Get the most recent info and news about Atexto on HackerNoon, where 10k+ technologists publish stories for 4M+ monthly readers.

Atexto’s creates, collects, annotates and transcribes audio to train voice assistants. Helping companies to deploy 9x faster trained voice assistants. As easy as ordering pizza.
Atexto is a 500 Startups backed company. 500 Startups is a global venture capital seed fund with a network of startup programs headquartered in Silicon Valley. 500 Startups is the #1 most active seed fund in the world.

Atexto

atexto

Existen muchas formas de trabajar de manera remota. Por un lado, pueden ingresar a sitios virtuales: Freelancer, Workana, Jobleads, ClickASnap, Remote Jobs, Remote First, Amazon Mechanical Turk, Atexto, Torre y Verbling.

Aprende a trabajar de forma remota si eres un latino emprendedor

The Salesforce development platform offers many powerful features to provide your team with apps that can unlock new workflows. For many years, the platform has run on a trifecta of technologies: (to view the data), (to handle the data), and Salesforce itself (to store the data). Visualforce Apex Apex is like many other object-oriented languages, and it has a Java-like syntax. However, , allowing developers to build and deploy an app without worrying about where to host it or how to secure their data. Apex runs directly on Salesforce servers The challenge of Apex and long-running commands Applications built on Salesforce run on its , so . With shared resources, however, wouldn’t it be possible for the code for one org’s app to consume so much processor time and memory space that it affects other users in that same org? An example of this could be a command that takes several minutes to complete. multitenant architecture server resources like CPU and memory are shared among different organizations Salesforce prevents situations like this from occurring by restricting how apps on its platform run. Long-running programs can potentially interrupt other work by hogging the limited resources available. If any app has the potential to interfere with other users, it is restricted from completing its command execution. If so, how might Salesforce developers build apps that execute long-running commands which can scale with user growth while not impacting performance? Salesforce Functions to the rescue Enter , which are small programs and deployed onto Salesforce’s servers. Functions can perform the resource-intensive work and be invoked directly from Apex. When the Salesforce Function completes the request, it can send its results back to the originating Apex application, which then performs any additional tasks on those results. Salesforce Functions written in JavaScript, TypeScript, or Java Salesforce Functions and on the Salesforce platform. The , allowing you to execute longer running and more complex tasks. Because Salesforce Functions run on the Salesforce platform, security is baked in; there’s as everything runs within the same trust boundary. run in their own container don’t affect other tenants memory and CPU limits are much higher no risk of privacy loss In this article, we’ll take a closer look at how to migrate a long-running Apex operation into a Salesforce Function, along with some general tips around the Salesforce DX suite. Prerequisites This article will require you to have some understanding of both Apex and TypeScript, but don’t worry if you’re not an expert. We’ll go through every piece of code to explain what is happening. Although the completed version of our code is available as , you may also want to download some of the CLI tools which Salesforce provides to follow along (or for your own future projects). a GitHub repository First, install , which is a tool that helps simplify common operations for Salesforce developers when building applications. the sfdx CLI It’s important that whatever you build and deploy doesn’t affect your “real” production Salesforce organization. So, create a separate that this app can interact with. To get your own scratch org, sign up for account. scratch org a free Developer Edition To use Salesforce Functions, you’ll need to by contacting your Salesforce account executive. register for a Salesforce Functions trial Finally, you can also install to make deploying your code a little bit easier. This step is optional. the Salesforce VS Code extension Touring the existing code Open up the file at and take a look at its contents: force-app/main/default/classes/Dogshow.cls public class Dogshow {
 public static void updateAccounts() {
 // Get the 5 oldest accounts
 Account[] accounts = [SELECT Id, Description FROM Account ORDER BY CreatedDate ASC LIMIT 5];

 // Set HTTP request
 HttpRequest req = new HttpRequest();
 req.setEndpoint('https://dog.ceo/api/breeds/image/random');
 req.setMethod('GET');

 // Create a new HTTP object to send the request object
 Http http = new Http();
 HTTPResponse res = http.send(req);

 String body = res.getBody();

 Map<String, String> m = (Map<String, String>) JSON.deserialize(jsonStr, Map<String, String>.class);
 String dogUrl = m.get('message');

 // loop through accounts and update the Description field
 for (Account acct : oldAccounts) {
 acct.Description += ' And their favorite dog can be found at ' + dogUrl;
 }

 // save the change you made
 update accounts;
 }
} These 30 lines perform a fairly simple function: It grabs the five oldest Salesforce accounts using SOQL. It issues an HTTP request to , which is a site that returns a JSON object with a random URL link to a very cute dog. https://dog.ceo/dog-api/ The Apex code then updates the description for those five accounts to indicate that dog is their favorite. that This code is fairly innocuous, but it introduces two situations that present some real problems: When issuing an HTTP request, several factors can affect your program. For example, the server you issue requests to could be overloaded and slow to respond. While your own code may be performant, you’re at the mercy of anything outside of your control, such as an external data source. Although we only iterate on five accounts here, what if we built an app that needed to iterate over 500 or 5,000? Looping through them one by one would be a slow, albeit unavoidable, process. This is an opportunity for a Salesforce Function to take over some of this work. Our Apex class can provide a list of accounts to update to a Salesforce Function. That Salesforce Function can then issue HTTP requests and update the accounts. Before seeing what that full migration might look like, let’s first write that Salesforce Function. Developing the Salesforce Function Using the sfdx CLI, we can easily using a single command: create a new Salesforce Function in TypeScript $ sf generate function -n dogshowfunction -l typescript This creates a set of files under . The most important of these is , which is where our main Salesforce Function code will reside. However, the other files are also important, dealing with testing and linting code, as well as defining TypeScript generation and the Salesforce deployment process. functions/dogshowfunction index.ts Let’s focus on . In this file, you’ll note that there’s one function exported, and it takes three parameters: index.ts : This describes the payload of data that is coming in from your Apex code. event : This contains the authorization logic necessary to communicate with Salesforce. context : This is a simple logger that also . logger integrates with Salesforce The template code which the CLI generates shows how powerful Salesforce Functions are: They can accept any JSON data sent over from Apex. They can work directly with Salesforce data. They integrate directly with the platform in such a way as to handle all the authentication and security for you. Best of all, since this particular function runs on Node.js, you can to supplement your code. Let’s do that right now by installing to issue our HTTP request: install and use any NPM package node-fetch $ npm i node-fetch Our Salesforce Function will be responsible for issuing our HTTP requests and updating our five accounts. To implement that functionality, our function might look something like this: export default async function execute(event: InvocationEvent<any>, context: Context, logger: Logger): Promise<RecordQueryResult> {
 const accounts = event.data.accounts;

 accounts.forEach(async (account) => {
 const response = await fetch('https://dog.ceo/api/breeds/image/random');
 const data = await response.json();
 const message = ` And their favorite dog is ${data.message}`

 const recordForUpdate = {
 type: 'Account',
 fields: {
 id: account.id,
 Description: `${account.Description} ${message}`
 }
 }
 context.org.dataApi.updateRecord(recordForUpdate);
 });
} Let’s break down what’s going on in the code snippet above. Our event argument is essentially a JSON object which we will define in our Apex code. Although this JSON object doesn’t exist yet, we can assume that it will have the and of the account we want to update, based on the behavior of our previous Apex code. id Description From here, it’s important to note that the context argument is essentially . Since we can assume that this account data is provided as an array, we can simply iterate through each item, plugging in the record data as part of our update command. an instantiation of the Node.js SDK for Salesforce Functions Migrate the Apex Code With our Salesforce Function defined, we can now replace the previous Apex logic with a call to this new function. Issuing a call to a Salesforce Function is surprisingly simple: We only need to know the name of our function and provide the data we want to send it, as shown below: public class Dogshow {
 public static void updateAccounts() {
 // Get the 5 oldest accounts
 Account[] accounts = [SELECT Id, Description FROM Account ORDER BY CreatedDate ASC LIMIT 5];

 // Set up the function
 functions.Function dogshowFunction = functions.Function.get('ApexToSalesforceFunctionsMigration.dogshowfunction');

 // Create a list to hold the record data
 List<Map<String, String>> jsonObj = new List<Map<String, String>>();
 for (Account account : accounts) {
 Map<String, Object> obj = new Map<String, Object>();

 obj.put('id', account.Id);
 obj.put('Description', account.Description);

 // Add an object to the record list
 jsonObj.add(obj);
 }
 // Send the record list to the function
 functions.FunctionInvocation invocation = dogshowFunction.invoke(JSON.Serialize(jsonObj));

 // if the function had a return value, it would be available here
 invocation.getResponse();
 }
} Just like that, we’ve taken the long-running operation out of our Apex code and offloaded it to a Salesforce Function. Now, we can be certain that our operation will continue to run even though it uses resources more heavily. The implications of Salesforce Functions cannot be overstated. With Salesforce Functions handling our need for time-consuming, resource-heavy operations, apps built on the Salesforce platform now have much more potential for scaling up seamlessly. Conclusion Salesforce Functions provide a way to improve workflows while building effective and durable projects. Without the memory and CPU limits you would experience in Apex, you can leverage Salesforce Functions for the execution of long-running commands, bringing scalability without a negative impact on performance. We’ve only begun to discuss the amazing capabilities provided by Salesforce Functions. To learn more about them, Salesforce Functions provides plenty of , along with various that are worth looking into. guides detailing specific tasks Trailhead recipes

Scaling Your Compute Resources on Salesforce

Welcome to the Round 5 results announcement of the brought to you by HackerNoon and ! Let’s see who won. Blockchain Writing Contest Tatum The Blockchain Writing Contest July 2022 Nominations & Winners As usual, we picked all the stories with the tag on HackerNoon, published in July 2022. Then we chose the top stories using 60:30:10 weightage respectively to: #blockchain Number of hours read The number of people reached The freshness of the content Here are the top 10 nominations: by What Happened to Terra Luna? @juxtathinka by No, Bitcoin Is Not Going to Fail! @AR by A CIA Agent's Guide to Steganography, Fooling the KGB, and Protecting Your Crypto @officercia by Is There Still Hope for the Future of Blockchain? @chixzyoge by From Trending to Falling Apart: A Reminder of the Importance of Blockchain Regulation @growthpunk by Laplace’s Demon Speaks: Is Something 'Alive' in Blockchain? @officercia by No One Knows RACA Has Been Manipulating The Entire Community - Part 1 @alextokflow by Cryptocurrency vs. Fiat Money: Everything You Need to Know @0xdelken by Who is USER221? @youngdegen by A Water-Cooling Upgrade That Can Give Bitcoin Miners Their Power Back @cryptofiresidepress by The editors’ favorite this month is A CIA Agent's Guide to Steganography, Fooling the KGB, and Protecting Your Crypto @officercia Unlike cryptography which hides the contents of a secret message, steganography hides the very fact of its existence. Steganography was first introduced in 1499, but the method itself has existed for a very long time. Legends have brought us a method that was used in the Roman Empire: a slave whose head was shaved was chosen to deliver a message, and then text was applied with a tattoo. After the hair grew back, the slave was sent on the road. The recipient of the message would cut off the slave's hair and read the message. on winning the first position. Well deserved! You’ve won 500 USDT! Congratulations @officercia , The place goes to by second From Trending to Falling Apart: A Reminder of the Importance of Blockchain Regulation @growthpunk While we await the international community to lay down a harmonized regulatory package on all aspects of blockchain-based business models, let us attempt to protect ourselves by choosing to align with projects that think ahead of the regulation curve. Projects that prioritise user protection and safety, and projects that want to comply with existing and coming laws and regulations. Well done, ! You’ve won 300 USDT! @growthpunk by has won the position. Laplace’s Demon Speaks: Is Something 'Alive' in Blockchain? @officercia third By establishing a core set of rules (enforced through smart contracts, for example), software can take the form of organisms in this new world and effectively compete for the scarce resources available on the blockchain. Each instance of software can be, like any living thing, self-serving and seeking to survive and reproduce. And as each genealogy of software develops, it improves not just in isolation but in its desperate attempt to out-compete all of the other software in the environment. Congratulations You’ve bagged another 100 USDT in the same round! @officercia ! The title of the most-read story goes to by What Happened to Terra Luna? @juxtathinka The Terra Luna crash was a defining moment in the world of cryptocurrency: it drove home the point that cryptocurrency in any form would always be volatile. Investors who believed in the ability of $UST to remain pegged to the US dollar lost faith in $UST and became more wary of Tether $USDT. The suspicion that not all stablecoins are actually backed by reserves resulted in less trust for cryptocurrency stablecoins and tokens in general. Cryptocurrency critics had a field day describing cryptocurrency as a Ponzi scheme in which investors had been played, not once but twice with Terra Luna. The cryptocurrency industry as a whole suffered, losing investors and over $400 billion in value in terms of crypto market capitalization. Yay, ! You have won 100 USDT! @juxtathinka On that note, let’s wrap up the announcement! We will contact the winners shortly. Keep an eye on to see the current and upcoming writing contests! contests.hackernoon.com See you all next month. HackerNoon and/or any of its employees, representatives, and/or contractors shall never ask for your wallet seed, your secret keys, private keys, and/or mnemonics to your wallet. Treat such emails with distrust - as you should any email/SMS that asks for such private information. Always remember, he/she/they who have your keys have your wallet. Do not hand out your wallet to internet strangers!

The Blockchain Writing Contest 2022: Round 5 Results Announced!

Concurso de escritura Blockchain 2022: ¡Se anuncian los resultados de la ronda 5!

Le concours d'écriture Blockchain 2022 : les résultats de la 5e manche sont annoncés !

ब्लॉकचेन लेखन प्रतियोगिता 2022: राउंड 5 के परिणाम घोषित!

The Blockchain Writing Contest 2022: 第 5 ラウンドの結果が発表されました!

Concurso de Redação Blockchain 2022: Resultados da 5ª Rodada Anunciados!

Cuộc thi Viết về Blockchain 2022: Kết quả Vòng 5 được Công bố!

2022 年区块链写作大赛：第 5 轮结果公布！

Welcome to modern game theory. You have a choice: act in your own best interest (cooperate with the cops) or the group’s best interest (remain silent). You decide to look out for numero uno and, BAM! Sentenced to 5 years instead of 365 days because everyone else decided to snitch too. That’s the “ ” and pretty much what’s happening to Hashmasks, minus the penal life. Why is that? Prisoner’s Dilemma Roots and Graphs The Hashmasks launched in January 2021 as a complete visual art and incomplete literary art project with the goal to merge the collector and collected. Its ERC-20 Name Change Token ( ) innovated unique collector-creator ERC-721 name traits. A Hashmasks token canvas can be used to hold 1 unique name, up to 25 characters for 1,830 NCT + gas fees. Rename as much as you have 1,830 NCT + ETH for gas per name. NCT Hashmask began with 10 years of producing 10 NCT per day. On January 2031, all NCT production goes to 0, forever. At the time of mint, it was been possible for the completed Hashmasks art to contain a maximum of up to 9,011,200 characters. At 1,800 characters per standard page that’s about the size of Wikipedia in 2009. The Founders figured hype around the launch would be weak without a bonus to jumpstart naming so every minted ERC-721 token got an NCT bonus equal to one year’s worth, enough for 2 names. Or maybe it was so that the plebs wouldn’t have to watch whales farm NCT to create the best name traits first. Note: there wasn’t going to be a bonus on any Hashmask tokens that didn’t mint out. Hashmasks minted out, and the free brushes to write on a Hashmask canvas were a success. Naming mooned. Millions of NCT were burned per day. It looked like the 16,384-piece illustrated novel was going to be written as fast as NCT was produced. And then, something happened. Community members decided it wasn’t in their best interest to burn NCT to complete the art. Now, 2 names is a busy day for NCT. No naming meant NCT hyper-inflation and hyper-inflation REKT the price of NCT. Look at NCT supply moon while NCT destroyed is flat. The on-chain analysis says project participation, aka NCT demand, is weak. Makes sense that the Hashmasks floor price gets punished. A Hashmask is the canvas that NCT gives access to. The market prices floor Hashmasks in the range of 100-200K NCT. Typewriter factories lost value when people stopped using typewriters. Think of NCT as the typewriter. The ERC-721 visual art token is like a factory that produces NCT and can store NCT products, unique name traits. There’s no hiding what’s going on at the web3 typewriter factory. NCT use, naming, is the on-chain metric the world uses to verify Hashmasks project participation. Dear reader can decide whether: (a) the ERC-20 wags the ERC-721’s tail or the other way around and (b) will that change after January 2031, when NCT is no longer being minted? “… participate in one of the largest collaborative NFT art projects in existence.” Hashmaskers get great visual art and access to a canvas that turns ordinary owners into “founding creators.” What does it mean to be a founding creator and what makes a Hashmask token owner want to be one? We know what it takes to become one. The time, ETH, and NCT opportunity costs haven’t completely stopped Hashmasks naming. Hashmaskers still roll out names to troll banks, capture a desirable 1/1 proper noun, build a unique naming evolution, brand or record historic events. Is that really enough to be considered ? founding creators Full stop, answer yes or no: An owner who names a Hashmask is a founding creator because the , as it says in the Manifesto. Hashmasks merges the creator and the consumer of the art piece into one Yes, - continue reading No, Hashmasks is a rug and so is web3 - stop reading Drinking a Bottle of the World’s Oldest Champagne, Tragedy of the Uncommons Economics and game theory overlap with . Once upon a time there was a forest full of trees and nothing stopping the Commons from cutting down all the trees to build stuff. You guessed correct. The forest without logging limits was no more because individuals served their self-interests. Sad trombone, everyone ended up worse off long-term. Tragedy of the Commons Resource + Demand + Low/no barriers to consumption = Resource used up, Everyone worse off The is a Tragedy of the . Hashmasker’s Dilemma Uncommons Theoretically Hashmasker’s must wait to accumulate enough NCT before it can be claimed and used to name (time barrier to consumption). In reality, there are LPs on Uniswap and Sushiswap (economic barrier). Trees are renewable. They’ll grow back if you don’t cut them all down. NCT is finite. Less than 700 million will ever exist. When a Common jacks a bunch of trees to build a house, the community gets hosed. When a Hashmask is named, the value of that burned NCT is redistributed to all the other NCT (scarcity) and ERC-721 token owners of a more complete artwork. Every time a Hashmask is named, value is redistributed to all owners in the form of a more complete literary art project and increased naming scarcity (NCT number go up). Here’s an IRL example. Divers pulled up 30 bottles of 18th Century champagne from the Baltic Sea in 2010 and promptly drank one. That was one less bottle of the world’s oldest champagne there would ever be. The remaining bottles all became more sought after and valuable. Such a fine year 2021 was for . Cheers UnCommons, to burning the world’s oldest on-chain naming utility token!! Now, how to get demand up?! Monnaie qui Change de Nom A Hashmasks Owner For Every Season Flippers aside, Hashmask owners come in 4 flavors, sort of. Just like IRL life, we’re not all 1 or the other. My collection is a mix of 3 flavors, like . Neapolitan/Harlequin Hang out in the Hashmasks Discord long enough and you are bound to see the most famous Virgin Maskooor of all, moonman66. To the best of my recollection, dear moonman was the first to champion the value of holding virgin Hashmasks. Definitions vary. The most extreme, and least accepted, is that said Hashmask can’t have ever left the wallet it was minted from. The general consensus seems to be that one day, unnamed tokens with all their NCT unclaimed will be a separate intra-Hashmasks thing. Naming non-participant owners are the biggest blocker to completing the Hashmasks art. In full disclosure, there’s 1 virgin mask in my collection and not naming it for at least the next 8.5 years is part of my individual strategy. The reader is encouraged: DYOR, Do Your Own Research! My guess is that after January 2031 some virgin masks will go up for sale. Virgin Maskooors are diamond hands playing a long game until at least 2031, when NCT is no longer minted. For the most part they’re not interested in selling soon. That’s my observation anyway and, we salute you! fans head this way. Highlander This is for the clique. Maybe it’s naming to establish a brand. It could be that visual art commands a certain literary component. The Perfect Nameooor burns NCT to tailor-fit a name meant to last. there can be only one Look at the Hashmask, Gas mask filters are color-coded to indicate what they protect against. Orange coded protective filters are for those times when you’re not trying to breath radioactive iodine, to include radioactive methyl iodine. Iodine gas is a purple color, just like the ERC-721’s background. Avoid the violet cloud. It’s as if our character is surrounded by radioactive iodine in the air and is wearing a gas mask to protect himself. Iodine. That perfect union of visual and literary art, it is a name trait match that arguably adds more value than any other name could. Iodine is the Hashmasks illustrated novel page 2,058 art complete✔. The market could devalue Iodine if the token was renamed to include another entry in the naming history, especially a name unrelated to the gas mask filter protection. Sought after harmonized visual and literary art gems like these leave 21 names on the table for other artists to pick up. 312/16,384 Hashmasks are red, orange, grey or blue pixel gasmasks. What do each of them protect against? On-chain typos do happen. Here’s one and the Chad who made it the example to remember. Notice the extra ? n Your name. Two weeks pass of thinking that bit of artistry was quite clever. The name pops in the Discord, “Unnamed.” That’s when it hits, you made an on-chain typo. Top it off with the fact that this Chad named a Hashmask token that had never had the NCT claimed. This is Hashmask with all its NCT is blockchain performance art. The Virgin Maskooor abides. Let’s revisit in January 2031. Unnamed Meet the Perfect Nameooor’s opposite. The Renameooor knows that low-effort naming can hurt a token’s marketability. Dope names that really fit the mask or evoke feelings through an event or persona can get more attention. Renameoor is the owner-artist operating your local Hashmasks literary art repair shop, pulling Masks from LPs and the floor. They go up for sale with a literary skills tax and charge for boring out the articulators. A Renameooor could also be playing the market for well-named masks. Recently there was a fox mask taken out of the NFTX LP and renamed. Slapping the new name, “Foxy,” made the token more desirable. This section had several Hashmasks that have been renamed. The purchase and renaming of this Hashy is featured because it so clearly marks an event and public figure. It’s a best piece to pivot from to the final kind of Hashmasker. . The Renameooor could end up using a lot of names for events in Stephen Curry’s career and becoming a Multi-Nameooor. The Multi-Nameooor fan becomes a literary creator pouring time, attention, ETH and NCT into creating an on-chain testament. Someone might even use more than the 22 names per Hashmask... ok, it hasn’t happened yet. All the toppings It could happen. It needs to. Considering how many names the Virgin Maskoors, Perfect Nameooors and Renameooors are going to burn NCT for names, it’s Multi-Nameooors who can change the game. The longest multi-naming we’ve seen is . It was a first. It enhanced the Hashmasks project with a piece of a public domain poem. It hasn’t been repeated and it’s also only 7 names long. That’s less than 1/3 the 22 names worth of NCT that Hashmasks get. See what kind of picture this is painting? Even if every Hashmask used 7 names the literary art would remain underwhelmingly incomplete. Away By the Sea It would be great to name a Hashmask more than 22 times. There’s just hasn’t been a rational reason to become a multi-nameooor on that level yet. Forget about triple-digit naming. It’s Multi-Nameooors can really change the game!! who name more than 22 times Would-be Hashmasks creatives need more motivation to redistribute ETH and NCT value to other players. Creator-founders who contributed 1 name’s worth and creator founders who contribute 183K NCT and 1 ETH in value added to the Hashmasks project get treated the same as owners who do not participate in naming. Dear Creator*- , thanks for spending your supplies + time to name, and paying a secondary sales fee.* Ouch. Founders The current rules of the game leave 1 rational choice for would be multi-nameooors: someone else can name like that. Breaking Out of the Hashmasker’s Dilemma This would not be the first time big brains have come together to help individuals reprioritize the common good over their own short-term self-interest. Look at the rules of the game. This isn’t a one and done deal. To name or not to name, that is the question that gets asked repeatedly. The Hashy name-game, like IRL economic and societal interactions, is a game of multiple iterations. Factor 1: players create incentives that build up over time, i.e. renaming poorly named Hashmasks and trying to flip them for profit. What do individuals do over time? Factor 2: institutional rewards that give individuals a reason to distribute value back to the community; more naming = more rewards. Think back to the founders giving 2 free names at mint. What institutional rewards could sweeten the deal for founding creators?? Factor 3: Economic natural selection combines the first two. The institutional rewards for naming can motivate groups to identify and rename Hashmasks or give feedback on multi-naming ideas to maximize the group’s institutional rewards. What naming subcommunities could form around institutional rewards? TLDR So Far The Manifesto proclaims that owners who participate by naming Hashmasks are founding creators Multi-Nameooors are founding creators essential to complete the art Formal strategies that reward community-based behavior (naming) can help overcome the Hashmasker’s Dilemma Community Member Old, Member New: Thoughts From 2/2 Two Hashmasks community members shared some thoughts on naming. Our OG 1/2 used all 25 characters to name “Lucy,” Her name aside, Lucy is the 3rd rarest Hashmasks canvas after the 2 transparent skins. In the realm of Perfect Names she is the queen of queens with all her jewels. LucyInTheSkyWithDiamonds. How many Hashmasks did you name and/or what percentage of your collection is named? Roughly 60 percent name… bought a few names ones… I thought the names would be assets. I sold one or two masked but changed the name before I did… Why do you think naming has fallen off so much? I think naming hasn’t been something that was used in other projects. The community decided for the current moment it didn’t have the value I first thought it would have. Initially, I was naming my hashmasks after the symbols or secrets on that mask. I can only remember the clowns and banks where names became a thing. Going forward I still believe it will hold value if hashmasks take off again What did you do with the extra NCT, if there was any? I don’t do anything with NCT. I just keep it. But for the moment, I am not really expecting much from it. What could be done to get folks to name more? Super tricky to get folks to name. I think there has to be an incentive. And I don’t mean only monetary… I mean incentivized as it represents a movement or being part of a community… look at the clown/bank movement... Focus should be on how does it add value to the community and why would community members want to have names Big warm welcome for 2/2, new to the community, the community member who created the first named sets! These thoughts from @smperlow go into the feels that created the named set of lions. Where did you get the idea to create the first batch of named sets? … my first Hashmask that I later named Visionary Lion, struck me as the picture of a young, entrepreneurial, forward-thinking man, empowered by the quiet around him… and my second lion—Stifled Lion—screamed at me of noise, and even oppression. How could that Lion accomplish anything? I positioned him next to Visionary Lion and thought the contrast between them told a story that would resonate in today’s world that can be so full of noise. The next day I noticed Harmonious Lion, which seemed to me a different path one could take—a full path, but full of a positive relationship with one’s surroundings, not an adversarial one… What could be done to get folks to name more? I wonder if more multi-Hashmask works would lead to more naming. With more than one Hashmask, the story being told is probably more complex. Naming Hashmasks—whether displaying the names on the art or not—could help creators tell those more complex stories. Is there anything else you’d like to share about naming, NCT, Hashmasks etc? I’m so excited to be a Hashmask owner. Wise @punk6529 has mentioned the value of buying NFTs that are “art that you like.” To me, Hashmasks are that, and more. They’re art that sparks my imagination, art that I love and will proudly display in my home, and art that I can build and be creative with. In ever turbulent crypto markets, those are exactly the kind of NFTs I want to own. Start a Convo on Twitter (@ , @ ) or in Discord ) WhiteChocoHashy TheHashmasks (discord.gg/hashmasks wtf did the founders give free 2 names at mint? [ ] what reward would get more artists to use a Hashmasks canvas? [ ] were references to leaves, roots, and graphs foreboding wordplay about the IRL champagne example? [ ] who setup the 1st NCT liquidity pool? [ ] wen naming moon? [ ] how much total value will names add to the complete art 20%, 30%, 40%+? [ ] This commentary and analysis is offered by a Hashmasks Team member for educational and entertainment value. It does not contain nor is it a substitute for financial advice, competent or otherwise, and cannot be reasonably relied upon to make financial decisions. Nothing should be construed as a forward looking statement concerning the Hashmasks NFT project nor as an official Hashmasks NFT project communication. Sources (in no particular order except the Manifesto) https://gigazine.net/gsc_news/en/20090617_wikipedia/ https://twitter.com/smperlow https://www.nba.com/news/5-incredible-stats-from-2022-bill-russell-nba-finals-mvp-stephen-curry https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/name-change-token https://dune.com/simodata/The-Hashmasks https://dune.com/giano/hm https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/prisoners-dilemma.asp https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-10673322 https://maskradar.yobalabs.com/?mask_id=36 https://www.be-atex.com/en/respiratory-protective-filters-colour-code-class-etc https://twitter.com/intuicon/status/1537512082614145028?s=20&t=NdnTxqUD0ZN8j-NEf5enwA https://www.thehashmasks.com/manifesto Hashmasks remove this separating line between the artist and the consumer and merges both into the art piece itself Unlike traditional art, the baton of responsibility is handed over to you, who gets the right and privilege to add his or her unique touch to this everchanging canvas. handing over the power over the rarest of all traits to the consumer: the name The final outcome of the art piece - engraved permanently in the history of art on the Ethereum blockchain - in many decades is only bound by the creativity of the creating community. Truly an art piece for the people, by the people. An NFT to solve the issues of transparency in the ownership and transfer of digital artwork and the NCT that derives it value from allowing users to participate in the digital art.

The Hashmasker's Dilemma

A Definitive Guide to JavaScript Prototypes

All modern frameworks are designed to help implement UI composition with components. Naturally you will have a parent-child hierarchy and the framework should provide a way to communicate between the child and parent. Angular provides two major ways of communication — through input/output bindings and services. I prefer using the first method for the while I employ DI for the . stateless presentational components stateful container components This article is concerned with the first method. Particularly it explores the underlying mechanism of how Angular updates s when parent bound values change. It continues a series of articles on change detection and builds upon my previous article . Since we will be looking how Angular updates input properties for both DOM elements and components it is assumed that you know how Angular represents directives and components internally. If you don’t then go ahead and get familiar with the topic by reading . Throughout this article I’ll be using terms directive and component interchangeably because internally Angular represents components as directives. child input propertie The mechanics of DOM updates in Angular Here is why you will not find components inside Angular Binding template syntax As you probably know Angular provides — []. This syntax is generic so it can be applied for both child components and native DOM elements. So if you want to pass some data to the child b-comp and span from the parent A component you do it like this in the component’s template: template syntax for property bindings import { Component } from '@angular/core';

@Component({
 moduleId: module.id,
 selector: 'a-comp',
 template: `
 <b-comp [textContent]="AText"></b-comp>
 
 `
})
export class AComponent {
 AText = 'some';
} You don’t have to do anything else for the span, but for the b-comp you need to indicate that it receives textContent property: @Component({
 selector: 'b-comp',
 template: 'Comes from parent: {{textContent}}'
})
export class BComponent {
 @Input() textContent;
} Now, whenever the AText property changes on the A component Angular will automatically update the property textContent on B component and span. It will also call ngOnChanges lifecycle hook for the child component. You may be wondering how Angular knows that BComponent and span support textContent binding. For the simple DOM elements it’s defined in the used by the compiler when parsing a template. For the components and directives it checks the metadata attached to the class and ensures that bound property is listed in the input decorator property. If the bound property not found the compiler throws an error: dom_element_schema_registry Can’t bind to ‘text’ since it isn’t a known property of … This is a well document functionality and there should be no problem with its understanding. Now let’s look at what happens internally. Factory specific information It’s important to understand that although we specified input bindings on the B and span all the relevant information for input update is defined on the parent A factory. Let’s take a look at the factory generated for the A component: function View_AComponent_0(_l) {
 return jit_viewDef1(0, [
 jit_elementDef2(..., 'b-comp', ...),
 jit_directiveDef5(..., jit_BComponent6, [], {
 textContent: [0, 'textContent']
 }, ...),
 jit_elementDef2(..., 'span', [], [[8, 'textContent', 0]], ...)
 ], function (_ck, _v) {
 var _co = _v.component;
 var currVal_0 = _co.AText;
 var currVal_1 = 'd';
 _ck(_v, 1, 0, currVal_0, currVal_1);
 }, function (_ck, _v) {
 var _co = _v.component;
 var currVal_2 = _co.AText;
 _ck(_v, 2, 0, currVal_2);
 });
} If you’ve read the articles I mentioned in the beginning all the view nodes in the factory should be familiar to you already. The the first two jit_elementDef2 and jit_directiveDef5 are an element and directive definition nodes that constitute our B component. The third is an element definition for the span. Node definition bindings One thing that distinguishes this factory from other you may have seen is the parameters that these node definitions take. Our jit_directiveDef5 receives a one new parameter here: jit_directiveDef5(..., jit_BComponent6, [], {
 textContent: [0, 'textContent']
}, ...), This parameter is called as you may see from the directiveDef function : props parameters list directiveDef(..., props?: {[name: string]: [number, string]}, ...) It is an object with keys where each key defines a bindings index and the property name to update. For our example there will be only one binding for the textContent property: {textContent: [0, 'textContent']} If our directive received several bindings, for example, like this: <b-comp [textContent]="AText" [otherProp]="AProp"> The props parameter would contain two properties: jit_directiveDef5(49152, null, 0, jit_BComponent6, [], {
 textContent: [0, 'textContent'],
 otherProp: [1, 'otherProp']
}, null), When Angular creates a directive definition node it uses these values to generate for the view node. During change detection each binding determines the type of operation Angular should use to update the node and provides context information. The binding type is set using . In case of property update for each binding the compiler sets the following flags: binding bindings flags export const enum BindingFlags {
 TypeProperty = 1 << 3, And since we also have bindings on the span element, the compiler generates the the props parameter supplied to the span element definition as well: jit_elementDef2(..., 'span', [], [[8, 'textContent', 0]], ...) For elements this parameter has a bit different structure — an array of props. The span has only one input binding so there is only one child array. The first number in the array specifies the type of operation to be used with the binding — which is property update: export const enum BindingFlags {
 TypeProperty = 1 << 3, // 8 The other possible variants are the following and they are explained in the : The mechanics of DOM updates in Angular TypeElementAttribute = 1 << 0,
TypeElementClass = 1 << 1,
TypeElementStyle = 1 << 2, The compiler didn’t provide operation type in the props for the directive definition since only properties can be updated for the directive so all bindings are set to BindingFlags.TypeProperty. Update renderer and Update directives The compiler also generated two functions in the factory: function (_ck, _v) {
 var _co = _v.component;
 var currVal_0 = _co.AText;
 var currVal_1 = _co.AProp;
 _ck(_v, 1, 0, currVal_0, currVal_1);
},
function (_ck, _v) {
 var _co = _v.component;
 var currVal_2 = _co.AText;
 _ck(_v, 2, 0, currVal_2);
} You should be familiar with the second function already from the article about DOM update. The first function is called updateDirectives. These both function are defined by the interface. What’s interesting is that they both look almost the same. They both take two parameters _ck and v which reference the same entities in each case. So why two functions? updateRenderer ViewUpdateFn Well, it’s because during change detection there are two distinct operations: updating input properties on the child components updating DOM elements of the current component And these operations are performed at different stages during change detection cycle. So Angular has two functions each specializing on a particular node definition and calls them at different stages when checking a component: updateDirectives — performs updates for directives (directiveDef) and is called in the beginning of the check updateRenderer — performs updates for DOM elements (elementDef) and is called in the middle of the check Both these functions are executed each time and the parameters to the function are supplied by the change detection mechanism. Now, let’s see what these functions do. Angular performs change detection for a component The _ck is short for check and references the function . The other parameter is a component’s view with nodes. The main task of these functions is to retrieve the current value of the bound property from the component instance and call the _ck function passing the view, node index and the retrieved value. The nodeIndex is the index of the view node for which the change detection should be performed. What’s important to understand is that Angular performs DOM updates for each view node separately — that’s why node index is required. If for example we had two spans and two directives: prodCheckAndUpdate <b-comp [textContent]="AText"></b-comp>
<b-comp [textContent]="AText"></b-comp>

 the compiler would generate the following body for the updateRenderer and updateDirectives functions: function(_ck, _v) {
 var _co = _v.component;
 var currVal_0 = _co.AText;
 
 // update first component
 _ck(_v, 1, 0, currVal_0);
 var currVal_1 = _co.AText;
 
 // update second component
 _ck(_v, 3, 0, currVal_1);
}, 

function(_ck, _v) {
 var _co = _v.component;
 var currVal_2 = _co.AText;
 
 // update first span
 _ck(_v, 4, 0, currVal_2);
 var currVal_3 = _co.AText;

 // update second span
 _ck(_v, 5, 0, currVal_3);
} There’s really not much going on. The crux of the functionality is outside these two functions. Let’s see what this functionality is. Updating properties on DOM elements We learnt above that updateRenderer function generated by the compiler as part of a components factory is used during change detection to update input properties on DOM elements. I mentioned that it is passed _ck function during change detection and this parameter references . This is a short generic function that makes a bunch of calls that eventually execute . The function basically checks whether the binding is of the angular special form [attr.name, class.name, style.some] or some node specific property: checkAndUpdate checkAndUpdateElement case BindingFlags.TypeElementAttribute -> setElementAttribute
case BindingFlags.TypeElementClass -> setElementClass
case BindingFlags.TypeElementStyle -> setElementStyle
case BindingFlags.TypeProperty -> setElementProperty; Here is where the bindings we explored above are used. Since the bindings where set as BindingFlags.TypeProperty the function will be used. Inside it just calls method of a renderer to update the property on the DOM element. setElementProperty setProperty Updating properties on directives As the complement to the updateRenderer function covered in the previous section the compiler adds updateDirective function to the component factory that is used to update input properties on components. Just as with updateRenderer it is passed _ck function during change detection and this parameter references . Only this time the function is used to perform update. This is because we’re updating properties on the nodes marked as NodeFlags.TypeDirective. The function does the following things: checkAndUpdate checkAndUpdateDirective retrieves component/directive class instance from the view node checks if the property changed if value changed:a. updates relevant property on the class instanceb. prepares data and updates oldValuesc. sets state to checksEnabled if a component uses OnPush strategyd. call ngOnChanges lifecycle hook SimpleChange calls ngOnInit lifecycle hook (if it’s the first time the view is being checked) call ngDoCheck lifecycle hook Of course, all lifecycle hooks are called only if they are defined on the component/directive class. Angular uses nodeDef flags shown above for that. You can see it from this code: if (... && (def.flags & NodeFlags.OnInit)) {
 directive.ngOnInit();
}
if (def.flags & NodeFlags.DoCheck) {
 directive.ngDoCheck();
} Just as with DOM update all previous values are stored on view in property on the view. That’s it! oldValues Did you find the information in the article helpful?

The mechanics of property bindings update in Angular

Kickstarter success for solopreneurs: Everything you need to know

It’s officially winter, so what could be better than drinking hot chocolate while querying the new ? It has every Stack Overflow question, answer, comment, and more — which means endless possibilities of data crunching. Inspired by ’s on how response time varies by tag, I wanted to look at the (53 million rows!). Stack Overflow dataset in BigQuery Felipe Hoffa post comments table The happiest Stack Overflow tags :) To measure happy comments I looked at comments with “thank you”, “thanks”, “awesome” or “:)” in the body. I limited the analysis to tags with more than 500,000 comments. Here’s : the query #standardSQLSELECTtag,ROUND((COUNT(case when comment_text like '%thanks%' or comment_text like '%:)%' or comment_text like '%thank you%' or comment_text like '%awesome%' then 1 end) / COUNT(*)) * 100,2) as percent_happy,COUNT(*) total_commentsFROM (SELECTLOWER(a.text) as comment_text,SPLIT(b.tags, '|') as tagsFROM `bigquery-public-data.stackoverflow.comments` aJOIN `bigquery-public-data.stackoverflow.posts_questions` bON a.post_id = b.idUNION ALLSELECTLOWER(b.text) as comment_text,SPLIT(c.tags, '|') as tagsFROM `bigquery-public-data.stackoverflow.posts_answers` aJOIN (SELECT post_id, text FROM `bigquery-public-data.stackoverflow.comments`) bON a.id = b.post_idJOIN `bigquery-public-data.stackoverflow.posts_questions` cON c.id = a.parent_id), UNNEST(tags) tagGROUP BY 1HAVING total_comments > 500000ORDER BY percent_happy DESC Here’s the result in BigQuery: And the chart: R, Ruby, HTML / CSS, and iOS are the communities with the happiest commenters according to this list. People who ask questions about XML and regular expressions also seem particularly thankful for help. If you’re curious, here are the 15 highest scoring happy comments that were short enough to fit in a screenshot (and their associated tags) : But because people sometimes get angry on the internet, you’re probably wondering… The angriest Stack Overflow tags :( For angry comments, I counted those with “wrong”, “horrible”, “stupid”, or “:(” in the body. The SQL is the same as above with the search terms swapped out. Here’s the result: And the chart: Clearly the angriest comments are those related to C derivatives. Many programming concepts also wound up here: multithreading, arrays, algorithms, and strings. And here are the highest scoring angry comments: This analysis is not perfect, as the comment “that one’s so stupid it underflows and becomes awesome” appears in both lists. That’s where a machine learning tool like the would come in handy. Natural Language API Between the two lists there were only a few tag overlaps. The most excitable tags (I’m interpreting tags that showed up in both the happy and angry list as ‘excitable’) are: ios, iphone, objective-c, and regex questions. And while the internet may seem like a dark place sometimes, there appears to be roughly six happy comments for every angry one. What’s next? Dive into the , or check out some of these awesome posts to get inspired: Stack Overflow dataset Stack Overflow dataset announcement Playing with Stack Overflow on BigQuery Always end your questions with a ‘?’ If you have comments or ideas for future analysis, find me on Twitter . @SRobTweets

Which programming languages have the happiest (and angriest) commenters?

Hi there, Alex's readers! Today I’m back to continue with the analysis of the project in the Fantoken category - LAZIO. In the previous article, I explained Smart Money - a smart cash flow that has a strong influence on the price of tokens. The transactions of the Smart Money wallet cluster are mainly supposed to coordinate and affect the token price by buy/sell orders, so the characteristics of this wallet cluster are the high asset value , a large number of tokens held and especially the huge number of trading orders . (nearly 2M USD in total) (nearly 17K tokens) (up to nearly 80K transactions) Cash Flow And Token Price In this article, I will delve into a type of cash flow that also affects the price of tokens, which is the cash flow from wallet clusters. Unlike the Smart Money wallet cluster, the main purpose of is to invest/speculate and make a profit. Therefore, usually do not trade too much. Instead, they invest in tokens when they see their potential. They can hold for a long time and only sell when they have achieved their goals of profit. Sharks-Whales Sharks-Whales Sharks-Whales Let’s take a look back at the chart showing the buying/selling amount of Smart Money in the previous article, every time Smart Money executes a lot of buy and sell orders simultaneously, the token price suddenly increases very high. Compared to the chart showing the buying/selling amount of , it is noticeable that only buy after the token price has dropped sharply,  and sell as soon as the token price spikes: Sharks-Whales Sharks-Whales In financial markets, it is pivotal for investors to study the signs and behaviors of large cash flows in order to seize opportunities and minimize investment risks, which is especially true for beginner or retail investors. By using , I compile a list of : TokFlow AI LAZIO's Shark wallets From the dashboard above, we have specific information on the Shark wallet list such as the wallet name, the total number of transactions, the number of tokens they hold, and the percentage of profit/loss of each wallet. It can be assessed that LAZIO does not attract too many Sharks-Whales to invest, as of now in October 2022, only are holding LAZIO tokens and Shark's investment volume is also quite small. Of the 8 Shark wallets, only 2 are profitable, the rest are at negative profits. 8 Shark wallets As I check the wallet which holds the largest number of LAZIO tokens, there are only 4 transactions. Shark07b0 In the chart on the right, we can track BUY/SELL transactions of wallet at each price range, the most recent activity is the . For more details on the transactions of this wallet, I check the Transaction history dashboard: Shark07b0 BUY order on 25 Sep 2022 On 25 September 2022, this wallet made 3 buy orders and 1 sell order. So I continue to go deeper to check the details of each transaction: The total volume for 3 consecutive buy orders of this Shark wallet is LAZIO tokens and there was a very small sell order execution worth only . 1003 $21.7 With an average buying price of around and with LAZIO's current price of , this wallet is . 7.3 4.88 Shark07b0 losing 34% After checking the remaining Shark wallets, I can come to the conclusion that these wallets share the same feature when spending a very small amount of money to buy LAZIO tokens (several thousand dollars) and executing test sales orders soon after that. In comparison with other wallet clusters, it is interesting to note that of the tokens are still in Dev & Funds wallets. There are even fewer tokens in Sharks-Whales wallets than in Retail Investors , and Smart Money wallets only own of LAZIO tokens. 87.64% (0.11%) (0.14%) 0.01% It can be seen that for this project, the Sharks-Whales have only taken a bite of the pie just to test and investigate. Still, they are expecting a better price and show no sign of accumulation desires at this time. So, if you are an investor who is interested in the LAZIO token, how will you make your mind up? Let’s share your thoughts in the comments section below!

Is $LAZIO Highly Regarded by Sharks and Whales?

Hi guys, it’s Alex again! In the previous article, I shed light on the roles and position of the actual leading players when trading QATAR 2022 TOKEN (FWC) and it turns out that after Market Makers had dumped a great deal of FWC into the market, this project is now mostly based on the community to develop. Perhaps, there will be a price adjustment for FWC to hit new heights in the near future concerning the 2022 FIFA World Cup looming. Today, let’s dig deep into another significant indicator to learn more about the trading volume of QATAR 2022 TOKEN. This is the interface of the TokFlow Volume Tracking dashboard. The Chart Volume above illustrates the detailed volume of Qatar 2022 Token including the total volume, real volume and fake volume by weeks. It is noticeable that on 23 September 2022, the total trading volume of FWC skyrocketed to more than 60 quadrillion (equivalent to over $8M), which is 12 times more than last week. It’s also important to note that during this time, the fake volume of FWC outnumbered the real volume. After hitting the peak in just a few days, the total volume of transactions of FWC dropped sharply to only 2 quadrillion (equivalent to $250K) with the real volume and fake volume following the parallel trend. In light of these metrics, we can come to a conclusion that a great number of bots have been actively involved in FWC. The substantial fake volume along with enormous growth in a short time frame indicate that this is a pump-and-dump token with the interference of Market Makers. Now let’s move to the Balance on Exchange chart which shows the volume of Qatar 2022 Token on both CEX and DEX by days: From this chart, we can see that the volume of FWC on both CEX and DEX has an upward trend. Most Qatar tokens are traded on some reputable centralized exchanges namely Gate.io, Mexc.com, BitMart, and Hotbit. It’s observable that this token is only listed on one decentralized exchange - PancakeSwap. With moderate but steady increase, it’s proved that there is a relatively good trading volume for Qatar 2022 Token on DEX as well as a demand for this token. In comparison with CEX, we can see that BitMart is a remarkable exchange owning the most tokens with Wallet 2 receiving a huge amount of FWC. However, I noticed a sudden gain in the volume of FWC on CEX in a short period from 9 to 18 October when it increased from 0.55% to 0.85%. This reveals a high probability of FWC being dumped on a massive scale as well as traces of price manipulation from MM. Taking a look at the Long-term and Short-term Holder chart, it is apparent that the amount of Qatar 2022 tokens held by Long-term holders is relatively considerable, accounting for about 14% while the amount of tokens belonging to the Short-term group only makes up 0,1% of the total supply. However, on 30 October 2022, the token balance of both witnessed such a rapid fall as it came back to zero, which means that the FWC army had dumped all of the tokens they held for a long time into the market without leaving anything in their wallets and showed no sign of accumulating more at the moment. This can be a negative indication for Qatar 2022 Token due to the fact that both long-term and short-term holders see no potential in this Fan Token. After all, Qatar 2022 Token is a token created for Qatar football lovers as a way for fans to support the club. It's pretty much the same as a meme coin in the market which mostly relies on the news related to the improvement of the token use case. Considering its minimal utility, the potential price growth is not high since it depends on the popularity of the club and the use of the token itself in the future. As I’ve analyzed and tracked its volume of transactions as above, this Fan Token shows some signs of a pump-and-dump scheme. So if you’re planning to invest in any type of Fan Token, it’s of utmost importance to do your own research into the roadmap and utility of that token as well as tracking the on-chain data to identify the real and fake volume, thereby making informed decisions. This is when TokFlow AI comes in to give you an edge. That’s the end of Alex’s on-chain analysis of Qatar 2022 Token. Let me know what you think in the comments section!

Are There Any Price Manipulation Patterns In Qatar 2022 Token?

Welcome back to Alex’s on-chain analysis. Recently we have witnessed the rise of Fan Tokens related to football teams on Binance. One of the most outstanding examples is Qatar 2022 Token, named after the football team in the upcoming World Cup, scheduled to be held in Qatar at the end of November this year. Especially on Pancakeswap, we can see the increasing development of this token with massive gains in such a short time. So is this project creditable or just another scam? What really drives the value of this token? Let's explore the answer with Alex! As usual, I will utilize TokFlow AI to analyze the token price movement along with the money flow of the actual major players in the networks. In the first place, let me guide you through the Trending Soon dashboard on the TokFlow homepage which enables you to partially predict the market trend by finding the most popular cryptocurrencies that people are searching for. It is obvious that Qatar 2022 Token (FWC) is currently on rank #4 in the Top Trending Gainers, which means that it is likely to increase in price within 1 week. However, one of its major drawbacks is not being listed in the top 10 tokens in the Trending Soon section. Probably, in the near future, the FWC price might not make a strong upward move. Nevertheless, the team’s performance in the upcoming World Cup can be one of the deciding factors that greatly influence the token value. As you can see from the Overview dashboard above, the current live price of Qatar 2022 Token at the time of writing is around 0.000000000111, which is down more than 6% in the last 24 hours. More importantly, according to the TokScore, the Qatar token only gains an “Average” score of 38 based on a 100-point scale, which is quite close to the “Poor” level. Based on the metrics compiled by TokFlow Analyst, we can clearly see the weakness of the Qatar 2022 Token with little likelihood of an increase in price in the near future. In the following part, I’ll be taking an in-depth look at the behaviors of Smart Money wallet to see its role in influencing the price of Qatar 2022 Token: It is evident that Smart Money has played a large part in determining the price of FWC since the token was first launched in February 2022. In just one month after its release, the FWC price suddenly skyrocketed from 0.0000000000080 (10 Feb 2022) to an ATH of 0.0000000042361 (10 Mar 2022). During March, we also notice an abnormally large buying and selling volume of almost 600K from Smart Money wallets. Beyond doubt, Smart Money mostly participated in the pricing process as well as manipulating the market by pumping and dumping the token at the same time. In Q2 and Q3, the FWC price kept moving sideways until Smart Money stockpiled a small number of tokens up to 18K on 17 Sep 2022, which pushed the price to 0.00000000249 and then quickly sold them out. As such, the value of Qatar 2022 Token was greatly driven by Smart Money’s pump-and-dump scheme. Looking at the Smart Money Asset Percentage Chart, we can see that this wallet is now holding almost 83% of Qatar tokens with a total asset of over $578K, a modest number. It is interesting to note that the Total Value Out ($6M) is larger than the Total Value In ($5M), which shows that MM had dumped such a huge volume of tokens into the market without leaving anything in the wallet. Tracking the data from Profit/Loss Average, I spot that most of the major players in the networks have enjoyed such a high profit from investing in Qatar 2022 Token in the last 1 month, except for a slight loss from Smart Money and Retail Investors wallet cluster between May and August 2022. In particular, Devs and Funds wallet was 100% profitable without any loss, which shows that they are likely to dump the token if there is a spike in price. Now, let’s pay a close attention to the Holder Tracking dashboard: While Smart Money is only holding 9.84% of FWC, the other key players including Devs & Funds, Whales-Sharks, and Retail Investors appear to be the biggest holders with the current asset being over $1M. This suggests that the community is taking a keen interest in the Qatar 2022 token as they gain a high profit when investing in this token. With these factors in mind, it can be deduced that after the strong dumping force of MM, the project is now based on community to develop. There are chances that the leading players apart from Smart Money will wait for a price adjustment in the near future to dump the tokens. Obviously, this is the hottest time for football token projects to bloom and the value of their fan token cryptos will rise in the run-up to the event. However, it’s highly recommended that you should do your due diligence before making important investment decisions. Of course, in the end, the decision is still yours. Good luck and see you in the next article!

What Really Drives the Value of Qatar 2022 Token?

Welcome back, Alex’s readers! In the previous article, we analyzed how market leaders including Market Makers, Shark-Whales & Dev & Funds set up the game using TokFlow's Shark Analyst and Holder Tracking features. Continuing the SANTOS token analysis series, in this article we will use two dashboards - and to observe the next movements from SANTOS traders. Let's get started! Profit/Loss Average Volume Tracking According to TokFlow’s latest updated data, in the past 2 months, all SANTOS investors in different positions are profitable by at least considering the . Notable losses were scattered as you can see in the clusters of charts on your right. Only Shark-Whales wallets experienced slight losses due to market fluctuations with the ratio 50:50 ( above 100% current token price of $11.4 from May to August “Profit/Loss in real time” the bar chart on the left). In short, the profit coming from all 4 wallet clusters shows that all of them are long-term holders. Therefore, in Q3 there was only a small loss, and Q4 witnessed all profitable investments. All players are “diamond hands” with good position and entry. Holding SANTOS for a long time represents investors' expectations for the future development of this token. Now let's continue with the next part by leveraging the Volume Tracking dashboard to see what's going on behind the charts as well as the latest happenings of SANTOS. Taking a look at the Chart Volume that shows the detailed volume of tokens per week, we can easily see that the highest trading volume of SANTOS in Q4 was recorded on August 19, 2022, with a equivalent to Right after that time, the SANTOS token experienced a descending trend and moved sideways steadily at equivalent to Total Volume of 280K tokens $4.7 million. less than 100K $2.1 million. only accounted for of total trading volume, which indicates that the Market Maker team didn't meddle too much with pushing the price. Instead, the majority of transactions came from retail investors. Fake Volume 0.008% The largest fake volume on record occurred on when SANTOS had a spectacular pump from **$6 to an ATH of $16.50.**Up to now, the price of SANTOS has dropped much from the peak and started the sideways phase. August 19 According to the current sideways situation of SANTOS, perhaps we will have to wait for 3-4 months for some noticeable volatility in the market to take place. This is the time when holders should store assets in the form of stablecoins and closely follow market movements in anticipation of the latest news. Of the total supply of SANTOS tokens, of them are being traded on Centralized Exchanges such as equally divided among different wallets. Binance is the exchange that owns the most tokens with 3 wallets including respectively. The number of tokens on CEX suddenly increased on accounting for ​​of the total supply. 12.54% Binance, Gate, MEXC, etc., Hot Wallet 20, Hot Wallet 6, and Hot Wallet 7 October 17, 12.5% The Decentralized Exchange possesses profound advantages in terms of transparency and security. The amount of tokens on DEX accounts for only a very small number compared to the overall. However, for that reason, it allows the DEX to have an exclusive advantage over the SANTOS token when it is only listed on 0.07%, PancakeSwap. It can be presumed that Fan Token is affirming its position in the community when it is constantly listed on reputable centralized exchanges such as . However, this will potentially pose a risk of price manipulation and derive benefits from investors. Binance, Gate, and MEXC Also, the negligible amount of tokens on the DEX may not meet the needs of liquidity for the majority of investors, which results in the fact that most of them are flocking to CEX as an alternative. However, that it’s suddenly listed on CEX can raise the possibilities of a dump phase. The amount of SANTOS tokens is mostly in the hands of long-term holders as these wallets hold that account for of the total supply. The amount of tokens belonging to the short-term group accounts for only 287K tokens 1% 0.01%. In a nutshell, the above figures show that SANTOS holders have their own long-term profit goals and expectations for the future. The market Cap of SANTOS will be a relatively small number if it is in an uptrend. But for the downtrend, this is quite a large number when the capital released into the market is no longer as abundant as before. After all, Fan Token is just a lottery coin created for the purpose of attracting cash flow into the market. So SANTOS token just serves as a refreshment for this crypto winter. If you decide to participate in Fan Token investment, then start with small capital and accept that it is possible to lose. Remember to have a plan for your investments before entering. Good luck!!! Be sure to follow and support the next analysis from Tokflow!!!

Is There Still Room for SANTOS to Grow?

Have a great day, Alex’s readers! Let’s review a little bit about what we discussed in the previous part about the activities of Smart Money on Santos token. With SANTOS getting positive acknowledgment from the community in the context of the upcoming World Cup, Smart Money is also gaining a high profit of 163%. Although it’s undeniable that the influence of Smart Money contributed to pushing the price to hit the peak in such a short time span, the volume of tokens being held in the wallet is still limited. In this article, I will give you the answer to the question if there is a high chance of big cash flows dumping SANTOS tokens in the near future. Let’s discover more about the behaviors of the leading players in the network with Alex! As you can see, the allows us to track the list of Sharks-Whales with detailed transactions of each wallet in the cluster. It is obvious that SANTOS isn’t highly regarded by Shark-Whales with only 4 players taking part at the time of writing. TokFlow Shark Analyst dashboard Though not attracting too many Sharks, it is interesting to note that all the wallets are profitable more than The total volume of tokens held is in the range of for each wallet. Despite the quite small investment volume, Sharks wallets are undeniably enjoying the profit at a good position in the market. 100%. 750-1000 tokens Let’s check the having 17 transactions in total with the highest profit on the list. Shark 7614 wallet The above chart provides information about the buying and selling volume of the at each price range in real-time. In the last 4 months , this wallet was completely inactive without entering into any transactions concerning SANTOS. However, it was seen mostly active during when buying a lot of tokens after the price dropped sharply to around Shark7614 wallet (June - Oct 2022) May 2022 $2. Checking more details in the section, I noticed that the only made without selling out. Transaction History Shark7614 wallet consecutive BUY orders The total assets in this wallet are currently worth only with almost of SANTOS being held. Moreover, the average buying price is approximately while SANTOS’s current price is about , this is reaping such a good profit of $10K 86% $4 $11 Shark7614 wallet over 228%. For the rest of the wallets, it’s noteworthy that they tend to accumulate quite a large amount of SANTOS tokens when the price goes down. Therefore, Shark wallets have achieved an ideal position when buying the tokens at prices ranging from $4 to $7. Now let’s take a look at the below: Holder Tracking dashboard There are some fundamental metrics we can view from these 2 charts: of the total token supply is held in Dev & Funds wallet worth 86.43% $293M of tokens are in the hands of Retail Investors worth 0.82% over $2M Whales-Sharks and Smart Money wallets are holding the least tokens (only respectively) 0,02% and 0.14% These metrics indicate that Whales-Sharks and Smart Money wallets will not dump SANTOS tokens on a massive scale since they are holding only a small volume compared to Dev & Fund’s wallets. The asset percentage of Retail Investors also shows that the community is taking interest in investing in this Fan Token. with signs of accumulating a large amount of SANTOS. This was the time when the token price gradually decreased. A closer look at this chart reveals that there was a concentration of Sharks-Whales wallets from September 24 to October 12 Therefore, I suppose that in the upcoming time, Sharks-Whales are likely to continue to collect more tokens in anticipation of a strong bull run. Further down, you can check detailed information about the number of root tokens in possession of this wallet cluster. As shown in the chart, the current SANTOS balance in the Sharks-Whales wallet is approximately More importantly, the most noticeable behavior of the Sharks-Whales wallet is that the amount of Stablecoins they were holding suddenly increased to 42K tokens. nearly 30M USD on October 22. On the very next day, it was reduced to just In a nutshell, Sharks-Whales are having a great entry when trading SANTOS, so they hardly dump the token until it rebounds. 134K USD. Tracking the metrics about Smart Money, I can see that this wallet only held a small amount of SANTOS tokens , ranging from except for the highest SANTOS balance of over (equivalent to more than ) on October 11. from the end of September to the end of October 2022 1,2K - 2,5K, 6K tokens 9M USD Hence, now I can give you the answer to the question discussed in the previous article that there is little likelihood of Smart Money wallet dumping the tokens in the upcoming time since the volume of tokens it’s holding currently is not big enough. Last but not least, it's such a pity not to mention the key player in this game - Dev & Funds wallet. As you can see in the chart, the buying time of this wallet is almost concurrent with the selling time. By holding a huge amount of tokens, Dev & Funds are undeniably taking part in the pricing process of SANTOS to manipulate the market and pump the price to reach a peak of 25.2 on September 24. In conclusion, the leading players in the networks seem to hold SANTOS tokens with the expectation of a better entry in the near future. Specifically, Sharks-Whales and Smart Money wallets only consider Fan Token as a meme coin, so the number of tokens held is not too large and the dumping force is not as strong as you may think. It's crucial for these wallet clusters to wait for a price adjustment to accumulate more. However, considering its profits, I think it is still a potential Fan Token, especially in the upcoming World Cup season. Hopefully, you can gain more insights with this analysis. And don’t forget to leave comments for Alex!

What Are the Positions of the Key Players When Trading $SANTOS?

Hi Alex’s readers, how’s everything today? As part of the series analyzing the list of Fan Tokens, I will provide my dearest readers with information about - one of the Fan Tokens that has gained popularity in the market in recent days. Santos FC Fan Token(SANTOS) Compared to LAZIO, SANTOS is in a fairly high price range at 13.3 (about 4 times higher than LAZIO). Going through some information from the TokFlow Overview interface, SANTOS is showing quite a positive signal when the current TokScore is with of the $SANTOS community making predictions that it will increase in the future. 61/100 75% I will elaborate more on the index which is calculated based on the metrics of , and such as the increase in interaction on networking sites, the number of followers and subscribers , thereby scoring the token's strength/weakness based on a 100-point scale. For $SANTOS, the score is in the range of "Average”, in close proximity to the “Good” level. This shows the potential of a bullish trend for this token. Tokscore Real Volume (30%), Source (30%), Price change (20%), Number of holders (15%) other social metrics (5%) With such a pretty good index, it’s worth noticing how the big and small money flows regarding $SANTOS? As usual, we cannot ignore the significant factor that has the strongest influence on the token price - Smart Money: It can be seen that, for Santos, Smart Money was active only in the first 6 months when this token was listed on the exchange and was highly active between March and May of this year: With the highest buying price of and the highest sell price of , Smart Money successfully pushed the $SANTOS price from about $978K (March 11) $836K 2.1 (late February) to 8.7 (March 12). And once again, with the highest buying price of , and the highest selling price of , Smart Money also pushed the lowest $SANTOS price from $817K (May 18) $856K (May 18) 1.7 (May 16). ) to hit the peak at 6.7 (May 18) after only 2 days. In this fourth quarter, Smart Money's activity was at a standstill. However, the token price increased quite high , also during this time, the highest figure in Q4 recorded for buyers were ; for sellers. This proves that the community is quite interested in $SANTOS, so there is no need for MM to put too much effort in pumping the price. (reaching a peak of 25.2 on September 24, 2022) $158K (September 23, 2022) $151K (August 17, 2022) and $140K (September 23, 2022) This can be shown in other Smart Money metrics: Buy orders scattered . The largest buy order executed was worth from wallet from $19,000 to $20,500 $20,377 0x08493d163de902cd289ae51406fe4ec8385634d2. Sell orders scattered . The largest sell order executed at coming from wallet . from $10,000 to $31,000 $31,012 0xa38c28f8049d95a0ef025cfbd3a2bff6ab2692c9 The total assets of Smart Money wallets are currently worth , a modest number. There’s only holding SANTOS, while the Total Value In is , and the Total Value Out is . This indicates that MM has transferred most of the cash flow and left only a relatively small amount in the wallet. $716K 2.92% $20.9M $20.3M With the average buying and selling price of SANTOS tokens ranging from and a very high profit of , it is very likely that Smart Money will dump if there is a robust $SANTOS bull run coming. However, how massive the sell-off is depended on the volume of tokens that Smart Money holds. Holding a quite small book at the moment, it’s necessary for Smart Money to have a strong adjustment to accumulate a large volume of tokens as well as ensure its control of the community. $8.6 - $8.5$ 163% So, which situation will be more likely to occur, especially in the context that the community is giving a lot of flavor to the SANTOS token? Will Smart Money wait for a strong adjustment to accumulate more or will the price pump greatly for MM to dump it? The answer will be found in the next article. Stay tuned with Alex!

What is Smart Money’s Next Step Towards SANTOS Tokens?

Hello, my dear readers, It’s Alex as always. Today, I’m back with my analysis of Fan Token LAZIO. If you have not read the first two parts of the series, then check them out here: Part 1: https://hackernoon.com/how-smart-money-influenced-lazios-price Part 2: https://hackernoon.com/is-$lazio-highly-regarded-by-sharks-and-whales In the previous articles, I showed you the portraits of Smart Money and Shark-Whales, the two subjects that have the greatest influence on the price of a token. In fact, these subjects have a lot of risk factors that affect the token price. Taking the profit/loss ratio of each wallet cluster for example. 1. Profit/Loss Average This is the interface of the feature of TokFlow AI. The bar chart on the left demonstrates the percentage of the number of wallets with profit/loss in the cluster, while the chart on the right shows the profit/loss period of each wallet cluster in real-time. Profit/Loss Average It is evident that Smart Money was greatly profitable from Currently, it witnesses a slight loss, and the ratio of the number of Smart Money wallets in profit and loss is equal to September 14 to October 10. 50%. Dev & Funds is losing and holding tokens. I don't see any signs of dumping from this wallet cluster. Sharks-Whales and Retail Investors both showed evidence of modest profits in September, but the majority was in deficit. It seems that these two subjects are buying high. It is common knowledge that if the price spikes, there is a great possibility that they will sell out. However, to be absolutely certain, we have to see how many tokens the subjects are holding. 2. Holder Tracking Now let’s go to the Holder Tracking dashboard: It can be seen that Smart Money, Sharks-Whales, and Retail Investors do not hold too many LAZIO tokens, so the dumping possibility of these wallets is not high. I suppose that in the coming time, the LAZIO price will have a much lower adjustment. It will be the time when Sharks-Whales and MM accumulate rapidly, then the price can rise again. Dev & Funds wallet is currently holding a lot of tokens in smart contracts. However, as I check, they are locked and not released. And needs to be checked on bscscan.com. 13% of “OTHER” After checking bscscan.com, it turns out that of the tokens are locked in the smart contract, the last time it was unlocked was 34 days ago. In addition, I also noticed that the amount of tokens circulating on the DEX is very small, most of the tokens are circulating on Binance (the rest are locked in the contract). 84% So I can come to the conclusion that the MM team mostly focuses on pushing the price on Binance, but it’s obvious that Smart Money on DEX is still very profitable. This proves that we can follow Smart Money through TokFlow (tracking all on-chain data) to make investment decisions because we are actually unable to track all data on Binance. We can see that in the rising price phase, Smart Money is the subject that gained a lot of profit especially when the market hit its peak, which means, at the highest price stage, Smart Money made a lot of take-profit orders while the rest made very little. Before making an investment decision, I think besides an in-depth study of important indicators of strong cash flows, and the Profit/Loss of each subject, investors should not ignore some other indicators to evaluate a project. 3. Volume Tracking Let's take a look at LAZIO's trading volume: The Chart Volume displays the volume of transactions on the DEX. Usually, this information is missing or incorrectly aggregated on Coingecko or CoinMarketcap, so the TokFlow team has summed it all up in the Volume Tracking feature. It is noteworthy that Lazio has very few bots in transactions as well as fake volume. Comparing October 13 and October 18, we see that there were a lot of tokens transferred to Binance. A closer inspection reveals that the token was heavily transferred to and Binance Hot Wallet 6 Binance Hot Wallet 20. One more indicator about Long-term and Short-term Holder shows that Long-term holders are holding , accounting for of the total supply which is relatively negligible. 118k $LAZIO 0.3% So going through 3 articles about $LAZIO with detailed tracking of on-chain data, Alex can draw several inferences: LAZIO Fan Token is a trending project that is still being nurtured by developers without too much promotion since most of the tokens are still being locked by Dev. Therefore, the number of Sharks-Whales or Retail Investors participating in the project is still limited with a lack of investment. However, in the context of the upcoming 2023 World Cup, this is still a quite potential token with a likelihood of an increase in price in the near future. And before that time, it is possible that there will be a price adjustment to clear the way for the investors to accumulate more tokens. The information provided in this article is solely the author’s opinion and not investment advice. To conduct in-depth research into the on-chain indicators of LAZIO or other tokens that you are interested in, you can use - a robust tool that Alex and the TokFlow team brought to the community. Disclaimer: TokFlow AI And as usual, if you have anything to share, please let Alex know in the comments!

3 Indicators You Should Use to Track $LAZIO

Good day guys, I'm Alex again! Today I will begin a series of pump-and-dump analysis of hot projects and tokens during this time. And the beginning of the series will be The whole world is eagerly awaiting the World Cup and Fan Token is the top target for price pumping. Lazio Fan Token. So there we have it - an analysis of LAZIO. The purpose of this article is to analyze the performance of cluster by utilizing and the role of this cluster in the pricing process of LAZIO tokens. Smart Money TokFlow AI First of all, for those who are new to crypto space and on-chain analysis, Smart money refers to wallets with unusual behaviors that greatly affect the price. It details what they are holding and where they are transferring their capital. In brief, it refers to trading or investing in crypto entities that are considered experienced, well-informed, or "in the know". Upon accessing the Smart Money dashboard, we can see: This chart shows the LAZIO buying/selling volume of Smart Money clusters at specific time and price range. You may have noticed that, every time the Smart Money wallet buys/sells a large volume, the price of the token increases quite sharply. On 4 Dec 2021, the total of Smart Money was the total was (buying is larger than selling), which caused the token price to go up to , starting from the lowest price of to the highest price of . And the very next day, Smart Money continued to a volume worth pushing the price to the highest of . However, made the price drop as low as . For example: buying price 1,035M USD, selling price 808K USD 95.61% 3.85 7.6 buy 827K USD, 8.59 selling over 1M USD 6.01 Currently, the buying/selling volume of Smart Money is relatively large from the beginning to the end of August, the average transaction value per week is Meanwhile, the price also increased from the lowest of . And there are signs of a gradual decrease in the value of trading volume starting from the end of August until now, the weekly buying/selling price Accordingly, the price of LAZIO also gradually reduced to the lowest level of between 700K and nearly 1M USD. 3.3 to the highest of 9.1 decreased from 300K-400K to only about 60K. 5.4. Hence, we can see the role of Smart Money wallet clusters in the price of LAZIO. Investors can also rely on the unusual buying/selling signals of this wallet cluster to create a reasonable investment strategy. To be more specific about the activities of each Smart Money wallet, I will analyze the 2 dashboards with the top buying and selling orders of MM in the screenshots below. According to this dashboard, the wallets with the biggest buyers are concentrated in wallets and , accumulating wallets; and the wallet with the biggest selling transactions , known as dumping wallet. You can check the details of each transaction at our . 0x53312c0d00adadb6cc217d6b9335a952c3064f4e 0xa26c6be0770a1c62df74e6195b774c50aa3fdeed 0x64c9768db394c38700b7fa425f91659c60038aae Smart Money feature dashboard The bottom of the Smart Money dashboard shows the Asset Value Percentage of Smart Money wallets. From this chart, it can be seen that LAZIO volume accounts for a very small proportion of the total asset value of more than 1.7M USD of Smart Money wallet cluster (accounting for only 1.17%). Although the LAZIO’s average buying price of the SM wallet cluster is 5.63 and its average selling price is 5.7, the profit rate of Smart Money is negative 3.49%. It is possible to deduce that the Smart Money wallet at the moment does not hold too many tokens and at least the wallets will not dump massively. There may be an adjustment for Smart Money to accumulate more tokens! So that's the perspective of Alex, how about you? Let’s share in the comments section!

How Smart Money Influenced LAZIO's Price

Cómo Smart Money influyó en el precio de LAZIO

Comment l'argent intelligent a influencé le prix du LATIUM

स्मार्ट मनी ने LAZIO की कीमत को कैसे प्रभावित किया

スマートマネーがLAZIOの価格にどのように影響したか

Como o dinheiro inteligente influenciou o preço da LAZIO

Tiền thông minh ảnh hưởng đến giá của LAZIO như thế nào

聪明的钱如何影响拉齐奥的价格

Hi guys, it's Alex from TokFlow again! In the previous section, I analyzed the RACA's steps to pump the prices and how market makers manipulated the community with media tricks. In part 2, I'm going to shed light on the end of the whole pump phase with a lot of striking evidence, and most importantly, how Radio CACA handled the media in the post-pump phase from the beginning of this year till now. After going sideways for about 2 weeks at the price of 0.003-0.004, the development team rapidly set the RACA price at an unexpected ATH level. 1. To the Moon On November 8, RACA proclaimed it would , an office located near SpaceX's headquarters. Besides, – an extremely valuable gift on the occasion of the project announcing a series of fascinating information. develop the Cyber Security Training Centre inside USM RACA also organized the airdrop program of 300 eggs and 10,000 DAU Milestone The community became so thrilled that the number of people joining the project had shot up. The developers continued to pamper the "contentment" of the community by announcing to all MPB owners on the same day (November 12, 2021). the burning of 300 million RACA and another 200 million RACA airdrops Two days later , RACA’s price successfully reached ATH at 0.0119888 in the tremendous excitement beyond suspicion of the community. Do you still remember the lowest price of RACA just about 7 months ago? Within more than half a year, developers had successfully pumped the price of a low cap coin . (November 14, 2021) 630 times higher 2. Mass Evidence That MM Pumped and Dumped the Token Some may think that RACA has developed comprehensively in terms of both marketing and project, so the sharp increase in RACA prices is entirely driven by the power of the community without deliberate manipulation. Our TokFlow team has developed an AI that tracks hundreds of MM wallet labels with total transactions worth tens of billions of RACA, and here is the proof: (Click here for more information: TokFlow Channel) This is a small portion of MM wallet labels that we collected, as you can see, the above wallets all hold a substantial token volume that can completely manipulate the market. Throughout the entire pump phase, MM wallets are constantly buying large quantities of RACA and selling very small quantities, pushing up the prices and simultaneously taking advantage of these MM wallets to fake market volume by buying and selling, at the same time, a very large number of tokens. I really take my hat off to the marketing and project development strategies of Radio CACA's team. A perfect plan without a bit of a loophole or suspicion from the community, and the that the developers chose to fake is also a pretty nice number to make them satisfied and move on to the next phase - ATH price (0.0119888) Dump. The question is how they pumped the token without shocking the market, or making the community criticize and boycott the project when using a lot of big names to PR for it. In fact, those wise whales and market makers never wait for a spike in price to start pumping. Instead, they gradually dumped while pumping the price without making the community notice. I'll take the example of a wallet address with a suspicious performance, which is called : : wallet A 0x9e8451158086ba066d93c11d8d4b6e1969bcbc8d According to TokFlow analytics, received money from Dev on September 7, 2021. Therefore, I suspect this is a wallet label controlled by the Dev team. wallet A To clarify this, I also checked the source of the wallet label transferred to on August 24, 2021. Not surprisingly, it turned out that the amount of RACA also came from Dev, then it was broken down and transferred to a lot of other wallets: 0xc99e4e934f1ddd2e3e03ffe38fe862ab5d6139be wallet A So, after receiving the token from 2 sources of Dev, held the token until mid-October and began to make a lot of orders transferring the token: wallet A I will randomly view a transaction of transferred 200K RACA to the wallet on October 7, 2021 to see the real purpose of this transaction. Here's what I found: wallet A when it 0x241ab55768da608196f4cd2d63f5dbc07415b1a2 From this, I came to the conclusion: received a large number of tokens from Dev's sources and then made a lot of orders transferring money to other sub-wallets to place the sell-off orders, which shows a fairly obvious dump behavior from the developers. wallet A During the tracing process, the TokFlow team tracked down by pushing the token to the exchange, then transferring the token to another wallet address that "only God knows" whether it was a real user wallet or Dev wallet. how the developers erased the trace of the token’s origin But nothing can cover the eyes of the community or the TokFlow AI; I will give you an example of another wallet label: ( ) 0xe4850258b8699bbd7b1cb337b6023c6b979e5808 The aforementioned is a regular wallet label, but could it receive tokens simultaneously from both exchange and Dev? This is the proof that the Dev team could transfer money to the exchange, and then wipe out the trace by transferring it to another wallet and transferring a few rounds to many other wallet labels to dump. My team - TokFlow - has counted hundreds of wallets with similar transactions which indicates that the number of tokens dumped to the community was not negligible at all (in particular, these wallets showed signs of dumping when the project had good news). In addition, it is also easy to notice the behavior of Dev breaking down the tokens into wallets and staking for rewards. Here's a similar example of how much money Dev spent on farming: I just showed you how Dev dumped the tokens. However, the number of tokens in Dev wallets is only a small portion. When I learned that Devs could erase traces by pushing tokens to the exchange and then withdrawing from other wallets, I had my TokFlow team review all the wallets receiving money from the exchange and dumping continuously, from the moment the price started to be pumped sharply from the end of October to the end of December. Here's part of what TokFlow found: (Click here for more information: TokFlow Channel) All of the above wallets show suspicious signs of receiving billions of RACA from the exchange and then selling in equal amounts. I will check for you wallets that have dumped more than 7.5 billion RACA: Take a look at some of the highlights from this wallet address as follows: 0x431731d312dffa688a37d81af8874a58776eacfd The wallet had a total of 32,865 transactions since 24/09/2021 (when the project had boosted pricing for more than 1 month) until now. The wallet had the most transactions from the end of October until mid-November 2021 (when the project consecutively reached new peaks) The wallet received a total number of 8,934,803,024 RACA from the exchanges, sold 7,509,388,951 RACA, and the remaining number of 1,425,414,073 RACA was transferred to other wallets, the current number of tokens in the wallet was zero. The total transaction of the wallet includes: Source of tokens in: 2 exchanges (PancakeSwap and Gate.io) or some other wallet addresses such as: (the source of money from this wallet address also came from the above 2 exchanges) 0x98e8f871d814bfc5506b6cd4abeb3d05f809f8c5 Source of tokens out: in 2 ways, either sold right on PancakeSwap, or transferred to some wallet address, e.g. 0xb023d7f5aabd97b41b367a74c8e09cfa34a97702 0x972c69d9d0af1bc888fee3efa15753f531046710 0x39bd1ae0c8f3387905684913dc84f34e18a1654a So, where will the tokens received from the above wallet addresses go? => As such, they continued to be pushed onto Gate.io or Mexc.com exchanges. And as analyzed above, this is a form of token erasure used by developers or market makers to make MM wallets up as regular user wallets that blinds the community. And with just one wallet label, the market makers have successfully dumped nearly tens of billions of tokens, so with the list of hundreds of wallets we found, the number is truly mind-boggling. 3. Handling of Community Crisis in the Post-dump Phase I know that, up to now, RACA has been quite successful. As the rest of the project’s community is still having a lot of faith in the development team, with the belief that this is just a stage of technology adjustment and upgradation, and one day they will reclaim. But just wait and see ‘cause who knows. The keyword that TokFlow and I want to show you here is "faith." The simplest way for a pump project to handle a community crisis when the tokens are divided too many times is to give the community conviction. By various methods, the developers won't let the project die suddenly. On the one hand, market makers will gut the project slowly, making the project more and more dumped. On the other hand, the marketing department continues to appease the community, creates things for the community to see the relentless efforts of the Dev team, and the project is still constantly developing. Well, that's exactly what Radio CACA has been doing and continues to do. In the previous section, I used TokFlow AI to analyze how MM and Dev dumped the tokens, and in terms of communication, immediately after reaching the ATH level, the inevitable consequence of a series of pump orders is that the RACA price is constantly falling and has divided 10 . in just over 1 month to only 0.00185 (December 12, 2021) The community panicked and lost their faith. At this time, the developers tried to appease the community by holding a round 2 MPB sale on RacaNFT on November 19 and ended it in less than 2 minutes. This indicates that the community is so optimistic that they see it as an opportunity to buy the dip. RACA manipulates the community's trust with a series of news that offers hope: Burn 10 billion RACA in December GiveAway more than 100k RACA for holders Continue to release USM Land Mystery Boxes (sold out in 3 minutes and 45 seconds). The token price was pushed back to 0.0047 on December 23, 2021, and dropped continuously for the next month to 0.0018 until January 22, 2022. I suppose, at this time, the dump phase of the developers is almost complete. However, the game of cat and mouse is not over. RACA continued to perform Pump and Dump on the tokens for the next 2 months to maintain trust in the community and "suck the blood" as much as possible. In late January and early February 2022, RACA's media buzzed with news: 30/1/2022: The Blockchain Association of the University of Cambridge partnered with Radio Caca (RACA) to build education in the Metaverse world "Metaverse + Education", Empowering Education Reform, Promoting Educational Equality. 3/2/2022: The transaction fee on the NFT market was reduced to 3%. 6/2/2022: 📢 Turkey 🇹🇷 Government 🏛 announced it is actively looking into the Metaverse. At the same time, the MOST widely-distributed and famous local press & newspapers 📰 in Turkey are highlighting all the great things about #RACA @USMverse The RACA price at this time increased continuously to 0.0025. Then, it was slowly dumped to 0.001. On March 28, 2022, the developers announced an airdrop of 680 million RACA market fees for all MPBs. This served as the last gift that market makers gave to the loyal communities at 0.0027 before the price continued to divide 9 more times until now. Currently, the price is trading in the range of 0.0003-0.0004. Market makers continue to show their efforts to fix and improve the project's mechanism, while communities whose assets have been divided several times are still holding on to hope that one day the project will thrive again. I've noticed that there are still signs of Dev, MM, or sharks collecting tokens in recent times: (Click here for more information: TokFlow Channel) This is part of the list of new wallets continuing to collect tokens, which is compiled by TokFlow. You can double-check the transactions on the BSC. I don't know if this is good news for those who are still hoping for a rebound or it’s the doubt that RACA developers just quietly manipulate the market and will once again steer the RACA boat out to sea for some more fish? I'm going to give this answer to the traders, but for me, Alex, and the TokFlow team - every trick can be exposed! Want to analyze hot tokens? Let’s join our to make your suggestions! We’re glad to be able to help you! TokFlow Community

No One Knows RACA Has Been Manipulating the Entire Community! - Part 2

Hi everyone, I'm Alex from , an organization in the financial sector that has a strategic role as private advisor and auditor for major companies and investors. Recently, I have been researching a relatively massive project - Radio CACA. This is a project that became popular by the end of 2021 and attracted tremendous attention in the NFT space. The RACA token already has nearly 20 million followers on CoinMarketCap, while the Twitter channel has reached 572k followers, which are impressive numbers for a low cap coin. TokFlow However, in the process of researching and tracing the details, I discovered that the entire data of the project had been over-hyped and fabricated in a very sophisticated and blatant way. Millions of users have been led by the nose without even knowing it. So how was the community misled by the development team? 1. Testing and Collecting Phase (May to mid-August 2021) Let's rewind the time on . When the price was at 0.000019, it suddenly increased to (10 times). At the same time, Radio CACA announced the launch of the RACA V1 project and drew the attention of the community by spreading the news that the media representative is Elon Musk's mother - Mrs. Maye Musk. Unexpectedly, the price was pushed back to 0.000016 just two days later. May 16, 2021 0.000195 Also in May, there were two times when Raca prices were boosted abnormally. with the news that the RACA token was listed on MEXC Global exchange on . 0.00007 May 20 with the announcement that NFT "The Dancing Koda" was listed on the BakerySwap exchange on . 0.00005 May 26 And then it was down again and only went sideways around the price zone of for more than 2 months. 0.00002 I consider the pricing events in May as a stepping stone for the developers to probe the community's reaction to the media news, while at the same time investigating and ensuring that the market has been completely manipulated in hand, and being well-prepared for the real fight to come. (Note: Koda, a four-legged robotic dog, is one of the world's first decentralized AI robot dog projects, with optional features for data stored on the IPFS/Filecoin Network. "Dancing Koda" NFT is the perfect performance for Koda's agility. This NFT will be listed  through Radio Caca and Raca tokens are the only means of bidding.) 2. Manipulating the Market and Media The RACA’s pump plan has really taken place since mid-August. In less than one week from 16-21/08/2021, the price continuously increased and set a new peak on August 21, 2021, with the highest price being 0.00048868. What has RACA done at this time to manipulate the market and legitimize the spike in prices? On August 17, 2021, the developers announced a Metaverse discussion with CZ & Maye Musk. RACA developers were really sharp to take advantage of the prevailing Metaverse trend, and the visual effects of two prominent KOLs in the world, CZ and Maye Musk, which made the project almost go viral. Moreover, RACA is constantly releasing information: On August 18, the RACA V2 token was first introduced that enabled users to swap RACA V1 into V2, along with the burning of 50 billion V1, the remaining supply was put into the V2 liquidity group 20/08/2021: RACA token was listed on CoinGecko. 21/08/2021: RACA token was listed on CoinMarketCap. Radio CACA has successfully blinded the community with a series of beneficial news, clearly gaining the reputation in the community in terms of both media and product. In order to manipulate the market, Raca's trading volume data was also blatantly faked, increasing the credibility with the legalization community for the unexpectedly high token price. Specifically: On August 20, data aggregated on BSC Chain showed that the transaction volume reached $44,052,912, but the actual trading volume was only $29,647,125 => the fake transaction volume amounted to $14,405,787. On August 21, data aggregated on BSC Chain showed that the transaction volume reached $36,138,572, but the actual trading volume was only $27,532,908 => the fake transaction volume amounted to $8,605,664. I'm going to give you an analysis of statistics on a small portion of RACA's fake trading volume only in August - when the project was promoting the pump phase: (Click here for more information: TokFlow channel) You'll ask me: how can RACA fake such a huge trading volume, and what evidence shows that the volume is fake? Now, I'll show you evidence of bot wallets that was built up by the professional development team of the project specializing in faking the trading volume during the pricing process: (Synthetic data by ) TokFlow AI This is an example of a bot’s wallet address (0x597fa8fc25a1d74f50d86c02e86accd225e8908a) with more than 1800 transactions instantly purchased and sold at a large number of tokens. Details of a fake transaction volume on PancakeSwap: use BNB to buy RACA, immediately sell RACA to BNB in equal quantities: (Synthetic data by ) TokFlow AI Without a doubt, this isn't the only wallet address faking volume, my team has aggregated more than 400 bot wallet addresses with hundreds of thousands of similar transactions to defraud the community throughout the time, and certainly the number just doesn't stop there. You can verify the information yourself through some of the following wallets: (Click here for more information: ) TokFlow channel It can be said that, by all means of fooling the community, the developers have successfully pumped the price of RACA 250 times higher than the lowest price in just 3 months. It's a really impressive number for any trader who has been lucky enough to invest in RACA since May. However, the game has only just begun. Market makers are well prepared to play with the community in an FOMO war about price continuously for 3 months from mid-August to mid-November. 3. The Pump Scheme and Money-Making Tools , RACA announced the participation of CZ and Maye Musk in the Binance Metaverse Panel (August 26), bringing the RACA price to set a new peak at and then immediately adjusting to and going sideways at this point until the end of September. On August 24, 2021 0.0009 0.0004 The price only slightly recovered to on when RACA announced that Justin Sun was with Maye Musk at The Sovereign Robot Dog's Avatar in Metaverse conference. 0.00069 September 7, 2021 It can be affirmed that a lot of prestigious names in the industry have been revealed for the sake of the scam, in order to establish credibility and put on the perfect cover for developers to help RACA prices continuously set up new ATH. If it’s all about pumping token prices using the media and famous KOLs, the project will definitely be nowhere near as a petty scam. However, the Radio CACA development team has created an entire ecosystem as a token support tool and enticed the community to make huge profits. First of all, it is crucial to mention the game project launched in . This is a play-to-earn mini-game on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC). After more than 10 days, the development team continued to release Metamon Beta 2.0 and burned 1 billion Raca after just one day of the game's release. This is a very easy game to play, but the initial investment is quite large (4000-5000 USD for the cheapest Metamon N). The community at that time had become excited by the strong development of Radio CACA and it is not difficult to understand that the price of RACA has skyrocketed and set a new peak at . Metamon early October 2021 0.00271 (October 10, 2021) Along with Metamon, RACA also owns a number of large projects on BSC such as . Notably, the project launched the – the first and only mysterious NFTs boxes belonging to the "MUSK" boxes – in the top 4 NFT brands. There was a time that the NFT hit $73,000, while it initially cost only about $200. USM Metaverse, The United States of Mars Maye Musk Mystery Box (MPB) Radio CACA also demonstrates its "generosity" to the community by constantly offering airdrop programs to MPB owners with hundreds of millions of dollars. More importantly, it is interesting to note that Elon Musk collaborated with Radio Caca to airdrop for the holder of RACA NFT and trust the project. MPB NFT holders have the opportunity to receive cars in real life released by the Tesla company for the partnership with the Radio Caca NFT project. So far, only one person has been lucky enough to own this car. 100 CyberTruck All of Radio CACA's marketing, community-oriented strategies over the course of more than 2 months have successfully legitimized the RACA price that climbed to a new peak of and sustained sideways at around 0.003-0.004 in the first week of November, getting prepared for the developers' final pumping campaign. 0.0039 by the end of October [To be continued…] This story was submitted to HackerNoon by an independent contributor. Hence the information contained therein has also been researched and compiled independently. Disclosure:

No One Knows RACA Has Been Manipulating The Entire Community - Part 1

Nadie sabe que RACA ha estado manipulando a toda la comunidad - Parte 1

Personne ne sait que RACA a manipulé toute la communauté - Partie 1

कोई नहीं जानता कि आरएसीए पूरे समुदाय के साथ छेड़छाड़ कर रहा है - भाग 1

RACA がコミュニティ全体を操作していることを誰も知らない - パート 1

Ninguém sabe que o RACA está manipulando toda a comunidade - Parte 1

Không ai biết RACA đã thao túng toàn bộ cộng đồng - Phần 1

没人知道 RACA 一直在操纵整个社区 - 第 1 部分

Marketing in the blockchain industry is not for the faint of heart. Like other emerging industries in tech, blockchain is a highly technical field with significant financial, political, and regulatory challenges, yet also an incredibly captivating narrative and potential for explosive growth. While you may be blissfully out-of-date with your blockchain marketing trends, your target customers, and competitors, are not. With the new year (and decade) right around the corner, here are 6 blockchain marketing trends for 2020: Trend #1: Crypto Twitter takes the reigns from Reddit, Telegram, and BitcoinTalk 2019 saw Twitter take the reigns from Reddit, Telegram, and BitcoinTalk as the blockchain industry’s dominant communication platform in the United States. The reasons for this are twofold. As blockchain companies mature and institutionalize, their communications inevitably become more buttoned up. Brands are choosing to stay a layer above the crypto wars, trolls, and FUD (fear, uncertainty, and doubt) that have become so prevalent in community driven channels like Reddit, Telegram, and BitcoinTalk. Telegram’s purpose, in particular, was to provide a means of getting questions answered quickly leading up to a token sale. With the drastic decrease in token sales, and serious feature flaws like no captcha to screen users, Telegram’s use case as a community growth channel is becoming obsolete. The other catalyst for Crypto Twitter’s growing popularity, is Jack Dorsey. A long time bitcoin advocate, Jack has backed Lightning Labs, launched a crypto division of Square that is now funding bitcoin core development, and grew Square’s Cash App into one of the leading retail onramps in the U.S. Several days ago, that Twitter would “fund a small independent team of up to five open source architects, engineers, and designers to develop an open and decentralized standard for social media” which got the community behind him (and Twitter) full throttle. Jack announced Apart from Twitter, another communication platform that I really believe in for 2020 is LinkedIn. In the past 3 years, LinkedIn has transformed from a job-seekers platform into a content platform with insanely high organic reach. LinkedIn is where Facebook was 7 years ago, and blockchain projects would be remiss to miss out on the opportunity in 2020. Trend #2: Goodbye Medium, hello Ghost 2020 will see an increasing number of blockchain brands moving their blogs away from Medium in favor of setting up native blogs on their own websites or using , an open-source publishing platform with more “crypto-friendly” values. Here’s why: Ghost When you publish to Medium, you lose control of your content. Medium now owns your content and drives traffic to its own services, not yours. You can link your site, but rarely anyone clicks through after reading your post. Medium is an aggregator. At the end of the day, you still need to promote your content across your marketing channels to get eyeballs. Instead of sending a reader to your own site where they can learn more about what you do, you’re sending them to another site and into another company’s customer acquisition funnel. Unlike with Ghost or a native blog, you to set custom domains to blog posts, thus reducing organic visibility and SEO value from your content. Medium does not allow Medium’s have caused some concern and from the blockchain community on the grounds of increasing censorship and threat of account suspension. policies towards cryptocurrencies pushback Whether its for policy reasons or for better SEO and conversion, expect the blockchain exodus from Medium to continue in 2020. Trend #3: Moats will almost be non-existent, other than brands Moats in the blockchain space are slowly disappearing. Competing projects are copying each other left and right. Surviving off cool technology, ICO proceeds, and operational efficiency is not enough. Something could be working for your project now, but it won’t last forever. What is a strong moat for blockchain organizations in 2020 and even a stronger one in the future? Brand. If your brand doesn't occupy a defined position in the minds of users/customers (and the prospective market), someone else will come and articulate their value better than you and occupy the position you want. It may not matter if you are the first to deliver a product. You need to be first in occupying that specific position in the minds of your target market. Some macro examples of blockchain projects that are doing this successfully: Bitcoin → Digital gold Ethereum → Programmable blockchain Coinbase → Simple cryptocurrency exchange MakerDAO → Powering Decentralized Finance Tether → Stablecoin Cosmos & Polkadot → Blockchain interoperability Build a brand, or bust. Trend #4: Education trumps fear. Don’t sell, educate. New things scare people. We live in a time when people form strong opinions before they know the facts. If something causes fear, uncertainty, and doubt (FUD), the majority of people are hardwired to avoid it. The antidote to fear is education. Crypto still suffers from a lack of understanding and basic knowledge. As marketers in a sector plagued by a dark history of crypto heists (Mt. Gox, Coincheck), black market use cases (Silk Road), and fraudulent ICOs, we’re forced to help clients and partners understand the real value that blockchain technology enables. This requires us to spend a significant amount of time speaking/writing about the benefits of blockchain and the opportunities it enables. Becoming a thought leader in the early days of any frontier industry is priceless. Companies that leverage content marketing significantly outperform those that don’t, both in terms of traffic and sales. Newcomers to the blockchain space, both retail and corporate, are increasingly conducting their own research, so lacking content to aid them in their research can mean immediate disqualification from their considerations. With brands like Messari on content this year, blockchain marketers in 2020 must have rock solid knowledge of the blockchain space, understand their customers, and write like the wind. raising the bar Trend #5: Blockchain projects will get sophisticated about their growth metrics 99% of blockchain organizations operate like traditional businesses. They have employees they need to pay and, therefore, require customers who use their protocol and generate revenue. Just as Daily Active users is the key growth metric for Facebook, or Nights Book is the key growth metric for AirBnb, blockchain projects too will measure more granular growth metrics in 2020 that reflect more than just price and market capitalization. Unlike traditional digital platforms, however, not all token holders in a blockchain utilize the protocol the same way. Some are miners who run blockchain nodes as a passive income scheme, some are developers building either infrastructure or applications that sit on the base-layer protocol, some are speculators, and yet others are ordinary users utilizing the blockchain for its intended function. Identifying each user segment, understanding their needs and behaviors, and retaining those users is necessary in order for the entity to transition into a healthy business. With blockchain business intelligence service providers like , blockchain organizations can label users (holders, traders, speculators), operators (nodes, miners, validators) and businesses (dapps, exchanges), and track the growth metrics specific to each user segment. Flipside Crypto Understanding these metrics will help guide both business and marketing decisions in 2020. Trend #6: Customer acquisition funnels still work Although many of the marketing channels, tactics, and tools in the blockchain space are unique, the core digital marketing principles are the same. And that is not something that will change in 2020. Every business has a unique set of funnels that make up the user acquisition journey, from visitor to paying customer. By mapping the data gathered from your analytics tools to your user journey, marketers can see the bottlenecks where users drop off and implement strategies to improve conversion rates across every stage of the funnel. Start your analysis with a series of questions about how a user engages with the product: How exactly does a user get from visitor to paying customer? At what moment does a user truly understand the value of your product/offering? (Your goal is to get people to this moment as quickly as possible, especially in a field as complex as blockchain) At which point in the funnel do you see drop-offs? (Use data from tools like Google Analytics to measure the conversion rate at every step of the user journey to find the pitfalls) Why are users dropping off at those funnel stages? (User testing and session recording tools will greatly help give you that understanding) What channels can you leverage to guide your users down the funnel? (Whether it's email newsletters, content, live chat, or retargeting ads, try to leverage every possible touch point to drive users through the entire funnel) The blockchain marketing trends for 2020 are, somewhat paradoxically, both more technical and more human. At the end of the day, marketers must work closer than ever with their product teams to define value upfront, replace complexity with simplicity, and give customers what they need.

Stories, News & Mentions about ATEXTO

Atexto’s Stories on HackerNoon

Atexto's News & Mentions