Abnormal Security is a technology company that takes a fundamentally different approach to its technology and its talent experience, challenging the traditional constraints of the old to relentlessly create something better for customers and employees every day

Abnormal Security

The Internet of Things (IoT) is rapidly growing in scale, with the market for IoT devices being set to double in the years between now and 2021. The pervasive nature of IoT means that enterprises are inevitably drawn into both the benefits of IoT, as well as the IoT security issues. Yet, with the right strategy, enterprises can guard against the security challenges posed by IoT. The good thing with IoT is that it : healthcare, logistics, retail, insurance and banking. It helps improve decision-making, understand users better, deliver new customer value propositions, improve and optimise operations, generate income and raise the value of the business. can be put to work with almost any domain IoT is present in every enterprise in ways that can often be missed. A recent survey found that a third of companies in the UK, US and Germany . had over 1,000 shadow IoT devices on their network on any given day Organisations continue to adopt IoT devices with enthusiasm, not realising that these devices are often insecure by design and provide many opportunities for attackers. This fact dramatically expands the IoT threat landscape. Moreover, many IoT devices aren’t registered in IT inventories due to poor asset management: they are part of the hidden IT. The more connected an enterprise becomes, the more security vulnerabilities may appear. Enterprises must assume that their networks harbour IoT devices, even if making use of IoT tech is not a formal IT policy. Of course, for many companies in the fields of manufacturing, auto production and healthcare, IoT is core to their operations, and . Regardless, every enterprise should take the network risks behind IoT very seriously. for these enterprises, IoT security is of major concern Why IoT poses a different kind of risk In 2018, the number of connected IoT devices is expected to reach 1.2 billion. A lot of them are vulnerable and designed without security in mind. This is a huge problem that involves device manufacturers, software developers and users. The security of IoT impacts the user experience (authentication and the use of cryptographic systems always introduces extra cumbersome steps for users), product cost (complex cryptographic operations and secure storage), as well as the development cost. Among the IoT-specific security issues, the following three are the most common for enterprise businesses: Challenges in cataloguing and managing devices Many aspects of IT security rely on knowing which devices require protection. IoT poses a challenge, in that, shadow IoT aside, even IoT which is deployed with the full knowledge of IT teams can be difficult to catalogue because of the sheer number of devices involved. A single factory can contain thousands of connected sensors that all require scrutiny. Bullet-proofing every single IoT device, when there are thousands online, can be very difficult. Updating the firmware and managing security settings on tens of thousands of devices is highly costly and perhaps simply unattainable from a logistics perspective. Simple devices can lead to complex consequences A small sensor may appear incapable of leading to serious harm, but wrongdoers can exploit a seemingly insignificant vulnerability to gain wider access to networks and facilities. Because a single-function IoT device (such as a sensor) rarely contains much computing power, it is easy to take the view that hackers cannot manipulate it with the goal of causing broader damage. In fact, even a very basic IoT device can act as the first entry point into a network. Once intruders have entered a network by using an IoT device as a stepping stone, they could successfully compromise more advanced devices that offer further opportunities. IoT devices have also been used to launch denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, which carry the risk of reputational blowback for the owners of compromised IoT devices. IoT devices are frequently not enterprise-grade Enterprise IT security relies on the enterprise-level security measures embedded in equipment sold for use in an enterprise environment. But many of the IoT devices on enterprise networks are in fact consumer grade, particularly where shadow IoT is concerned. This can limit the options for controlling important security aspects such as authentication and network encryption. There’s not much that enterprises can do about this fact, and for this reason, security teams need to think of alternative methods to mitigate any risks posed by IoT. How to protect against IoT security issues The world is expecting to see ransomware hijacks of IoT devices in the next year. Ransomware will evolve to target connected, smart, physical devices, potentially putting lives in danger. There is a lack of minimum-security standards for IoT, and this is critical, at least for governments and strategic infrastructure. Without that standard, there is no control over the security of IoT devices on the market. As Bruce Schneier says: “Companies can continue to sell IoT devices with whatever lousy security they want.” Awareness of the challenges that IoT poses is a good start: technology teams should view IoT devices as ‘hot’ and treat IoT accordingly to ensure that the benefits of IoT can be enjoyed on an ongoing basis. While replacing the legacy IoT infrastructure is often not the most practical approach, one of the options is to isolate insecure devices and create an additional layer of security between them. You need to obtain complete environment visibility, establish strict access control with privileged access management, and implement security monitoring to detect suspicious events, abnormal authentication events and unexpected configuration changes. Enterprise IoT devices shouldn’t be exposed to the Internet or enabled on networks with end-user stations. Clearly, and enterprises can mitigate IoT challenges by checking existing security practices against the following list: prevention is better than the cure IoT devices should be treated differently to other network devices from a security perspective. Ringfencing IoT devices and limiting the parts of your network that IoT devices have access to is a good start. Ensure network authentication is required for every single device. Devices should not be allowed access to gateways and network applications unless necessary. Also, ensure that strong passwords are always used and enable 2FA where possible. Apply network encryption everywhere, including Transport Security Layer (TLS), as this can ensure that data transmitted by IoT devices remains confidential. Physically block devices: if a device is not needed, turn off the power. Block ports on exposed devices as these can provide entry points. As far as practically possible, make a serious attempt to catalogue IoT devices so that your enterprise can update firmware and manage patches. Watch out for IoT where it’s least expected, such as in consumer electronics like fridges and conference room TV sets. Manage the connectivity of these devices carefully, blocking network access where it is not needed. These are just some of the steps your enterprise can take to ensure IoT devices, both known and unknown, do not pose a hazard to your network. But keeping IoT security issues under control requires . a broad change in security thinking “It’s not just about technology. A proper IoT governance is also essential”, says Iurii Garasym, the Director of Corporate Security at ELEKS. “For instance, you need to implement a security process for adding IoT devices to your network. Before IoT deployment, consider what information is collected and shared, as well as who can access it.” With stating in a recent survey that IoT poses a security risk, your company should seriously consider engaging a security partner that can help mitigate IoT risks. to discuss how to minimise your IoT security challenges. 77% of enterprises Get in touch Originally published at eleks.com on September 20, 2018.

Countering IoT Security Issues: an Enterprise Guide

The increasing reliance on for efficient communication between various applications and services has created a critical need for robust security measures. This comprehensive guide will delve into the diverse landscape of API Security, shedding light on the various types and helping you determine the optimal approach for your organization's specific needs. APIs APIs are the backbone of modern software applications, facilitating data exchange and functionality across different platforms. However, this connectivity also introduces vulnerabilities malicious actors can exploit if not properly protected. Therefore, understanding and implementing the right API Security measures is paramount. According to a Report, of security professionals have encountered security issues in production APIs in the past year, while 17% reported experiencing an API-related breach! 94% In this article, we will see the types of API Security, exploring key concepts and strategies that organizations can employ to fortify their APIs against potential threats. Understanding Azure Backup Encryption Azure Backup Encryption is a crucial component of Microsoft's comprehensive approach to data security. It encompasses the procedure of transforming plain, understandable data into an incomprehensible format through the application of cryptographic algorithms. This guarantees that if unauthorized individuals manage to access the data, they won't be able to decode its contents unless they possess the encryption key. Encrypting Azure backups provides several benefits in terms of data security. Without encryption, sensitive information stored in backups can be easily accessed by malicious actors, leading to potential risks such as: 1. Data Breaches: According to a study by IBM Security, the average cost of a data breach in 2020 was $3.86 million. Encrypting backups adds an extra layer of protection, making it significantly harder for attackers to access sensitive information. 2. Compliance Violations: Many industries have regulatory requirements regarding the protection of sensitive customer data. Failing to encrypt backups can result in non-compliance with regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS. Azure Backup offers multiple encryption options based on customer needs: 1. Service-managed keys: With this option, Microsoft manages the encryption keys on behalf of the customer. The keys are stored securely in Azure Key Vault and automatically rotated periodically. 2. Customer-managed keys: In this option, customers have full control over their encryption keys and can choose where they are stored and how they are managed. Types of API Security Discover the varying layers of security practices that ensure the safe operation and integration of APIs in a rapidly digitizing world. A. Encryption and Authentication: Encryption is an essential component of as it protects data during transit. Encryption ensures that the data remains secure even if intercepted by converting information into an unreadable format using cryptographic algorithms. This is especially critical when transmitting sensitive information such as personally identifiable (PII) or financial data. API Security In addition to encryption, authentication methods play a crucial role in verifying the identity of users or systems accessing an API. Common authentication methods include API keys, tokens, and OAuth. API keys are unique identifiers issued to developers to authenticate their requests. Tokens are similar to API keys but provide additional security by expiring after a certain period or specific usage conditions. OAuth is a widely adopted protocol that enables delegated authorization, allowing users to grant limited access rights to third-party applications without sharing their credentials. When comparing these authentication methods, OAuth stands out as a robust solution that offers enhanced security through token-based authorization and delegation capabilities. It provides fine-grained access control while reducing the risk of exposing sensitive credentials. However, implementing OAuth may require more effort than simpler methods like API keys. B. Rate Limiting and Throttling: Rate limiting and throttling are techniques used to control the amount of API traffic from a particular source. These measures help prevent abuse, protect against denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, and ensure fair usage of API resources. Rate limiting sets a maximum number of requests that can be made within a specific time frame. By limiting the rate at which requests can be made, businesses can mitigate the risk of overwhelming their systems or depleting resources. Conversely, Throttling regulates the rate at which responses are returned to the requesting client. This prevents an overload of data being transmitted and allows for more efficient resource allocation. Implementing rate limiting and throttling requires careful consideration of expected usage patterns, available resources, and business requirements. Best practices include setting appropriate limits based on user roles or tiers, providing clear error messages to users when limits are exceeded, and regularly monitoring usage patterns to identify potential abuse. C. Input Validation and Output Encoding: Input validation is essential in preventing injection attacks where malicious code is inserted into an API request or payload. By validating input parameters against predefined rules or patterns, businesses can ensure that only their APIs accept valid data. This helps protect against common vulnerabilities such as SQL injection or cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. Output encoding involves converting special characters into their respective HTML entities, preventing them from being interpreted as code by web browsers. This technique mitigates the risk of XSS attacks where malicious scripts are injected into web pages to steal sensitive information or perform unauthorized actions. Implementing input validation and output encoding requires attention to detail and adherence to best practices. Some common input validation techniques include white-listing acceptable characters, implementing length and format checks, and employing regular expressions for complex data validation. D. Audit Logging and Monitoring: Audit logging plays a critical role in by providing an audit trail of all API activities. Businesses can track system behavior and detect potential security incidents or compliance breaches by recording details such as user identities, timestamps, request parameters, and responses. Audit logs also aid in forensic analysis and investigation during a security breach. API Security Real-time monitoring complements audit logging by enabling businesses to identify anomalies or suspicious patterns in API traffic proactively. By leveraging log analysis tools, organizations can gain insights into API usage trends, detect abnormal behavior, and respond promptly to potential threats. Choosing the Best API Security Approach Determine your API's most effective security method by understanding your unique business needs, weighing scalability, and leveraging your team's expertise. These summaries provide a quick insight into the main content of each section, guiding the reader on what to expect. A. Assessing Business Needs and Risks: When choosing an approach, assessing your business needs and the sensitivity of the data transmitted through the API is crucial. Identify potential risks and threats and align your security measures with compliance requirements. Conducting a risk assessment can help prioritize the implementation of appropriate security measures. API security B. Considering Scalability and Performance: measures can impact system performance and scalability. Consider the potential trade-offs between enhanced security and your business's speed or capacity requirements. Striking a balance between these factors is essential to ensure optimal performance with adequate security measures. API security C. Leveraging Developer Expertise and Familiarity: Consider the expertise of your development team and their familiarity with specific API security approaches. Implementing a solution that aligns with their skill set can reduce implementation complexity and shorten the learning curve. Conclusion API Security is paramount for businesses operating in today's digital landscape where data protection is critical. Encryption and authentication provide a foundation for securing data in transit, while rate limiting and throttling prevent abuse and protect against DoS attacks. Input validation and output encoding mitigate injection attacks, while audit logging and monitoring aid in detecting and responding to potential security incidents. When choosing the best approach, assessing your business needs, considering scalability and performance requirements, and leveraging your development team's expertise are essential. Embee, with its expertise in providing comprehensive API security solutions, can help businesses navigate these considerations and implement robust security measures tailored to their specific requirements. Protect your APIs and safeguard your data with 's industry-leading solutions. API Security Embee Please make sure to delete all the information above before writing and submitting your draft. Thanks!

Choosing the Right API Security for Your Needs 

আপনার প্রয়োজনের জন্য সঠিক API নিরাপত্তা নির্বাচন করা

Wählen Sie die richtige API-Sicherheit für Ihre Anforderungen

Elegir la seguridad API adecuada para sus necesidades

Choisir la sécurité API adaptée à vos besoins

अपनी आवश्यकताओं के लिए सही एपीआई सुरक्षा चुनना

ニーズに合わせた適切な API セキュリティの選択

귀하의 요구에 맞는 올바른 API 보안 선택

Escolhendo a segurança de API certa para suas necessidades

Выбор подходящего API-безопасности для ваших нужд

İhtiyaçlarınız İçin Doğru API Güvenliğini Seçme

Chọn bảo mật API phù hợp với nhu cầu của bạn

根据您的需求选择正确的 API 安全性

The growing reliance on software-as-a-service (SaaS) applications to run critical business functions keeps expanding the cloud-based attack surface. Yet, effectively securing cloud-based third-party services and resources is a complex task often relegated to a later time when resources and knowledge will be available. Why Do You Need SSPM Recommended best practices by industry standard bearers are largely reliant on manual documentation. published by the National Telecommunication and Information Administration (NTIA) in July 2021 also relies on self-reported lists of included materials. The Minimum Elements for a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) report Even the relies on non-digital due diligence questions related to the supplier’s reliability from multiple angles, ranging from financial stability to organizational stature, external influence, and maliciousness, including organizational security. MITRE System of Trust (SoT) The amount of manual work required to ingest these reports and coordinate their content when integrating a SaaS into a network is considerable and the process is impractical. In addition, the constant growth in sanctioned, unsanctioned, and forgotten SaaS apps has created sprawl that makes these apps difficult to govern and monitor. Without visibility, these shadow ITs proliferate, expanding the unmonitored, yet exploitable, attack surface. This is where SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) comes in handy. SSPM tools focus specifically on managing the security configurations and access controls of SaaS apps. What Is SSPM SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) tools are specialized to help manage the security settings, configurations, and access controls of a portfolio of SaaS applications. SSPM tools provide visibility into the up-to-date state of SaaS security in areas like user permissions, asset inventory, and regulatory compliance. It then enforces secure baselines and adjusts configurations to remediate issues as they occur. SSPM focuses specifically on the unique requirements of SaaS environments and the growing landscape of cloud-based apps being adopted. Gartner has recognized SSPM as an emerging market segment fueled by the growth of SaaS adoption. Supplying these dedicated security tools is a rising cluster of vendors such as Zscaler, Obsidian Security, Adaptive Shield, Spin.AI, and many others. These companies integrate with an organization’s existing identity provider and SaaS apps and then layer on analysis, monitoring, and automation capabilities purpose-built to manage ongoing security risks as user permissions rapidly expand across growing app portfolios. Exploring the Multifaceted Applications of SSPM SSPMs serve a variety of functions, each contributing to a robust cybersecurity framework: Discovering shadow IT The SSPM discovery step detects unmonitored or unauthorized SaaS applications. Aside from informing the risk mitigation process, the discovery also lists underutilized licenses which contributes to cost optimization. Identifying misconfigurations or overprivileged access SSPM tools automate the detection of compromised credentials, suspicious login locations or times, and abnormal permissioning activities. Upon detection, it alerts stakeholders to investigate and remediate threats. Automating continuous security monitoring and response specific to SaaS environments Going beyond visibility, SSPMs can instantly trigger remediation actions based on policy violations. For example, automatically disabling compromised accounts or revoking an app integration with suspicious scope creep. Supporting compliance and audit processes SSPM tools y provide an audit trail for compliance requirements related to SaaS usage and security. When audits demand evidence of controls around access, configurations, and activity, SSPMs generate reports that demonstrate policies are enforced, which reduces the compliance burden. Techniques Employed by SSPM for Enhanced SaaS Security SSPM solutions utilize a comprehensive set of techniques: : Overseeing user accounts and streamlining identity and access controls. User management and IAM administration : Managing approved SaaS applications and identifying unauthorized usage. SaaS application catalog and shadow IT detection : Monitoring third-party app integrations and changes in SaaS configurations. Connected apps analysis and configuration drift detection : Using best practice templates and advanced threat detection capabilities. SaaS app configuration templates and threat detection : Ensuring data within SaaS applications is protected and licenses are managed efficiently. Data protection and license management Enhancing SSPM Effectiveness with Advanced Integrations SSPMs integrate with various technologies: : Provide real-time visibility into SaaS applications by extracting detailed configuration and permissioning data. API integrations : Align access controls and incorporate MFA status into user risk level assessments. Identity provider integration : Track SaaS app usage and login attempts, correlating data against access policies. Browser extensions and endpoint software : Offer templates aligned with compliance frameworks for automated monitoring and swift remediation of security lapses. Pre-configured security templates Navigating the Complexities of Implementing SSPM While beneficial, adopting an SSPM solution for enhanced SaaS security comes with its own set of challenges: Privacy Concerns The deep level of monitoring of user activities and application behaviors by SSPM tools can lead to privacy concerns. Establishing transparent policies and engaging in careful change management are essential to address these concerns and maintain trust. Budgetary Considerations Adding SSPM tools to the technology stack means an additional financial commitment. Justifying this investment requires quantifying the risk reduction and productivity enhancements SSPM achieves. Keeping Pace with Evolving Threats and Regulations The constantly evolving cyber threats and regulatory requirements demand that SSPM vendors rapidly evolve their products. Staying ahead of these changes is crucial for SSPM tools to remain effective and relevant. Balancing Security with User Experience Implementing security measures, such as enforced re-authentication, can sometimes disrupt user workflows. Finding the right balance between robust security and a seamless user experience is critical to ensure that security measures do not hinder productivity. The spectrum of benefits offered by SSPMs is vast, encompassing cost optimization, access governance, threat mitigation, and audit facilitation. However, unlocking the full potential of these tools requires careful selection, aligning them with the specific needs of an organization, and ensuring that the investment matches the scale of ambition. When implemented thoughtfully, SSPMs are not just tools but pivotal allies, scaling security assurance in step with an organization's cloud adoption journey, ensuring that growth and security go hand in hand.

How to Manage the Complexities of SaaS Security With SSPM

is a biometric system that employs the distinctive patterns of raised ridges and recessed valleys on a person's fingertips to establish and verify their identity. It is one of the most popular and widely used biometric methods, as it offers several advantages, such as high accuracy, high convenience, and low cost. Fingerprint recognition However, it is also vulnerable to spoofing attacks, where an intruder tries to manipulate or fake a fingerprint to gain unauthorized access to a system or device. This begs the question: How real is the threat of fingerprint spoofing and how can we prevent it? This article will cover the following topics Fingerprint Spoofing: How real is the threat and how to prevent it Fingerprint Recognition Systems: How They Work and How to Use Them Safely Fingerprint Spoofing Attacks and Countermeasures The Role of the Industries Manufacturing Fingerprint Recognition Mechanisms The Role of the Government Agencies in Regards to Fingerprint Recognition Security Fingerprint Spoofing: How Real is the Threat and How Can It Be Prevented? Fingerprint spoofing is not a new phenomenon. It has been documented since the 19th century when criminals used various methods to alter or erase their fingerprints. In the 20th century, fingerprint spoofing became more sophisticated with the advent of new materials and techniques, such as latex, gelatin, silicone, wax, and glue. These materials can be used to create artificial fingerprints from molds, casts, or prints of genuine fingers. Alternatively, they can be used to coat a finger or a prosthetic device with a thin layer of fake skin that mimics the fingerprint pattern of another person. Fingerprint spoofing can be done for various purposes, such as impersonating someone else, bypassing security systems, or evading law enforcement. Some examples of fingerprint spoofing in real life include: According to BBC (2013) Publication, a Brazilian doctor used silicone fingers to fool a biometric attendance system and sign in for absent colleagues. According to Kim Zetter (2008) in a publication on Wired.com highlighted that a German hacker group claimed to have reproduced the fingerprint of the then-German Interior Minister from a glass he used at a press conference. According to CNBC (2018) Publication, a team of researchers from Michigan State University and New York University created fake fingerprints that could match multiple real fingerprints stored in a database. In the 2022 Times of India publication, 4 were arrested for cloning fingerprints in Aadhaar payments fraud. According to Biometricupdate.com (2021) Publication, Arrests in Pakistan for fake fingerprint biometrics, NADRA breach alleged These examples show that fingerprint spoofing is not only possible but also relatively easy and cheap to perform. Moreover, fingerprint spoofing can be done without the knowledge or consent of the legitimate owner of the fingerprint. This poses a serious challenge for the security and reliability of fingerprint recognition systems. How can we prevent fingerprint spoofing? There are several measures that can be taken to prevent or detect fingerprint spoofing. Some of them are: Using high-quality sensors that can capture the fine details and characteristics of fingerprints, such as pores, sweat glands, and blood vessels. Using liveness detection techniques that can distinguish between live and fake fingers based on physiological or behavioral features, such as temperature, pulse, blood pressure, skin texture, color, moisture, elasticity, response time, and movement. Using multi-factor authentication requires more than one biometric trait or other factors, such as passwords, PINs, tokens, or cards. Using biometric fusion combines the information from multiple biometric sensors or modalities to enhance the accuracy and robustness of recognition. Using anti-spoofing algorithms that can detect anomalies or inconsistencies in the fingerprint images or features. Educating users about the risks and best practices of using fingerprint recognition systems. Fingerprint Recognition Systems: How They Work and How to Use Them Safely Fingerprint recognition systems consist of four main components: a sensor, a feature extractor, a matcher, and a database. The basic steps involved in fingerprint recognition are: The user registers their fingerprint by placing their finger on the sensor. The sensor captures an image of the fingerprint and sends it to the feature extractor. The feature extractor extracts the salient features of the fingerprint, such as minutiae points (the endings and bifurcations of the ridges), ridge orientation, frequency, and shape. The features are then stored in a template in the database, along with the user's identity information. Enrollment: The user presents their fingerprint again to the sensor for verification. The sensor captures an image of the fingerprint and sends it to the feature extractor. The feature extractor extracts the features of the fingerprint and compares them with the template stored in the database. The matcher then calculates a similarity score between the two sets of features and determines whether they match or not. If the score is above a predefined threshold, the user is authenticated; otherwise, they are rejected. Verification: : The user presents their fingerprint to the sensor for identification. The sensor captures an image of the fingerprint and sends it to the feature extractor. The feature extractor extracts the features of the fingerprint and compares them with all the templates stored in the database. The matcher then ranks the templates according to their similarity scores with the input fingerprint and returns the identity of the most similar one. Identification How to use fingerprint recognition systems safely Fingerprint recognition systems are not foolproof. They may be susceptible to a range of attack types, including: Spoofing: An attacker creates a fake fingerprint from a mold, cast, or print of a genuine finger and uses it to deceive the sensor. Alteration: An attacker modifies their own fingerprint by cutting, burning, or grafting skin to change its pattern. Obfuscation: An attacker covers their own fingerprint with dirt, oil, or other substances to reduce its quality or clarity. Denial: An attacker damages or destroys the sensor or the database to prevent legitimate users from accessing the system. Replay: An attacker captures and replays a fingerprint image or signal to the sensor or the system.
Notably, to prevent or mitigate these attacks, users should follow some best practices when using fingerprint recognition systems, such as: Keep your fingers clean and dry before touching the sensor. Do not share your fingerprints with anyone or leave them on surfaces that can be easily accessed by others. Use additional factors of authentication, such as passwords, PINs, tokens, or cards, along with your fingerprints. Choose a reliable and secure system that has anti-spoofing and liveness detection capabilities. Report any suspicious or abnormal activities or incidents related to your fingerprints or the system. Fingerprint Spoofing Attacks and Countermeasures Fingerprint spoofing attacks are a type of presentation attack, where an adversary tries to fool a fingerprint recognition system by presenting a fake or altered fingerprint. These attacks pose a serious threat to the security and privacy of biometric systems, as they can compromise the identity and access of legitimate users. In this article, we survey the state-of-the-art methods and techniques for fingerprint spoofing attacks and countermeasures and discuss the challenges and future directions in this field. Fingerprint spoofing attacks can be classified into two categories: and . Direct Indirect involve the fabrication and presentation of a fake fingerprint that mimics the appearance and features of a genuine one. Direct attacks involve the modification or obfuscation of a genuine fingerprint to alter its recognition outcome. Indirect attacks can be further divided into three types: 2D, 3D, and cadaver. 2D attacks use flat materials, such as paper, film, or tape, to print or transfer a fingerprint image onto a surface that can be placed on the sensor. 3D attacks use materials that can create a relief or a mold of a fingerprint, such as latex, gelatin, silicone, wax, or glue. Cadaver attacks use real human fingers that are detached from corpses or amputated from living persons. Direct attacks can be further divided into four types: alteration, obscuration, denial, and replay. Indirect attacks Alteration attacks use physical or chemical methods to change the shape or pattern of a fingerprint, such as cutting, burning, grafting, or bleaching. Obscuration attacks use substances or objects to cover or degrade the quality of a fingerprint, such as dirt, oil, gloves, or rings. Denial attacks use methods to damage or destroy the sensor or the system components, such as smashing, tampering, or hacking. Replay attacks use methods to capture and replay a fingerprint image or signal to the sensor or the system, such as eavesdropping, recording, or injecting. Fingerprint spoofing countermeasures are techniques that aim to detect and prevent fingerprint spoofing attacks. They can be classified into two categories: and . hardware-based software-based use additional sensors or devices to capture additional information about the fingerprint or the finger, such as temperature, pulse, blood pressure, skin texture, color, moisture, elasticity, response time, and movement. Software-based countermeasures use algorithms or models to analyze the fingerprint image or signal and extract features or patterns that can distinguish between genuine and fake fingerprints. Hardware-based countermeasures Hardware-based countermeasures have the advantage of being more robust and reliable than software-based ones, as they can capture physiological or behavioral characteristics that are difficult to fake or modify. However, they also have some drawbacks, such as being more expensive, complex, intrusive, and user-unfriendly than software-based ones. have the advantage of being more flexible and adaptable than hardware-based ones, as they can be implemented on existing sensors and systems without requiring additional hardware. However, they also have some drawbacks, such as being more vulnerable to noise, variability, and spoofing techniques than hardware-based ones. Software-based countermeasures : Some examples of hardware-based countermeasures are Thermal sensors that measure the heat emitted by the finger. Optical sensors that capture the subsurface structure of the finger. Capacitive sensors that measure the electric charge of the finger. Pressure sensors that measure the force applied by the finger. Liveness detection devices that verify the presence of vital signs in the finger. Some examples of software-based countermeasures are: Texture analysis methods that extract features from the fingerprint image based on its gray-level distribution. Frequency analysis methods that extract features from the fingerprint image based on its spectral properties. Minutiae analysis methods that extract features from the fingerprint image based on its ridge endings and bifurcations. Machine learning methods that use classifiers or neural networks to learn patterns from genuine and fake fingerprints. Anti-spoofing algorithms that detect anomalies or inconsistencies in the fingerprint image or signal. Fingerprint spoofing attacks and countermeasures are an active and evolving research area in biometric security. Some of the challenges and future directions in this field are: Developing more realistic and diverse spoofing materials and techniques that can challenge existing countermeasures. Developing more robust and accurate countermeasures that can cope with different types and qualities of fingerprints and sensors. Developing more standardized and comprehensive datasets and protocols for evaluating fingerprint spoofing attacks and countermeasures. Developing more user-friendly and privacy-preserving countermeasures that can balance security and convenience for users. Developing more integrated and holistic countermeasures that can combine multiple hardware and software techniques for enhanced protection. The Role of the Industries Manufacturing Fingerprint Recognition Mechanisms The industries manufacturing fingerprint recognition mechanisms should play an important role in guarding against fingerprint spoofing attacks. They should: Follow the standards and guidelines for fingerprint recognition systems developed by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and other relevant organizations. These standards and guidelines specify the formats, protocols, and performance requirements for exchanging and processing fingerprint data. . Implement the best practices and recommendations for fingerprint recognition systems provided by NIST and other experts. These best practices and recommendations cover various aspects of fingerprint recognition systems, such as sensor design, image quality, feature extraction, matching algorithms, liveness detection, anti-spoofing techniques, and system security. . Conduct regular testing and evaluation of their fingerprint recognition mechanisms using the tools and methods developed by NIST and other entities. These tools and methods enable the industries to measure the accuracy, reliability, interoperability, and robustness of their fingerprint recognition mechanisms against various types of spoofing attacks. . Collaborate with other stakeholders, such as government agencies, academic institutions, and user groups, to share information, experiences, and feedback on fingerprint recognition systems. This collaboration can help the industries to identify the emerging trends, challenges, and opportunities in fingerprint recognition technologies and applications. . The Role of the Government Agencies in Regards to Fingerprint Recognition Security The role of the government agencies in regards to fingerprint recognition security is to: Develop and implement policies and regulations that govern the collection, storage, sharing, and use of fingerprint data for various purposes, such as law enforcement, immigration, national security, and civil services. These policies and regulations should balance the benefits and risks of fingerprint recognition systems, and protect the rights and privacy of individuals. Establish and maintain standards and guidelines for fingerprint recognition systems, such as the formats, protocols, and performance requirements for exchanging and processing fingerprint data. These standards and guidelines should ensure the interoperability, accuracy, reliability, and robustness of fingerprint recognition systems across different domains and platforms. Support and fund research and development activities that aim to improve the quality, efficiency, and security of fingerprint recognition systems. These activities should include the evaluation and testing of existing and emerging technologies, methods, and techniques for fingerprint capture, extraction, matching, liveness detection, anti-spoofing, and biometric fusion. , Fingerprint recognition is a powerful and convenient technology that can provide high levels of security and convenience for various applications. However, it is not immune to spoofing attacks that can compromise its effectiveness and trustworthiness. Therefore, it is important to use it wisely and responsibly and to implement appropriate countermeasures that can prevent or detect fingerprint spoofing and ensure the integrity and privacy of biometric data. In Conclusion Moreover, it is essential to have a collaborative and coordinated effort among the industries manufacturing fingerprint recognition mechanisms, the government agencies regulating and supporting fingerprint recognition systems, and the users and stakeholders benefiting from fingerprint recognition systems. By doing so, we can enhance the security and reliability of fingerprint recognition systems and protect the identity and access of legitimate users. Featured image by Geralt on Pixabay

Fingerprint Recognition Security: A Concise Guide On The Need To Know

is a modern cybersecurity approach that challenges the traditional perimeter-based model by assuming no user or device can be trusted by default. It operates on the principle of continuously verifying and validating access requests, ensuring only authorized entities have access to sensitive resources. This approach mitigates risks associated with insider threats, external attacks, and the increasing complexity of network environments. Implementing Zero Trust involves implementing comprehensive security measures such as multifactor authentication, encryption, and least privilege access controls. These safeguards prevent unauthorized access and reduce the potential harm that malicious actors might cause. By continuously monitoring and evaluating access requests, organizations can detect and respond to suspicious activities in real-time, reducing the likelihood of successful attacks. With the increasing prevalence of remote work and cloud-based services, adopting a zero-trust approach is essential in today's digital landscape to protect sensitive data. Zero Trust Security Architecture More Remote Workers Means an Increased Need for Remote Access The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the shift towards remote work, leading to an increase in employees accessing corporate networks from non-traditional office environments. This has highlighted the importance of secure remote access solutions to protect data and maintain organizational network integrity. Organizations must establish robust authentication and authorization mechanisms to verify remote users' identities and permissions, minimizing unauthorized access and data breaches. Multi-factor authentication, combining passwords, biometrics, and one-time passcodes, is recommended. Regular updates and patching of remote access software and devices are crucial to mitigating vulnerabilities. Monitoring and logging mechanisms for remote access activities can detect malicious actions and provide a comprehensive log for future reference in case of security breaches. In today's digital environment, securing remote access solutions is essential for safeguarding confidential information and maintaining network security. Two-factor authentication is a security measure for remote access, requiring employees to input a password and a unique code sent to their mobile device. This ensures unauthorized individuals cannot successfully authenticate without the second factor. Regular updates and patches are implemented to mitigate vulnerabilities and minimize unauthorized access. Monitoring and logging remote access activities helps detect suspicious or unauthorized login attempts, allowing users to respond promptly. Comprehensive training is provided to employees on optimal protocols for secure remote access, emphasizing the importance of using robust passwords and avoiding public Wi-Fi networks. Example: Challenges & Benefits of Monitoring and Logging Remote Access Activities Remote monitoring ensures adherence to security policies and regulations, including regular password updates and secure network usage. This solution reduces potential data breaches and unauthorized access to sensitive information. Despite appearing intrusive, remote monitoring's benefits in mitigating security breaches and enhancing overall security make it an essential procedure for large organizations with a remote workforce. This data-driven approach enhances security, optimizes workflow, and drives overall organizational efficiency. By closely monitoring remote workers, tasks and projects are completed in a timely manner, and resources are allocated accordingly. Challenges of Zero Trust Security Architecture for Remote Workers 1. Difficulty in implementing and managing the complex infrastructure: The implementation and management of a zero-trust security architecture can be challenging for remote workers due to its complexity. This involves multiple layers of security measures, including authentication, authorization, and continuous monitoring, to ensure only trusted users and devices can access sensitive resources. The dynamic nature of remote work environments adds to the complexity. Organizations must consider potential risks, such as increased vulnerability to cyberattacks and data breaches, and implement robust security protocols like multi-factor authentication and encrypted communication channels. Regular monitoring and auditing of access logs and user activities are crucial for identifying and mitigating potential security threats. A comprehensive and proactive approach is needed to safeguard sensitive resources and maintain the integrity of the organization's digital infrastructure. In a remote work environment, employees can access their company's VPN using multi-factor authentication, which involves entering their password and a unique code generated by an authentication app on their smartphone. This extra layer of security prevents unauthorized access even if someone manages to obtain the password. Encryption protects all communication channels between employees and the company's servers, ensuring that only authorized parties can decipher and scramble data transmission. The company regularly updates its security protocols and conducts vulnerability assessments to identify and address potential weaknesses, ensuring a high level of security and protecting sensitive information from unauthorized access. For example, 2. Balancing security measures with user experience and productivity: The company prioritizes a balance between robust security measures and a user-friendly experience. They use biometric or two-factor authentication to enhance security and streamline the login process. The IT department regularly seeks employee feedback to identify areas for improvement without compromising productivity. This proactive approach ensures security measures are effective and minimize disruptions to daily operations. By actively involving employees in the security process, the company ensures practical changes align with their needs. This collaborative approach fosters a culture of security awareness and responsibility, encouraging employees to adhere to protocols and guidelines. This approach maintains a strong security posture while maintaining high productivity levels. By regularly updating security protocols and guidelines, the company stays ahead of emerging threats and ensures that employees are equipped with the latest knowledge and tools to protect sensitive information. Additionally, conducting regular training sessions and awareness campaigns helps reinforce the importance of security practices and empowers employees to be proactive in identifying potential risks. This holistic approach not only strengthens the company's security posture but also enhances overall productivity by creating a well-informed and vigilant workforce. 3. Ensuring consistent security across different devices and networks: In today's interconnected world, organizations must ensure consistent security across devices and networks. This includes robust encryption protocols, multi-factor authentication, and regular updates to security patches and software. By monitoring and securing all devices and networks, companies can minimize data breaches and unauthorized access, providing a secure environment for employees. Employees should be educated on cybersecurity hygiene, including phishing prevention, secure password practices, and cautious access to sensitive information on public networks. Implementing virtual private networks (VPNs) can add an extra layer of protection for remote work. These proactive measures strengthen the organization's overall security posture and ensure data and system safety. Benefits of Zero Trust Security Architecture for Remote Workers 1. Enhanced protection against data breaches and insider threats: Zero Trust Security Architecture is a security model that focuses on verifying and validating every user and device attempting to access a network, reducing the risk of unauthorized access and insider threats. This approach eliminates the traditional perimeter-based security model, allowing attackers to pass multiple layers of authentication and authorization to gain access to sensitive data or systems. It also allows organizations to closely monitor and control user behavior, ensuring any suspicious activity is flagged and investigated promptly. This proactive approach allows for quicker responses to potential threats, limiting damage caused by malicious actors. Zero Trust Security Architecture provides a comprehensive defense system that prioritizes security and protects sensitive information from unauthorized access. For instance, a company could implement a Zero Trust approach by requiring multi-factor authentication for all employees accessing their network, regardless of their location. This additional layer of security prevents unauthorized access even if login credentials are compromised. Continuous monitoring and analysis of network traffic for suspicious activity enables companies to identify and respond to potential threats before they can cause significant damage. 2. Improved visibility and control over remote access activities: The Zero Trust approach enhances security through multi-factor authentication and provides companies with improved visibility and control over remote access activities. By closely monitoring network traffic, organizations can gain real-time insights into who is accessing their network and from where, detecting abnormal behavior and taking immediate action to mitigate potential risks. Granular access controls and permissions can be set for remote employees, ensuring they only have access to resources and data needed for their job duties. This proactive approach to network security helps businesses stay ahead of potential threats and protect their valuable assets. Real-time network traffic monitoring is a crucial component of an effective cybersecurity strategy, providing visibility and control to safeguard network infrastructure. 3. Facilitates secure collaboration and remote productivity: In the digital age, businesses need to prioritize network security to ensure secure collaboration and remote productivity. Implementing robust security measures like secure VPNs and encrypted communication channels ensures sensitive information remains confidential and protected from unauthorized access. Remote employees can access company resources and applications securely, enhancing productivity and fostering a flexible work environment. Network security also provides protection against cyber threats and attacks through firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and antivirus software. These measures minimize the risk of data breaches and unauthorized access, safeguard valuable assets, and instill confidence among clients and partners. Investing in robust network security measures is crucial for businesses to operate smoothly and maintain a competitive advantage in the digital landscape. Key Components of Zero Trust Security Architecture for Remote Workers 1. Identity and access management (IAM) solutions: Identity and access management (IAM) solutions are essential for implementing a zero-trust security architecture for remote workers. They provide a centralized system for managing user identities, authentication, and authorization, ensuring only authorized individuals have access to sensitive resources and data. Strong authentication methods like multi-factor authentication and biometric authentication strengthen the security posture. IAM solutions enforce strict access controls, granting employees access only for job functions, minimizing data breaches and insider threats. They also offer centralized control and visibility over user access, enabling easy tracking and monitoring of user activities. Regular review and updating of access permissions ensures the security of sensitive resources and data. 2. Multi-factor authentication (MFA) for strong user authentication: Multi-factor authentication (MFA) is a crucial security measure that requires users to provide multiple forms of identification, such as a password, fingerprint, or one-time passcode, to enhance user authentication. This method reduces the risk of unauthorized access and protects against identity theft or account takeover. MFA is especially important for sensitive systems and data, where a single authentication factor may not be enough. It also helps detect and prevent phishing attacks by adding an additional step for attackers to bypass. Implementing MFA is a proactive measure for organizations and individuals to enhance their security posture and safeguard their digital assets. 3. Network segmentation and micro-segmentation to limit lateral movement: Network segmentation and micro-segmentation are two strategies that organizations can employ to improve their security stance and mitigate the risk of lateral movement within their networks. Organizations can mitigate the potential impact of a breach or unauthorized access by partitioning a network into smaller, isolated segments. This approach effectively mitigates potential threats and hinders attackers from horizontally traversing the network in order to gain unauthorized access to sensitive data or systems. To take the idea even further, micro-segmentation adds specific access controls and policies to each segment. This makes it harder for people to get in and lessens the chance of attacks. By implementing these security measures, organizations can effectively decrease the likelihood of unauthorized access and minimize the potential harm resulting from a breach. Micro-segmentation serves the purpose of restricting an attacker's lateral movement within the network and, in the event of a breach, limiting the attacker's access to a designated segment. This containment strategy successfully lessens the potential damage the breach could cause. Using granular access controls and policies also helps organizations find and stop any potentially bad activity, which makes their overall security stronger. Investing in micro-segmentation offers organizations an efficient defense strategy against unauthorized access and potential data breaches. Best Practices for Implementing Zero Trust Security Architecture for Remote Workers 1. Conducting regular security assessments and vulnerability scans: Regularly conducting security assessments and vulnerability scans is an essential best practice when implementing a Zero Trust security architecture for remote workers. The purpose of these assessments is to assist organizations in identifying any potential weaknesses or vulnerabilities within their network infrastructure, devices, and applications. Organizations can proactively address any potential security gaps by conducting regular scans, thereby mitigating the risk of exploitation by malicious actors. Implementing comprehensive security assessments also helps organizations get a full picture of their overall security situation and make smart choices about where to put their resources to improve things. In addition, this technology allows organizations to maintain compliance with industry regulations and standards by effectively identifying any deficiencies in their security controls. Implementing effective compliance measures not only mitigates the risk of incurring substantial financial penalties but also serves to bolster the organization's standing and foster confidence among its stakeholders. Organizations can ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of their sensitive data, as well as protect it from unauthorized access and potential data breaches, by conducting regular security assessments. In today's dynamic threat landscape, it is imperative to prioritize comprehensive security assessments as a means to uphold a robust and resilient security posture. : 2. Providing security awareness training The provision of security awareness training is an essential component in maintaining a robust security posture. Employees are frequently identified as the most vulnerable aspect in an organization's security framework due to their potential susceptibility to phishing scams and other forms of social engineering. Organizations can enhance the security of their environment by providing employees with education on prevalent security threats and effective data protection practices. This enables the workforce to make well-informed decisions and actively contribute to maintaining a secure environment. As another way to remind employees how important it is to use strong passwords, encryption tools, and follow the right procedures for handling data, regular training sessions can be used. Investing in security awareness training can ultimately foster a security-oriented culture within the organization. This entails encouraging employees to be vigilant and proactive in identifying and reporting potential security risks. This not only enhances the overall security stance but also fosters a culture of responsibility and accountability among employees in safeguarding sensitive information. Furthermore, the establishment of a robust security culture has the potential to bolster customer trust and confidence in the organization, resulting in heightened levels of customer satisfaction and loyalty. Conclusion In conclusion, the establishment of a robust security culture within an organization is of utmost importance in the current digital environment. Companies can significantly mitigate the likelihood of data breaches and cyber-attacks by implementing robust security training programs and fostering a culture of accountability among employees. Furthermore, the establishment of a strong security culture can have a favorable influence on customer relationships. Organizations that prioritize the safeguarding of sensitive information are more likely to earn the trust of clients, thereby increasing the likelihood of continued business transactions. Investing in a security culture is a strategic decision that directly impacts the long-term success and reputation of a company.

Pros and Cons of Zero Trust Security Architecture for Remote Workers

In today's business landscape, there is a constant push for digital innovation and rapid development, often leaving cybersecurity as an afterthought. However, Identity and Access Management (IAM) plays a critical role in safeguarding your digital assets and ensuring secure access for authorized users. From user identification to access regulation and activity logging, IAM provides a robust framework that fortifies against cyber threats while promoting operational efficiency and future scalability. The ABCs (Or AAAs) of Identity and Access Management IAM is a core security pillar for businesses, responsible for identifying users, regulating access, and diligently logging every action within your system. It's a complex framework that encompasses identification, authentication, authorization, and accounting (aka auditing), working together to build a strong defence mechanism for your business. By protecting your operations and maintaining your organisation's reputation through a comprehensive IAM strategy, you'll be well-positioned in future-proofing your business. Identification: This involves managing unique user identities within a system. User identity refers to the directory information of each user, which is distinct from authentication. This could be their username, email address, or even teams or roles within the organization. Authentication: Verifying user credentials, often using protocols like OAuth2 or OpenID Connect. In a typical modern application, this could involve issuing JSON Web Tokens (JWTs) after the user identity has been authenticated along with encoded data about the user, such as their unique ID, roles, and any other data required for the application to function. Authorization: Implementing fine-grained access controls to resources. There are different methods for achieving this, such as Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) and Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC). RBAC assigns permissions based on the role of an individual within an organization, whereas ABAC allows for a more nuanced control by defining access policies based on user and resource attributes and context, enabling more flexible and dynamic access control. Accounting: Diligently logging user actions for traceability, accountability and auditing. By recording every action, you create an audit trail that can be invaluable for identifying security incidents, understanding user behavior, and ensuring regulatory compliance. Centralized logging solutions, such as Datadog, Elastic or Loki, can be particularly effective in managing logs across various services, providing a comprehensive overview that is crucial for thorough and effective auditing. By fortifying your applications with a robust IAM strategy, you not only secure your operations but also create a system designed for scalability and future growth. Crafting a Robust IAM Policy Crafting a robust IAM policy is a blend of technical acumen and product requirement understanding. It entails real-time system monitoring, analysing access patterns, and refining policies based on data-driven insights as well as future roadmap consideration. For instance, deploying monitoring tools that provide alerts for abnormal behaviour or excessive access requests can help identify potential security vulnerabilities. Analyzing these patterns over time can allow you to fine-tune access control policies and establish a more granular level of control, such as by implementing role-based access control (RBAC) or attribute-based access control (ABAC) models. In addition, using these insights to develop 'least privilege' access principles ensures that users have the minimum levels of access they need to perform their roles, thereby minimizing the potential damage from a compromised account. Regularly reviewing and updating these access privileges in line with changes in staff roles or project requirements is also a vital part of maintaining a secure IAM policy. This proactive approach not only bolsters your security but also aids in meeting regulatory compliance requirements, as it provides the necessary evidence to demonstrate control over access to sensitive data. IAM's Role in Compliance and Risk Management IAM is vital for risk management and regulatory compliance within a business. It standardizes access policies across architectures, preventing security gaps, and streamlines compliance processes and licensing. IAM's auditable logs provide user activity tracking, key for identifying anomalies and demonstrating compliance. For GDPR or HIPAA, IAM manages and enforces access to sensitive data, ensuring authorized access and maintaining compliance. Features like risk-based authentication, which adjusts policies based on factors like location or unusual behavior, add an intelligent layer to access control, reducing security risks. Selecting the Right IAM Solutions Selecting effective IAM solutions involves understanding your technical objectives, user types, and access control models. It's crucial to remember that IAM is a combination of technologies, each specializing in different areas such as authentication, directory services, authorization, and logging. Assess your needs for RBAC, ABAC, or a mix. Your chosen solutions should integrate well with your tech stack, offer APIs, and scale to match your evolving needs, including Single Sign-On (SSO), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), and social login functionalities. Ensure your solutions provide detailed audit logs for regulatory compliance and security monitoring. Careful planning will lead you to a combination of IAM solutions that perfectly align with your technical requirements. Overcoming IAM Implementation Challenges Implementing an IAM solution presents technical challenges, such as defining granular permission roles, accommodating user and application growth, and integrating diverse tech stacks. Tackle these by applying the principle of least privilege, ensuring scalability, and supporting various protocols like OAuth, OpenID, SAML, and LDAP. For the authorization aspect of IAM, solutions like Cerbos can provide the necessary flexibility and scalability. Putting IAM at the forefront of your business strategy helps protect your operations and fosters a culture of security awareness, crucial for your business's continued growth and success. By understanding the complexities of IAM and carefully selecting the right tools for each component, you can effectively manage your digital identities and secure access to your resources.

The Role of Identity and Access Management in The Security of Your Business

Building Enterprise-Grade Security Solutions For Web3

I recently spoke with Andrew Beal, the spokesperson of , on Web3 security, the rise in DeFi hacks, and where blockchain protocols are going wrong. Forta Q: Welcome, Andrew. Before getting into specifics, can you give us an overview of the Web3 industry’s security infrastructure. Hey, thanks for having me. So in terms of security infrastructure, let’s partition this discussion. There’s smart contract security, and there’s traditional Web 2 security, and teams need to invest in both. I break smart contract security up in two buckets - pre-deployment security and post-deployment security. Before you deploy your smart contracts, you should leverage templates to the extent possible, and get multiple, independent code audits. After you deploy, it’s common practice to put a bug bounty program in place to encourage white hats to identify vulnerabilities. The other two pillars of post-deployment security are real-time monitoring and alerting, and incident response. The Forta Network, for example, monitors on-chain activity in real-time for threats and anomalies, but there is a close relationship between the alerts emitted by Forta and the incident response function. Alerts are only helpful if teams can timely respond to them. You also can’t forget about the Web 2 components - every project has to secure their website, emails accounts, private keys, physical infrastructure, etc. A lot of hacks are the result of poor security practices in these areas. We see a lack of understanding and an underinvestment from teams across the board.  If you look at the , hackers . In absolute numbers, losses rose by 79% from 2020. Now we think most of these attacks were preventable. data from Chainalysis stole $14 billion in 2021 Q: Why do you say these Web3 attacks and hacks are preventable? Can you explain why some Web3 protocols fail to prevent these attacks in some instances? First, a lot of hacks occur because teams aren’t following best practice with respect to their “Web 2 components” - private key management, account security, access controls, etc. There’s nothing Web 3 about these, and simply following best practice would have prevented them. Second, there’s a misconception that most smart contract exploits are atomic - meaning they occur in a single block. Over 50% of exploits actually occur over several blocks. We can dissect the anatomy of a Web3 attack into four phases, known as the “kill chain”. In the first stage (Funding), attackers gather funds to pay transaction fees for high-volume trades and accumulate collateral for loans. In the second stage (Preparation), attackers often deploy special smart contracts used to carry out the attack. In the third stage (Exploitation), hackers execute the attack by draining funds from smart contracts or user’s wallets. And finally, in the fourth stage (Money Laundering), attackers launder stolen proceeds through privacy protocols like Tornado Cash. If you identify an exploit attempt early enough in the kill chain, you have an opportunity to prevent it. Today, the only means of prevention are either pausing the protocol, or frontrunning the malicious transaction. In the future, we expect there to be more mechanisms for incident response, which may include things like transaction simulations, and user and contract reputation systems. Q: What is the modus operandi of Forta? How does Forta prevent Web3 attacks? Forta is a decentralized network for monitoring, detecting, and alerting users about potential threats and anomalies. Forta monitors and protects over $36 billion across Ethereum, Polygon, Binance Smart Chain, Arbitrum, Optimism, Avalanche, and Fantom. We have a vast network of executing over 1,000+ Detection Bots to monitor, alert, and prevent Web3 attacks. 12,000+ Scan Nodes There are two primary components to the Forta Network - bots and scan nodes. Bots are pieces of code that act like little virtual security cameras, monitoring something specific on-chain. Scan nodes are like the alarm system behind the scenes that run the bots against each block of transaction. If a bot finds what it’s looking for in a block, the node running that bot emits a public alert. Forta’s role in attack prevention is to detect threats and other malicious activity as early as possible. By alerting our users as early as possible, they have an opportunity to take preventative action. Q: Can you elaborate on some of Forta's techniques for preventing Web3 attacks? How are Forta’s monitoring systems different from other monitoring protocols in the market? The Forta developer community has built bots leveraging a variety of techniques to monitor and detect threats. One of these techniques is Attack Simulation. The bot simulates an attack, mimicking the exploit transaction locally before it happens on-chain. Another strategy used is Time Series Analysis, where Bots map historical data variance within a fixed time frame. This helps create a ‘normal range’ and bandwidth within which the data can fluctuate without generating any alerts. However, when the value deviates from the expected range, the bot generates an alert. Time series analysis provides efficient threat detection, as it can ignore routine spikes and variabilities. More and more bots are also using data science and machine learning techniques.. For example, our uses the ML algorithm to identify abnormal transaction activity for ERC-20 token transfers. Similarly, bots use the to create clusters and label wallet addresses based on transaction activity. Anomalous Token Transfers Detection Bot Isolation Forest StackingClassifier Q: How do you envision the future of Web3 security? Will Web3 attacks cease to exist with the emergence of security and monitoring networks? The answer to your second question is no; attacks won’t go away. In fact, they will evolve and get more sophisticated over time. Our detection and prevention techniques will also improve. This is the nature of any adversarial environment. To your first question around the future of Web 3 security, I think it requires a combination of upfront prevention and real-time detection. There are things we can do up front to identify bad actors and malicious transactions, such as requiring transactions above a certain dollar amount to be simulated before they are broadcast and included in a block. At some point in the future, I expect we’ll have better on-chain reputation systems for both users and EOAs, which should make it easier to identify suspicious actors and contracts. In conjunction with upfront prevention, teams should also be investing in real-time detection capabilities, because no matter how hard you try, you won’t be able to prevent every single attack.

ABNORMAL SECURITY

abnormalsecurity.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

ABNORMAL SECURITY

EVERGREEN INDEX #761

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Abnormal Security WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!

ABNORMAL SECURITY

abnormalsecurity.com

-- employees

Since n.d.

COMPANY RANKING

ABNORMAL SECURITY

EVERGREEN INDEX #761

RELATED COMPANIESRANK

STORIES ABOUT ABNORMAL SECURITY

Representing this company? Click here to claim and customize this page!

Abnormal Security WIKI

Apply to get your Tech Company News Page live on HackerNoon.com today!