Breaking Down the New Jersey Antitrust Lawsuit Against Amazon

COUNT XII: VIOLATION OF THE NEW JERSEY ANTITRUST ACT (MONOPOLY MAINTENANCE)

497. Plaintiff State of New Jersey repeats and realleges and incorporates by reference each and every preceding paragraph and allegation of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein.

498. The New Jersey Antitrust Act, N.J.S.A. 56:9-4(a), states:

It shall be unlawful for any person to monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, or to combine or conspire with any person or persons, to monopolize trade or commerce in any relevant market within this State.

499. In the operation of its business, Amazon engaged in numerous commercial practices that violate the New Jersey Antitrust Act, N.J.S.A. 56:9-1 to -19, including monopolizing or attempting to monopolize trade or commerce in the online superstore market and the market for online marketplace services within the State of New Jersey, in violation of N.J.S.A. 56:9-4.

500. Each violation of the New Jersey Antitrust Act by Amazon constitutes a separate unlawful practice and violation, under N.J.S.A. 56:9-16.

501. Plaintiff State of New Jersey seeks all remedies available under the New Jersey Antitrust Act, N.J.S.A. 56:9-1 to -19, including, without limitation, the following:

(a) Injunctive and other equitable relief, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:9-7 and N.J.S.A. 56:9-10(a);

(b) Costs and attorney’s fees, pursuant to N.J.S.A. 56:9-12; and

(c) Other remedies as the Court may deem appropriate and the interests of justice may require.