The American crypto-financial industry has witnessed a massive rivalry in recent years. Two prominent “actors”, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), keep their powder dry for regulatory superiority.
This article examines the legal outlines of this battle, exploring the contentious issues, learning points, and the discussion of whether regulatory clarity or continued friction will shape the future of crypto in the US.
The SEC is an independent federal government regulatory agency responsible for protecting investors, maintaining fair and orderly functioning of the securities markets, and facilitating capital formation. It was created by Congress in 1934 as the first federal regulator of the securities markets.
The SEC promotes full public disclosure, protects investors against fraudulent and manipulative practices in the market, and monitors corporate takeover actions in the United States. It also approves registration statements for bookrunners among underwriting firms. (
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit set aside the judgment against EOX Holdings, L.L.C., and Andrew Gizienski, which the Commodity Futures Trading Commission initiated.
In a dispute over broker conduct, the CFTC accused EOX and Andrew Gizienski of disregarding client consent by trading against their interests. However, finding the CFTC's interpretation of the rule unclear and unannounced, the Fifth Circuit Court overturned the judgment.
The case focused on Gizienski's discretionary trades for client Jason Vaccaro.
The case centered on Gizienski's client-authorized trades allegedly opposing other clients, a practice the CFTC deemed consent-violating. However, upholding fair notice principles, the court found the CFTC's interpretation unduly broad, reversing the penalty judgment and part of the injunction and remanding the case.
In June 2023, the SEC
Offering unregistered securities: The SEC argues that specific tokens listed on Binance meet the definition of "securities" yet were sold without proper registration.
Deficient anti-money laundering (AML) and know-your-customer (KYC) control: Concerns were raised about potential money laundering risks due to allegedly weak enforcement measures.
Arguments and proceedings are still updating the case. If the SEC prevails, it could set a precedent for stricter oversight and enforcement, potentially hindering the industry's growth. Conversely, a victory for Binance could embolden other exchanges and challenge the SEC's regulatory reach.
The SEC has sent a "perfunctory" notification to Coinbase about a potential lawsuit regarding their crypto offerings. Coinbase called the notice a "delay tactic" and demanded the SEC respond to their year-old petition seeking clear crypto regulations.
When the SEC didn't comply, Coinbase preemptively sued the commission, seeking a court order forcing them to address their petition.
Coinbase's offerings may violate existing securities laws but acknowledge the need for more explicit regulations. The ongoing lawsuit could set a precedent for how cryptocurrencies are regulated in the US.
Recognize the differing focuses of the CFTC and SEC. The CFTC primarily regulates derivatives and futures contracts, while the SEC concentrates on securities offerings and exchanges.
Aligning your offerings with the appropriate regulatory framework is crucial to avoid overlap and potential conflict.
Despite increased enforcement, regulatory clarity in crypto remains a significant challenge. Seek legal counsel to navigate ambiguities and stay informed about evolving interpretations of existing regulations.
Striking a balance between robust compliance and ongoing innovation is critical. Implementing proactive compliance measures can shield your business from enforcement actions while fostering trust and stability.
The agencies are increasingly scrutinizing celebrity endorsements and marketing tactics used in the crypto space. Focus on building your business on sustainable fundamentals and avoid hype-driven promotions.
What can be changed via this situation in the near future?
Both CFTC and SEC could potentially change the following aspects of the crypto industry shortly:
Setting margin requirements and regulating crypto swaps, potentially involving stricter oversight of exchanges offering them.
Clarification of the legal status of different token types to determine applicable regulations.
Oversight of crypto exchanges that offer derivatives trading, particularly those catering to US customers.
As the author says in this
article , there will be many unexpected twists between the SEC and CFTC, so stay tuned! But presumptive:
Joint SEC-CFTC task forces or memorandums of understanding could be established to manage shared responsibilities and reduce overlaps.
Congress might pass clarifying legislation to delineate jurisdictional boundaries, although reaching a consensus will likely be challenging.
Continued lawsuits seeking clarity on specific tokens' classification could further muddy the waters.
The CFTC and SEC's rivalry over cryptocurrency regulation reflects a more profound challenge: adapting existing frameworks to a rapidly changing cryptocurrency world. As the cryptosphere expands, its participants should demonstrate stability and integrity within the regulatory system.
Investors need assurance, developers require a predictable path, and both seek protection from emergencies.
Overall, expect conflict or resolution in 2024 to be incremental and piecemeal, with ongoing tension between the SEC and CFTC until a more definitive framework emerges if the path of war or collaboration, prioritizing safety, consumer rights, legislation, and innovation will be the decisive moment in this financial world.