Where We Are Classic production and business processes are usually planned, implemented, and evaluated in that order. If something goes wrong, and it usually does, one must return to the drawing board. Even if everything proceeds according to plan, there are always limitations in terms of resources. But what are these natural constraints? You will always encounter limiting factors such as: Manpower: The size of your team is restricted by the availability of skilled labor. Time: There is only so much any individual can accomplish within a given period. Money: Revenue must ultimately exceed costs to ensure sustainability. Scalability: Expanding operations introduces overhead and inefficiencies. Diminishing returns, especially in human-centered processes, often feel like a natural law. Manpower: The size of your team is restricted by the availability of skilled labor. Time: There is only so much any individual can accomplish within a given period. Money: Revenue must ultimately exceed costs to ensure sustainability. Scalability: Expanding operations introduces overhead and inefficiencies. Diminishing returns, especially in human-centered processes, often feel like a natural law. This has been the reality for a long time. But things are beginning to change. Welcome to Autonomy Autonomous systems, powered by artificial intelligence and robotics, offer a way to overcome these traditional constraints. Imagine a world where you can expand your workforce simply by pressing a button. Need more software developers? Launch more intelligent coding agents. Need customer service for different time zones? Deploy multilingual conversational agents at once. What matters most is the capability of the agent. If it requires constant supervision, it is just a sophisticated autocomplete tool. Real autonomy means the system accepts your objective, handles all the intermediate steps, and delivers a final result. If you are not satisfied, you can provide feedback and restart the process. You will shift from overseeing every detail to evaluating outcomes. In this way, the nature of work changes completely. As these systems become faster and more efficient, even time itself becomes less of a limitation. Tasks that once took weeks may soon take minutes. The first fields to benefit are non-physical ones such as: Software development Legal research Graphic design Software development Legal research Graphic design But the physical world is next. The Physical World The Physical World Imagine speeding up the construction of your home by sending additional autonomous machines. This is not about remote-controlled excavators or trucks. These still require human operation. Now imagine humanoid robots that operate those already existing machines without human input. A robot driving an excavator. A robot managing logistics and inventory. Suddenly, the limiting factor is no longer labor. It becomes the availability of raw materials. Even that can be addressed. Raw materials and construction elements can also be produced by automated factories running with minimal or no human presence. This creates vertical integration of autonomous productivity across the entire value chain. What limits remain? Only natural resources and available energy. We are not there yet. But we are getting close. "What is the output of an economy? It is productivity per capita times population or capita. Once you have humanoid robots, the actual economic output potential is tremendous." - Elon Musk "What is the output of an economy? It is productivity per capita times population or capita. Once you have humanoid robots, the actual economic output potential is tremendous." - Elon Musk They Will Take All Our Jobs? Many people fear that machines will replace human labor entirely. Sounds familiar? This is not a new concern. More than one hundred years ago, factory workers voiced the same fears. Entire professions have already disappeared: Telephone operators Elevator attendants Typists Telephone operators Elevator attendants Typists Technological progress has always transformed work. That is how humanity grows wealth and improves living standards. Some now argue that autonomy and robotics are fundamentally different. They worry that nobody will be needed anymore. Let us assume this is technically possible. Even then, such a transition would never happen all at once. In a market economy, automation must be adopted voluntarily and at a sustainable pace. Companies still need customers who can afford to buy products. If everyone lost their jobs overnight, there would be no demand. That makes instant full automation economically impossible. Instead, we will see gradual transitions. More goods and services will be produced with fewer human inputs. This has been happening for decades. It will continue, but not as a sudden collapse. A More Autonomous You A More Autonomous You In an ideal and quite realistic future, more people will spend time on things they want to do rather than things they must do. This does not mean idleness. It means a new age of creativity, exploration, education, and personal fulfillment. want must Autonomous systems can make you more autonomous. you Ideally, we will not descend into intellectual and cultural stagnation as depicted in the movie Idiocracy. Instead, we could see the rise of meaningful hobbies, self-initiated projects, independent learning, and social contribution. Whether that happens depends on how we structure the transition. The outcome will be shaped not just by the technology, but by the freedoms and institutions we choose to preserve or abandon. Idiocracy we choose Two Real Concerns Interference from governments Governments may attempt to control or accelerate the transition through regulation or subsidization. Over-subsidizing autonomous technologies could cause sectors to collapse before society is ready to adapt. On the other hand, excessive regulation could slow down adoption to such an extent that entire regions fall behind in global competition. In a world where innovation moves at exponential speed, falling behind can be irreversible. The right pace of transition will most likely be determined by the free market, through the interaction of supply, demand, and entrepreneurial risk-taking. Policy should enable adaptation, not replace market mechanisms. Loss of control over artificial intelligence There is a small but very real risk that advanced artificial intelligence systems could behave in unintended or dangerous ways. This includes both technical failure and malicious use. However, similar risks have existed for decades in the form of nuclear and biological weapons. The existence of such threats is not new. Can we really be sure that humans in control can guarantee safety better than an AI would? Interference from governments Governments may attempt to control or accelerate the transition through regulation or subsidization. Over-subsidizing autonomous technologies could cause sectors to collapse before society is ready to adapt. On the other hand, excessive regulation could slow down adoption to such an extent that entire regions fall behind in global competition. In a world where innovation moves at exponential speed, falling behind can be irreversible. The right pace of transition will most likely be determined by the free market, through the interaction of supply, demand, and entrepreneurial risk-taking. Policy should enable adaptation, not replace market mechanisms. Interference from governments Interference from governments Governments may attempt to control or accelerate the transition through regulation or subsidization. Over-subsidizing autonomous technologies could cause sectors to collapse before society is ready to adapt. On the other hand, excessive regulation could slow down adoption to such an extent that entire regions fall behind in global competition. In a world where innovation moves at exponential speed, falling behind can be irreversible. The right pace of transition will most likely be determined by the free market, through the interaction of supply, demand, and entrepreneurial risk-taking. Policy should enable adaptation, not replace market mechanisms. Loss of control over artificial intelligence There is a small but very real risk that advanced artificial intelligence systems could behave in unintended or dangerous ways. This includes both technical failure and malicious use. However, similar risks have existed for decades in the form of nuclear and biological weapons. The existence of such threats is not new. Can we really be sure that humans in control can guarantee safety better than an AI would? Loss of control over artificial intelligence Loss of control over artificial intelligence There is a small but very real risk that advanced artificial intelligence systems could behave in unintended or dangerous ways. This includes both technical failure and malicious use. However, similar risks have existed for decades in the form of nuclear and biological weapons. The existence of such threats is not new. Can we really be sure that humans in control can guarantee safety better than an AI would?
