The TNT Tropang Giga will try and exact revenge against Japanese team Chiba Jets as the two teams face in the East Asia Super League (EASL) competition Wednesday night.

TNT takes another crack at Chiba Jets in EASL

Legacy extended its winning streak in the series against rival Midland High to seven games after a 49-31 win on Oct. 27 at Astound Broadband Stadium.

HS FOOTBALL: Rebels continue success against Bulldogs

To find the right software at the right price, CIOs and CFOs need to take a tandem approach on new technologies and solutions.

CFO, CIO need to be in ‘lockstep’ on software purchases: Olive CEO

In a regional consolation game on Thursday, October 26, 2023, Kittatinny High School staged a fourth quarter comeback to defeat Whippany Park. The final score stood at 21-11 with three seed Kittatinny beating second seed Whippany Park.

Football: Kittatinny Stages Comeback to Top Whippany Park in Regional Consolation Game

Purdue commit Marcos Davila threw for 392 yards and accounted for four total TDs to lead Legacy to a 49-31 win over Midland High in District 2-6A play.

HS FOOTBALL: Rebels use late surge to hold off Bulldogs, 49-31

Ferdinand “Thirdy” Ravena III and the San-en NeoPhoenix stretched their winning ways in Japan B.League Division 1 after a dominant 88-74 win over the Akita Northern Happinets on Saturday night at the CNA Arena in Akita.

Thirdy Ravena, San-en register seventh win in Japan B.League

GAIA Asia Pacific Calls for Stronger Safeguards 27 October 2023 - The Global Alliance for Incinerator Alternatives (GAIA) Asia Pacific, a network of 120

Asian Development Bank (ADB)’s draft Safeguards Policy Falls Short on Ambition

Jacob Savage burst through for a 60-yard run and that followed that up with the 2-point conversion run to give Kittatinny a 14-11 lead. Kevin O’Keefe then ran in it from seven yards out, and Tyler Scarpone added the extra point to make it 21-11.

Kittatinny comes back to top Whippany Park - Football Regional Consolation Game

According to research firm Statista, US is also home to the largest fintech companies worldwide by market capitalisation, with fintech majors Visa, Paypal, and Mastercard dominating the global ecosystem.

India ranks third among countries with most fintech unicorns in 2023; US retains the crown globally: Report

As C-suite responsibilities change, the gap between roles such as the CFO and chief operating officer is narrowing.

Straddling the CFO, COO divide: Brex

Get the most recent info and news about Brex on HackerNoon, where 10k+ technologists publish stories for 4M+ monthly readers.

We’re reimagining financial systems so every growing company can realize their full potential. Email us at support@brex.com for help.

Brex

This is by (source: ). Blond is a partner at Founders Fund. Twitter thread Sam Blond @samdblond 05-01-2023 https://twitter.com/samdblond/status/1653150044265099265?s=46&t=hLXLvA2wSOmlARX4ZS1fvA&embedable=true&thread=true The lead image for this article was generated by HackerNoon's via the prompt "Billboard” AI Image Generator

Sam Blond: Here's How Brex Ran the Most Successful Billboard Campaign in History

An inquiry into public opinion suggests that fear and confusion could push sensitive personal data out of the country. Data never sleeps. It’s generated every second of the day. So if the United Kingdom (UK) exits the European Union (EU) on October 31st, 2019 without a deal, there should be clear guidelines as to how personal data will be managed and protected. But in reality, there’s a lot of uncertainty surrounding the rules that will govern sensitive personal information stored inside and outside the country. This is evidenced by a recent study conducted by the cloud security firm, . The research was conducted on both sides of the pond (covering the UK and the US) to shed some light on the internal and external perspective on the issue. Artmotion According to the findings, as much as 61% of British respondents didn’t know what laws would apply to their personal data after Brexit. Another 62% weren’t aware of how their data would be protected after the UK left the EU. So while we should have some clarity by now, we are still discussing a lot of “ ” scenarios across the political spectrum and the media. what if Who is currently regulating British customer data? The data generated in the UK is currently governed by the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). But what happens after October 31st? Number 10 Downing Street did set out some , but it was (further adding to the uncertainty surrounding the issue). guidance on data governance last year withdrawn on March 1st, 2019 Who will regulate British customer data after Brexit? The UK government has always maintained that following Brexit, GDPR will be absorbed into British law. But there’s still no indication about when that will happen. founder and CEO, , said “the British government needs to do more to address these issues and mitigate risk. There is a lot of confusion and fear surrounding the impact of Brexit on cloud data, and it will help many business owners if these issues are discussed in greater detail.” Artmotion’s Mateo Meier There’s also cause for concern as a French data protection regulator recently announced that in the event of a no-deal Brexit and the absence of an adequacy decision, that is outside the European Economic Area. the UK would be treated like any other country (or as a third country) It’s also highly likely that other EU country regulators will adopt this approach, and this could have some ramifications for British companies. For example, they might have to implement new protocols to oversee the data transfers by data controllers and data processors. What’s the potential impact of a No-Deal Brexit on British data? To alleviate fear and appease their customers, for example, retailers could migrate customer data to mainland Europe, leading to a loss of jobs and tax revenue. This scenario is highly likely as 53% of respondents preferred neutral and politically stable countries like Switzerland to host their data. Switzerland was followed by Iceland and Norway as suitable destinations to store sensitive personal information. According to Meier, “while the British government was busy engaging in political debates, Switzerland focused on stability and innovation. This has paid off as we’re now seeing an increasing demand for IT infrastructure hosting and backup solutions here in Switzerland.” It’s important to address this issue as 80% of the respondents were unsure if Brexit would have a positive or negative impact on cloud services providers. Only 4.8% of respondents believed that Brexit would have a positive impact on cloud companies. It can also have a far-reaching effect on British businesses as only 12.5% of US customers would choose a UK-based cloud services provider after Brexit. For example, British brands with a global audience might be forced to move their data and operations out of the country to accommodate the demands of their customers. The present situation could also hinder the growth of the British cloud market in the long-term. Even though a hard Brexit is just weeks away, no one really knows for sure what will happen after the UK leaves the EU. So even if the government fails to act, British organizations must explore the complexities surrounding data protection now to avoid potential compliance violations and loss of revenue. Let's take this conversations over to Twitter !

Research Suggests That a Hard Brexit Could Lead to Significant Confusion within the UK Cloud Market

The answer to this question is ‘no one knows’, and all that most of us can do is to guess. Here is my view. Being an entrepreneur and considering that most stats indicate a 10% success rate for start-ups, I wouldn’t want more uncertainty and would vote to stay in the EU. However, that doesn’t mean that I disagree with the arguments of the leave campaigners; for me, the most important thing is to see my start-up succeed, and for that, status quo and clarity work best. Most people may not realise, but the vote on EU referendum could significantly affect our near and distant . Unfortunately, most people will not be able to make informed decisions as both the remain and leave campaigns have done an appalling job of showing a complete unbiased view to the public. future In my article from Feb this year , I had already discussed how uncertainty, pound depreciation, investment, bureaucracy, and lack of talent could affect start-ups after . Now, let’s now think how it may affect the global economies. ‘How will Brexit affect UK startups?’ Brexit Both sides agree that if Brexit happens, both UK and EU will struggle in the short run While both sides disagree on the medium to long term impact of breaking away from the EU, they agree that in the short run, there will be a knee jerk reaction — the pound may depreciate, businesses may suffer, and may result in job losses. In the long run, the leave campaigners believe that it’s the best thing to do. With the amount of information we have, I’m just not sure how anyone could predict our fate going forward. Even if we leave the EU, we are still impacted by the fate of the EU Yes, so, do I agree that we can have the same trade and business relationship with the EU after Brexit like we do now? Maybe, or maybe not. In today’s interconnected world, issues in China affect global economies. Similarly, if after Brexit, the EU weakens, Frexit happens, and Euro suffers, this will have an impact on our economy. With global economy being so fragile, Brexit could lead the World economy back into a recession We still haven’t yet fully recovered from the 2008 recession, and Brexit could take us back to those tough years again. Yes, we can make all decisions based on impact on financial markets, but remember that the lifestyle we live today is a result of capitalism. The rich may get through the short term downturn, but the poor are the ones who’ll suffer the most If you just about get-by or have major monthly payment commitments such as mortgage, etc, be worried, be very worried. If we head right back into recession, it could lead to job losses, pay cuts, and the poor will suffer. The divide between the rich and the poor will only increase. The rich usually can hedge their portfolios, take advantage of beaten down stocks and properties, and can even gain by shorting the markets i.e. making money from the markets and economies declining. Immigration control through Brexit might backfire and result in more job losses for Britons Immigration is one of the key issues raised, and there are different reports as to whether or not immigration helps or adversely affects the British economy and jobs, etc. In the case of Brexit, our friends from Eastern Europe can no longer come and “steal” jobs in the UK. This will result in more jobs for the locals at the lower end of the market, for example in retail, but with lower supply of labour, the costs will rise very quickly. If a recession happens, the consumer spending power will go down and businesses will have to shut down leading to job losses again. Your answer to whether immigration is good or bad typically depends on if you are an economist or a politician. Exports may be competitive if the currency falls, but higher costs of imports could cause inflation and may result in interest rate hikes There is an argument that depreciating currency may be good for exports and economies, but most people forget how it could affect imports and may cause inflation which may require the central bank to take tough measures including higher interest rates on your mortgage. UK may lose the advantage of being in the center of the World and time zones and may not be the first choice for European headquarters for international companies For the last few years, several financial institutions have evaluated whether London is the best place for them to be in Europe. They’ll now have one more reason to move their business elsewhere. Summary For us in the UK, this will be one of the toughest choices that we have had to make in recent years, and I sincerely hope that people weigh in the pros and cons even with the limited information that we have access to. My view is that in 2016, we shouldn’t be building more walls. Who knows, we in the UK may ourselves need help in the future. If you want to stay abreast of breaking news on Brexit, GBP/USD, GBP/EUR, and FTSE100, you can do that on our site . CityFALCON Originally published on Blog CityFALCON

How Will Brexit Affect The UK And World Economies, Start-ups, The Rich, And The Poor?

I’m leaving most of this post to the podcast version as I had a co-host in the form of and we spoke for nearly an hour about Bitspiration, startups in Eastern Europe, Warsaw, WW2, IoT, Booth Babes, Europe vs Silicon Valley and much, much more. Cate Lawrence Podcast All of the Weekly Squeak posts are accompanied by a podcast where I go more in-depth into the topic, subscribe here or listen to the individual episode to the left.

Bitspiration in Warsaw and Brexit

Can Blockchain Help Ease BREXIT?

In the world of UK FinTech, nothing stays still for long. Just when you think you’ve got the hang of the latest trend, the landscape shifts beneath your feet. From sky-high investments to Brexit-induced headaches, it’s been a whirlwind few years for Britain’s financial innovators. Investment Trends: Peaks and Valleys The last few years have been nothing short of a financial rollercoaster for the UK FinTech sector. Once the darling of the innovation economy, it’s now grappling with shrinking investments and a tough economic climate. According to innovatefinance.com, in 2023, global FinTech investment plummeted to $51.2 billion from $99 billion the previous year. The UK saw a significant drop, too, attracting just $5.1 billion compared to $14.6 billion in 2022. Forbes provides data for 2024: in the first quarter, British startups attracted $3.9 billion in investment, down from $4.8 billion the previous quarter. Early-stage pre-seed and seed funding accounted for $279 million of that total, while $769 million was raised in Series A rounds. This improvement in early-stage investment was a rare bright spot amidst the gloomy numbers. Jason Miles, founder of Payment Solutions Consultants in Britain, observed, “The overall market trends have shifted from stability to volatility.” He noted that in 2020 and 2021, capital raising was a breeze for FinTech firms. “If you had a good idea, you just raised some money and started to implement it,” he said. “Now, venture capitalists want a thorough business plan in place. They want to meet regularly.” Mr. Miles also mentioned increased scrutiny of FinTech teams, their backgrounds, and compliance records. This shift is attributed to rising interest rates, higher capital costs, and geopolitical uncertainties. A turbulent public market and inflation fears are also impacting capital raising. He highlighted that venture capitalists now often disburse funds in tranches, linking further investment to milestone achievements. Down rounds are becoming more common, where firms raise new capital at valuations lower than previous rounds. “There is a higher level of due diligence. Depending upon performance, you may see some down rounds of funding occurring,” added Mr Miles. The Other Hurdles for UK FinTech While businesses panicked over COVID-19, FinTech companies thrived in the new normal, benefiting from their digital-first approach. This period highlighted the fragility of legacy banking systems, which struggled with the shift online. FinTech firms, already digital-centric, capitalized on this shift, accelerating innovation and the adoption of digital financial solutions. However, it wasn't all smooth sailing — Brexit soon occurred, bringing with it a labyrinth of new regulations and licensing requirements for the FinTech industry. UK-based companies wanting to do business in Europe now need European licenses and must adhere to EU data storage and client norms. It’s a costly and complex endeavor, limiting the scalability of British FinTech firms. The ability of British FinTech companies to scale has weakened as access to EU markets is restricted. The forced relocation of parts of the business to the EU means a loss of revenue for the UK from FinTech companies. Major British FinTech companies are more inclined to merge with or acquire technology companies outside the UK, which could lead to a loss of potential investments in the coming years. As the online presence and number of FinTech services grow, the frequency and sophistication of cybercrimes are increasing proportionally.  A new wave began with the widespread adoption of AI – I wrote about this in the article “FinTech Wary as AI Fuels Financial Crime Surge.” The rise in cybercrime is pushing FinTech firms to up their game. FinTech companies are increasing their investments in cybersecurity, allocating more resources to the development and implementation of advanced protection technologies, staff training, and cyber threat monitoring. Machine learning and artificial intelligence are being deployed to detect abnormal behavior and prevent cyberattacks. Multi-factor authentication, including the use of biometric data and one-time passwords, is enhancing user security. Enhanced data protection measures, regular monitoring for data breaches, and strict security policies are becoming standard. According to the FinTech Payrow, financial companies are establishing partnerships with specialised cybersecurity firms and startups to gain access to advanced technologies and expertise in cybersecurity. The government has also taken measures to enhance data security, such as the introduction of the Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act, which mandates that smart devices meet minimum security standards and provides security issue reporting contact details and update durations. Innovation Amidst Chaos Technology has always been the lifeblood of FinTech firms, enabling them to outpace traditional banks. Over the past five years, automation, AI integration, and niche products have become the norm. The digital transformation was more than a buzzword; it was a necessity. As consumers and businesses moved online, FinTech companies were ready with user-friendly interfaces, swift transactions, and low fees. Automation has streamlined operations, while AI has revolutionized service delivery and decision-making processes. Niche products tailored to specific customer needs have gained popularity, and open banking has made financial services more transparent. Technologies like IoT, AI, and Big Data are leading this era, with the sector’s value projected to reach between $11 to $17 trillion by 2030, according to reports from McKinsey. The Road Ahead In 2024, financial inclusion remains a key objective. As we forge ahead with the development of the Fintech industry, the barriers for startups are getting higher. To stay in the game, founders need to focus on building user-friendly products, forming smart partnerships, thinking about scalability, and being diligent about security and reputation. So, what can FinTech companies do to maintain and grow their customer base? Several ideas are thrown around in the article “Scaling FinTech Startups in 2024: Strategies and Challenges.” The suggestions include making the most of strategic alliances, building scalable solutions, focusing on security, reputation, and trust, prioritizing the customer experience, monetizing intelligently, and not being afraid to experiment. Regarding government support, the UK offers some unique perks for FinTech startups, including the Talent Visa and tax incentives such as EIS/SEIS. These measures provide substantial benefits to FinTech companies, founders, and employees during the early stages. However, low startup valuations compared to the US and a cautious stance from venture investors are not conducive to rapid growth in the UK FinTech sector. In the world of UK FinTech, nothing stays still for long. Just when you think you’ve got the hang of the latest trend, the landscape shifts beneath your feet. From sky-high investments to Brexit-induced headaches, it’s been a whirlwind few years for Britain’s financial innovators. Investment Trends: Peaks and Valleys The last few years have been nothing short of a financial rollercoaster for the UK FinTech sector. Once the darling of the innovation economy, it’s now grappling with shrinking investments and a tough economic climate. According to innovatefinance.com , in 2023, global FinTech investment plummeted to $51.2 billion from $99 billion the previous year. The UK saw a significant drop, too, attracting just $5.1 billion compared to $14.6 billion in 2022. innovatefinance.com innovatefinance.com Forbes provides data for 2024 : in the first quarter, British startups attracted $3.9 billion in investment, down from $4.8 billion the previous quarter. Early-stage pre-seed and seed funding accounted for $279 million of that total, while $769 million was raised in Series A rounds. This improvement in early-stage investment was a rare bright spot amidst the gloomy numbers. Forbes provides data for 2024 Forbes provides data for 2024 Jason Miles, founder of Payment Solutions Consultants in Britain, observed , “The overall market trends have shifted from stability to volatility.” He noted that in 2020 and 2021, capital raising was a breeze for FinTech firms. “If you had a good idea, you just raised some money and started to implement it,” he said. “Now, venture capitalists want a thorough business plan in place. They want to meet regularly.” Jason Miles, founder of Payment Solutions Consultants in Britain, observed Jason Miles, founder of Payment Solutions Consultants in Britain, observed Mr. Miles also mentioned increased scrutiny of FinTech teams, their backgrounds, and compliance records. This shift is attributed to rising interest rates, higher capital costs, and geopolitical uncertainties. A turbulent public market and inflation fears are also impacting capital raising. He highlighted that venture capitalists now often disburse funds in tranches, linking further investment to milestone achievements. Down rounds are becoming more common, where firms raise new capital at valuations lower than previous rounds. “There is a higher level of due diligence. Depending upon performance, you may see some down rounds of funding occurring,” added Mr Miles. The Other Hurdles for UK FinTech The Other Hurdles for UK FinTech While businesses panicked over COVID-19, FinTech companies thrived in the new normal, benefiting from their digital-first approach. This period highlighted the fragility of legacy banking systems, which struggled with the shift online. FinTech firms, already digital-centric, capitalized on this shift, accelerating innovation and the adoption of digital financial solutions. However, it wasn't all smooth sailing — Brexit soon occurred, bringing with it a labyrinth of new regulations and licensing requirements for the FinTech industry. UK-based companies wanting to do business in Europe now need European licenses and must adhere to EU data storage and client norms. It’s a costly and complex endeavor, limiting the scalability of British FinTech firms. The ability of British FinTech companies to scale has weakened as access to EU markets is restricted. The forced relocation of parts of the business to the EU means a loss of revenue for the UK from FinTech companies. Major British FinTech companies are more inclined to merge with or acquire technology companies outside the UK, which could lead to a loss of potential investments in the coming years. As the online presence and number of FinTech services grow, the frequency and sophistication of cybercrimes are increasing proportionally.  A new wave began with the widespread adoption of AI – I wrote about this in the article “ FinTech Wary as AI Fuels Financial Crime Surge .” FinTech Wary as AI Fuels Financial Crime Surge FinTech Wary as AI Fuels Financial Crime Surge The rise in cybercrime is pushing FinTech firms to up their game. FinTech companies are increasing their investments in cybersecurity, allocating more resources to the development and implementation of advanced protection technologies, staff training, and cyber threat monitoring. Machine learning and artificial intelligence are being deployed to detect abnormal behavior and prevent cyberattacks. Multi-factor authentication, including the use of biometric data and one-time passwords, is enhancing user security. Enhanced data protection measures, regular monitoring for data breaches, and strict security policies are becoming standard. According to the FinTech Payrow , financial companies are establishing partnerships with specialised cybersecurity firms and startups to gain access to advanced technologies and expertise in cybersecurity. According to the FinTech Payrow According to the FinTech Payrow The government has also taken measures to enhance data security, such as the introduction of the Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act, which mandates that smart devices meet minimum security standards and provides security issue reporting contact details and update durations. Innovation Amidst Chaos Technology has always been the lifeblood of FinTech firms, enabling them to outpace traditional banks. Over the past five years, automation, AI integration, and niche products have become the norm. The digital transformation was more than a buzzword; it was a necessity. As consumers and businesses moved online, FinTech companies were ready with user-friendly interfaces, swift transactions, and low fees. Automation has streamlined operations, while AI has revolutionized service delivery and decision-making processes. Niche products tailored to specific customer needs have gained popularity, and open banking has made financial services more transparent. Technologies like IoT, AI, and Big Data are leading this era, with the sector’s value projected to reach between $11 to $17 trillion by 2030, according to reports from McKinsey. according to reports from McKinsey. according to reports from McKinsey. The Road Ahead The Road Ahead In 2024, financial inclusion remains a key objective. As we forge ahead with the development of the Fintech industry, the barriers for startups are getting higher. To stay in the game, founders need to focus on building user-friendly products, forming smart partnerships, thinking about scalability, and being diligent about security and reputation. So, what can FinTech companies do to maintain and grow their customer base? Several ideas are thrown around in the article “ Scaling FinTech Startups in 2024: Strategies and Challenges .” The suggestions include making the most of strategic alliances, building scalable solutions, focusing on security, reputation, and trust, prioritizing the customer experience, monetizing intelligently, and not being afraid to experiment. Scaling FinTech Startups in 2024: Strategies and Challenges Scaling FinTech Startups in 2024: Strategies and Challenges Regarding government support, the UK offers some unique perks for FinTech startups, including the Talent Visa and tax incentives such as EIS/SEIS. These measures provide substantial benefits to FinTech companies, founders, and employees during the early stages. However, low startup valuations compared to the US and a cautious stance from venture investors are not conducive to rapid growth in the UK FinTech sector.

Is the UK Still a FinTech Hub Amidst Market Volatility?

News and Misinformation Consumption in Europe: Results and Discussion

ইউরোপে সংবাদ এবং ভুল তথ্যের ব্যবহার: ফলাফল এবং আলোচনা

Nachrichten- und Desinformationskonsum in Europa: Ergebnisse und Diskussion

Consumo de noticias y desinformación en Europa: resultados y discusión

Consommation d’informations et de désinformation en Europe : résultats et discussions

यूरोप में समाचार और गलत सूचना का उपभोग: परिणाम और चर्चा

ヨーロッパにおけるニュースと誤情報の消費：結果と考察

유럽의 뉴스와 잘못된 정보 소비: 결과 및 토론

Consumo de notícias e desinformação na Europa: resultados e discussão

Новости и потребление дезинформации в Европе: результаты и обсуждение

Avrupa'da Haber ve Yanlış Bilgi Tüketimi: Sonuçlar ve Tartışma

Tiêu thụ tin tức và thông tin sai lệch ở châu Âu: Kết quả và thảo luận

欧洲的新闻和虚假信息消费：结果与讨论

Authors:
(1) Anees Baqir, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy;
(2) Alessandro Galeazzi, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy;
(3) Fabiana Zollo, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy and The New Institute Centre for Environmental Humanities, Italy. Table of Links Abstract and Intro
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
Conclusions and References
Supplementary Information 4. Conclusions In this study, we have delved into the evolving dynamics of news production and consumption within the European context. We examined the consumption of Twitter content produced by news outlets in France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom, providing a cross-country and cross-topic comparison of the online public discourse. We identified topics debated across all four countries and highlighted differences and similarities in consumption patterns. Additionally, we constructed networks based on the similarities among news outlets’ audiences, revealing the presence of groups of users engaging with sources of different reliability. Our findings indicated that reliable sources dominate the information landscape, but users consuming content mainly or exclusively from questionable news outlets were often present. However, the size and importance of such groups vary based on the topic and the country under consideration. Furthermore, our cross-country comparison has revealed variations in the structure of news sources’ similarity networks. While some countries exhibited a clearer separation between clusters of questionable sources and reliable sources, others showed a more heterogeneous situation with less detectable differences in cluster composition. However, the connectedness of the networks and users’ behavior analysis indicated the presence of a small fraction of users with a mixed news diet in all countries. Our results emphasized the differences and similarities in news consumption patterns across countries in relation to globally significant subjects. Understanding the dynamic of news consumption and its dependence on factors such as the topic or country can provide valuable insights into the development of effective countermeasures to mitigate the spread of misinformation and disinformation. Monitoring the information landscape at both national and European levels is indeed crucial to understanding the state of public discourse on contentious topics and developing tailored cohesive strategies to improve the health of information ecosystems. References European commission, the digital services act package. accessed on 23-10-2023. Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., and Watts, D. J. (2011). Identifying influencers on twitter. In Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Seach and Data Mining (WSDM), volume 2. Bakshy, E., Messing, S., and Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on facebook. Science, 348(6239):1130–1132. Bessi, A. and Ferrara, E. (2016). Social bots distort the 2016 us presidential election online discussion. First monday, 21(11-7). Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., and Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment, 2008(10):P10008. Bovet, A. and Makse, H. A. (2019). Influence of fake news in twitter during the 2016 us presidential election. Nature communications, 10(1):7. Broniatowski, D. A., Simons, J. R., Gu, J., Jamison, A. M., and Abroms, L. C. (2023). The efficacy of facebook’s vaccine misinformation policies and architecture during the covid-19 pandemic. Science Advances, 9(37):eadh2132. Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., and Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9):e2023301118. Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., Zola, P., Zollo, F., and Scala, A. (2020). The covid-19 social media infodemic. Scientific reports, 10(1):1–10. Cota, W., Ferreira, S. C., Pastor-Satorras, R., and Starnini, M. (2019). Quantifying echo chamber effects in information spreading over political communication networks. EPJ Data Science, 8(1):35. Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. E., and Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the national academy of Sciences, 113(3):554–559. Del Vicario, M., Zollo, F., Caldarelli, G., Scala, A., and Quattrociocchi, W. (2017). Mapping social dynamics on facebook: The brexit debate. Social Networks, 50:6–16. Falkenberg, M., Galeazzi, A., Torricelli, M., Di Marco, N., Larosa, F., Sas, M., Mekacher, A., Pearce, W., Zollo, F., Quattrociocchi, W., et al. (2022). Growing polarization around climate change on social media. Nature Climate Change, pages 1–8. Ferrara, E. (2017). Disinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 french presidential election. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00086. Ferrara, E., Cresci, S., and Luceri, L. (2020). Misinformation, manipulation, and abuse on social media in the era of covid-19. Journal of Computational Social Science, 3:271–277. Flamino, J., Galeazzi, A., Feldman, S., Macy, M. W., Cross, B., Zhou, Z., Serafino, M., Bovet, A., Makse, H. A., and Szymanski, B. K. (2023). Political polarization of news media and influencers on twitter in the 2016 and 2020 us presidential elections. Nature Human Behaviour, pages 1–13. Flaxman, S., Goel, S., and Rao, J. M. (2013). Ideological segregation and the effects of social media on news consumption. Available at SSRN, 2363701. Garimella, K., Smith, T., Weiss, R., and West, R. (2021). Political polarization in online news consumption. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, volume 15, pages 152–162. Gonz´alez-Bail´on, S., Lazer, D., Barber´a, P., Zhang, M., Allcott, H., Brown, T., Crespo-Tenorio, A., Freelon, D., Gentzkow, M., Guess, A. M., et al. (2023). Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on facebook. Science, 381(6656):392–398. Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., and Lazer, D. (2019). Fake news on twitter during the 2016 us presidential election. Science, 363(6425):374–378. Grootendorst, M. (2022). Bertopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based tf-idf procedure. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05794. Karimi, F. and Oliveira, M. (2022). On the inadequacy of nominal assortativity for assessing homophily in networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10245. Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., et al. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380):1094–1096. McInnes, L., Healy, J., and Astels, S. (2017). hdbscan: Hierarchical density based clustering. J. Open Source Softw., 2(11):205. McInnes, L., Healy, J., and Melville, J. (2018). Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426. Nyhan, B., Settle, J., Thorson, E., Wojcieszak, M., Barber´a, P., Chen, A. Y., Allcott, H., Brown, T., Crespo-Tenorio, A., Dimmery, D., et al. (2023). Like-minded sources on facebook are prevalent but not polarizing. Nature, 620(7972):137–144. Ruths, D. (2019). The misinformation machine. Science, 363(6425):348–348. Sammut, C. and Webb, G. I. (2011). Encyclopedia of machine learning. Springer Science & Business Media. Santoro, A., Galeazzi, A., Scantamburlo, T., Baronchelli, A., Quattrociocchi, W., and Zollo, F. (2023). Analyzing the changing landscape of the covid-19 vaccine debate on twitter. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 13(1):115. Schmidt, A. L., Zollo, F., Scala, A., Betsch, C., and Quattrociocchi, W. (2018). Polarization of the vaccination debate on facebook. Vaccine, 36(25):3606–3612. Stella, M., Ferrara, E., and De Domenico, M. (2018). Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(49):12435–12440. Zannettou, S., Bradlyn, B., De Cristofaro, E., Kwak, H., Sirivianos, M., Stringini, G., and Blackburn, J. (2018). What is gab: A bastion of free speech or an alt-right echo chamber. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018, pages 1007–1014. Zannettou, S., Caulfield, T., De Cristofaro, E., Sirivianos, M., Stringhini, G., and Blackburn, J. (2019). Disinformation warfare: Understanding state-sponsored trolls on twitter and their influence on the web. In Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference, pages 218–226. This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. Authors: (1) Anees Baqir, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy; (2) Alessandro Galeazzi, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy; (3) Fabiana Zollo, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy and The New Institute Centre for Environmental Humanities, Italy. Authors: Authors: (1) Anees Baqir, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy; (2) Alessandro Galeazzi, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy; (3) Fabiana Zollo, Ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy and The New Institute Centre for Environmental Humanities, Italy. Table of Links Abstract and Intro Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Conclusions and References Supplementary Information Abstract and Intro Abstract and Intro Materials and Methods Materials and Methods Results and Discussion Results and Discussion Conclusions and References Conclusions and References Supplementary Information Supplementary Information 4. Conclusions In this study, we have delved into the evolving dynamics of news production and consumption within the European context. We examined the consumption of Twitter content produced by news outlets in France, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom, providing a cross-country and cross-topic comparison of the online public discourse. We identified topics debated across all four countries and highlighted differences and similarities in consumption patterns. Additionally, we constructed networks based on the similarities among news outlets’ audiences, revealing the presence of groups of users engaging with sources of different reliability. Our findings indicated that reliable sources dominate the information landscape, but users consuming content mainly or exclusively from questionable news outlets were often present. However, the size and importance of such groups vary based on the topic and the country under consideration. Furthermore, our cross-country comparison has revealed variations in the structure of news sources’ similarity networks. While some countries exhibited a clearer separation between clusters of questionable sources and reliable sources, others showed a more heterogeneous situation with less detectable differences in cluster composition. However, the connectedness of the networks and users’ behavior analysis indicated the presence of a small fraction of users with a mixed news diet in all countries. Our results emphasized the differences and similarities in news consumption patterns across countries in relation to globally significant subjects. Understanding the dynamic of news consumption and its dependence on factors such as the topic or country can provide valuable insights into the development of effective countermeasures to mitigate the spread of misinformation and disinformation. Monitoring the information landscape at both national and European levels is indeed crucial to understanding the state of public discourse on contentious topics and developing tailored cohesive strategies to improve the health of information ecosystems. References European commission, the digital services act package. accessed on 23-10-2023. Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., and Watts, D. J. (2011). Identifying influencers on twitter. In Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Seach and Data Mining (WSDM), volume 2. Bakshy, E., Messing, S., and Adamic, L. A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on facebook. Science, 348(6239):1130–1132. Bessi, A. and Ferrara, E. (2016). Social bots distort the 2016 us presidential election online discussion. First monday, 21(11-7). Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R., and Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. Journal of statistical mechanics: theory and experiment, 2008(10):P10008. Bovet, A. and Makse, H. A. (2019). Influence of fake news in twitter during the 2016 us presidential election. Nature communications, 10(1):7. Broniatowski, D. A., Simons, J. R., Gu, J., Jamison, A. M., and Abroms, L. C. (2023). The efficacy of facebook’s vaccine misinformation policies and architecture during the covid-19 pandemic. Science Advances, 9(37):eadh2132. Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., and Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9):e2023301118. Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., Zola, P., Zollo, F., and Scala, A. (2020). The covid-19 social media infodemic. Scientific reports, 10(1):1–10. Cota, W., Ferreira, S. C., Pastor-Satorras, R., and Starnini, M. (2019). Quantifying echo chamber effects in information spreading over political communication networks. EPJ Data Science, 8(1):35. Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., Stanley, H. E., and Quattrociocchi, W. (2016). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the national academy of Sciences, 113(3):554–559. Del Vicario, M., Zollo, F., Caldarelli, G., Scala, A., and Quattrociocchi, W. (2017). Mapping social dynamics on facebook: The brexit debate. Social Networks, 50:6–16. Falkenberg, M., Galeazzi, A., Torricelli, M., Di Marco, N., Larosa, F., Sas, M., Mekacher, A., Pearce, W., Zollo, F., Quattrociocchi, W., et al. (2022). Growing polarization around climate change on social media. Nature Climate Change, pages 1–8. Ferrara, E. (2017). Disinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 french presidential election. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00086. Ferrara, E., Cresci, S., and Luceri, L. (2020). Misinformation, manipulation, and abuse on social media in the era of covid-19. Journal of Computational Social Science, 3:271–277. Flamino, J., Galeazzi, A., Feldman, S., Macy, M. W., Cross, B., Zhou, Z., Serafino, M., Bovet, A., Makse, H. A., and Szymanski, B. K. (2023). Political polarization of news media and influencers on twitter in the 2016 and 2020 us presidential elections. Nature Human Behaviour, pages 1–13. Flaxman, S., Goel, S., and Rao, J. M. (2013). Ideological segregation and the effects of social media on news consumption. Available at SSRN, 2363701. Garimella, K., Smith, T., Weiss, R., and West, R. (2021). Political polarization in online news consumption. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, volume 15, pages 152–162. Gonz´alez-Bail´on, S., Lazer, D., Barber´a, P., Zhang, M., Allcott, H., Brown, T., Crespo-Tenorio, A., Freelon, D., Gentzkow, M., Guess, A. M., et al. (2023). Asymmetric ideological segregation in exposure to political news on facebook. Science, 381(6656):392–398. Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., and Lazer, D. (2019). Fake news on twitter during the 2016 us presidential election. Science, 363(6425):374–378. Grootendorst, M. (2022). Bertopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based tf-idf procedure. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.05794. Karimi, F. and Oliveira, M. (2022). On the inadequacy of nominal assortativity for assessing homophily in networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10245. Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., et al. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380):1094–1096. McInnes, L., Healy, J., and Astels, S. (2017). hdbscan: Hierarchical density based clustering. J. Open Source Softw., 2(11):205. McInnes, L., Healy, J., and Melville, J. (2018). Umap: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426. Nyhan, B., Settle, J., Thorson, E., Wojcieszak, M., Barber´a, P., Chen, A. Y., Allcott, H., Brown, T., Crespo-Tenorio, A., Dimmery, D., et al. (2023). Like-minded sources on facebook are prevalent but not polarizing. Nature, 620(7972):137–144. Ruths, D. (2019). The misinformation machine. Science, 363(6425):348–348. Sammut, C. and Webb, G. I. (2011). Encyclopedia of machine learning. Springer Science & Business Media. Santoro, A., Galeazzi, A., Scantamburlo, T., Baronchelli, A., Quattrociocchi, W., and Zollo, F. (2023). Analyzing the changing landscape of the covid-19 vaccine debate on twitter. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 13(1):115. Schmidt, A. L., Zollo, F., Scala, A., Betsch, C., and Quattrociocchi, W. (2018). Polarization of the vaccination debate on facebook. Vaccine, 36(25):3606–3612. Stella, M., Ferrara, E., and De Domenico, M. (2018). Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(49):12435–12440. Zannettou, S., Bradlyn, B., De Cristofaro, E., Kwak, H., Sirivianos, M., Stringini, G., and Blackburn, J. (2018). What is gab: A bastion of free speech or an alt-right echo chamber. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018, pages 1007–1014. Zannettou, S., Caulfield, T., De Cristofaro, E., Sirivianos, M., Stringhini, G., and Blackburn, J. (2019). Disinformation warfare: Understanding state-sponsored trolls on twitter and their influence on the web. In Companion proceedings of the 2019 world wide web conference, pages 218–226. This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license. available on arxiv

BREX

brex.com

1K-5K employees

Since 2017

COMPANY RANKING

BREX

EVERGREEN INDEX #2022

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Brex WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

BREX

brex.com

1K-5K employees

Since 2017

COMPANY RANKING

BREX

EVERGREEN INDEX #2022

RELATED COMPANIESRANK

STORIES ABOUT BREX

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Brex WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!