Companies in the Industrial Goods sector have received a lot of coverage today as analysts weigh in on Dana Holding (DAN – Research Report)

Analysts Conflicted on These Industrial Goods Names: Dana Holding (DAN) and Mohawk (MHK)

On a per-share basis, the Maumee, Ohio-based company said it had net income of 13 cents. Earnings, adjusted for one-time gains and costs, were 30 cents per share. The results beat Wall Street expectations. The average estimate of three analysts surveyed by Zacks Investment Research was for earnings of 10 cents per share.

Dana: Q3 Earnings Snapshot

Axle supplier outlines a potential $500 million swing in revenue depending on when the UAW strikes conclude. Full-year revenue could range from $10.2 billion to $10.7 billion, Dana said.

Dana sees 'significant impact' from UAW strikes, but swings to Q3 profit

Dana Incorporated (NYSE:DAN) reported third-quarter FY23 sales growth of 5% year-on-year to $2.669 billion, missing the consensus of $2.695 billion. Adjusted EPS of $0.30 beat the analyst consensus of $0.13.

Dana Overcomes Challenges With Q3 EPS Beat But Foresees $500M Sales Drop If No UAW Strike Resolution By Year's End

Over the last four quarters, the company has surpassed consensus EPS estimates three times. Dana, which belongs to the Zacks Automotive - Original Equipment industry, posted revenues of $2.67 billion for the quarter ended September 2023, missing the Zacks ...

Dana (DAN) Q3 Earnings Top Estimates

Auto parts supplier Dana said on Friday its operations in North America were "significantly impacted" by the ongoing United Auto Workers (UAW) union strikes against automakers, while outlining the expected financial hit from them.

Dana sees 'significant impact' from UAW strikes to North American operations

Dana (DAN) came out with quarterly earnings of $0.30 per share, beating the Zacks Consensus Estimate of $0.10 per share. This compares to earnings of $0.24 per share a year ago. These figures are adjusted for non-recurring items.

(DAN) on Friday reported third-quarter earnings of $19 million. On a per-share basis, the Maumee, Ohio-based company said it had net income of

Detroit Employment Solutions Corp. on Tuesday announced the promotion of Dana Williams to the role of president and CEO.

Detroit Employment Solutions Corp. names new CEO

Dana

dana

HackerNoon editorial team has launched to celebrate their achievements and share their struggles. We need more women in technology, and by sharing stories, we can encourage many girls to follow their dreams. ! this interview series with women in tech Share your story today Tell us about yourself! I’m Dana Sydorenko, a Ukrainian entrepreneur best known as the co-founder of , a platform designed to connect gamers globally. Before my ventures in the tech industry, my background was in classical business. Also, I served as a paramedic in the Ukrainian Army and later transitioned my experience to the business sector by creating one of the largest military supply companies in Ukraine. I established myself as the founder and CEO of a few successful businesses and startups. GameTree Why did you choose this field in the first place? My way to tech was unexpected and fast. I served as a paramedic on the front line when I was 18, and after I got back to civil life, I felt very isolated and depressed. I started to play more MMO games, and they became my safe space, but often, instead of a safe and friendly community, I faced toxicity and harassment. I decided to change that. I believe there is nothing else like technology that could change the world and make it better. I fell in love with the idea of using algorithms to improve people's communities and connect people better. That's why I’m developing GameTree. It is not about games; it is about bringing people together. What tech are you most excited/passionate about right now and why? Right now, I'm enjoying the speed of the changes, and I am a futurist, dreaming about a world without government, without physical money, with self-driving cars and space travel, where we have more time for each other. A time when there is no inequality, sexism, racism, or wars. And if you say it’s impossible, I will answer that there are thousands of people building it right now. And some of us will succeed. Then, everyone will live in the new world that we are building for the next generations. What tech are you most worried about right now and why? I am concerned about how tech affects human social skills and mental health. Levels of diagnosed depression and suicidal rates go up every year. People need people, and technology should be here to help, not to make it worse, especially with everything moving toward AI interactions. I wonder if we're losing touch with the human element, and it will make us more isolated. What are your hobbies and interests outside of tech? Away from the tech world, I have a deep love for techno music; its rhythm and energy are a perfect escape for me. I also enjoy horse riding as I believe it is the best training for leadership and emotional intelligence, and also it is the best break from the digital life. Lately, I find happiness in sharing with others my experiences and mentoring in startup and tech programs for students, transferring my knowledge and insights to raise the next generation. Let's talk about breaking the glass ceiling. What were the biggest challenges you faced as a woman in tech, and how did you deal with them? I’ve often felt like I had to prove myself more. I felt that when you are a girl and you look too attractive, some people don’t take you seriously, so you need to look more like a man, think like a man, and behave like a man. Over time, I don’t have the energy to be concerned about people's thoughts and perspectives that much, rather, I show what I am worth through my actions and results. Hopefully, one day, it will be easier for girls like me to not be occupied with these situations or feelings at all. Any questionable misogynistic story/situation you faced/handled that you would like to share with the HackerNoon Fam? At the beginning of my career, I worked for a company with a very sexist boss, and I shared how difficult it is with a very inspiring woman, my mom. I asked her how she handles sexism when faced with it, and her answer became my credo. She said that she doesn't care what they think of her or her gender; she doesn’t care how they look at her or what they talk about behind her back. She does what she needs and what needs to be done and leaves people alone with their opinions. It's so simple, but it always works. What was the biggest setback/failure that you faced, and how did you manage it? I can’t say if it is my biggest failure. Probably, my biggest failure is still in front of me, but it is a situation that is hard for me personally and causes a lot of pain. As a war veteran in Ukraine, I served for a year as a paramedic on the front line, and when the Russian invasion started again, I felt a big responsibility to go back to the army, but GameTree really needed me too, and it was not an easy choice to make. It is a situation where all decisions lead to pain and loss. I still ask and blame myself for not fighting with my people. What's your biggest achievement that you're really proud of? I am proud of the teams and communities I was able to build. It makes me smile to see how the right people working, talking, or playing together are able to multiply each other’s strengths and cover each other’s weaknesses. My previous company became one of the largest military suppliers in Ukraine without me, and I am proud of them and proud I was able to bring these people together. Furthermore, GameTree's success belongs to the incredible people on the team. It is remarkable to see how together we are creating technology and products that change people's lives. We are receiving dozens of emails and messages about how we helped people meet someone who became their best friend or found the love of their life, and this is what makes me proud. I am honored to create these amazing teams and groups of people who, together, are able to do amazing things. In your opinion, why do we see this huge gender gap in the tech industry, and how can we reduce it? I see it is getting better, and I think the gap is about culture and stereotypes. Culturally, we are overprotecting girls and teaching them to be less risk-taking. Startups and Tech are is not just for men but for dreamers, for the bold and creative, those who are ready to take the initiative and be responsible for victories and mess-ups. We need to show young girls that tech isn’t just a 'guy thing.' It's about creativity, solving problems, and making a difference. Today, we are changing this by being visible role models and encouraging girls to go for it with us. Who is your tech idol? Why? My tech idol is not technically from the tech world (sorry for wordplay), but she inspires me a lot: Marie Curie. She broke barriers in science, showing the world what women can achieve against all odds. Her courage and determination are what I admire the most. As I mentioned before, one of the most remarkable women I know is my mom, a woman who taught me how to take risks, how to not be afraid of problems and complications, and how to be strong and unstoppable but smart and flexible. It is absolutely crucial to be surrounded by strong women so we can inspire each other and show how to get through difficult situations as a woman. Do you have any advice for aspiring girls who want to join the field? Follow your curiosity. Don’t let anyone tell you tech isn’t for you. You belong here as much as anyone. Your ideas, your creativity, they’re needed. Be messy if needed, be a troublemaker, be a rebel, make mistakes, and take risks. Be brave and look directly into the problems and difficulties with a beautiful female smile. We are waiting for you on this side.

Women in Tech: Dana Sydorenko creates connections to bring gamers together 

We’re excited to interview , whose article has recently become a on Hackernoon. Dana Kachan TOP Story So let’s start! Tell us a bit about yourself. I work as a strategic PR & marketing advisor to tech companies. I am also a business author and contributor to big media including HackerNoon, Entrepreneur, VentureBeat, and UX Magazine. I earlier worked as a Chief Marketing Officer of BullPerks (decentralized VC & crypto launchpad) and GamesPad (GameFi, NFT & metaverse ecosystem and launchpad). I have a track record in marketing advisory of high-tech and Web 3.0 startups all over the world. Along with other reputable experts, I contributed to a few research papers, including “ ” by GamesPad and “ ” by Divante and Kantar. Metaverse: Emerging Business Opportunities Global ECommerce Trends Interesting! What was your latest Hackernoon Top Story about? My latest story featured the innovative vision of who earlier collaborated with global brands such as Dior, Nike, and Porsche, as well as celebrities Justin Bieber, Steve Aoki, and others. luxury brands through the vintage cartoon aesthetics of the world-famous 3D artist Gal Yosef Do you usually write on similar topics? If not, what do you usually write about? The topic of art is pretty common to me. I’ve written a lot about .  Since I have extensive marketing and management experience, I often write about startup marketing, corporate life, and business in general. art and design on Medium Great! What is your usual writing routine like (if you have one?) Ideas for my articles are being born very organically. Acquiring experience and overcoming different challenges, I just feel the natural desire to share my findings with others. People who have ever worked with me know that I am very honest in my articles and share only what I really think. I have an extraordinary approach to content creation. It doesn’t look like anything that content writers and SEO specialists usually advise, and it might even meet criticism. Everything starts with the mission of the article. Before writing Op-Eds, I always question myself why should it matter to people. The internet is full of useless content, how to make mine different? How can it be particular? Based on that, I formulate the topic and start writing down a free flow of consciousness - a collection of my insights, thoughts, and conclusions. No structure. It's like a sketch on a bare canvas. Later, I structure all the content into an easy-to-understand article, adding statistics and interesting facts to back my concepts. Of course, this approach only works for Op-Ed articles and will unlikely work for businesses where everything requires a very clear structure. Being a writer in tech can be a challenge. It’s not often our main role, but an addition to another one. What is the biggest challenge you have when it comes to writing? The biggest challenge is to make an article thought-provoking. While sharing some professional insights, it’s also important to me to motivate people to read between the lines and understand important things that can bring change to our world. This is how viral content is usually born. It should resonate with people's pains and wants. What is the next thing you hope to achieve in your career? Nowadays, we can see many ambitious startups in clean tech, fintech, crypto, AI, and other emerging industries that are poised to become game-changers in the modern world. I want to be a part of this change and help these companies turn their inspirational ideas into reality, guiding them in marketing. My other goal is to become an educator and share my insights with like-minded people. I am actively moving in this direction, joining startup accelerators as a mentor. Wow, that’s admirable. Now, something more casual: What is your guilty pleasure of choice? I try to keep a healthy lifestyle, but sometimes, I give in to the temptation to eat something sweet like chocolate, ice cream, or cakes. :) Do you have a non-tech-related hobby? If yes, what is it? I like walking or jogging near the sea. It’s really relaxing and helps clear the mind. What can the HackerNoon community expect to read from you next? I can only say that I will try to make something extraordinary, educational, and definitely worth your time to read it. What’s your opinion on HackerNoon as a platform for writers? HackerNoon is a very progressive platform. I like the content you pick for publishing. As a marketer, I am really amazed by your newsletters. They are so creative, fun, and catchy! Thanks for taking the time to join our “ ” series. It was a pleasure. Do you have any closing words? Meet the writer Thank you for this opportunity! HackerNoon is a great magazine, and it’s a great pleasure for me to be one of your contributors and share my insights with your readers. Thanks once again!

Meet HackerNoon Contributor Dana Kachan: A Strategic Marketing Consultant & Startup Advisor 

Legendary Harlem-based fashion innovator and influencer Dapper Dan partners with Gap to launch his first NFT collection announced a limited-edition collection of non-fungible tokens (NFTs) designed in collaboration with legendary fashion innovator and style influencer, Dapper Dan. The launch will build on the gamification of its first NFT launch, allowing customers to build their NFT collection with several drops at various levels and price points. This event marks the adoption of NFT by the fashion industry as a means to provide gamified customer experience to its customers. Gap Gap and Dapper Dan have just released two special-edition DAP GAP collaborations, and now they're taking the partnership a step further by collaborating on a limited edition NFT collection, as well as a "Harlem Tailor" hoodie and a one-of-a-kind varsity jacket—a first-time NFT partnership for Dapper Dan." One-of-a-Kind DAP GAP digital art made by Dapper Dan and a limited-edition physical DAP GAP varsity jacket autographed by Dap himself are up for sale during the 48-hour NFT event beginning on April 2 at 9 a.m. PT/12 p.m. ET. The auction begins on the same day as the inaugural annual fundraiser in New York City for Fifteen Percent Pledge. An advocacy group, the Fifteen Percent Pledge, will receive all the auction proceeds, which will be given to Gap Inc. to support its commitment to creating access and opportunity for the Black community by increasing its pipeline programmes by 15 percent, through the fiscal sponsor, Philanthropic Ventures Foundation. The experience will include three gamified level drops following the auction: Common, Rare and Epic. Starting on April 5, Common will be on sale for 48 hours, for 2 Tez (XTZ). Currently, 2 Tez is roughly $7 USD Rare will be on sale starting April 7 for 10  Tez and Epic on April 12 for 100 Tez. All levels will be available to shop exclusively on at 9 am PT / 12 pm ET. The digital collectables will be available on a first-come, first-served basis, with Rare and Epic levels available in more limited editions. (exact conversion rates may vary based on market price fluctuations). gap.com/nft The gamified experience encourages customers to collect iconic Gap hoodie digital art at the Common and Rare levels to unlock the opportunity to purchase the Epic—limited edition digital art designed by Dapper Dan and a special-edition physical DAP GAP Epic “Harlem Tailor” hoodie. For those who participated in the first Metallic series drop in January (Series 1), there are several perks they can expect: Metallic Series holders will receive one Dapper Dan Common NFT via Airdrop on 4/4 Metallic Series Epic holders will receive one Dapper Dan Rare NFT via Airdrop on 4/6 Preferred Access: 100 Dapper Dan Epic NFTs will be available for purchase on a first-come, first-served basis for holders with un-redeemed Metallic Series collector’s special (NFT created by fusing four Common and two Rare Metallic Series NFTs) beginning at 8 am PT on 4/12, one hour before they are available to the public Simultaneously with this drop, Gap is also announcing a new Discord server where customers can connect, engage, and foster a community with other fans of our NFTs. The Discord server can be accessed at . discord.gg/gapthreads Gap partners with and to create the Gap Threads marketplace, using a more energy efficient approach to secure its network, allowing it to operate with minimal energy consumption and a . Tezos Interpop low carbon footprint With Gap’s second venture into the metaverse, the company plans to continue testing and learning in this space. There will be future drops with a commitment to partnering with creators that mirror the brand’s values and push the boundaries of creativity. Don’t forget to like and share the story! The content of this story DO NOT represent the views of HackerNoon and are meant as information only from the lens of the independent contributor. Please DYOR before investing.

Dapper Dan, a Legendary Harlem-Based Fashion Innovator Debuts His First NFT Collection With GAP

The 2020 #Noonies are here, and they are both much greener and much bigger than last year. Among the 2,000+ deserving humans nominated across 5 categories for over 200 award titles, we discovered who’s has been nominated for a 2020 #Noonie in the Dana Kachan from Ukraine, Future Heroes and Technology categories. Without further ado, we present to you, our big techy world, from the perspective of Dana. 1.  Which 2020 Noonie have you been nominated for? Hacker Noon Contributor of the Year - PRODUCT DESIGN 2. Tell us a bit about yourself. Hi Hacker Noon! I'm so excited to appear on the list of your top contributors, it's a great honor to me. Thanks once again! A little about me: I'm a digital marketing strategist serving product design and development companies based in the USA, Singapore, and Europe. I'm also an author of many articles on design, product development, business, and marketing. 3. Tell us about the things you make / write / manage / build. Besides providing digital marketing consulting services for B2B businesses located in the USA, Singapore, and Europe, I try to be helpful and share my findings with other people via my articles. I'm also a UX design researcher and the co-author of the book "Business-Driven Digital Product Design" created collaboratively with Fireart Studio. Recently, I've become a contributing marketing expert at the 7th edition of Global eCommerce Trends Report 2020 created by Divante in collaboration with Kantar. After publishing my last article "What you need to know about digital marketing for the new normal" on E27, I have been invited to participate in a video podcast about marketing during the COVID-19 conducted by REL Communications (it's planned to be released soon). My recent articles have been published on your amazing magazine, as well as other online media, such as Yahoo News Singapore, The Designest, Noupe, ReadWrite, Business2Community, Creative Bloq, Usability Geek, Speakyboy Magazine, and E27. Networking with many product design&development companies, I often interview CEOs and Founders and include their opinions in my articles. So that I try to ensure readers always access tips and practices backed at my own digital marketing experience or experience of those incredible people who have grown their own products and companies. 4. What are you most excited about right now? I am excited to combine my passions for Design, Marketing, Digital Transformation, and Business topics, and write articles about UI/UX and graphic design in the context of marketing, the importance of design for business success, and how design intersects with customer psychology. 5. What are you worried about right now? My favorite Turkish food restaurant and clothing shop faced bankruptcy during the Coronavirus lockdown, so I am really worried about the future of all small businesses now. To support SMBs in these challenging times, I am now writing a articles on how they can boost their marketing to overcome a recession. 6. What's the most useful advice you've ever given somebody? The most useful advice? Likely, it was "Stop crying, be a strong man!" given to my small brother. The funniest thing is that instead of by brother, it has been sent to my boss by mistake on the first my working day, right after the final interview. 7. How has the pandemic changed your life and/or career? I have realized the significance of digital transformation for businesses even more than before since most of my clients have faced challenges related to it during a pandemic and were forced to adjust their businesses to new digital market rules. 8. If we gave you $10 million to invest in one thing right now, where would you put it? I would organize a 2-in-1 company - digital marketing agency + media production house (like Red Bull's one, including own magazine, radio, video production, etc) 9. What's an opinion you have that most people don't agree with? I believe in aliens. :) Since it would be too egocentric to think that we're alone in the whole Universe. 10. Which apps can't you live without? LinkedIn app, digital wallets 11. What are you currently learning? marketing approaches by Seth Godin For much the same reasons Hacker Noon decided not to put good ideas behind pop-ups or paywalls — nor abuse your personal data to target you with creepy ads — we also decided that you don’t have to be a #thinkfluencer or have 50k followers on Twitter to earn the recognition that comes with a 2020 Noonie Nomination. Make somebody’s day and nominate them to be recognized in the internet’s most independent and community-driven awards: . NOONIES.TECH

"Stop Crying, Be a Strong Man", Interview with Dana Kachan

Uni-OVSeg: A Step Towards Efficient and Bias-Resilient Vision Systems

A mysterious botnet, identified by the user-agent string Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64), is aggressively scraping WordPress websites at an alarming rate, flagrantly disregarding the crawl delay directives set in the  robots.txt file. The botnet has been found to be causing significant server strain, bypassing web administrators' efforts to control access and protect their site resources. Despite the bot's user-agent string mimicking a legitimate Linux browser, its bad behavior is anything but lawful. Not only does it ignore robots.txt instructions, but it also carries out non-stop scraping activities that severely impact the performance and security of affected websites. The unregulated scraping can lead to slowed website loading times and increased bandwidth consumption. IP Addresses and ASN Sources Involved The IP addresses behind this botnet appear to originate from multiple autonomous system numbers (ASNs), primarily hosted by less-reputable service providers. The IPs exhibit coordinated behavior, systematically scraping WordPress websites with no regard for the implemented crawl-delay directives. The ASNs and their affiliated IP addresses are: ASN 13886 - Cloud-South


ASN 21769 - AS-COLOAM


ASN 263735 - Sociedad Buena Hosting, S.A.


ASN 52393 - Corporacion Dana S.A. 185.199.117.126
216.10.7.2
104.233.51.70
104.249.4.61
186.179.1.64
181.177.71.218
185.195.215.202
185.193.73.239
104.239.116.255
185.199.118.137
185.193.72.244
216.10.3.36
186.179.11.6
181.177.70.128
104.239.115.2
186.179.10.14
104.249.5.146
185.199.116.245
104.233.54.62
185.207.97.112
185.199.116.218
181.177.71.59
104.249.0.172
104.233.49.164
185.188.78.129
216.10.2.44
104.233.48.205
216.10.6.143
104.249.1.226
185.196.191.240
67.227.122.211
185.195.221.166
181.177.79.165
186.179.25.11
185.199.117.248
185.195.220.198
104.239.114.195
181.177.66.111
67.227.127.113
185.205.196.57
199.168.122.42
186.179.27.9
185.193.75.105
216.10.3.10
216.10.2.161
185.188.77.24
104.233.48.70
185.188.79.15
186.179.2.186
181.177.72.76
216.10.6.205
186.179.13.13
181.177.78.227
181.177.72.12
181.177.79.141
186.179.25.210
104.233.49.36
104.249.3.157
104.239.117.199
104.233.48.52
104.233.51.106
216.10.3.78
216.10.0.49
185.207.99.161
67.227.120.127
67.227.121.26
104.233.55.225
104.249.3.194
185.195.220.41
181.177.71.84
104.233.48.111
104.249.2.46
181.177.67.170
104.249.2.195
186.179.13.80
67.227.124.74
104.239.116.151
104.239.119.180
185.195.221.180
104.249.2.99
104.239.114.190
104.239.117.112
181.177.71.49
67.227.121.109
199.168.121.93
185.195.223.14
181.177.67.30
181.177.76.63
181.177.77.79
181.177.66.29
181.177.77.197
186.179.24.252
185.196.188.94
181.177.76.62
216.10.7.75
181.177.68.33
186.179.11.165
181.177.71.188
185.195.213.87
185.193.74.97
67.227.122.57
185.196.189.63
216.10.1.142
199.168.122.193
186.179.2.117
181.177.72.134
181.177.66.212
185.188.77.122
185.207.96.121
199.168.121.246
104.249.0.31
185.195.222.160 Potential Mitigation Strategies Web administrators are urged to monitor their logs for suspicious activity involving the Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) user-agent string and IPs associated with the above ASNs. Immediate actions to consider include: Blocking or rate-limiting the offending IPs through firewall rules.


Implementing CAPTCHA systems for suspicious traffic.


Using bot protection plugins or services such as Cloudflare to prevent excessive scraping. The persistence of this botnet highlights the importance of continually refining web security measures to protect digital assets from unauthorized data scraping and potential attacks. This unknown botnet's activity is a pressing issue for WordPress site owners, and if left unchecked, its presence could lead to server overloads, data leaks, or even downtime for many websites. Interestingly, despite the aggressive nature of this botnet, none of the associated IPs have been flagged or reported in popular databases like AbuseIPDB. Even more surprising, these IPs are not natively blocked by Cloudflare’s managed rules, which typically catch such malicious behavior early on. This suggests that the botnet is currently flying under the radar, operating in a gray zone of anonymity. The lack of detection and reporting raises concerns about how sophisticated and stealthy this botnet may be. For now, it seems to be an entirely unknown entity in the cybersecurity landscape. However, it does seem look like it is scraping WordPress content. A mysterious botnet, identified by the user-agent string Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) , is aggressively scraping WordPress websites at an alarming rate, flagrantly disregarding the crawl delay directives set in the  robots.txt file. The botnet has been found to be causing significant server strain, bypassing web administrators' efforts to control access and protect their site resources. Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) Despite the bot's user-agent string mimicking a legitimate Linux browser, its bad behavior is anything but lawful. Not only does it ignore robots.txt instructions, but it also carries out non-stop scraping activities that severely impact the performance and security of affected websites. The unregulated scraping can lead to slowed website loading times and increased bandwidth consumption. robots.txt IP Addresses and ASN Sources Involved The IP addresses behind this botnet appear to originate from multiple autonomous system numbers (ASNs), primarily hosted by less-reputable service providers. The IPs exhibit coordinated behavior, systematically scraping WordPress websites with no regard for the implemented crawl-delay directives. The ASNs and their affiliated IP addresses are: ASN 13886 - Cloud-South ASN 21769 - AS-COLOAM ASN 263735 - Sociedad Buena Hosting, S.A. ASN 52393 - Corporacion Dana S.A. ASN 13886 - Cloud-South ASN 13886 - Cloud-South ASN 13886 - Cloud-South ASN 21769 - AS-COLOAM ASN 21769 - AS-COLOAM ASN 21769 - AS-COLOAM ASN 263735 - Sociedad Buena Hosting, S.A. ASN 263735 - Sociedad Buena Hosting, S.A. ASN 263735 - Sociedad Buena Hosting, S.A. ASN 52393 - Corporacion Dana S.A. ASN 52393 - Corporacion Dana S.A. ASN 52393 - Corporacion Dana S.A. 185.199.117.126
216.10.7.2
104.233.51.70
104.249.4.61
186.179.1.64
181.177.71.218
185.195.215.202
185.193.73.239
104.239.116.255
185.199.118.137
185.193.72.244
216.10.3.36
186.179.11.6
181.177.70.128
104.239.115.2
186.179.10.14
104.249.5.146
185.199.116.245
104.233.54.62
185.207.97.112
185.199.116.218
181.177.71.59
104.249.0.172
104.233.49.164
185.188.78.129
216.10.2.44
104.233.48.205
216.10.6.143
104.249.1.226
185.196.191.240
67.227.122.211
185.195.221.166
181.177.79.165
186.179.25.11
185.199.117.248
185.195.220.198
104.239.114.195
181.177.66.111
67.227.127.113
185.205.196.57
199.168.122.42
186.179.27.9
185.193.75.105
216.10.3.10
216.10.2.161
185.188.77.24
104.233.48.70
185.188.79.15
186.179.2.186
181.177.72.76
216.10.6.205
186.179.13.13
181.177.78.227
181.177.72.12
181.177.79.141
186.179.25.210
104.233.49.36
104.249.3.157
104.239.117.199
104.233.48.52
104.233.51.106
216.10.3.78
216.10.0.49
185.207.99.161
67.227.120.127
67.227.121.26
104.233.55.225
104.249.3.194
185.195.220.41
181.177.71.84
104.233.48.111
104.249.2.46
181.177.67.170
104.249.2.195
186.179.13.80
67.227.124.74
104.239.116.151
104.239.119.180
185.195.221.180
104.249.2.99
104.239.114.190
104.239.117.112
181.177.71.49
67.227.121.109
199.168.121.93
185.195.223.14
181.177.67.30
181.177.76.63
181.177.77.79
181.177.66.29
181.177.77.197
186.179.24.252
185.196.188.94
181.177.76.62
216.10.7.75
181.177.68.33
186.179.11.165
181.177.71.188
185.195.213.87
185.193.74.97
67.227.122.57
185.196.189.63
216.10.1.142
199.168.122.193
186.179.2.117
181.177.72.134
181.177.66.212
185.188.77.122
185.207.96.121
199.168.121.246
104.249.0.31
185.195.222.160 Potential Mitigation Strategies Web administrators are urged to monitor their logs for suspicious activity involving the Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) user-agent string and IPs associated with the above ASNs. Immediate actions to consider include: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) Blocking or rate-limiting the offending IPs through firewall rules. Implementing CAPTCHA systems for suspicious traffic. Using bot protection plugins or services such as Cloudflare to prevent excessive scraping. Blocking or rate-limiting the offending IPs through firewall rules. Blocking or rate-limiting the offending IPs through firewall rules. Implementing CAPTCHA systems for suspicious traffic. Implementing CAPTCHA systems for suspicious traffic. Using bot protection plugins or services such as Cloudflare to prevent excessive scraping. Using bot protection plugins or services such as Cloudflare to prevent excessive scraping. The persistence of this botnet highlights the importance of continually refining web security measures to protect digital assets from unauthorized data scraping and potential attacks. This unknown botnet's activity is a pressing issue for WordPress site owners, and if left unchecked, its presence could lead to server overloads, data leaks, or even downtime for many websites. Interestingly, despite the aggressive nature of this botnet, none of the associated IPs have been flagged or reported in popular databases like AbuseIPDB. Even more surprising, these IPs are not natively blocked by Cloudflare’s managed rules, which typically catch such malicious behavior early on. This suggests that the botnet is currently flying under the radar, operating in a gray zone of anonymity. The lack of detection and reporting raises concerns about how sophisticated and stealthy this botnet may be. For now, it seems to be an entirely unknown entity in the cybersecurity landscape. However, it does seem look like it is scraping WordPress content. unknown entity

Unknown Botnet Using Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_ User Agent Ignoring Crawl Delay on WordPress Sites

The Next Steps for Primordial Black Hole Research

Hey Hackers! It’s Jose here. I’ll be taking over Tech What the Heck this week while Sheharyar is out. So, get strapped in because we have a lot to talk about. Adobe vs the U.S. If you’ve ever used Adobe, you know that their products are good but their subscription method is god awful. It’s too expensive, especially for freelance beginners and hobbyists. $60 a month is just too much for people who are either doing it for fun or don’t have enough experience to get paying gigs. If you want to make the argument that Adobe is for professionals and you should only start using it when you’re years into your freelance career, then okay; I’ll concede that point. However, my other problem with Adobe’s subscription is far more serious: It’s extremely predatory. And I’m not the only one who thinks so; Uncle Sam does too. Adobe recently got sued by the U.S. government for harming consumers with their subscription model and their cancellation method. Here’s an excerpt from the complaint filed against the company: “For years, Adobe has harmed consumers by enrolling them in its default, most lucrative subscription plan without clearly disclosing important plan terms. Adobe fails to adequately disclose to consumers that by signing up for the “Annual, Paid Monthly” subscription plan (“APM plan”), they are agreeing to a year-long commitment and a hefty early termination fee (“ETF”) that can amount to hundreds of dollars. Adobe clearly discloses the ETF only when subscribers attempt to cancel, turning the stealth ETF into a powerful retention tool that by trapping consumers in subscriptions they no longer want. During enrollment, Adobe hides material terms of its APM plan in fine print and behind optional textboxes and hyperlinks, providing disclosures that are designed to go unnoticed and that most consumers never see. Adobe then deters cancellations by employing an onerous and complicated cancellation process. As part of this convoluted process, Adobe ambushes subscribers with the previously obscured ETF when they attempt to cancel. Through these practices, Adobe has violated federal laws designed to protect consumers.” To break it down for you, the U.S. government is alleging that Adobe is hiding secret fees and only springing them up on their customers when they try to cancel their subscriptions. They’re specifically talking about Adobe’s “annual, paid monthly” subscription plan; which is supposed to be the cheapest of the three plans. If you look at the screenshot above, you will notice that it says a fee will apply if you try to cancel it after 14 days. Any normal person would look at that and go “Oh, the fee couldn’t be more than a couple dozen dollars.” But nope. People hoping to cancel their subscriptions have to pay “50 percent of their remaining annual subscription,” according to Ars Technica. Here’s a more in-depth look at how much you would owe if you chose the “annual, paid monthly” plan and tried to cancel it. A subscription that is supposed to be only $60 a month could cost you over $200 to cancel. But the fees are one thing; another thing the U.S. government is accusing Adobe of is making the cancellation process too complicated. In fact, they have an entire section in the complaint they filed titled “Adobe’s Unlawful Cancellation Practices.” Here are some excerpts from it that immediately caught my attention. “Locating and clicking on a “Cancel your plan” button does not result in cancellation. Instead, after users have clicked “Cancel your plan,” Adobe has forced them to undergo a convoluted process requiring several additional steps, some of which were wholly unnecessary to complete cancellation.” “Additionally, consumers have had to navigate through several web pages, pop-ups, and offers designed for retention.” “Many subscribers attempting to cancel via phone or chat have been subjected to a time-consuming and burdensome process.” Although this all seems damning, Adobe won’t take it lying down. Dana Rao, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Chief Trust Officer of Adobe, said in a statement: “Subscription services are convenient, flexible and cost effective to allow users to choose the plan that best fits their needs, timeline and budget. Our priority is to always ensure our customers have a positive experience. We are transparent with the terms and conditions of our subscription agreements and have a simple cancellation process. We will refute the FTC’s claims in court.” We’ll see how it goes for Adobe who, in the last two weeks, has fallen over 600 spots on HackerNoon’s Tech Company Rankings, going from rank 35 to 649. Sponsored Content Discover unparalleled speech clarity with this advanced, state-of-the-art hearing aid. With crystal-clear sound delivered to your ears and a sleek, discreet design powered by German technology, you can now enjoy clear speech with minimum background distractions, even in the noisiest environments. Take comfort in our commitment to your hearing and try our 45-day no-risk trial today. In Other News: Tesla reportedly delays Cybertruck deliveries because of windshield wiper issues - The Verge EV startup Fisker files for bankruptcy - TechCrunch US pushing Netherlands, Japan to restrict more chipmaking equipment to China, source says - Reuters That’s all for now, but we’ll see you next week! Jose Hernandez, HackerNoon Editor *All rankings are current as of Monday. To see how the rankings have changed, please visit HackerNoon's Tech Company Rankings page.*Tech, What the Heck!? is a once-weekly newsletter written by HackerNoon editors that combine HackerNoon's proprietary data with news-worthy tech stories from around the internet. Humorous and insightful, the newsletter recaps trending events that are shaping the world of tech. Subscribe here.* Hey Hackers! It’s Jose here. I’ll be taking over Tech What the Heck this week while Sheharyar is out. So, get strapped in because we have a lot to talk about. Hey Hackers! It’s Jose here. I’ll be taking over Tech What the Heck this week while Sheharyar is out. So, get strapped in because we have a lot to talk about. Adobe vs the U.S. Adobe vs the U.S. If you’ve ever used Adobe, you know that their products are good but their subscription method is god awful. It’s too expensive, especially for freelance beginners and hobbyists. If you’ve ever used Adobe, you know that their products are good but their subscription method is god awful. It’s too expensive, especially for freelance beginners and hobbyists. $60 a month is just too much for people who are either doing it for fun or don’t have enough experience to get paying gigs. $60 a month $60 a month If you want to make the argument that Adobe is for professionals and you should only start using it when you’re years into your freelance career, then okay; I’ll concede that point. However, my other problem with Adobe’s subscription is far more serious: It’s extremely predatory. And I’m not the only one who thinks so; Uncle Sam does too. Adobe recently got sued by the U.S. government for harming consumers with their subscription model and their cancellation method. Here’s an excerpt from the complaint filed against the company: complaint complaint “For years, Adobe has harmed consumers by enrolling them in its default, most lucrative subscription plan without clearly disclosing important plan terms. Adobe fails to adequately disclose to consumers that by signing up for the “Annual, Paid Monthly” subscription plan (“APM plan”), they are agreeing to a year-long commitment and a hefty early termination fee (“ETF”) that can amount to hundreds of dollars. Adobe clearly discloses the ETF only when subscribers attempt to cancel, turning the stealth ETF into a powerful retention tool that by trapping consumers in subscriptions they no longer want. During enrollment, Adobe hides material terms of its APM plan in fine print and behind optional textboxes and hyperlinks, providing disclosures that are designed to go unnoticed and that most consumers never see. Adobe then deters cancellations by employing an onerous and complicated cancellation process. As part of this convoluted process, Adobe ambushes subscribers with the previously obscured ETF when they attempt to cancel. Through these practices, Adobe has violated federal laws designed to protect consumers.” To break it down for you, the U.S. government is alleging that Adobe is hiding secret fees and only springing them up on their customers when they try to cancel their subscriptions. They’re specifically talking about Adobe’s “annual, paid monthly” subscription plan; which is supposed to be the cheapest of the three plans. If you look at the screenshot above, you will notice that it says a fee will apply if you try to cancel it after 14 days. Any normal person would look at that and go “Oh, the fee couldn’t be more than a couple dozen dollars.” But nope. People hoping to cancel their subscriptions have to pay “50 percent of their remaining annual subscription,” according to Ars Technica . Ars Technica Ars Technica Here’s a more in-depth look at how much you would owe if you chose the “annual, paid monthly” plan and tried to cancel it. in-depth look in-depth look A subscription that is supposed to be only $60 a month could cost you over $200 to cancel. But the fees are one thing; another thing the U.S. government is accusing Adobe of is making the cancellation process too complicated. In fact, they have an entire section in the complaint they filed titled “Adobe’s Unlawful Cancellation Practices.” complaint complaint Here are some excerpts from it that immediately caught my attention. “Locating and clicking on a “Cancel your plan” button does not result in cancellation. Instead, after users have clicked “Cancel your plan,” Adobe has forced them to undergo a convoluted process requiring several additional steps, some of which were wholly unnecessary to complete cancellation.” “Additionally, consumers have had to navigate through several web pages, pop-ups, and offers designed for retention.” “Many subscribers attempting to cancel via phone or chat have been subjected to a time-consuming and burdensome process.” Although this all seems damning, Adobe won’t take it lying down. Dana Rao, Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Chief Trust Officer of Adobe, said in a statement : statement statement “Subscription services are convenient, flexible and cost effective to allow users to choose the plan that best fits their needs, timeline and budget. Our priority is to always ensure our customers have a positive experience. We are transparent with the terms and conditions of our subscription agreements and have a simple cancellation process. We will refute the FTC’s claims in court.” We’ll see how it goes for Adobe who, in the last two weeks, has fallen over 600 spots on HackerNoon’s Tech Company Rankings , going from rank 35 to 649 . HackerNoon’s Tech Company Rankings HackerNoon’s Tech Company Rankings rank 35 to 649 rank 35 to 649 Sponsored Content Sponsored Content Discover unparalleled speech clarity with this advanced, state-of-the-art hearing aid. With crystal-clear sound delivered to your ears and a sleek, discreet design powered by German technology, you can now enjoy clear speech with minimum background distractions, even in the noisiest environments. Take comfort in our commitment to your hearing and try our 45-day no-risk trial today . try our 45-day no-risk trial today In Other News: Tesla reportedly delays Cybertruck deliveries because of windshield wiper issues - The Verge Tesla reportedly delays Cybertruck deliveries because of windshield wiper issues - The Verge The Verge The Verge EV startup Fisker files for bankruptcy - TechCrunch EV startup Fisker files for bankruptcy - TechCrunch TechCrunch TechCrunch US pushing Netherlands, Japan to restrict more chipmaking equipment to China, source says - Reuters US pushing Netherlands, Japan to restrict more chipmaking equipment to China, source says - Reuters Reuters Reuters That’s all for now, but we’ll see you next week! Jose Hernandez , HackerNoon Editor Jose Hernandez Jose Hernandez *All rankings are current as of Monday. To see how the rankings have changed, please visit HackerNoon's Tech Company Rankings page. *Tech, What the Heck!? is a once-weekly newsletter written by HackerNoon editors that combine HackerNoon's proprietary data with news-worthy tech stories from around the internet. Humorous and insightful, the newsletter recaps trending events that are shaping the world of tech. Subscribe here .* *All rankings are current as of Monday. To see how the rankings have changed, please visit HackerNoon's Tech Company Rankings page. Tech Company Rankings here

Uncle Sam Elbow Drops Adobe With a Lawsuit

VEATIC: Familiarity and Enjoyment Ratings & References

VEATIC: পরিচিতি এবং উপভোগ রেটিং এবং রেফারেন্স

VEATIC: Vertrautheits- und Genussbewertungen und Referenzen

VEATIC: Calificaciones y referencias de familiaridad y disfrute

VEATIC : Notes et références de familiarité et de plaisir

VEATIC: परिचितता और आनंद रेटिंग और संदर्भ

VEATIC: 親しみやすさと楽しさの評価と参考文献

VEATIC: 친숙함과 즐거움 평가 및 참고자료

VEATIC: classificações e referências de familiaridade e prazer

VEATIC: рейтинги знакомства и удовольствия, а также ссылки

VEATIC: Aşinalık ve Eğlence Derecelendirmeler ve Referanslar

VEATIC: Đánh giá và tham khảo về sự quen thuộc và thích thú

VEATIC：熟悉度和享受度评级及参考

Authors:
(1) Scott Conn, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California;
(2) Joseph Fitzgerald, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California;
(3) Jorn Callies, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California. Table of Links Abstract and Intro Observations Models Results Discussion Conclusion APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C References References Alford, M. H., 2001: Internal swell generation: The spatial distribution of energy flux from the wind to mixed layer near-inertial motions. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 31 (8), 2359–2368. Alford, M. H., 2020: Revisiting near-inertial wind work: Slab models, relative stress, and mixed layer deepening. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 50 (11), 3141–3156. Alford, M. H., J. A. MacKinnon, H. L. Simmons, and J. D. Nash, 2016: Near-inertial internal gravity waves in the ocean. Annual review of marine science, 8, 95–123. Arbic, B. K., and G. R. Flierl, 2004: Baroclinically unstable geostrophic turbulence in the limits of strong and weak bottom ekman friction: Application to midocean eddies. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 34 (10), 2257–2273. Asselin, O., and W. R. Young, 2020: Penetration of wind-generated near-inertial waves into a turbulent ocean. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 50 (6), 1699–1716. Balmforth, N., S. G. Llewellyn Smith, and W. Young, 1998: Enhanced dispersion of near-inertial waves in an idealized geostrophic flow. Journal of marine research, 56 (1), 1–40. Balmforth, N. J., and W. R. Young, 1999: Radiative damping of near-inertial oscillations in the mixed layer. Journal of marine research, 57 (4), 561–584. Buckingham, C. E., and Coauthors, 2016: Seasonality of submesoscale flows in the ocean surface boundary layer. Geophysical Research Letters, 43 (5), 2118–2126. Burns, K. J., G. M. Vasil, J. S. Oishi, D. Lecoanet, and B. P. Brown, 2020: Dedalus: A flexible framework for numerical simulations with spectral methods. Phys. Rev. Res., 2, 023 068. Callies, J., R. Barkan, and A. N. Garabato, 2020: Time scales of submesoscale flow inferred from a mooring array. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 50 (4), 1065–1086. Damerell, G. M., K. J. Heywood, D. Calvert, A. L. Grant, M. J. Bell, and S. E. Belcher, 2020: A comparison of five surface mixed layer models with a year of observations in the north atlantic. Progress in Oceanography, 187, 102 316. Damerell, G. M., K. J. Heywood, A. F. Thompson, U. Binetti, and J. Kaiser, 2016: The vertical structure of upper ocean variability at the porcupine abyssal plain during 2012–2013. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 121 (5), 3075–3089. D’Asaro, E. A., 1985: The energy flux from the wind to near-inertial motions in the surface mixed layer. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 15 (8), 1043–1059. D’Asaro, E. A., 1995: Upper-ocean inertial currents forced by a strong storm. Part III: Interaction of inertial currents and mesoscale eddies. Journal of physical oceanography, 25 (11), 2953–2958. D’Asaro, E. A., C. C. Eriksen, M. D. Levine, P. Niiler, P. Van Meurs, and Coauthors, 1995: Upperocean inertial currents forced by a strong storm. Part I: Data and comparisons with linear theory. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 25 (11), 2909–2936. Dewar, W. K., and G. R. Flierl, 1987: Some effects of the wind on rings. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 17 (10), 1653–1667. Essink, S., E. Kunze, R.-C. Lien, R. Inoue, and S.-i. Ito, 2022: Near-inertial wave interactions and turbulence production in a kuroshio anticyclonic eddy. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 52 (11), 2687–2704. Ferrari, R., and C. Wunsch, 2009: Ocean circulation kinetic energy: Reservoirs, sources, and sinks. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 41, 253–282. Flexas, M. M., A. F. Thompson, H. S. Torres, P. Klein, J. T. Farrar, H. Zhang, and D. Menemenlis, 2019: Global estimates of the energy transfer from the wind to the ocean, with emphasis on near-inertial oscillations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 124 (8), 5723–5746. Gill, A. E., 1984: On the behavior of internal waves in the wakes of storms. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 14 (7), 1129–1151. Gnanadesikan, A., M.-A. Pradal, and R. Abernathey, 2015: Isopycnal mixing by mesoscale eddies significantly impacts oceanic anthropogenic carbon uptake. Geophysical Research Letters, 42 (11), 4249–4255. Guan, S., W. Zhao, J. Huthnance, J. Tian, and J. Wang, 2014: Observed upper ocean response to typhoon megi (2010) in the northern south china sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119 (5), 3134–3157. Hersbach, H., and Coauthors, 2018: Era5 hourly data on single levels from 1979 to present. Copernicus climate change service (c3s) climate data store (cds), 10 (10.24381). Jayne, S. R., and J. Marotzke, 2002: The oceanic eddy heat transport. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 32 (12), 3328–3345. Jochum, M., B. P. Briegleb, G. Danabasoglu, W. G. Large, N. J. Norton, S. R. Jayne, M. H. Alford, and F. O. Bryan, 2013: The impact of oceanic near-inertial waves on climate. Journal of Climate, 26 (9), 2833–2844. Kato, H., and O. Phillips, 1969: On the penetration of a turbulent layer into stratified fluid. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 37 (4), 643–655. Kunze, E., 1985: Near-inertial wave propagation in geostrophic shear. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 15 (5), 544–565. Large, W., and S. Pond, 1981: Open ocean momentum flux measurements in moderate to strong winds. Journal of physical oceanography, 11 (3), 324–336. Lee, D.-K., and P. P. Niiler, 1998: The inertial chimney: The near-inertial energy drainage from the ocean surface to the deep layer. 103 (C4), 7579–7591. Moehlis, J., and S. G. L. Smith, 2001: Radiation of mixed layer near-inertial oscillations into the ocean interior. Journal of physical oceanography, 31 (6), 1550–1560. M¨uller, P., J. McWilliams, and J. Molemaker, 2011: Routes to dissipation in the ocean: The 2D/3D turbulence conundrum. Marine Turbulence: Theories, Observations, and Models, Cambridge University Press. Nikurashin, M., G. K. Vallis, and A. Adcroft, 2013: Routes to energy dissipation for geostrophic flows in the Southern Ocean. Nature Geoscience, 6 (1), 48–51. Plueddemann, A., and J. Farrar, 2006: Observations and models of the energy flux from the wind to mixed-layer inertial currents. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 53 (1-2), 5–30. Pollard, R. T., and R. Millard, 1970: Comparison between observed and simulated wind-generated inertial oscillations. Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, 17, 813–821. Pollard, R. T., P. B. Rhines, and R. O. Thompson, 1973: The deepening of the wind-mixed layer. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, 4 (4), 381–404. Rama, J., C. J. Shakespeare, and A. M. Hogg, 2022: The wavelength dependence of the propagation of near-inertial internal waves. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 52 (10), 2493–2514. Renault, L., M. J. Molemaker, J. C. McWilliams, A. F. Shchepetkin, F. Lemarie, D. Chelton, ´ S. Illig, and A. Hall, 2016: Modulation of wind work by oceanic current interaction with the atmosphere. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 46 (6), 1685–1704. Rocha, C. B., G. L. Wagner, and W. R. Young, 2018: Stimulated generation: extraction of energy from balanced flow by near-inertial waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 847, 417–451. Taburet, G., A. Sanchez-Roman, M. Ballarotta, M.-I. Pujol, J.-F. Legeais, F. Fournier, Y. Faugere, and G. Dibarboure, 2019: Duacs dt2018: 25 years of reprocessed sea level altimetry products. Ocean Science, 15 (5), 1207–1224. Thomas, L. N., L. Rainville, O. Asselin, W. R. Young, J. Girton, C. B. Whalen, L. Centurioni, and V. Hormann, 2020: Direct observations of near-inertial wave 𝜁-refraction in a dipole vortex. Geophysical Research Letters, 47 (21), e2020GL090 375. Thompson, A. F., A. Lazar, C. Buckingham, A. C. N. Garabato, G. M. Damerell, and K. J. Heywood, 2016: Open-ocean submesoscale motions: A full seasonal cycle of mixed layer instabilities from gliders. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 46 (4), 1285–1307. von Storch, J.-S., and V. L¨uschow, 2023: Wind power input to ocean near-inertial waves diagnosed from a 5-km global coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 128 (2), e2022JC019 111. Wagner, G., and W. Young, 2016: A three-component model for the coupled evolution of near-inertial waves, quasi-geostrophic flow and the near-inertial second harmonic. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 802, 806–837. Wunsch, C., and R. Ferrari, 2004: Vertical mixing, energy, and the general circulation of the oceans. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 36, 281–314. Xie, J.-H., and J. Vanneste, 2015: A generalised-lagrangian-mean model of the interactions between near-inertial waves and mean flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 774, 143–169. Young, W., and M. Ben Jelloul, 1997: Propagation of near-inertial oscillations through a geostrophic flow. JMR, 55, 735–766. Yu, X., A. C. Naveira Garabato, C. Vic, J. Gula, A. C. Savage, J. Wang, A. F. Waterhouse, and J. A. MacKinnon, 2022: Observed equatorward propagation and chimney effect of near-inertial waves in the midlatitude ocean. Geophysical Research Letters, 49 (13), e2022GL098 522. Zhai, X., H. L. Johnson, and D. P. Marshall, 2010: Significant sink of ocean-eddy energy near western boundaries. Nature Geoscience, 3 (9), 608–612. This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. Authors: (1) Scott Conn, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California; (2) Joseph Fitzgerald, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California; (3) Jorn Callies, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California. Authors: Authors: (1) Scott Conn, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California; (2) Joseph Fitzgerald, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California; (3) Jorn Callies, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California. Table of Links Abstract and Intro Abstract and Intro Observations Observations Models Models Results Results Discussion Discussion Conclusion Conclusion APPENDIX A APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX C References References References Alford, M. H., 2001: Internal swell generation: The spatial distribution of energy flux from the wind to mixed layer near-inertial motions. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 31 (8), 2359–2368. Alford, M. H., 2020: Revisiting near-inertial wind work: Slab models, relative stress, and mixed layer deepening. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 50 (11), 3141–3156. Alford, M. H., J. A. MacKinnon, H. L. Simmons, and J. D. Nash, 2016: Near-inertial internal gravity waves in the ocean. Annual review of marine science, 8, 95–123. Arbic, B. K., and G. R. Flierl, 2004: Baroclinically unstable geostrophic turbulence in the limits of strong and weak bottom ekman friction: Application to midocean eddies. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 34 (10), 2257–2273. Asselin, O., and W. R. Young, 2020: Penetration of wind-generated near-inertial waves into a turbulent ocean. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 50 (6), 1699–1716. Balmforth, N., S. G. Llewellyn Smith, and W. Young, 1998: Enhanced dispersion of near-inertial waves in an idealized geostrophic flow. Journal of marine research, 56 (1), 1–40. Balmforth, N. J., and W. R. Young, 1999: Radiative damping of near-inertial oscillations in the mixed layer. Journal of marine research, 57 (4), 561–584. Buckingham, C. E., and Coauthors, 2016: Seasonality of submesoscale flows in the ocean surface boundary layer. Geophysical Research Letters, 43 (5), 2118–2126. Burns, K. J., G. M. Vasil, J. S. Oishi, D. Lecoanet, and B. P. Brown, 2020: Dedalus: A flexible framework for numerical simulations with spectral methods. Phys. Rev. Res., 2, 023 068. Callies, J., R. Barkan, and A. N. Garabato, 2020: Time scales of submesoscale flow inferred from a mooring array. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 50 (4), 1065–1086. Damerell, G. M., K. J. Heywood, D. Calvert, A. L. Grant, M. J. Bell, and S. E. Belcher, 2020: A comparison of five surface mixed layer models with a year of observations in the north atlantic. Progress in Oceanography, 187, 102 316. Damerell, G. M., K. J. Heywood, A. F. Thompson, U. Binetti, and J. Kaiser, 2016: The vertical structure of upper ocean variability at the porcupine abyssal plain during 2012–2013. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 121 (5), 3075–3089. D’Asaro, E. A., 1985: The energy flux from the wind to near-inertial motions in the surface mixed layer. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 15 (8), 1043–1059. D’Asaro, E. A., 1995: Upper-ocean inertial currents forced by a strong storm. Part III: Interaction of inertial currents and mesoscale eddies. Journal of physical oceanography, 25 (11), 2953–2958. D’Asaro, E. A., C. C. Eriksen, M. D. Levine, P. Niiler, P. Van Meurs, and Coauthors, 1995: Upperocean inertial currents forced by a strong storm. Part I: Data and comparisons with linear theory. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 25 (11), 2909–2936. Dewar, W. K., and G. R. Flierl, 1987: Some effects of the wind on rings. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 17 (10), 1653–1667. Essink, S., E. Kunze, R.-C. Lien, R. Inoue, and S.-i. Ito, 2022: Near-inertial wave interactions and turbulence production in a kuroshio anticyclonic eddy. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 52 (11), 2687–2704. Ferrari, R., and C. Wunsch, 2009: Ocean circulation kinetic energy: Reservoirs, sources, and sinks. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 41, 253–282. Flexas, M. M., A. F. Thompson, H. S. Torres, P. Klein, J. T. Farrar, H. Zhang, and D. Menemenlis, 2019: Global estimates of the energy transfer from the wind to the ocean, with emphasis on near-inertial oscillations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 124 (8), 5723–5746. Gill, A. E., 1984: On the behavior of internal waves in the wakes of storms. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 14 (7), 1129–1151. Gnanadesikan, A., M.-A. Pradal, and R. Abernathey, 2015: Isopycnal mixing by mesoscale eddies significantly impacts oceanic anthropogenic carbon uptake. Geophysical Research Letters, 42 (11), 4249–4255. Guan, S., W. Zhao, J. Huthnance, J. Tian, and J. Wang, 2014: Observed upper ocean response to typhoon megi (2010) in the northern south china sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 119 (5), 3134–3157. Hersbach, H., and Coauthors, 2018: Era5 hourly data on single levels from 1979 to present. Copernicus climate change service (c3s) climate data store (cds), 10 (10.24381). Jayne, S. R., and J. Marotzke, 2002: The oceanic eddy heat transport. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 32 (12), 3328–3345. Jochum, M., B. P. Briegleb, G. Danabasoglu, W. G. Large, N. J. Norton, S. R. Jayne, M. H. Alford, and F. O. Bryan, 2013: The impact of oceanic near-inertial waves on climate. Journal of Climate, 26 (9), 2833–2844. Kato, H., and O. Phillips, 1969: On the penetration of a turbulent layer into stratified fluid. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 37 (4), 643–655. Kunze, E., 1985: Near-inertial wave propagation in geostrophic shear. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 15 (5), 544–565. Large, W., and S. Pond, 1981: Open ocean momentum flux measurements in moderate to strong winds. Journal of physical oceanography, 11 (3), 324–336. Lee, D.-K., and P. P. Niiler, 1998: The inertial chimney: The near-inertial energy drainage from the ocean surface to the deep layer. 103 (C4), 7579–7591. Moehlis, J., and S. G. L. Smith, 2001: Radiation of mixed layer near-inertial oscillations into the ocean interior. Journal of physical oceanography, 31 (6), 1550–1560. M¨uller, P., J. McWilliams, and J. Molemaker, 2011: Routes to dissipation in the ocean: The 2D/3D turbulence conundrum. Marine Turbulence: Theories, Observations, and Models, Cambridge University Press. Nikurashin, M., G. K. Vallis, and A. Adcroft, 2013: Routes to energy dissipation for geostrophic flows in the Southern Ocean. Nature Geoscience, 6 (1), 48–51. Plueddemann, A., and J. Farrar, 2006: Observations and models of the energy flux from the wind to mixed-layer inertial currents. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 53 (1-2), 5–30. Pollard, R. T., and R. Millard, 1970: Comparison between observed and simulated wind-generated inertial oscillations. Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, 17, 813–821. Pollard, R. T., P. B. Rhines, and R. O. Thompson, 1973: The deepening of the wind-mixed layer. Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, 4 (4), 381–404. Rama, J., C. J. Shakespeare, and A. M. Hogg, 2022: The wavelength dependence of the propagation of near-inertial internal waves. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 52 (10), 2493–2514. Renault, L., M. J. Molemaker, J. C. McWilliams, A. F. Shchepetkin, F. Lemarie, D. Chelton, ´ S. Illig, and A. Hall, 2016: Modulation of wind work by oceanic current interaction with the atmosphere. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 46 (6), 1685–1704. Rocha, C. B., G. L. Wagner, and W. R. Young, 2018: Stimulated generation: extraction of energy from balanced flow by near-inertial waves. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 847, 417–451. Taburet, G., A. Sanchez-Roman, M. Ballarotta, M.-I. Pujol, J.-F. Legeais, F. Fournier, Y. Faugere, and G. Dibarboure, 2019: Duacs dt2018: 25 years of reprocessed sea level altimetry products. Ocean Science, 15 (5), 1207–1224. Thomas, L. N., L. Rainville, O. Asselin, W. R. Young, J. Girton, C. B. Whalen, L. Centurioni, and V. Hormann, 2020: Direct observations of near-inertial wave 𝜁-refraction in a dipole vortex. Geophysical Research Letters, 47 (21), e2020GL090 375. Thompson, A. F., A. Lazar, C. Buckingham, A. C. N. Garabato, G. M. Damerell, and K. J. Heywood, 2016: Open-ocean submesoscale motions: A full seasonal cycle of mixed layer instabilities from gliders. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 46 (4), 1285–1307. von Storch, J.-S., and V. L¨uschow, 2023: Wind power input to ocean near-inertial waves diagnosed from a 5-km global coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation model. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 128 (2), e2022JC019 111. Wagner, G., and W. Young, 2016: A three-component model for the coupled evolution of near-inertial waves, quasi-geostrophic flow and the near-inertial second harmonic. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 802, 806–837. Wunsch, C., and R. Ferrari, 2004: Vertical mixing, energy, and the general circulation of the oceans. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 36, 281–314. Xie, J.-H., and J. Vanneste, 2015: A generalised-lagrangian-mean model of the interactions between near-inertial waves and mean flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 774, 143–169. Young, W., and M. Ben Jelloul, 1997: Propagation of near-inertial oscillations through a geostrophic flow. JMR, 55, 735–766. Yu, X., A. C. Naveira Garabato, C. Vic, J. Gula, A. C. Savage, J. Wang, A. F. Waterhouse, and J. A. MacKinnon, 2022: Observed equatorward propagation and chimney effect of near-inertial waves in the midlatitude ocean. Geophysical Research Letters, 49 (13), e2022GL098 522. Zhai, X., H. L. Johnson, and D. P. Marshall, 2010: Significant sink of ocean-eddy energy near western boundaries. Nature Geoscience, 3 (9), 608–612. This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. available on arxiv

Stories, News & Mentions about DANA

Dana’s Stories on HackerNoon

Dana's News & Mentions