Colligo

Hey everyone :) I really want to share with you something amazing that happened today! There was an Indie Hackers meetup in Dublin, Ireland. I’m from a city called Cork that is about 3 hours drive from Dublin. As soon as I heard Courtland was interviewing John Collison at this meetup, I decided to travel up from Cork to Dublin! And it was amazing. I learned so much during the interview, and took loads of notes! I even got to speak to John about some of my ideas. I also spoke with Courtlands +1 Cloey about becoming an ambassador for Indie Hacker events in my city! Here are some of the things that the interview covered: Core attributes of a promising founder worth following: Progress/trajectory over time How well they lead a team & Make the vision happen Most impressed when someone is way ahead of where you thought they would be when you check up/see them a few months later. Indie Makers have such a benefit of being small, fast, nimble workers in comparison to big companies. We can easily pivot and vastly change a project of ours. We can change as we learn more about our users. Big companies can take months/years for even the smallest of pivots. Before you find a product market you can pivot your project as many times as necessary until you find something that works. Then you only have one thing to do: scale, scale, scale. Be obsessed with the little details. listen to every single person who uses your product reply to every single person who emails you about your product ask them what they like and do not like iterate your product, make changes, pivot if necessary Paul Graham’s name came up with a feeling of great admiration! Naturally! It was Paul who said: In the early stages of a company just; write code talk/sell to customers to stress test your idea Nothing else. A great reason somebody will use your product is that it makes them more productive. You gain great leverage in making products that make many many people better at their jobs. This is a vastly under appreciated market that needs to be addressed. Don’t spend a long time making a product without at least asking (or straight charging) users if they would pay. Release as soon as possible. Get feedback. See if it works. Some very enthusiastic users are far far better than a large number of users who kind of like the product or service. Take your small very enthusiastic user base and keep making the product better for them. More users will come naturally via word of mouth. As soon as you have found something that your users love… scale like your life depended on it. How do you scale? Marketing & Sales. Don’t try to do it all yourself. Get help. Outsource. Hire. Smart people know when to delegate. There has always been an opportunity looking at complicated software that’s not listening to/satisfying its user’s needs. Look for big products with a lot of negative feedback. Make something better. Even if just a small amount of those agitated users will love it. One of the best methods of preparing yourself for the corporate world (when you’re an undergrad) is by getting real-world experience. work experience projects failing learning trying again I think that advice is useful for a lot of us! Keep moving fast by working smarter not harder. spending your time wisely working with co-founders who you get on with very well sharing your ideas and getting feedback slowly but surely learning more about what works and what does not work John stays motivated and is full of energy to work in the morning because there are so many exciting problems to solve. He loves hearing that people use his products and that they are really helpful. Hearing that peoples lives are easier because of Stripe. Courtland finds it much easier to stay motivated when somebody is holding you accountable for your work. A weekly mailing list. A product that needs updating. When somebody depends on you to work, you will be much more likely to complete that work. Well, you get the idea! John & Courtland had many interesting things to say. So much valuable information in such a short amount of time. I can hardly believe it. You can read more about it here https://twitter.com/joeytawadrous/status/1060681217216036864

I met John Collison and Courtland Allen today — this is what I learned

Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions by Edwin Abbott Abbott is part of the HackerNoon Books Series. You can jump to any chapter in this book . Concerning Irregular Figures here Concerning Irregular Figures Throughout the previous pages I have been assuming—what perhaps should have been laid down at the beginning as a distinct and fundamental proposition—that every human being in Flatland is a Regular Figure, that is to say of regular construction. By this I mean that a Woman must not only be a line, but a straight line; that an Artisan or Soldier must have two of his sides equal; that Tradesmen must have three sides equal; Lawyers (of which class I am a humble member), four sides equal, and generally, that in every Polygon, all the sides must be equal. The size of the sides would of course depend upon the age of the individual. A Female at birth would be about an inch long, while a tall adult Woman might extend to a foot. As to the Males of every class, it may be roughly said that the length of an adult's sides, when added together, is two feet or a little more. But the size of our sides is not under consideration. I am speaking of the EQUALITY of sides, and it does not need much reflection to see that the whole of the social life in Flatland rests upon the fundamental fact that Nature wills all Figures to have their sides equal. If our sides were unequal our angles might be unequal. Instead of its being sufficient to feel, or estimate by sight, a single angle in order to determine the form of an individual, it would be necessary to ascertain each angle by the experiment of Feeling. But life would be too short for such a tedious grouping. The whole science and art of Sight Recognition would at once perish; Feeling, so far as it is an art, would not long survive; intercourse would become perilous or impossible; there would be an end to all confidence, all forethought; no one would be safe in making the most simple social arrangements; in a word, civilization would relapse into barbarism. Am I going too fast to carry my Readers with me to these obvious conclusions? Surely a moment's reflection, and a single instance from common life, must convince every one that our whole social system is based upon Regularity, or Equality of Angles. You meet, for example, two or three Tradesmen in the street, whom you recognize at once to be Tradesmen by a glance at their angles and rapidly bedimmed sides, and you ask them to step into your house to lunch. This you do at present with perfect confidence, because everyone knows to an inch or two the area occupied by an adult Triangle: but imagine that your Tradesman drags behind his regular and respectable vertex, a parallelogram of twelve or thirteen inches in diagonal:—what are you to do with such a monster sticking fast in your house door? But I am insulting the intelligence of my Readers by accumulating details which must be patent to everyone who enjoys the advantages of a Residence in Spaceland. Obviously the measurements of a single angle would no longer be sufficient under such portentous circumstances; one's whole life would be taken up in feeling or surveying the perimeter of one's acquaintances. Already the difficulties of avoiding a collision in a crowd are enough to tax the sagacity of even a well-educated Square; but if no one could calculate the Regularity of a single figure in the company, all would be chaos and confusion, and the slightest panic would cause serious injuries, or—if there happened to be any Women or Soldiers present—perhaps considerable loss of life. Expediency therefore concurs with Nature in stamping the seal of its approval upon Regularity of conformation: nor has the Law been backward in seconding their efforts. "Irregularity of Figure" means with us the same as, or more than, a combination of moral obliquity and criminality with you, and is treated accordingly. There are not wanting, it is true, some promulgators of paradoxes who maintain that there is no necessary connection between geometrical and moral Irregularity. "The Irregular", they say, "is from his birth scouted by his own parents, derided by his brothers and sisters, neglected by the domestics, scorned and suspected by society, and excluded from all posts of responsibility, trust, and useful activity. His every movement is jealously watched by the police till he comes of age and presents himself for inspection; then he is either destroyed, if he is found to exceed the fixed margin of deviation, or else immured in a Government Office as a clerk of the seventh class; prevented from marriage; forced to drudge at an uninteresting occupation for a miserable stipend; obliged to live and board at the office, and to take even his vacation under close supervision; what wonder that human nature, even in the best and purest, is embittered and perverted by such surroundings!" All this very plausible reasoning does not convince me, as it has not convinced the wisest of our Statesmen, that our ancestors erred in laying it down as an axiom of policy that the toleration of Irregularity is incompatible with the safety of the State. Doubtless, the life of an Irregular is hard; but the interests of the Greater Number require that it shall be hard. If a man with a triangular front and a polygonal back were allowed to exist and to propagate a still more Irregular posterity, what would become of the arts of life? Are the houses and doors and churches in Flatland to be altered in order to accommodate such monsters? Are our ticket-collectors to be required to measure every man's perimeter before they allow him to enter a theatre or to take his place in a lecture room? Is an Irregular to be exempted from the militia? And if not, how is he to be prevented from carrying desolation into the ranks of his comrades? Again, what irresistible temptations to fraudulent impostures must needs beset such a creature! How easy for him to enter a shop with his polygonal front foremost, and to order goods to any extent from a confiding tradesman! Let the advocates of a falsely called Philanthropy plead as they may for the abrogation of the Irregular Penal Laws, I for my part have never known an Irregular who was not also what Nature evidently intended him to be—a hypocrite, a misanthropist, and, up to the limits of his power, a perpetrator of all manner of mischief. Not that I should be disposed to recommend (at present) the extreme measures adopted by some States, where an infant whose angle deviates by half a degree from the correct angularity is summarily destroyed at birth. Some of our highest and ablest men, men of real genius, have during their earliest days laboured under deviations as great as, or even greater than, forty-five minutes: and the loss of their precious lives would have been an irreparable injury to the State. The art of healing also has achieved some of its most glorious triumphs in the compressions, extensions, trepannings, colligations, and other surgical or diaetetic operations by which Irregularity has been partly or wholly cured. Advocating therefore a VIA MEDIA, I would lay down no fixed or absolute line of demarcation; but at the period when the frame is just beginning to set, and when the Medical Board has reported that recovery is improbable, I would suggest that the Irregular offspring be painlessly and mercifully consumed. About HackerNoon Book Series: We bring you the most important technical, scientific, and insightful public domain books. This book is part of the public domain. Edwin Abbott Abbott (1995). Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions. Urbana, Illinois: Project Gutenberg. Retrieved https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/201/pg201-images.html This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at , located at . www.gutenberg.org https://www.gutenberg.org/policy/license.html

Concerning Irregular Figures

Foot-fetichism and Shoe-fetichism

Of the Empire of the Persians

Of the two Contemporary Empires of the Babylonians and Medes

Of the power of the eleventh horn of Daniel's fourth Beast, to change times and laws

No part of this article was written by an AI, just a flawed human… This is the first year I’ve worried I will lose my job to a machine. My solution? I know that sounds kind of obvious, but it’s really the only thing I can think to do. Work while you can. In 2022 we witnessed assistive AIs become more competent at performing tasks like drawing, compiling research or even writing code. As a result, I predict that the things we do uniquely well as humans won’t be our technical skills but our ability to think creatively, grapple with philosophical and ethical questions, and simplify complex ideas. Hopefully, we will live in future where these smart machines remove our daily drudgery and simply help us rediscover what makes us uniquely great. Perhaps we will start working and thinking less like automatons and more like … well … people. In an attempt to hedge my bets against AI, many of my insights this year focus on the types of human vocation I believe an AI will always struggle with. From being more creative, managing information overload, the dangers of programming fairness into systems, finding purpose in one’s work, and how to stop the grand innovation slowdown we have been experiencing since 1970. I hope you find something inspiring here today, and remember to enjoy your work while you can … because change is a comin’. Building a system that generates ideas Remember, the concept of “having new ideas” is still a relatively new concept, historically speaking. “You have to keep a dozen of your favorite problems constantly present in your mind, although by and large they will lay in a dormant state. Every time you hear or read a new trick or a new result, test it against each of your twelve problems to see whether it helps. Every once in a while there will be a hit, and people will say, “How did he do it? He must be a genius!” — Richard Feynman, the theoretical physicist and all-around genius One of the benefits of, say, going to a yoga class or church is that it’s impossible to work while you’re there. Presence, I find, is better protected by obligations than intentions, and that helps when creating an environment to cultivate ideas. When we’re curious, we tend to question the world around us more. This can be as easy as looking at our surroundings and asking ourselves, “What must have been true in the world for this thing to exist?” The best way to come up with better ideas is to deliberately re-expose yourself to notes and ideas you’ve previously captured, and no better time exists for this than Lunchtime. As Mark Twain said, “I have never let school get in the way of my education.” We can’t always rely on others to feed us new perspectives on the world, so seek them out. Reading List (Book) The Myth of the Myth of the Lone Genius (Roger’s Bacon) Create your legacy through work Why Aren’t Smart People Happier (Adam Mastroianni) The Intelligence Trap Revolutionise your Thinking and Make Wiser Decisions Using notes to better organise my thoughts for work happiness I find that when we read intending to find something that resonates, the experience becomes more intentional. Our minds are always on the hunt for insights, and we can’t help but resonate with content on a deeper level. Even though it’s exhausting, once the insights are saved, it feels worth it and becomes part of our working memory over time. This allows me to connect the dots between different pieces of information more efficiently and clearly see the big picture. The people who took the extra time to plan for failure were up to three times more likely to achieve their daily goals, and, not insignificantly, they were substantially happier at the end of each day! “We learn from reflection on experience, not from experience itself.” — John Dewey, Philosopher Before adding any note one of the most important questions I ask myself is: — Is It Surprising? If you’re not surprised, then you already knew it at some level, so why take note of it? A great life hack I’ve learned is that I could cognitively offload most things by simply writing them down. Usually, I do this by journaling before bed, making a schedule, or creating a to-do list for the day ahead. This way, I can clear my mind of everything I need to do and focus on enjoying my free time or getting a good night’s sleep. Reading List Day in the life of an obsessive note taker Discussion on productivity and second brain (Zain, LinkedIn) Sometimes, paying attention means we see the world less clearly (psyche.co) Building a Second Brain (Tiago Forte) It's futile building things that are completely fair The risk is that in trying to enshrine fairness into services, we always risk enforcing new biases upon people in the future by making them see the world as we do today. Our tools impose rules on us as though all people are the same, and the context won’t change. Long-term solutions don’t account for how the self changes over time. An algorithm that is fair along one standard will inevitably be unfair along another standard. Although no mathematical definition of algorithmic fairness fully encapsulates the philosophical notion of fairness or justice Historical opinions risk becoming ghosts in the machine that haunt generations to come. We should strive to never solve a long-term problem without first building platforms that help us understand their nuance and complexity. We are all required — tech users, critics, and product teams — to ask ‘what if’ and ‘why not’ about the possibility of technologies designed to support a long-term spirit of questioning. Until we do so, the riskiest person in control of our work will always be us. Reading List Escaping the Impossibility of Fairness From Formal to Substantive Algorithmic Fairness (Green, Ben) The dangers of Product Longtermism A Theory of Justice — John Rawls How the EU’s Flawed Artificial Intelligence Regulation Endangers the Social Safety Net Questions and Answers (Human Rights Watch) Overcoming the overwhelming amount of information we consume By condensing everything I value into two summary emails , I no longer feel the need to constantly be engaged. I can focus on other tasks and enjoy my downtime without worry of missing out. daily A study cited by the Times estimates that we consume the equivalent of 174 full newspapers’ worth of content daily, five times higher than in 1986. But instead of empowering us, this deluge of information often overwhelms (and depresses) us. Information Overload has become Information Exhaustion, taxing our mental resources and leaving us constantly anxious that we’re forgetting something. Instantaneous access to the world’s knowledge through the Internet was supposed to educate and inform us, but instead it has created a society wide poverty of attention. Reading List Day in the life of an obsessive note taker The Collector’s Fallacy (zettelkasten.de) What is this? The case for continually questioning our online experience (systems-souls-society.com) Your Attention Didn’t Collapse. It Was Stolen (Johann Hari) Mortality should be our great motivator “Remembering that I’ll be dead soon is the most important tool I’ve ever encountered to help me make the big choices in life.” — Steve Jobs Taken literally, even Steve Jobs’s efforts to “put a dent in the universe” ultimately failed: 10,000 years from now, no one’s going to know what an iPhone was. Human civilization can be seen in many ways as the reflexive response to our awareness of our own mortality. When we accept that death is a tool that gives our lives and work meaning, the things we choose to do with our time here begin to become more meaningful. The fact that someone took the day off and decided to spend it with you doing something fun suddenly makes it all the more special. Humans seem to really love a sense of looming fate; how else could five star chrome extensions exist that remind us of how long have left to live? “Accepting the absurdity of everything around us is one step, a necessary experience. It should not become a dead end. It arouses a revolt that can become fruitful.” — Albert Camus That six-page proposal your boss asked for by Monday is saving us from existential crisis, and we didn’t even get them a thank you card. The great thing about building legacy and immortality projects is their ability to help us build a life full of fulfilment while hopefully making other people’s lives better along the way. Reading List The Creation of Meaning — Escape From 163 (Philosophize This!) Create your legacy through work A Philosopher’s Case Against Death (The MIT Press Reader) Soft skills are essential for navigating ambiguity We don’t always need to understand all the complexities of a user’s problem. Sometimes we just need to build the tools, features and ways of working that enable us to do things independently. Our greatest challenge as product people is understanding a user’s intent when even the user doesn’t know what they want. Practising the “art” of product management is more valuable than the “science”: communicating, empathy, leading without authority, having difficult conversations, storytelling, making decisions when you don’t have all the information, dealing with ambiguity, inspiring others, and connecting deeply with users. Finding peace with the ambiguity of product work means discovering ways to . The best way to achieve this is by focusing on skills that facilitate robust working methods and ensure strong teamwork. reduce uncertainty Reading List So you want to build a search engine What I’ve Learned in 45 Years in the Software Industry We need to get better at recognising truly complex problems Product people tend to presume, rather than openly investigate, the problems we set out to tackle; reaching for solutions before questions have been fully asked. We are drawn to develop solutions based on our dominant assumptions, but in the absence of that, we do the next worst thing: trying to decipher the ‘truth’ of a problem by looking for its mythical average. Our problem is that in trying to fix things, we start viewing society in terms of . Therefore it becomes easier to view solutions to our problems in terms of data networks, surveillance coverage, and interactions among distributed people and devices that must be regulated. networks of harm all In many ways, search products like many product develop processes are a sum of destructions. You need to predict a little bit at a time and then verify. Our role in product is to connect a love of the problem with the available technology. We need to be technical enough to understand the vocabulary of engineers, but not so much that our vocabulary restricts our vision. “Nothing important comes with instructions. Those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything” — George Bernard Shaw Reading List So you want to build a search engine The Use of Knowledge in Society The dangers of Product Longtermism Inspired How To Create Products Customers Love (Marty Cagan) Small things matter, but don’t take your eye off the bigger picture Regarding the (80/20 Rule) — our question should become: what opportunities do we miss by ignoring that 80%? Pareto principle other To usher in a more mature tech paradigm, we need to start seeing products not just as solutions but as instruments that teach us how to see the world more fully By focusing on longer-term product impact, we didn’t get distracted by arbitrary goals like optimising search relevancy. Instead, we concentrated more on the holistic user experience and prioritised features that built trust, such as explaining result relevancy or assisting users with choosing better keywords … otherwise I doubt we would have achieved our double-digit growth and engagement success. “Your life is the sum of what you focus on. “It’s not what you look at that matters, it’s what you see. ” Henry David Thoreau. Reading List 4D Roadmaps (reforge.com) The dangers of Product Longtermism So you want to build a search engine We are not innovating fast enough Transitioning from 1970 to 2020, besides computing and genetic engineering, one can’t help but notice a lack of revolutionary breakthroughs compared with previous decades. The number of researchers required today to achieve the famous doubling every two years of the density of computer chips is more than 18 times larger than the number in the early 1970s. In fact, research teams have nearly quadrupled in size over the 20th century, and that growth continues today. required Tackling things like climate change requires more exponential technology, not less. Reversing a trend of technological stagnation begins with first acknowledging the stagnation and ends with believing change is possible. The current response to the burden of knowledge is to develop increasingly specialized fields with increasingly specialised experts to occupy them. I wouldn’t be surprised if its this trend for building narrower domains of knowledge becomes one of the biggest contributors for decreasing technological innovation. Instead of focusing on one discipline at a time, we need to focus on patterns that can be applied from one knowledge domain to another. We need to learn to be unsatisfied with predictable incremental progress. Reading List Science Is Getting Less Bang for Its Buck (Patrick Collison and Michael Nielsen) The dangers of Product Longtermism How to Analyze Progress, Stagnation, and Low-Hanging Fruit (The Roots of Progress) Artificial Intelligence (Melanie Mitchell) AI will become super memory companions AI agents may not be able to make us super-intelligent, but they could pass knowledge on to us from the lessons of history — a sort of super-history. AIs, in Brazilian philosopher Vilém Flusser’s view, will soon “possess a historical consciousness far superior to ours,” allowing them to “make better, faster, and more varied history than we ever did,” with the result that we’ll leave the business of history writing to them. AI will always be limited by only what it knows — a machine is unlikely to start an airline when no airlines exist. Only the right kind of machine, one that is embodied and active in the world would have human level intelligence in its reach. Reading List If We Succeed (American Academy of Arts & Sciences) AI Has Become a Design Problem Artificial Time (fortelabs.co) Search changes the way we think and see the world Search changes our perception of the world and our ability to live within it … it changes text, changes reading, how we understand and even what it means to be literate. The ubiquity of the search engine has given rise to a widespread anxiety that search has become a mentality, a mode of reading and learning that is supplanting the old modes is, we are told, changing our brains, shortening our attention spans and eroding our capacity for memory. What we would later learn is many users don’t actually know what they are searching for. Users were effectively using search to try and make sense of information chaos and develop a vocabulary to better articulate their query. Reading List So you want to build a search engine How Scholars Once Feared That the Book Index Would Destroy Reading (Dennis Duncan) We need to start prioritising individual creativity over groups “invention occurs at the level of the individual, and we should address the factors that determine individual creativity.” — Joel Mokyr Genius starts with individual brilliance. A singular vision can lead to innovation, but it takes teamwork to make creativity happen. Keith Sawyer, a psychologist at Washington University, has summarised the science: “Serendipitous thought, the kind that makes critical breakthroughs and solves challenging problems, does not occur in groups.” Let’s do better by providing a more nuanced picture of innovation in which solitary exploration by “geniuses” and collaboration both play critical roles. “Most geniuses especially those who lead others prosper not by deconstructing intricate complexities, but by exploiting unrecognized simplicities.” — Andy Benoit Reading List Groupthink (newyorker.com) The Myth of the Myth of the Lone Genius (Roger’s Bacon) The dangers of Product Longtermism Why Brainstorming Doesn’t Work (inc.com) The Ingredients For Innovation Happy new year EVERYONE!

A product manager’s 64 insights from 2022

If you ever needed more proof that the world's richest man is no visionary, look no further than the events of last week. Having finally acquired , Elon Musk crowned himself the CEO of yet another company he personally did not build and followed it up with what can best be surmised as a.. bloodbath. 😞 Twitter Twitter laid off 3,700 people, or half of its workforce, on Friday — letting go of employees in considered important in maintaining advertisers' trust (content moderation) while those that remained were to roll out new features on the platform. As former employees started flooding LinkedIn to say goodbyes and begin searching for new opportunities, Twitter asked because they were either fired mistakenly or were needed to build Musk's vision for the social media giant. teams working round-the-clock some of them to return back to work Musk wants to make Twitter profitable but has yet to detail how he plans on doing so. Meetings with advertisers haven't gone as planned as tons of companies have to determine what to make of Twitter's new owner and over content moderation. paused ad spending air concerns In the interim, Musk wants to generate revenue by selling the verified blue check mark for , making it easier for users to appear more authentic while complicating Musk's own efforts to transform Twitter into a . $7.99 a month sharing disinformation source of accurate information As a side note, Musk seems to be taking a page straight out of Donald Trump's playbook, garnering free media attention for being so bizarrely eccentric that outlets have no choice but to spam our feeds with one news story related to Twitter after the next. Is there a term for Musk fatigue? Because we're surely feeling it. Twitter was trending #32 in this week's . Tech Company Rankings ⛈️ Layoffs Come to Silicon Valley Twitter wasn't the only tech company letting go of people this past week. Digital payment firm and ride-hailing company announced similar measures, though their rationale was more grounded in the state of the global economy than the whims of a billionaire who just purchased their company. Stripe Lyft Stripe it would be letting go of around 1,000 people, or 14% of its workforce, in a move meant to help the company course correct after it reached new heights during the COVID-19 pandemic. Essentially, the company overhired in response to tripling its revenue and payment volume over the course of 2020 and 2021, perhaps hoping that this growth would continue. However, the winds are now blowing in the opposite direction, with "stubborn inflation, energy shocks, [and] reduced investment budgets" prompting CEO Patrick Collison to trim the fat around corners in an attempt to save costs. said Lyft too is looking to become leaner given "several challenges playing out across the economy." In a to employees, the company's management blamed a looming recession and the "realities of inflation and a slowing economy" for its decision to cut 683 jobs, or 13% of its workforce, while selling its first-party vehicle service business. letter If that wasn't enough, told employees last week that it would no longer be hiring more people in its corporate workforce, the same macroeconomic reasons as Stripe and Lyft. Amazon citing Amazon ranked #11 in this week's Tech Company Rankings. 🖥️ AMD Brings Out Spanking New GPUs The are heating up now that has announced the 7 series XT and XTX graphic cards. By being cheaper and performing as well as their green counterparts, preliminary response to the GPUs have been overwhelmingly positive, even though tech reviewers are yet to benchmark the cards. GPU wars AMD Still, that didn't stop Linus Tech Tips from extrapolating the cards' performance, that the beefier of the two newly announced AMD cards (the 7900XTX) performed just as well as 's 4090 at $600 less. It's not just about the performance though: the AMD card is smaller, consumes less power, and is to be a fire hazard. concluding Nvidia less likely It's been less than a decade since Lisa Su took over the reins at AMD, and already the company has the monopolies of titans and Nvidia. It was only in 2017 that AMD announced the Ryzen line of processors, only to follow it up with one impressive product launch after the next and capture more and more market share in both the consumer and commercial markets. disrupted Intel Nvidia ranked #44 in this week's Tech Company Rankings. In Other News.. Ajit Mohan parent 's India operations to join rival Snap. 📸 left Facebook Meta is said to have nearly $8 billion in cryptocurrency transactions from Iran despite U.S. sanctions on the country. 🪙 Binance processed Twitter alternative Mastodon is seeing more and more users its platform. 🐮 join And that’s a wrap! Thanks for reading Tech Company News Brief Issue #23! See y’all next week. PEACE ☮️ — Sheharyar Khan, Editor, Business Tech @ HackerNoon

Musk Is No Visionary: Half of Twitter Workforce Laid Off

Musk no es un visionario: la mitad de la fuerza laboral de Twitter fue despedida

Musk n'est pas un visionnaire : la moitié de la main-d'œuvre de Twitter licenciée

मस्क इज़ नो विजनरी: आधे ट्विटर वर्कफोर्स की छंटनी की गई

Musk はビジョナリーではない: Twitter 従業員の半数が解雇される

Musk não é visionário: metade da força de trabalho do Twitter é demitida

Musk không có tầm nhìn xa: Một nửa lực lượng lao động trên Twitter đã sa thải

马斯克没有远见：推特一半员工下岗

COLLIGO

getcolligo.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

COLLIGO

EVERGREEN INDEX #3130

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Colligo WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

COLLIGO

getcolligo.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

COLLIGO

EVERGREEN INDEX #3130

RELATED COMPANIESRANK

STORIES ABOUT COLLIGO

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Colligo WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!