Pre-trained models are easy to use, but are you glossing over details that could impact your model performance? How many times have you run the following snippets: torchvision.models models
inception = models.inception_v3(pretrained= import as or keras.applications.inception_v3 InceptionV3
base_model = InceptionV3(weights= , include_top=False) from import 'imagenet' It seems like using these pre-trained models have become a new standard for industry best practices. After all, why you take advantage of a model that’s been trained on more data and compute than you could ever muster by yourself? wouldn’t Long live pre-trained models! There are several substantial benefits to leveraging pre-trained models: super simple to incorporate achieve solid (same or even better) model performance quickly there’s not as much labeled data required versatile uses cases from transfer learning, prediction, and feature extraction Advances within the NLP space have also encouraged the use of pre-trained language models like , AllenNLP’s , Google’s , and Sebastian Ruder and Jeremy Howard’s (for an excellent over of these models, see ). GPT and GPT-2 ELMo BERT ULMFiT this TOPBOTs post One common technique for leveraging pretrained models is feature extraction, where you’re retrieving intermediate representations produced by the pretrained model and using those representations as inputs for a new model. These final fully-connected layers are generally assumed to capture information that is relevant for solving a new task. Everyone’s in on the game Every major framework like Tensorflow, Keras, PyTorch, MXNet, etc… offers pre-trained models like Inception V3, ResNet, AlexNet with weights: Keras Applications PyTorch torchvision.models Tensorflow Official Models (and now TensorFlow Hubs) MXNet Model Zoo Fast.ai Applications But are these benchmarks reproducible? The article that inspired this post came from Curtis Northcutt , a computer science PhD candidate at MIT. — His article ‘ Towards Reproducibility: Benchmarking Keras and PyTorch ’ made several interesting claims 1. architectures perform better in PyTorch and inception architectures perform better in Keras resnet 2. The on cannot be reproduced, even when exactly copying the example code. In fact, their reported accuracies (as of Feb. 2019) are usually higher than the actual accuracies (citing and ) published benchmarks Keras Applications 1 2 3. Some pre-trained Keras models yield inconsistent or lower accuracies when deployed on a server ( ) or run in sequence with other Keras models ( ) 3 4 4. Keras models using batch normalization can be unreliable. For some models, forward-pass evaluations (with gradients supposedly off) still result in weights changing at inference time. (See ) You might be wondering: 5 How is that possible? Well, you’re not alone. Curtis’ article also sparked some reactions on Twitter: Aren’t these the same model and shouldn’t they have the same performance if trained with the same conditions? and some interesting insights into the reason for these differences: Knowing (and trusting) these benchmarks are important because they allow you to make informed decisions around which framework to use and are often used as baselines for research and implementation. So what are some things to look out for when you’re leveraging these pre-trained models? Considerations for using pre-trained models 1. How similar is your task? How similar is your data? Are you expecting that cited 0.945% validation accuracy for the Keras Xception model you’re using with your new dataset of x-rays? First, you need to check how similar your data is to the original dataset that the model was trained on (in this case: ImageNet). You also need to be aware of where the features have been transferred from (the bottom, middle, or top of the network) because that will impact model performance depending on task similarity. Read and ‘ ’ CS231n — Transfer Learning How transferable are features in deep neural networks? 2. How did you preprocess the data? Your model’s pre-processing should be the same as the original model’s training. With almost all torchvision models, they use the same pre-processing values. For , you should always use the function for the corresponding model-level module. Keras models preprocess_input For example: # # VGG16 keras .applications .vgg16 .preprocess_input InceptionV3 keras .applications .inception_v3 .preprocess_input #ResNet50 keras .applications .resnet50 .preprocess_input 3. What’s your backend? There were that changing the Keras’ backend from Tensorflow to CNTK (Microsoft Cognitive toolkit) improved the performance. Since Keras is a model-level library, it does not handle lower-level operations such as tensor products, convolutions, etc… so it relies on like the TensorFlow backend and the Theano backend. some rumblings on HackerNews other tensor manipulation frameworks Max Woolf provided that found that while accuracy was the same between CNTK and Tensorflow, CNTK was faster at LSTMs and Multilayer Perceptions (MLPs) while Tensorflow was faster at CNNs and embeddings. an excellent benchmarking project Woolf’s post is from 2017, so It’d be interesting to get an updated comparison that also includes Theano and (although Theano is now deprecated). MXNet as a backend There are also some claims that there are certain versions of Theano that may ignore your seed (for a relevant post form Keras, see ) this 4. What’s your hardware? Are you using an Amazon EC2 NVIDIA Tesla K80 or a Google Compute NVIDIA Tesla P100? Maybe even a TPU? 😜 Check out these useful benchmark resources for run times for these different pretrained models. ’s Apache MXNet GluonNLP 0.6:Closing the Gap in Reproducible Research with BERT Caleb Robinson’s ‘ ’ (and of course, again, Curtis’ ) How to reproduce ImageNet validation results benchmarking post DL Bench Stanford DAWNBench TensorFlow’s performance benchmarks 5. What’s your learning rate? In practice, you should either keep the pre-trained parameters fixed (ie. use the pre-trained models as feature extractors) as or tune them with a fairly small learning in order to not unlearn everything in the original model. 6. Is there a difference in how you use optimizations like batch normalization or dropout, especially between training mode and inference mode? As Curtis’ post claims: Keras models using batch normalization can be unreliable. For some models, forward-pass evaluations (with gradients supposedly off) still result in weights changing at inference time. (See ) 5 But is this the case? why According to Vasilis Vryniotis, Principal Data Scientist at Expedia, who first identified the issue with the frozen batch normalization layer in Keras (see Vasilis’ PR and detailed blog post ): here here The problem with the current implementation of Keras is that when a batch normalization (BN) layer is frozen, it continues to use the mini-batch statistics during training. I believe a better approach when the BN is frozen is to use the moving mean and variance that it learned during training. Why? For the same reasons why the mini-batch statistics should not be updated when the layer is frozen: it can lead to poor results because the next layers are not trained properly. Vasilis also cited instances where this discrepancy led to significant drops in model performance (“from 100% down to 50% accuracy) when the Keras model is switched from train mode to test mode. Use these questions to guide how you interact with pre-trained models for your next project.

Amazon

Apache

Google

Microsoft

NVIDIA

Super

Tesla

Twitter

Getting Started with Natural Language Processing: US Airline Sentiment Analysis

Too Long; Didn't Read

Approach Pre-Trained Deep Learning Models With Caution 

Approach Pre-Trained Deep Learning Models With Caution

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Building an End-to-End Speech Recognition Model in PyTorch with AssemblyAI

It Is Okay If You Don't Know What You Like. We Do (feat. Deep Recommendation Algorithms)

10 Machine Learning, Data Science, and Deep Learning Courses for Programmers in 2020

10 Computer Vision Startups on Product Hunt with the Most Upvotes

10 Best Entry Level Machine Learning Tutorials

10 Best + Free Machine Learning Courses Collection

Building an End-to-End Speech Recognition Model in PyTorch with AssemblyAI

It Is Okay If You Don't Know What You Like. We Do (feat. Deep Recommendation Algorithms)

10 Machine Learning, Data Science, and Deep Learning Courses for Programmers in 2020

10 Computer Vision Startups on Product Hunt with the Most Upvotes

10 Best Entry Level Machine Learning Tutorials

10 Best + Free Machine Learning Courses Collection

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Minty

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps