There seems to be a misunderstanding as to how the US gov't is using anti-competition laws in the case against Apple. I'm no legal expert, but from what I've read, the core problem is Apple's various platforms allow 3rd parties but, through (limited API access, stopping legal and fair products from appearing in their stores, etc...), never actually allow for free and fair competition on said Platforms and as thus is liable to be sued. Market Manipulation Basically, you can summarize the lawsuit down to 2 points, Apple is using its platform to limit competition in unfair ways; if iOS and others were not open to 3rd parties, this really wouldn't be a problem Apple may not be the largest player per see, but its and of said power is an indication of behavior Market Power Abuse Monopolistic A good example here would be Amazon and Google. Amazon is not the only shopping website in the world (neither is Google for search), but they have a lot of . On their Platforms, they need to ensure that they don't unfairly promote their products at the expense of other competition. Basically, the competition must be fair when you have a platform (same thing with Microsoft, actually). Market Power : Gov't don't care if you're a Monopoly, what they care about is if you're actively abusing your enhanced Market Position to limit competition or promote your own products. Note necessarily : The US gov't doesn't necessarily use anti-trust laws for the sake of consumers they use it to guarantee competition and a fair playground/market place with the idea being that with more competition, customers get better deals and better products Another Note : The US gov't is not suing Apple for the Phones (they can't touch that since people are voting with their wallets there) they're suing Apple for their OS, and the rules being unfair on said OS Another Another Note Apple is abusing market power in a way that makes it difficult for it to compete on its platforms. Apple may have built the best sandbox but so long as they're allowing others to play in that sandbox they need to make sure the game is played fairly, this same rule applied to Microsoft during their anti-trust lawsuit case. Windows is Microsoft's baby, but if Microsoft unfairly promotes its products at the detriment of other competitors, then it;s an anti-trust lawsuit (as simple as that). TL;DR: Also published . here

The is an opinion piece based on the author’s POV and does not necessarily reflect the views of HackerNoon.

Empowering Your DevContainer with Podman in VS Code

Read My Stories

Portfolio

Blog

Hire Me

Buy Me a Coffee

Nominated for 2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Docker

Nominated for 2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Github

Nominated for 2022 - HackerNoon Contributor of the Year - Typescript

Too Long; Didn't Read

Boost your HackerNoon story @ $159.99! 🚀

Apple is Fighting the US Government, and the US Government is Right

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

Bundlejs: An Online Esbuild-Based Bundler

70% of Amazon's Annual Revenue Comes from American Consumers Who Pay $14.99/month for Prime

Amazon Accused of Failing To Provide Simple Cancellation Mechanism, Violating ROSCA

Amazon Accused of Unfairly Charging Consumers Without Consent

Amazon Accused of Violating the Maryland Antitrust Act

Bundlejs: An Online Esbuild-Based Bundler

70% of Amazon's Annual Revenue Comes from American Consumers Who Pay $14.99/month for Prime

Amazon Accused of Failing To Provide Simple Cancellation Mechanism, Violating ROSCA

Amazon Accused of Unfairly Charging Consumers Without Consent

Amazon Accused of Violating the Maryland Antitrust Act

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps