among which was one for shaping block shells, which seems to have had Bentham's indorsement. As Inspector General, in 1803, Sir Samuel advised the Admiralty to introduce many of his new machines, and also to permit the use of steam engines; accordingly, the dockyards were fitted with engines for sawing, planing, boring, tenoning, mortising, etc. The labor saved by their use can be inferred from the fact that Brunel, who had assisted in their construction, received as a premium for his inventions the amount saved in the yards by their use in one year, which reached the respectable sum of $80,000. In the same year the government settled with Jeremy Bentham, after arbitration, and allowed him for machines furnished the yards and prisons, $100,000. We learn from testimony given before the arbitrators that "Sir Samuel Bentham prepared a system of machinery for the employment of men without skill, and particularly with a view to utilizing convict labor. In 1793 patents were taken out on these inventions to secure their exclusive use for the prisons." The testimony states that no skill was required in the use of these machines; they were introduced into the dockyards and worked by common laborers. It was claimed that nine tenths of the labor was saved by the use of Bentham's machines, which proves that they were at least effective, which cannot be said in all cases of those of modern manufacture. The patent of Bentham, issued in 1793, is doubtless one of the most remarkable ones ever issued, both for the importance of the inventions it protected and the clearness with which they and the principles on which they operated are described. Richards, in referring to that section of this patent which relates to rotary tools for woodcutting, quotes the inventor as saying: "The idea of adapting the rotative motion of a tool with more or less advantage, to give all sorts of substances any shape that may be required, is my own, and, as I believe, entirely new." For those not skilled in nor acquainted with the nature and extent of the various operations in wood conversion which come under the head of shaping with rotary cutters, it will be difficult to convey an idea of the invention here set forth; it includes, indeed, nearly all operations in woodworking, and as an original invention may be said to consist in the discovery of the fact that flat surfaces, or surfaces of any contour, can be properly prepared by the action of rotating tools. It is not to be wondered at that such an operation should not have been sooner discovered, for even at the present time there are few processes in treating material which seem so anomalous as that of planing a flat surface with cutters revolving in a circle of a few inches in diameter. In reference to planing mouldings, it is said: "If the circumference of a circular cutter be formed in the shape of any moulding, and projecting above the bench no more than necessary, the piece being shoved over the cutter will thus be cut to a moulding corresponding to the cutter—that is, the reverse of it, just as a plane iron cuts the reverse. If a plane cutter, such as that above spoken of for cutting a groove in the breadth of a piece, be made so thick, or, as we might be apt to say now, so broad, or so long, as to cover the whole breadth of the piece, it will present the idea of a roller. This I call a cutting roller; it maybe employed in many cases with great advantage to perform the office of a plane." The cutting roller of Bentham is the present cutter block of England, or the cutting cylinder of America, and after what has been quoted it may be seen that the idea of rotary planing and moulding machines had been fully grasped by Bentham. He goes on as usual to the various conditions which attach to the process of planing, and says further: "if a cutting roller of this sort be placed with its axis horizontal and the bench beneath, it may be made to rise and lower. The bench (machine) may be very readily adjusted, so as to determine the thickness to which a piece will be reduced by being passed under the roller." "To gain time, cutters may be applied to different sides of a piece at once, and such of them as make parallel cuts may be mounted on the same spindle." These extracts would not be out of place in an explanatory lecture or essay on woodcutting at the present day, and cannot help awakening surprise that they should have been written eighty-three years ago, when there had, so far as we know, been no precedents, nor even suggestions from previous practice. The foregoing shows that nearly all the fundamental principles, upon which woodcutting by machinery in its present development depends, were familiar to Sir Samuel Bentham, and though his name has been almost forgotten, it may be safely asserted that he gave to the world more useful inventions than any other man of his age. His work shows throughout a constant method and system of reasoning, which point rather to a life of persistent labor than to one of what would ordinarily be called genius. That latter quality he must certainly have possessed in the highest degree, for without it even his knowledge and experience could not have been equal to the work he accomplished. Directed to different ends, his talent and genius would doubtless have secured for him a fame that would live for years, though it does not seem possible that he could have conferred upon the world a greater benefit. About HackerNoon Book Series: We bring you the most important technical, scientific, and insightful public domain books. This book is part of the public domain. Various (2006). Scientific American, Volume XXXVI., No. 8, February 24, 1877. Urbana, Illinois: Project Gutenberg. Retrieved https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/19406/pg19406-images.html This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at , located at www.gutenberg.org https://www.gutenberg.org/policy/license.html

Planing Mill Machinery

The Future of Social Networking: User Empowerment, Privacy, and Freedom From Censorship

Mark Twain's Speeches by Mark Twain, is part of the HackerNoon Books Series. You can jump to any chapter in this book . READING-ROOM OPENING here READING-ROOM OPENING On October 13, 1900, Mr. Clemens made his last address
          preceding his departure for America at Kensal Rise, London. I formally declare this reading-room open, and I think that the legislature should not compel a community to provide itself with intelligent food, but give it the privilege of providing it if the community so desires. If the community is anxious to have a reading-room it would put its hand in its pocket and bring out the penny tax. I think it a proof of the healthy, moral, financial, and mental condition of the community if it taxes itself for its mental food. A reading-room is the proper introduction to a library, leading up through the newspapers and magazines to other literature. What would we do without newspapers? Look at the rapid manner in which the news of the Galveston disaster was made known to the entire world. This reminds me of an episode which occurred fifteen years ago when I was at church in Hartford, Connecticut. The clergyman decided to make a collection for the survivors, if any. He did not include me among the leading citizens who took the plates around for collection. I complained to the governor of his lack of financial trust in me, and he replied: “I would trust you myself—if you had a bell-punch.” You have paid me many compliments, and I like to listen to compliments. I indorse all your chairman has said to you about the union of England and America. He also alluded to my name, of which I am rather fond. A little girl wrote me from New Zealand in a letter I received yesterday, stating that her father said my proper name was not Mark Twain but Samuel Clemens, but that she knew better, because Clemens was the name of the man who sold the patent medicine, and his name was not Mark. She was sure it was Mark Twain, because Mark is in the Bible and Twain is in the Bible. I was very glad to get that expression of confidence in my origin, and as I now know my name to be a scriptural one, I am not without hopes of making it worthy. About HackerNoon Book Series: We bring you the most important technical, scientific, and insightful public domain books. This book is part of the public domain. Mark Twain (2004). Mark Twain's Speeches. Urbana, Illinois: Project Gutenberg. Retrieved October 2022 https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/3188/pg3188-images.html This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at , located at . www.gutenberg.org https://www.gutenberg.org/policy/license.html

INDORSE

indorse.io

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

INDORSE

EVERGREEN INDEX #5733

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Indorse WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

INDORSE

indorse.io

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

INDORSE

EVERGREEN INDEX #5733

RELATED COMPANIESRANK

STORIES ABOUT INDORSE

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Indorse WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!