At present, investors (along with spouse and minor child) holding shares worth Rs 5 lakh in any particular company may be faced with certain restrictions, including access to bank loans in some cases,” said Anish Mashruwala, partner & co-chair (Finance) at JSA Advocates & Solicitors.

Explainer: What Banking Law Bill changes mean for banks & depositors - Banking & Finance News | The Financial Express

Explainer: What the changes mean for banks & depositors - Banking & Finance News | The Financial Express

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman highlights the stress of high bank interest rates and urges steps to make them affordable. She reassures that government is aware of economic challenges both domestically and globally, advising banks to focus on loans and avoid insurance product misselling.

Finance Minister Advocates for Affordable Bank Interest Rates | Headlines

Oftentimes, when people think about brand advocates, they may think of external people, such as social media influencers. While this may be true, consider this: your employees know your company inside out and can lend a unique voice to your brand’s reputation.

What Is Employee Advocacy and Does It Really Work? | Sprout Social

This is why brand advocacy is a key aspect to large and growing organizations. In order to understand why this matters for your company, it’s important to cover what brand advocacy is and define some key elements.

What is Brand Advocacy? Everything Your Company Needs to Know

Over 45 Years of Specialist Legal Services On your side since 1977 OUR JOURNEY An Affiliate Member of AB &amp; David Africa AB &amp; DAVID AFRICA Legal &amp; Kenyan Issue 18 LEGAL &amp; KENYAN High Court Strikes Down Parts of the Law of Succession Act as unconstitutional LEGAL ALERT The Critical Role of ...

Home - Oraro & Company Advocates

We cannot provide a description for this page right now

B M Musau & Company, Advocates LLP

It is no secret that it is people that make a company. That is why we carefully formed our team to ensure that our clients enjoy a high level of service, skill and value. These among many other things, are the qualities that set us apart from the rest.

Home - Musyimi

GLI understands that almost all of its customers seek help because they have a common goal – to improve their business. We dicussed ways the company advocates for its customers.

GLI Discusses Four Ways the Company Advocates for Its Customers - GLI

August 29, 2021 REGISTRATION OF NON-GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS (NGO) IN UGANDA Onyango &amp; Company advocates’ non-profit practise is one of the best and most vibrant in Uganda. Some of our partners worked in the non-profit sector before joining private lega ..

Home Page - Onyango & Company Advocates

Advocates

advocates

World Economic Forum (WEF) president Børge Brende suggests that there should be an algorithm above other algorithms in order to better serve humankind. Speaking at the Doha Forum in Qatar during a session on “The Geopolitics of Artificial Intelligence” over the weekend, Brende said that China and the US have realized that whoever comes out on top with AI will be the most powerful nation, and there should be an algorithm to keep other algorithms in check for the sake of humankind. “I think we need an agreement on the algorithm above the algorithms, maybe an algorithm that can control that the algorithms do work in the interest of humankind“
WEF President Børge Brende, Doha Forum, December 2024 https://x.com/TimHinchliffe/status/1866142245860094070?embedable=true “These are superpowers without superpowers, and they know that the future superpower is GenAI, and GenAI can be a force for good; it can increase productivity with 10 percent in the coming decade — that’s a lot of prosperity, but I think it’s a good idea that the humans are on top of the algorithms and not the algorithms on top of the humans,” said the WEF president. “I think we need an agreement on the algorithm above the algorithms, maybe an algorithm that can control that the algorithms do work in the interest of humankind,” he added. “I see that the power of AI can be so much for good, something that nuclear weapons have never been, but we have to make sure we don’t lose the baby with the bathwater”
WEF President Børge Brende, Doha Forum, December 2024 https://x.com/TimHinchliffe/status/1866146866594754610?embedable=true While recognizing the potential of AI to create productivity and prosperity in the world, Brende also said that one of the downsides is the trillions of dollars lost to cybercrime, and that China and the US should come to regulatory agreements to combat that. “I see that the power of AI can be so much for good, something that nuclear weapons have never been, but we have to make sure we don’t lose the baby with the bathwater,” said Brende. “And $10 trillion USD can be lost annually in cybercrime by 2025, and I think both China and the US have to agree that that is not a good use of money — that should be stopped now,” he added. While the US and China battle for AI supremacy, the WEF president said he was concerned about the “global south” being left behind, especially Africa, where only 20 percent of the population has internet access and large swaths still don’t have reliable electricity. “In Africa, 20 percent of the population have access to internet. How can you then be part of this revolution? One thing is you don’t have access to electricity, then you don’t have access to the internet”
WEF President Børge Brende, Doha Forum, December 2024 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-ZlGMaVHpk&embedable=true “In Africa, 20 percent of the population have access to internet,” said Brende. “How can you then be part of this revolution? One thing is you don’t have access to electricity, then you don’t have access to the internet,” he added. With developed nations and big tech platforms being the “winners” in the AI race, Brende turned back to the US and China, stating: “I do hope that there is enough self-interest, and they do see that it is in their self-interest from the big players to agree on some traffic rules.” Apart from regulations and competition between the US and China, another key point concerning the geopolitics of AI was how to power data centers and where that power was coming from. You can find out more about that in our follow-up story: here. Tim Hinchliffe, Editor, The Sociable World Economic Forum (WEF) president Børge Brende suggests that there should be an algorithm above other algorithms in order to better serve humankind. Speaking at the Doha Forum in Qatar during a session on “ The Geopolitics of Artificial Intelligence ” over the weekend, Brende said that China and the US have realized that whoever comes out on top with AI will be the most powerful nation, and there should be an algorithm to keep other algorithms in check for the sake of humankind. Doha Forum The Geopolitics of Artificial Intelligence Brende said “I think we need an agreement on the algorithm above the algorithms, maybe an algorithm that can control that the algorithms do work in the interest of humankind“ WEF President Børge Brende, Doha Forum, December 2024 “I think we need an agreement on the algorithm above the algorithms, maybe an algorithm that can control that the algorithms do work in the interest of humankind“ “ I think we need an agreement on the algorithm above the algorithms, maybe an algorithm that can control that the algorithms do work in the interest of humankind “ I think we need an agreement on the algorithm above the algorithms, maybe an algorithm that can control that the algorithms do work in the interest of humankind WEF President Børge Brende, Doha Forum, December 2024 https://x.com/TimHinchliffe/status/1866142245860094070?embedable=true https://x.com/TimHinchliffe/status/1866142245860094070?embedable=true “ These are superpowers without superpowers, and they know that the future superpower is GenAI, and GenAI can be a force for good; it can increase productivity with 10 percent in the coming decade — that’s a lot of prosperity, but I think it’s a good idea that the humans are on top of the algorithms and not the algorithms on top of the humans ,” said the WEF president. These are superpowers without superpowers, and they know that the future superpower is GenAI, and GenAI can be a force for good; it can increase productivity with 10 percent in the coming decade — that’s a lot of prosperity, but These are superpowers without superpowers, and they know that the future superpower is GenAI, and GenAI can be a force for good; it can increase productivity with 10 percent in the coming decade — that’s a lot of prosperity, but I think it’s a good idea that the humans are on top of the algorithms and not the algorithms on top of the humans I think it’s a good idea that the humans are on top of the algorithms and not the algorithms on top of the humans “ I think we need an agreement on the algorithm above the algorithms, maybe an algorithm that can control that the algorithms do work in the interest of humankind ,” he added. I think we need an agreement on the algorithm above the algorithms, maybe an algorithm that can control that the algorithms do work in the interest of humankind I think we need an agreement on the algorithm above the algorithms, maybe an algorithm that can control that the algorithms do work in the interest of humankind “I see that the power of AI can be so much for good, something that nuclear weapons have never been, but we have to make sure we don’t lose the baby with the bathwater” WEF President Børge Brende, Doha Forum, December 2024 “I see that the power of AI can be so much for good, something that nuclear weapons have never been, but we have to make sure we don’t lose the baby with the bathwater” “I see that the power of AI can be so much for good, something that nuclear weapons have never been, but we have to make sure we don’t lose the baby with the bathwater” “I see that the power of AI can be so much for good, something that nuclear weapons have never been, but we have to make sure we don’t lose the baby with the bathwater” WEF President Børge Brende, Doha Forum, December 2024 https://x.com/TimHinchliffe/status/1866146866594754610?embedable=true https://x.com/TimHinchliffe/status/1866146866594754610?embedable=true While recognizing the potential of AI to create productivity and prosperity in the world, Brende also said that one of the downsides is the trillions of dollars lost to cybercrime, and that China and the US should come to regulatory agreements to combat that. “I see that the power of AI can be so much for good, something that nuclear weapons have never been, but we have to make sure we don’t lose the baby with the bathwater ,” said Brende. “I see that the power of AI can be so much for good, something that nuclear weapons have never been, but we have to make sure we don’t lose the baby with the bathwater “I see that the power of AI can be so much for good, something that nuclear weapons have never been, but we have to make sure we don’t lose the baby with the bathwater “ And $10 trillion USD can be lost annually in cybercrime by 2025, and I think both China and the US have to agree that that is not a good use of money — that should be stopped now ,” he added. And $10 trillion USD can be lost annually in cybercrime by 2025, and I think both China and the US have to agree that that is not a good use of money — that should be stopped now And $10 trillion USD can be lost annually in cybercrime by 2025, and I think both China and the US have to agree that that is not a good use of money — that should be stopped now While the US and China battle for AI supremacy, the WEF president said he was concerned about the “global south” being left behind, especially Africa, where only 20 percent of the population has internet access and large swaths still don’t have reliable electricity. “In Africa, 20 percent of the population have access to internet. How can you then be part of this revolution? One thing is you don’t have access to electricity, then you don’t have access to the internet” WEF President Børge Brende, Doha Forum, December 2024 “In Africa, 20 percent of the population have access to internet. How can you then be part of this revolution? One thing is you don’t have access to electricity, then you don’t have access to the internet” “In Africa, 20 percent of the population have access to internet. How can you then be part of this revolution? One thing is you don’t have access to electricity, then you don’t have access to the internet” “In Africa, 20 percent of the population have access to internet. How can you then be part of this revolution? One thing is you don’t have access to electricity, then you don’t have access to the internet” WEF President Børge Brende, Doha Forum, December 2024 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-ZlGMaVHpk&embedable=true https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-ZlGMaVHpk&embedable=true “ In Africa, 20 percent of the population have access to internet ,” said Brende. In Africa, 20 percent of the population have access to internet In Africa, 20 percent of the population have access to internet “ How can you then be part of this revolution? One thing is you don’t have access to electricity, then you don’t have access to the internet, ” he added. How can you then be part of this revolution? One thing is you don’t have access to electricity, then you don’t have access to the internet, How can you then be part of this revolution? One thing is you don’t have access to electricity, then you don’t have access to the internet, With developed nations and big tech platforms being the “winners” in the AI race, Brende turned back to the US and China, stating: “ I do hope that there is enough self-interest, and they do see that it is in their self-interest from the big players to agree on some traffic rules .” I do hope that there is enough self-interest, and they do see that it is in their self-interest from the big players to agree on some traffic rules I do hope that there is enough self-interest, and they do see that it is in their self-interest from the big players to agree on some traffic rules Apart from regulations and competition between the US and China, another key point concerning the geopolitics of AI was how to power data centers and where that power was coming from. You can find out more about that in our follow-up story: here . here Tim Hinchliffe, Editor, The Sociable Tim Hinchliffe, Editor, The Sociable

WEF President Advocates for a Supervisory Algorithm to Guide AI for the Greater Good

Prezident WEF obhajuje algoritmus dohledu, který povede AI pro větší dobro

El presidente del Foro Económico Mundial aboga por un algoritmo de supervisión que oriente la IA hacia el bien común

Prezidan WEF defann yon algorithm sipèvize pou gide AI pou pi gwo byen

A WEF elnöke egy olyan felügyeleti algoritmust támogat, amely az AI-t a nagyobb jó érdekében irányítja

Il presidente del WEF sostiene un algoritmo di supervisione per guidare l'intelligenza artificiale per il bene comune

WEF会長、AIを社会全体の利益のために導く監督アルゴリズムを提唱

ປະທານ WEF ສະໜັບສະໜູນລະບົບການເບິ່ງແຍງກວດກາເພື່ອແນະນຳ AI ເພື່ອຄວາມດີທີ່ໃຫຍ່ກວ່າ

Presiden WEF Menyokong Algoritma Penyeliaan untuk Membimbing AI demi Kebaikan yang Lebih Besar

WEF umalliqmi huk Algoritmo Supervisor nisqamanta rimarin, AI nisqa hatun allinpaq pusananpaq

Председник ВЕФ-а се залаже за надзорни алгоритам за вођење АИ за веће добро

WEF کے صدر عظیم تر بھلائی کے لیے AI کی رہنمائی کے لیے ایک سپروائزری الگورتھم کی وکالت کرتے ہیں۔

Chủ tịch WEF ủng hộ thuật toán giám sát để hướng dẫn AI hướng đến mục tiêu tốt đẹp hơn

You can jump to any part of the United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy Strategy here. This part is 21 of 38. Line of Effort 4: Expand and Diversify Civil Society Participation in Multistakeholder Processes The United States and its partners remain committed to the multistakeholder model of Internet and digital governance. Active and meaningful participation of all stakeholders, including governments, civil society, the private sector, academia, and the technical community, is essential to informing our discussions and policymaking, promoting transparency and accountability, and strengthening implementation and sustainable development. Through foreign assistance programs, the Department of State is advancing policy and advocacy initiatives through which civil society stakeholders engage with national governments, regional governance bodies, and international standard-setting entities to encourage Internet and digital governance policies consistent with democratic values and international human rights. The Department of State will continue its efforts to expand and diversify the groups who are working to promote interoperable, rights-respecting, and secure digital technologies. It will also continue to prevent and defend against efforts by repressive governments to exclude civil society and other stakeholders from participation in relevant fora. The United States strongly supports the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) as the preeminent global body bringing together all stakeholders through a bottom-up process to discuss rights-respecting solutions to Internet public policy issues. It will continue to work with allies and partners to sustain and bolster the IGF’s relevance. Continue Reading Here. This post was originally published on May 6, 2024, by the U.S Department of State You can jump to any part of the United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy Strategy here. This part is 21 of 38. You can jump to any part of the United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy Strategy here . This part is 21 of 38. here Line of Effort 4: Expand and Diversify Civil Society Participation in Multistakeholder Processes The United States and its partners remain committed to the multistakeholder model of Internet and digital governance. Active and meaningful participation of all stakeholders, including governments, civil society, the private sector, academia, and the technical community, is essential to informing our discussions and policymaking, promoting transparency and accountability, and strengthening implementation and sustainable development. Through foreign assistance programs, the Department of State is advancing policy and advocacy initiatives through which civil society stakeholders engage with national governments, regional governance bodies, and international standard-setting entities to encourage Internet and digital governance policies consistent with democratic values and international human rights. The Department of State will continue its efforts to expand and diversify the groups who are working to promote interoperable, rights-respecting, and secure digital technologies. It will also continue to prevent and defend against efforts by repressive governments to exclude civil society and other stakeholders from participation in relevant fora. The United States strongly supports the Internet Governance Forum (IGF) as the preeminent global body bringing together all stakeholders through a bottom-up process to discuss rights-respecting solutions to Internet public policy issues. It will continue to work with allies and partners to sustain and bolster the IGF’s relevance. Continue Reading Here. Continue Reading Here . Here This post was originally published on May 6, 2024, by the U.S Department of State This post was originally published on May 6, 2024, by the U.S Department of State by the U.S Department of State

U.S. Advocates Multistakeholder Model for Internet Governance, Empowers Civil Society Participation

You can jump to any part of the United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy Strategy here. This part is 18 of 38. Line of Effort 1: Support the Trusted Flow of Data and Advocate for Multistakeholder, Risk-Based Approaches to Digital and Data Governance Digital solidarity is further built and reinforced through the joint development, harmonization, and mutual recognition of rights-respecting approaches to data governance and digital trade. This work is currently ongoing through mechanisms such as Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF), Digital Transformation with Africa initiative (DTA), the Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity (APEP), the G7, OECD, TTC, and the Quad. The United States supports the trusted free flow of data and an open Internet with strong and effective protections for individuals’ human rights and privacy and measures to preserve governments’ abilities to enforce laws and advance policies in the public interest. Legitimate concerns about data privacy can be addressed through protective mechanisms that follow the data while at the same time facilitate cross-border data flows and strengthen global cooperation among enforcement authorities. The United States will continue championing trusted cross-border data flows by promoting data transfer mechanisms that improve interoperability between different data privacy regimes. Working alongside our interagency partners, the Department of State supported the negotiation and implementation of the EU- U.S. Data Privacy Framework; the development of the OECD Declaration on Trusted Government Access to Data Held by the Private Sector, which identifies commonalities in the privacy safeguards democratic governments follow when accessing data for legitimate law enforcement and national security purposes; as well as initiatives on Data Free Flow with Trust at both the G7 and the OECD. The Department of State works with the Department of Justice to clarify application of the U.S. Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act and to negotiate bilateral agreements under the act. Along with Australia, Canada, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, the Philippines, Singapore, and Taiwan, the United States launched the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) Forum in April 2022, building on the previously established Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) CBPR system. The CBPR provides a data privacy certification backed by relevant authorities that facilitates data flows by promoting interoperable, enforceable data protection standards. Officials from the Departments of State and Commerce will continue efforts to bring new countries into the agreement, building on efforts such as workshops held in Kenya, Mexico, Chile, Brazil, UK, Israel, Jordan, Panama, Colombia, Fiji, and Barbados as well as ASEAN countries. While the United States and its likeminded trade partners share many of the same values, we often have differing approaches to how to regulate the digital economy. The U.S. government advocates for multistakeholder, risk-based approaches that target the challenges we face while providing the flexibility to realize the benefits of new and emerging technologies. Unilateral approaches in digital taxation and the imposition of network usage fees often do not address the core issues of accessibility and fairness expressed by their proponents. Additionally, the rise of a growing digital sovereignty narrative that has been embraced by some of our close partners and allies has the potential to undermine key digital economy and cybersecurity objectives. The Department of State, working with other agencies, will continue to argue against data localization, network usage fees, digital services taxes as well as other market access barriers that contribute to the perception of increased control, but in reality often can undermine growth and security objectives. Continue Reading Here. This post was originally published on May 6, 2024, by the U.S Department of State You can jump to any part of the United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy Strategy here. This part is 18 of 38. You can jump to any part of the United States International Cyberspace & Digital Policy Strategy here . This part is 18 of 38. here Line of Effort 1: Support the Trusted Flow of Data and Advocate for Multistakeholder, Risk-Based Approaches to Digital and Data Governance Digital solidarity is further built and reinforced through the joint development, harmonization, and mutual recognition of rights-respecting approaches to data governance and digital trade. This work is currently ongoing through mechanisms such as Indo-Pacific Economic Framework for Prosperity (IPEF), Digital Transformation with Africa initiative (DTA), the Americas Partnership for Economic Prosperity (APEP), the G7, OECD, TTC, and the Quad. The United States supports the trusted free flow of data and an open Internet with strong and effective protections for individuals’ human rights and privacy and measures to preserve governments’ abilities to enforce laws and advance policies in the public interest. Legitimate concerns about data privacy can be addressed through protective mechanisms that follow the data while at the same time facilitate cross-border data flows and strengthen global cooperation among enforcement authorities. The United States will continue championing trusted cross-border data flows by promoting data transfer mechanisms that improve interoperability between different data privacy regimes. Working alongside our interagency partners, the Department of State supported the negotiation and implementation of the EU- U.S. Data Privacy Framework; the development of the OECD Declaration on Trusted Government Access to Data Held by the Private Sector, which identifies commonalities in the privacy safeguards democratic governments follow when accessing data for legitimate law enforcement and national security purposes; as well as initiatives on Data Free Flow with Trust at both the G7 and the OECD. The Department of State works with the Department of Justice to clarify application of the U.S. Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data (CLOUD) Act and to negotiate bilateral agreements under the act. Along with Australia, Canada, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Mexico, the Philippines, Singapore, and Taiwan, the United States launched the Global Cross-Border Privacy Rules (CBPR) Forum in April 2022, building on the previously established Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) CBPR system. The CBPR provides a data privacy certification backed by relevant authorities that facilitates data flows by promoting interoperable, enforceable data protection standards. Officials from the Departments of State and Commerce will continue efforts to bring new countries into the agreement, building on efforts such as workshops held in Kenya, Mexico, Chile, Brazil, UK, Israel, Jordan, Panama, Colombia, Fiji, and Barbados as well as ASEAN countries. While the United States and its likeminded trade partners share many of the same values, we often have differing approaches to how to regulate the digital economy. The U.S. government advocates for multistakeholder, risk-based approaches that target the challenges we face while providing the flexibility to realize the benefits of new and emerging technologies. Unilateral approaches in digital taxation and the imposition of network usage fees often do not address the core issues of accessibility and fairness expressed by their proponents. Additionally, the rise of a growing digital sovereignty narrative that has been embraced by some of our close partners and allies has the potential to undermine key digital economy and cybersecurity objectives. The Department of State, working with other agencies, will continue to argue against data localization, network usage fees, digital services taxes as well as other market access barriers that contribute to the perception of increased control, but in reality often can undermine growth and security objectives. Continue Reading Here. Continue Reading Here . Here This post was originally published on May 6, 2024, by the U.S Department of State This post was originally published on May 6, 2024, by the U.S Department of State by the U.S Department of State

The U.S. Advocates for Trusted Data Flows and Multistakeholder Digital Governance

USA v. Samuel Bankman-Fried Court Filing, retrieved on March 15, 2024 is part of . You can jump to any part in this filing . This part is 33 of 33. HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series here CONCLUSION In view of all of the facts and factors set out above, Bankman-Fried is deserving of a severe sanction, proportionate to his role in this historic fraud. While a Guidelinessentence – which would exceed 100 years, effectively a life sentence – is not necessary, the Government urges the Court to impose a sentence that underscores the remarkably serious nature of the harm to thousands of victims; prevents the defendant from ever again committing fraud; and sends a powerful signal to others who might be tempted to engage in financial misconduct that the consequences will be severe. A sentence of 40 to 50 years is necessary to serve such purposes. Dated: New York, New York March 15, 2024 Respectfully submitted, b About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings. This court case retrieved on March 15, 2024, from is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction. storage.courtlistener

Government Advocates for Severe Sanction in Bankman-Fried Case

We’ve seen how due to the ecosystem in place, thanks to the synchronization between government, startups, and venture capital. Spain is becoming an essential hub for startups to flourish Today we see this trend is keeping its peace, as has become one of the leading contributors to the European Tech Champions Initiative (ECTI), a new fund of funds aimed at expanding Europe’s venture capital markets. Spain The initiative, funded by the European Investment Bank (EIB) and five member states, including Spain, will inject €3.75bn into the continent’s startup ecosystem, particularly into those that are in the final stages of growth. The Spanish contribution is €1bn, the same amount as France and Germany, while Italy and Belgium are providing €150m and €100m, respectively. Larger funds on the make ECTI is a response to the lack of funding available to European startups when they reach the final stage of development, often when they require rounds of €100m, which few European funds can provide. The new fund will contribute to creating larger funds that can generate the necessary amounts and, thus, reduce the number of startups that move to the US for funding. According to Ricardo Mourinho, Vice President of the EIB, startups often choose to settle in the US because of a lack of funding in Europe. “ECTI is a response to this situation. It is €3.75bn that will help generate larger funds and potentially larger investments”, he explained during a panel titled “Decarbonised economy: financing, impact and success stories” at the MadBlue summit in Madrid. ECTI will provide significant investments in large-scale venture capital funds that will, in turn, invest in European technology champions. The initiative is a crucial part of the pan-European Scaleup Initiative, launched last year to support innovation, entrepreneurship, and high-tech ecosystems in Europe. Reducing the investment gap could create many highly skilled jobs and boost growth. Jose Zudaire, CEO of Spain’s primary venture capital association, SPAINCAP, highlighted Spain’s positive attitude towards capital markets, despite the rising interest rate environment. “We come from 2022 with over 930 operations. There is still liquidity, and players are still opening offices in Spain,” he said. Elena Gauter, General Manager of the Candriam fund management company for Iberia and Latin America, emphasized the need to create the conditions for European startups to remain in Europe. “That gap makes startups that have grown here want to leave,” she said. The Europe VC problem ECTI will help deepen Europe’s venture capital markets by closing gaps in funding availability, especially for companies seeking to raise more than €50m. It will also create an asset class for European institutional investors to diversify their portfolios, thus maintaining a steady flow of funding for emerging European companies. This positive self-sustaining dynamic in the European high-tech landscape will encourage innovation, attract talent and help build globally competitive companies. The initiative is a step towards addressing the challenges facing Europe’s venture capital markets. According to a report by Invest Europe, in 2021, €12.6bn was invested in European startups, compared to €38.5bn in the US. However, the report highlights , as only 22% of venture capital is invested in Europe, compared to 43% in the US. ECTI could be the solution to closing this gap and retaining European startups in Europe. the high growth potential Launching the European Tech Champions Initiative in Spain represents a significant step towards deepening Europe’s venture capital markets and supporting its innovation ecosystem. ECTI will help address the funding gap that often forces European startups to move to the US for funding and contribute to the creation of more significant funds that can invest in the region’s emerging technology champions. This article was originally published by Daniel Mora Matiz on . Novobrief

EIB VP Advocates for a European Venture Capital Investment Organization

El vicepresidente del BEI aboga por una organización europea de inversión de capital riesgo

Le vice-président de la BEI plaide pour une organisation européenne d'investissement en capital-risque

ईआईबी वीपी एक यूरोपीय उद्यम पूंजी निवेश संगठन के लिए वकालत करता है

欧州のベンチャーキャピタル投資組織のEIB VP Advocates

O vice-presidente do BEI defende uma organização europeia de investimento em capital de risco

EIB VP Vận động cho Tổ chức Đầu tư Vốn Mạo hiểm Châu Âu

EIB 副总裁为一家欧洲风险投资机构代言

Working as an educator in tech is very much an exercise in branding. If you define yourself as a trainer then clients assume you don’t really know what you’re talking about. But present yourself as a nerdy developer and they will assume you can’t teach. So you learn to strike a balance between the extremes with good humour and a healthy dose of humility. It doesn’t help that there was never a term for the role. But a few years back, the label popped into existence, and has steadily grown in popularity. Senior folk much smarter than myself have started using the term in anger, and a quick Google search tells you that . Developer Advocate Developer Relations DR is an official thing in the business world What interests me, and motivated this article, is why the role emerged now. After all we managed perfectly well for several decades without Developer Advocates, so why should they matter today? After some consideration I believe the advent of Developer Advocacy is a direct result of the fall of Consultancy and the rise of Mentoring. The Fall of Consultancy When I started as a developer back in the 1990’s the Consultancy role was essential to the industry. Simply put Consultants were the custodians of magic knowledge. Let’s take a typical 1990’s enterprise vendor called MegaCorp, who produce a major database, transaction manager or server product. Everything they do is closed source and made available only on a commercial basis. Documentation is solely available via subscription within a partnership programme and training is only provided from authorised suppliers at a hefty price. This restricted access to knowledge and expertise created a gap where consultancy could flourish. Consultants were typically ex-MegaCorp staff, or employed by MegaCorp satellite companies. They had years of insider knowledge gained from private conversations. They had been on the original standards committees or helped with early proofs of concept. Frequently they had written their own libraries of diagnostic tools, which gave them a head start when troubleshooting. Fast forward twenty years and everything has changed. Community editions of products are the norm. Documentation is online and universally accessible. Vendors encourage senior staff to address esoteric bugs on forums like StackOverflow. Extensions to products are typically exposed as open source projects, if not out of altruism, then in hope of conference workshops and book deals. All of this has eroded what makes the consultancy role special. This is not to deny that there are still world-class individuals, who make a living advising clients in their specialist subject. But these are the best of the best. The hordes of consultants that once dominated the industry are long gone and show no signs of returning. The Rise of Mentoring From my description above you might think that all is well in developer land, but of course this is not entirely the case. From being starved of information developers today risk being overwhelmed. Googling for tutorials on any moderately popular language or framework will give you the phone book. You will find a plethora of Medium articles, blog posts, e-learning tutorials, academic courses etc… The vast majority of these resources will go back over the same ground, frequently staying on the happy path and away from the pain points. As someone who has written dozens of Getting Started tutorials it’s easy to spot when an author takes a shortcut and sidesteps an issue that will bite anyone trying to use the technology in anger. The situation is worse when you have frameworks and languages that are going through a rapid evolution and updating their best practices at high speed. The worst offender here is JavaScript Frameworks, but Cloud Providers aren’t far behind. Even established languages like Java and Scala are retooling their feature set to stay current. Today it is easy to become overwhelmed, bewildered and lost. So the ability to access mentors becomes vitally important. We can all benefit from having a tour guide when we start out, or when switching platforms or job roles. Your mentor doesn’t need to be a world class authority, they just need the expertise to help you move further and faster than you could by yourself - ideally with a lot less stress. If you subscribe to it’s actually more beneficial for your mentor to be close to your level of expertise. the Dreyfus model of learning Welcome to the World Of Tomorrow In an environment where consultancy matters less and mentoring matters more, it becomes important for companies to reach out and engage with the developers that make up their target audience. Whereas in the past it was enough to have online documentation or introductory article it now becomes important to create a path of least resistance toward your product. some an Vendors of developer tools have always been engaged in a Darwinian arms race, but these days it has taken on an added dimension. Survival of the friendliest if you will. Hence companies need a new kind of advocate, who can skilfully manage the outreach for them. These folk need to be developers, but also authors, trainers, presenters, mentors and (whisper it softly) salespeople. Of course, some of us are already in this role. In my case not by good judgement but by a combination of fate, circumstance and personality quirks. We can but hope, that having a name for the trade makes us feel a little less isolated, and enables us to work closer together and make the software industry less foreboding and more accessible to everyone. Also published at https://medium.com/@garthgilmour/the-rise-of-the-developer-advocate-f8ed5c290346

Why Developer Advocates Are on the Rise

Have you heard about Glitch?I am sure you did, it’s the new product launched earlier this year by , the company behind and . Fog Creek Stack Overflow Trello Here is the simple pitch: Glitch is an online IDE mixed with collaboration and community features like in . Github After using it I wanted to share some feedback and vision on how this tool can be used by Developer Advocates. These are the Glitch fish. 🎏 The aha moment 😲🎉 I had visited their homepage a numerous number of times when it was still named Gomix. But I never really got the point of using Glitch until I’ve seen and at doing a demo on stage fews ago in San Francisco. Jenn Schiffer Anil Dash DevXcon During the demo they presented a new feature called , the idea is that in your code highlight a specific line and ask for help. The same way you would do it in the office and tap your colleague’s shoulder to get some fresh eyes on your issue. “Ask for help” Here, by clicking on a button you can ask the community to come help you. If you have remixed (cloned) someone’s project they will be notified, and it’s also posted on Glitch homepage. How it looks from coder’s perspective How people see it on front page glitch.com When I tried to get help, I waited a long time, even though I was the only one asking for help. It’s still a new feature and a new product, give it some time 😉. Context is key On the helper side, this is also a great tool, as it gives you more context around the problem. You see what the coder is trying to build, and have an overview of what could go wrong. It’s hard to have this context on an online forum or on Stack Overflow. People have tried to use like or , but it is really limited to frontend code. tools Codepen JSfiddle Sometime people would share their github repo with the support team. Great idea on paper, but then it’s a pain to debug and make sure you have the same environment as theirs. Using Glitch, you see exactly what the coder is seeing. You can be more helpful in your comments and mentoring. How could you use it for your DevRel efforts?👩‍🔧👨‍🔧📣 Before they launched this community-based “ask for help” feature, I was really seeing Glitch a nice online IDE to build some fun hacks. Now, I really see the whole potential when you are an API provider. It gives you new ways to interact with your community. Give life to your coding-samples 🐛🦋 Generally, API providers would provide some coding samples on how to use their SDK in the context of a small app. It usually sits on a Github repo. And sometimes come with a live version of the example hosted somewhere, so people can try. But there is still some friction before the developer tries to deploy their own for their own need. Fork the repo, clone it locally, install all the dependencies, update the framework version, launch it and test. This could be a hassle and another drop-out in your conversion funnel. With Glitch, hackers could “remix” your example, modify it, and see results live in a matter of seconds. You’ve earned some precious minutes in your . “time to Hello World” Inline support💬 As we’ve seen, with the new help features, you will get notified as the owner of a project if someone is asking for help. It means you can be reactive and answer developers quickly to “un-stuck” them. It gives a positive experience. You can even organize your projects by language or framework (so far, only Node is supported), your language experts will be notified specifically. Brand awareness and community rewarding🎁 Glitch is really community centered, there are literally tons of projects to discover. You can use it at your own advantage. You can encourage your active community developers to publish their projects on Glitch. It helps them get recognized as great hackers and it helps your community with more examples available. There are also some curated categories like or Getting your projects selected in those will help reaching more developers. Featured Community Picks. It’s really thought for platforms🔌🛠 Look! They have a special section for us: Glitch for Platforms What’s next?🎏 Try it, start a new project there, and experiment how this changes developer experience. Personally I’ve used it to build a Slack bot for . At first, I thought I would do something that people can re-use and adapt, but I have seen also some potential as “serverless” alternative. So now the app is more complex and I will use it to distribute our Slack bot. That’s always an option. 3scale Check the project . here I would love to hear your thoughts on the tools you are using for your DevRel reach.

Is Glitch Developer Advocate’s best friend?

Building Automation That Works: Lessons from MVPs with LLMs by Aparimeya Taneja

Automatización de Edificios ukax irnaqañapawa: MVPs ukanakat yatichäwinak LLMs ukanakamp Aparimeya Taneja ukan qillqata

Automatizacija zgrada koja radi: lekcije MVP-a sa LLM-ima od Aparimeya Taneja

Automatización de edificios que funciona: lecciones de MVP con LLM por Aparimeya Taneja

אוטומציה של בניין שעובדת: שיעורים מ-MVPs עם LLMs מאת Aparimeya Taneja

効果的なビルディングオートメーション: LLM を取得した MVP からの教訓 (Aparimeya Taneja 著)

Fanamboarana automatique izay miasa: Lesona avy amin'ny MVP miaraka amin'ny LLM nataon'i Aparimeya Taneja

Kuvaka Automation Inoshanda: Zvidzidzo kubva kuMVPs neLLMs naAparimeya Taneja

வேலை செய்யும் பில்டிங் ஆட்டோமேஷன்: அபரிமேயா தனேஜாவின் LLMகளுடன் MVP களில் இருந்து பாடங்கள்

Автоматикунонии бино, ки кор мекунад: Дарсҳо аз MVPs бо LLMs аз ҷониби Апаримея Танежа

ዝሰርሕ ህንጻ ኣውቶማቲክ፡ ትምህርቲ ካብ MVPs ምስ LLMs ብኣፓሪሜያ ታነጃ

Işleýän gurluşyk awtomatizasiýasy: Aparimeya Tanejanyň LLM-leri bolan MVP-lerden sapaklar

Ku Aka Automation Leyi Tirhaka: Tidyondzo ku suka eka ti-MVP leti nga na ti-LLM hi Aparimeya Taneja

As Donald Trump prepares to take office, America’s artificial intelligence (AI) policy stands at a crucial turning point, sparking debates about the future of AI development and regulation. His victory as the 47th president has already earned congratulations from tech giants like Jeff Bezos and ignited discussions about potentially giving Elon Musk a significant role in shaping the country’s AI policies moving forward. Trump has vowed to reverse many of the AI executive orders put in place by the Biden administration, arguing that they "stifle AI innovation" and push "radical left-wing ideas" onto the development of the technology. Although it's unclear what the direct impact of this repeal will be, it signals a move toward deregulation. The rhetoric surrounding it is dividing opinions, turning AI policy into a partisan issue—although voters across party lines support balanced regulation. Industry experts, however, are concerned that cutting back regulation may jeopardize AI safety at a time when it’s needed most. “The U.S. must focus on a solid and efficient infrastructure that allows organizations evaluating AI systems and their deployment to publish credible and verifiable information about these systems, including their origins, training data, sensor data provenance, and any security incidents,” Dave Maher, CTO of Intertrust Technologies, told me. “These filters should enforce safeguards and test for violations of ethical principles, such as promoting or endorsing harmful behaviors like violence in an AI model’s outputs.” A New Direction: Rolling Back AI Regulation? Musk, who supported Trump throughout his campaign, has been appointed to lead the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)—a role aimed at overhauling the nation’s regulatory framework. He’ll be working alongside entrepreneur and politician Vivek Ramaswamy in this ambitious effort. Meanwhile, Americans for Responsible Innovation (ARI), a nonprofit focused on promoting responsible AI development, has started a petition with a goal of 10,000 signatures, urging Trump to appoint Elon Musk as a special advisor on AI. The group argues that Musk’s deep technical expertise and outspoken commitment to AI safety make him the perfect person to lead the U.S. in this crucial tech race. “The U.S. should lead the world in advancing AI safely and securely. No one is better equipped to help the Trump Administration make America lead on AI than Elon Musk,” reads the petition page on ARI’s website. “With proper mechanisms in place to handle conflicts of interest, Musk would be an invaluable asset for helping the Trump administration navigate the development of this transformational technology. Help us tell President-Elect Trump to make Musk a Special Advisor to the President on AI.” Musk has long warned about AI’s existential risks and expressed concern over AI becoming too powerful too quickly. But critics aren’t convinced. Some remain skeptical about Musk’s role in shaping AI policy, pointing to his decision to distance himself from OpenAI, a company he helped create, as well as his outspoken opposition to AI regulations. “There’s no way for Elon Musk to be unbiased, just like there’s no such thing as a truly ‘unregulated market.’ The absence of regulation is, in itself, a form of regulation—one that gives big corporations free rein to push their own agendas,” Hamid Ekbia, Director of the Autonomous Systems Policy Institute (ASPI) and Professor at Syracuse University, told me. “When Musk talks about deregulating AI, what he’s after is the chance to outpace his competitors. That's why he and others tend to exaggerate the existential risks of AI.” China’s Growing AI Prowess Fuels U.S. Concerns The U.S. faces mounting competition from China, which has invested heavily in AI development intending to surpass America by 2030. The AI race has become a central issue in discussions on national security, with both Democrats and Republicans viewing AI technology as a crucial component in defense strategies. China’s lower labor costs and focus on model training give it an edge in the AI race. Trump’s administration will likely continue to tighten restrictions on Chinese access to advanced semiconductors, a strategy initiated during his first term and expanded under President Biden. Trump’s stance on AI has been erratic, often praising its potential while warning of its dangers. He said that the U.S. would require vast infrastructure upgrades for AI, particularly in energy and computing power, to ensure the U.S. maintains its lead over China. To secure America’s technological position, experts call for ambitious investments in AI infrastructure. A recent proposal from OpenAI suggests creating "National Transmission Highways" to modernize the power grid and meet AI’s immense energy demands, a plan that aligns with Trump’s vision of improving infrastructure. “AI can optimize energy distribution and usage through virtual power plants, which manage thousands of components involved in energy production, storage, and consumption,” added Maher. “However, this is only feasible with extensive automation and AI to support precise decision-making. AI safety and security will be crucial for such systems’ successful, large-scale deployment.” Future of AI Regulation: What’s at Stake? Despite widespread bipartisan support, the U.S. AI Safety Institute (AISI) —an organization created after Biden’s executive order to spearhead government efforts on AI safety—could face an uncertain future under President-elect Trump’s newly created DOGE. The department is expected to target federal programs for cuts, and AISI might be on the chopping block. However, tech leaders, lawmakers, and advocates are rallying for a more nuanced approach, arguing that safeguarding AI technology is critical to both national security and ethical progress. Moreover, AI companies like Leading OpenAI and Microsoft are vocal about the need for strong safeguards to maintain the U.S.’s position as a global leader in AI. “AI regulation has to start at the top,” Raj De Datta, CEO and co-founder of Bloomreach, shared with me. “A handful of companies dominate the AI market, and everyone else depends on their data centers or the models they produce. It’s vital that we start with these tech giants—ensuring they respect privacy, operate fairly, use diverse datasets, and uphold values we all agree on. That’s how we get the outcomes we want, the kind that benefit society.” But others, like Ekbia, caution that the current profit-driven approach of big tech companies is unlikely to prioritize the safety of their systems, let alone ethical or environmental concerns. He pointed to recent controversies at OpenAI as evidence that many tech companies put profit—their so-called "bottom line"—ahead of legal and ethical considerations. “How can we expect companies like Google, which has moved operations to tax havens like Ireland or the Cayman Islands, to act responsibly when it comes to developing AI?” he asks. The current situation underscores a key tension: balancing innovation with accountability. As Trump prepares to reshape U.S. AI policy, the industry faces a period of uncertainty. Whether his administration will accelerate or stifle innovation remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the stakes for AI safety, security, and leadership are higher than ever before. As Donald Trump prepares to take office, America’s artificial intelligence (AI) policy stands at a crucial turning point, sparking debates about the future of AI development and regulation. His victory as the 47th president has already earned congratulations from tech giants like Jeff Bezos and ignited discussions about potentially giving Elon Musk a significant role in shaping the country’s AI policies moving forward. Trump has vowed to reverse many of the AI executive orders put in place by the Biden administration, arguing that they "stifle AI innovation" and push "radical left-wing ideas" onto the development of the technology. Although it's unclear what the direct impact of this repeal will be, it signals a move toward deregulation. As Donald Trump prepares to take office, America’s artificial intelligence (AI) policy stands at a crucial turning point, sparking debates about the future of AI development and regulation. His victory as the 47th president has already earned congratulations from tech giants like Jeff Bezos and ignited discussions about potentially giving Elon Musk a significant role in shaping the country’s AI policies moving forward. Trump has vowed to reverse many of the AI executive orders put in place by the Biden administration, arguing that they "stifle AI innovation" and push "radical left-wing ideas" onto the development of the technology. Although it's unclear what the direct impact of this repeal will be, it signals a move toward deregulation. AI executive orders The rhetoric surrounding it is dividing opinions, turning AI policy into a partisan issue—although voters across party lines support balanced regulation. Industry experts, however, are concerned that cutting back regulation may jeopardize AI safety at a time when it’s needed most. “The U.S. must focus on a solid and efficient infrastructure that allows organizations evaluating AI systems and their deployment to publish credible and verifiable information about these systems, including their origins, training data, sensor data provenance, and any security incidents,” Dave Maher , CTO of Intertrust Technologies, told me. “These filters should enforce safeguards and test for violations of ethical principles, such as promoting or endorsing harmful behaviors like violence in an AI model’s outputs.” Dave Maher Dave Maher A New Direction: Rolling Back AI Regulation? Musk, who supported Trump throughout his campaign, has been appointed to lead the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) —a role aimed at overhauling the nation’s regulatory framework. He’ll be working alongside entrepreneur and politician Vivek Ramaswamy in this ambitious effort. Meanwhile, Americans for Responsible Innovation (ARI), a nonprofit focused on promoting responsible AI development, has started a petition with a goal of 10,000 signatures, urging Trump to appoint Elon Musk as a special advisor on AI. The group argues that Musk’s deep technical expertise and outspoken commitment to AI safety make him the perfect person to lead the U.S. in this crucial tech race. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) “The U.S. should lead the world in advancing AI safely and securely. No one is better equipped to help the Trump Administration make America lead on AI than Elon Musk,” reads the petition page on ARI’s website. “With proper mechanisms in place to handle conflicts of interest, Musk would be an invaluable asset for helping the Trump administration navigate the development of this transformational technology. Help us tell President-Elect Trump to make Musk a Special Advisor to the President on AI.” petition page petition page Musk has long warned about AI’s existential risks and expressed concern over AI becoming too powerful too quickly. But critics aren’t convinced. Some remain skeptical about Musk’s role in shaping AI policy, pointing to his decision to distance himself from OpenAI, a company he helped create, as well as his outspoken opposition to AI regulations. “There’s no way for Elon Musk to be unbiased, just like there’s no such thing as a truly ‘unregulated market.’ The absence of regulation is, in itself, a form of regulation—one that gives big corporations free rein to push their own agendas,” Hamid Ekbia , Director of the Autonomous Systems Policy Institute ( ASPI ) and Professor at Syracuse University, told me. “When Musk talks about deregulating AI, what he’s after is the chance to outpace his competitors. That's why he and others tend to exaggerate the existential risks of AI.” Hamid Ekbia Hamid Ekbia ASPI ASPI China’s Growing AI Prowess Fuels U.S. Concerns The U.S. faces mounting competition from China, which has invested heavily in AI development intending to surpass America by 2030. The AI race has become a central issue in discussions on national security, with both Democrats and Republicans viewing AI technology as a crucial component in defense strategies. China’s lower labor costs and focus on model training give it an edge in the AI race. Trump’s administration will likely continue to tighten restrictions on Chinese access to advanced semiconductors, a strategy initiated during his first term and expanded under President Biden. Trump’s stance on AI has been erratic, often praising its potential while warning of its dangers. He said that the U.S. would require vast infrastructure upgrades for AI, particularly in energy and computing power, to ensure the U.S. maintains its lead over China. To secure America’s technological position, experts call for ambitious investments in AI infrastructure. A recent proposal from OpenAI suggests creating "National Transmission Highways" to modernize the power grid and meet AI’s immense energy demands, a plan that aligns with Trump’s vision of improving infrastructure. “AI can optimize energy distribution and usage through virtual power plants, which manage thousands of components involved in energy production, storage, and consumption,” added Maher. “However, this is only feasible with extensive automation and AI to support precise decision-making. AI safety and security will be crucial for such systems’ successful, large-scale deployment.” Future of AI Regulation: What’s at Stake? Despite widespread bipartisan support, the U.S. AI Safety Institute (AISI) —an organization created after Biden’s executive order to spearhead government efforts on AI safety—could face an uncertain future under President-elect Trump’s newly created DOGE. The department is expected to target federal programs for cuts, and AISI might be on the chopping block. However, tech leaders, lawmakers, and advocates are rallying for a more nuanced approach, arguing that safeguarding AI technology is critical to both national security and ethical progress. Moreover, AI companies like Leading OpenAI and Microsoft are vocal about the need for strong safeguards to maintain the U.S.’s position as a global leader in AI. “AI regulation has to start at the top,” Raj De Datta, CEO and co-founder of Bloomreach, shared with me. “A handful of companies dominate the AI market, and everyone else depends on their data centers or the models they produce. It’s vital that we start with these tech giants—ensuring they respect privacy, operate fairly, use diverse datasets, and uphold values we all agree on. That’s how we get the outcomes we want, the kind that benefit society.” But others, like Ekbia, caution that the current profit-driven approach of big tech companies is unlikely to prioritize the safety of their systems, let alone ethical or environmental concerns. He pointed to recent controversies at OpenAI as evidence that many tech companies put profit—their so-called "bottom line"—ahead of legal and ethical considerations. “How can we expect companies like Google, which has moved operations to tax havens like Ireland or the Cayman Islands, to act responsibly when it comes to developing AI?” he asks. The current situation underscores a key tension: balancing innovation with accountability. As Trump prepares to reshape U.S. AI policy, the industry faces a period of uncertainty. Whether his administration will accelerate or stifle innovation remains to be seen, but one thing is clear: the stakes for AI safety, security, and leadership are higher than ever before.

Trump’s 2024 Victory Sparks AI Policy Debate: What’s Next for America’s Tech Future?

Trumpovo vítězství v roce 2024 podnítí politickou debatu o AI: Co bude dál pro americkou technologickou budoucnost?

La victoria de Trump en 2024 genera un debate sobre políticas de inteligencia artificial: ¿qué le espera al futuro tecnológico de Estados Unidos?

Trumpen 2024ko garaipenak AI politikaren eztabaida pizten du: zer da Amerikako etorkizun teknologikorako?

Viktwa 2024 Trump la te pwovoke deba sou politik AI: kisa kap vini pou avni teknoloji Amerik la?

La vittoria di Trump nel 2024 accende il dibattito sulla politica dell’intelligenza artificiale: quale sarà il futuro tecnologico degli Stati Uniti?

トランプ大統領の2024年勝利がAI政策論争を巻き起こす：アメリカのテクノロジーの未来はどうなるのか？

ტრამპის 2024 წლის გამარჯვებამ გამოიწვია AI პოლიტიკის დებატები: რა არის შემდეგი ამერიკის ტექნიკური მომავლისთვის?

Трамптың 2024 жылғы жеңісі AI саясатына қатысты пікірталас тудырды: Американың техникалық болашағын не күтіп тұр?

트럼프의 2024년 승리가 AI 정책 논쟁을 촉발: 미국의 기술 미래는 어떻게 될까?

ට්‍රම්ප්ගේ 2024 ජයග්‍රහණය AI ප්‍රතිපත්ති විවාදයට තුඩු දෙයි: ඇමරිකාවේ තාක්ෂණික අනාගතය සඳහා මීළඟට කුමක් ද?

Trump-nyň 2024-nji ýyldaky ýeňşi AI syýasaty barada jedel döredýär: Amerikanyň tehnologiýa geljegi üçin näme bolar?

Trump'ın 2024 Zaferi Yapay Zeka Politikası Tartışmasını Başlattı: Amerika'nın Teknoloji Geleceğinde Sırada Ne Var?

Panama City, Panama, December 19th, 2024/Chainwire/--PoSciDonDAO has announced that Boost VC has invested in the project, representing a significant step forward in its mission to decentralize scientific research and innovation. The investment includes PoSciDonDAO’s acceptance into Boost VC’s Go-To-Market Program, which will provide valuable resources to support the project’s development and adoption. Boost VC Expands Commitment to Decentralized Science With PoSciDonDAO Boost VC, co-founded by Adam Draper and Brayton Williams, is known for supporting emerging technologies that introduce alternative approaches to traditional systems. Over the years, Boost VC has demonstrated a strong commitment to the decentralized science (DeSci) space by investing in projects such as Molecule, ResearchHub, HairDAO, and Data Lake. These initiatives have advanced democratized science, open innovation, and accessibility for researchers and innovators. By including PoSciDonDAO in its program, Boost VC reinforces its dedication to decentralized approaches in scientific research and development. Opportunities Through Boost VC’s Partnership Boost VC’s investment and PoSciDonDAO’s participation in its Go-To-Market Program present new opportunities for growth. Key benefits include: Access to Expert Mentorship: Boost VC’s team and network of industry experts will provide guidance to help PoSciDonDAO refine its strategy and scale.
Market Positioning: Insights into navigating competitive landscapes, with tailored go-to-market strategies for adoption and growth.
Network Expansion: Integration into a collaborative community of innovators, fostering partnerships with research institutions and advocates in decentralized science and blockchain. A Shared Vision for Decentralized Science This partnership reflects a shared vision of decentralization as a tool to promote equity, inclusivity, and progress in science. PoSciDonDAO and Boost VC aim to collaborate in fostering a movement that emphasizes transparency in research funding and equitable access to scientific resources. The Future of DeSci: A Collective Effort Boost VC’s partnership with PoSciDonDAO underscores growing momentum for DeSci. Through this collaboration, both entities aim to demonstrate that decentralization can enhance inclusivity and equity in scientific innovation. By joining forces, PoSciDonDAO and Boost VC will work toward advancing a model of knowledge creation and resource allocation that benefits the global scientific community. About PoSciDonDAO PoSciDonDAO leverages blockchain technology to democratize personalized medicine research by bridging the gap between researchers, funders, and the broader scientific community. Through decentralized governance and funding, the platform ensures transparent and equitable resource allocation, fostering trust and inclusivity in advancing personalized medicine innovation. For more information about PoSciDonDAO, users can visit the official PoSciDonDAO website. Users are invited to stay informed about PoSciDonDAO’s initiatives by following the project on social platforms: Twitter/X | Telegram | Discord Contact Marketing Representative Ayat Abourashed ayat@poscidon.com This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here Panama City, Panama, December 19th, 2024/Chainwire/--PoSciDonDAO has announced that Boost VC has invested in the project, representing a significant step forward in its mission to decentralize scientific research and innovation. The investment includes PoSciDonDAO’s acceptance into Boost VC’s Go-To-Market Program, which will provide valuable resources to support the project’s development and adoption. Boost VC Expands Commitment to Decentralized Science With PoSciDonDAO Boost VC, co-founded by Adam Draper and Brayton Williams, is known for supporting emerging technologies that introduce alternative approaches to traditional systems. Over the years, Boost VC has demonstrated a strong commitment to the decentralized science (DeSci) space by investing in projects such as Molecule, ResearchHub, HairDAO, and Data Lake. These initiatives have advanced democratized science, open innovation, and accessibility for researchers and innovators. By including PoSciDonDAO in its program, Boost VC reinforces its dedication to decentralized approaches in scientific research and development. Opportunities Through Boost VC’s Partnership Boost VC’s investment and PoSciDonDAO’s participation in its Go-To-Market Program present new opportunities for growth. Key benefits include: Access to Expert Mentorship: Boost VC’s team and network of industry experts will provide guidance to help PoSciDonDAO refine its strategy and scale. Market Positioning: Insights into navigating competitive landscapes, with tailored go-to-market strategies for adoption and growth. Network Expansion: Integration into a collaborative community of innovators, fostering partnerships with research institutions and advocates in decentralized science and blockchain. Access to Expert Mentorship: Boost VC’s team and network of industry experts will provide guidance to help PoSciDonDAO refine its strategy and scale. Market Positioning: Insights into navigating competitive landscapes, with tailored go-to-market strategies for adoption and growth. Network Expansion: Integration into a collaborative community of innovators, fostering partnerships with research institutions and advocates in decentralized science and blockchain. A Shared Vision for Decentralized Science This partnership reflects a shared vision of decentralization as a tool to promote equity, inclusivity, and progress in science. PoSciDonDAO and Boost VC aim to collaborate in fostering a movement that emphasizes transparency in research funding and equitable access to scientific resources. The Future of DeSci: A Collective Effort Boost VC’s partnership with PoSciDonDAO underscores growing momentum for DeSci. Through this collaboration, both entities aim to demonstrate that decentralization can enhance inclusivity and equity in scientific innovation. By joining forces, PoSciDonDAO and Boost VC will work toward advancing a model of knowledge creation and resource allocation that benefits the global scientific community. About PoSciDonDAO PoSciDonDAO leverages blockchain technology to democratize personalized medicine research by bridging the gap between researchers, funders, and the broader scientific community. Through decentralized governance and funding, the platform ensures transparent and equitable resource allocation, fostering trust and inclusivity in advancing personalized medicine innovation. For more information about PoSciDonDAO, users can visit the official PoSciDonDAO website . website website Users are invited to stay informed about PoSciDonDAO’s initiatives by following the project on social platforms: Twitter/X | Telegram | Discord Twitter/X Twitter/X Telegram Telegram Discord Discord Contact Marketing Representative Ayat Abourashed ayat@poscidon.com This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here This story was distributed as a release by Chainwire under HackerNoon’s Business Blogging Program. Learn more about the program here here here

Boost VC Invests In PoSciDonDAO, Welcoming It To Their Go-To-Market Program

Boost VC инвестира в PoSciDonDAO, приветствайки го в тяхната програма за излизане на пазара

Boost VC ulaže u PoSciDonDAO, pozdravljajući ga u svom programu za izlazak na tržište

Boost VC investuje do PoSciDonDAO a vítá jej v jejich programu Go-To-Market

Ενισχύστε τις επενδύσεις της VC στο PoSciDonDAO, καλωσορίζοντας το στο πρόγραμμα Go-To-Market

Boost VC invierte en PoSciDonDAO y le da la bienvenida a su programa de lanzamiento al mercado

Boost VC ulaže u PoSciDonDAO, pozdravljajući ga u svom programu Go-To-Market

Boost VC Berinvestasi di PoSciDonDAO, Menyambutnya ke Program Go-To-Market Mereka

Boost VC משקיעה ב-PoSciDonDAO, מברכת אותו בתוכנית היציאה לשוק שלהם

Boost VCがPoSciDonDAOに投資し、市場参入プログラムに迎え入れる

Boost VC, PoSciDonDAO에 투자, 자사의 Go-To-Market 프로그램에 참여를 환영

Palieliniet VC ieguldījumus PoSciDonDAO, sveicot to viņu tirgus programmā

பூஸ்ட் VC PoSciDonDAO இல் முதலீடு செய்கிறது, அதை அவர்களின் சந்தைக்குச் செல்லும் திட்டத்திற்கு வரவேற்கிறது

Stories, News & Mentions about ADVOCATES

Advocates’s Stories on HackerNoon

Advocates's News & Mentions