Observability platforms are akin to the immune system. Just like immune cells are everywhere in human bodies, an observability platform patrols every corner of your devices, components, and architectures, identifying any potential threats and proactively mitigating them. However, I might have gone too far with that metaphor because, till these days, we have never invented a system as sophisticated as the human body, but we can always make advancements. The key to upgrading an observability platform is to increase data processing speed and reduce costs. This is based on two reasons: The faster you can identify abnormalities from your data, the more you can contain the potential damage. An observability platform needs to store a sea of data, and low storage cost is the only way to make that sustainable. This post is about how GuanceDB, an observability platform, makes progress in these two aspects by replacing Elasticsearch with Apache Doris as its query and storage engine. The result is 70% less storage costs and 200%～400% data query performance. GuanceDB GuanceDB is an all-around observability solution. It provides services including data analytics, data visualization, monitoring and alerting, and security inspection. From GuanceDB, users can have an understanding of their objects, network performance, applications, user experience, system availability, etc. From the standpoint of a data pipeline, GuanceDB can be divided into two parts: data ingestion and data analysis. I will get to them one by one. Data integration For data integration, GuanceDB uses its self-made tool called DataKit. It is an all-in-one data collector that extracts from different end devices, business systems, middleware, and data infrastructure. It can also preprocess data and relate it with metadata. It provides extensive support for data, from logs, and time series metrics, to data of distributed tracing, security events, and user behaviors from mobile apps and web browsers. To cater to diverse needs across multiple scenarios, it ensures compatibility with various open-source probes and collectors as well as data sources of custom formats. Query & storage engine Data collected by DataKit goes through the core computation layer and arrives in GuanceDB, which is a multil-model database that combines various database technologies. It consists of the query engine layer and the storage engine layer. By decoupling the query engine and the storage engine, it enables pluggable and interchangeable architecture. For time series data, they built Metric Store, which is a self-developed storage engine based on VictoriaMetrics. For logs, they integrate Elasticsearch and OpenSearch. GuanceDB is performant in this architecture, while Elasticsearch demonstrates room for improvement: : Elasticsearch consumes a big share of CPU and memory resources. It is not only costly but also disruptive to query execution. Data writing : Elasticsearch provides schemaless support by Dynamic Mapping, but that’s not enough to handle large amounts of user-defined fields. In this case, it can lead to field-type conflict and, thus, data loss. Schemaless support : Large aggregation tasks often trigger a timeout error in Elasticsearch. Data aggregation So this is where the upgrade happens. GuanceDB tried and replaced Elasticsearch with . Apache Doris DQL In the GuanceDB observability platform, almost all queries involve timestamp filtering. Meanwhile, most data aggregations need to be performed within specified time windows. Additionally, there is a need to perform rollups of time series data on individual sequences within a time window. Expressing these semantics using SQL often requires nested subqueries, resulting in complex and cumbersome statements. That’s why GuanceDB developed its own Data Query Language (DQL). With simplified syntax elements and computing functions optimized for observability use cases, this DQL can query metrics, logs, object data, and data from distributed tracing. This is how DQL works together with Apache Doris. GuanceDB has found a way to make full use of the analytic power of Doris, while complementing its SQL functionalities. As is shown below, Guance-Insert is the data writing component, while Guance-Select is the DQL query engine. : It allows data of different tenants to be accumulated in different batches and strikes a balance between writing throughput and writing latency. When logs are generated in large volumes, it can maintain a low data latency of 2~3 seconds. Guance-Insert : For query execution, if the query SQL semantics or function is supported in Doris, Guance-Select will push the query down to the Doris Frontend for computation; if not, it will go for a fallback option: acquire columnar data in Arrow format via the Thrift RPC interface, and then finish computation in Guance-Select. The catch is that it cannot push the computation logic down to Doris Backend, so it can be slightly slower than executing queries in Doris Frontend. Guance-Select Observations Storage cost 70% down, query speed 300% up. Previously, with Elasticsearch clusters, they used 20 cloud virtual machines (16vCPU 64GB) and had independent index writing services (that’s another 20 cloud virtual machines). Now, with Apache Doris, they only need 13 cloud virtual machines of the same configuration in total, representing . This is contributed by three capabilities of Apache Doris: a 67% cost reduction : Under a consistent writing throughput of 1GB/s, Doris maintains a CPU usage of less than 20%. That equals 2.6 cloud virtual machines. With low CPU usage, the system is more stable and better prepared for sudden writing peaks. High writing throughput : Doris utilizes the ZSTD compression algorithm on top of columnar storage. It can realize a compression ratio of 8:1. Compared to 1.5:1 in Elasticsearch, Doris can reduce storage costs by around 80%. High data compression ratio : Doris allows a more cost-effective way to store data: to put hot data in local disks and cold data object storage. Once the storage policy is set, Doris can automatically manage the “cooldown” process of hot data and move cold data to object storage. Such data lifecycle is transparent to the data application layer, so it is user-friendly. Also, Doris speeds up cold data queries by local cache. Tiered storage With lower storage costs, Doris does not compromise query performance. It doubles the execution speed of queries that return a single row and those that return a result set. For aggregation queries without sampling, Doris runs at four times the speed of Elasticsearch. To sum up, Apache Doris achieves 2~4 times the query performance of Elasticsearch with only 1/3 of the storage cost it consumes. Inverted index for full-text search Inverted index is the magic potion for log analytics because it can considerably increase full-text search performance and reduce query overheads. It is especially useful in these scenarios: Full-text search by , , and . in combination with an inverted index is the alternative to the Elasticsearch full-text search functionality. MATCH_ALL MATCH_ANY MATCH_PHRASE MATCH_PHRASE Equivalence queries (=, ! =, IN), range queries (>, >=, <, <=), and support for numerics, DateTime, and strings. As a powerful accelerator for full-text searches, the inverted index in Doris is flexible because we witness the need for on-demand adjustments. In Elasticsearch, indexes are fixed upon creation, so there needs to be good planning of which fields need to be indexed; otherwise, any changes to the index will require a complete rewrite. In contrast, Doris allows for dynamic indexing. You can add an inverted index to a field during runtime, and it will take effect immediately. You can also decide which data partitions to create indexes on. A new data type for dynamic schema change By nature, an observability platform requires support for dynamic schema because the data it collects is prone to changes. Every click by a user on the webpage might add a new metric to the database. Looking around the database landscape, you will find that static schema is the norm. Some databases take a step further. For example, Elasticsearch realizes dynamic schema by mapping. However, this functionality can be easily interrupted by field type conflicts or unexpired historical fields. The Doris solution for the dynamic schema is a newly-introduced data type, Variant, and GuanceDB is among the first to try it out. (It will officially be available in Apache Doris V2.1.) The Variant data type is the move of Doris to embrace semi-structured data analytics. It can solve a lot of the problems that often harass database users: : A Variant column in Doris can accommodate any legal JSON data and can automatically recognize the subfields and data types. JSON data storage : The frequently occurring subfields will be stored in a column-oriented manner to facilitate analysis, while the less frequently seen subfields will be merged into the same column to streamline the data schema. Schema explosion due to too many fields : A Variant column allows different types of data in the same field and applies different storage for different data types. Write failure due to data type conflicts Difference between Variant and Dynamic Mapping From a functional perspective, the biggest difference between Variant in Doris and Dynamic Mapping in Elasticsearch is that the scope of Dynamic Mapping extends throughout the entire lifecycle of the current table, while that of Variant can be limited to the current data partition. For example, if a user has changed the business logic and renamed some Variant fields today, the old field name will remain on the partitions before today, but will not appear on the new partitions since tomorrow. So, there is a lower risk of data type conflict. In the case of field type conflicts in the same partition, the two fields will be changed to JSON type to avoid data error or data loss. For example, there are two fields in the user's business system: One is strings, and the other is numerics, so in queries, the user can decide whether to query the string field, the numeric field, or both. (E.g. If you specify in the filters, the query will only be executed on the string field.) status status = "ok" From the users’ perspective, they can use the Variant type as simply as other data types. They can add or remove Variant fields based on their business needs, and no extra syntax or annotation is required. Currently, the Variant type requires extra type assertion; we plan to automate this process in future versions of Doris. GuanceDB is one step faster in this aspect. They have realized auto-type assertions for their DQL queries. In most cases, type assertion is based on the actual data type of Variant fields. In some rare cases, when there is a type conflict, the Variant fields will be upgraded to JSON fields, and then type assertion will be based on the semantics of operators in DQL queries. Conclusion GuanceDB’s transition from Elasticsearch to Apache Doris showcases a big stride in improving data processing speed and reducing costs. For these purposes, Apache Doris has optimized itself in the two major aspects of data processing: data integration and data analysis. It has expanded its schemaless support to flexibly accommodate more data types and introduced features like inverted index and tiered storage to enable faster and more cost-effective queries. Evolution is an ongoing process. Apache Doris has never stopped improving itself. We have a lot of new features under development and the Doris embraces any input and feedback. community Also published . here

Augmentastic || Augmented Reality

Data Analytics: Apache Doris' Impact in Reporting, Tagging, and Data Lake Operations

Live Stream Data Analysis: What Happens in Real Time Needs to Be Analyzed in Real Time

Join the Apache Doris community on Slack

Read My Stories

Too Long; Didn't Read

Make resilience your competitive advantage

Advancing Observability Platforms: Upgrading Data Processing and Reducing Costs with Apache Doris

About Author

Comments

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN

Related Stories

Untitled Story

Evolution of Data Sharding Towards Automation and Flexibility in Apache Doris

A/B Testing was a Jerk, Until we Found the Replacement for Druid

Building the Next-Generation Data Lakehouse: 10X Performance

Database in Fintech: How to Support 10,000 Dashboards Without Creating a Mess

Elasticsearch VS Apache Doris in Log Analysis

Evolution of Data Sharding Towards Automation and Flexibility in Apache Doris

A/B Testing was a Jerk, Until we Found the Replacement for Druid

Building the Next-Generation Data Lakehouse: 10X Performance

Database in Fintech: How to Support 10,000 Dashboards Without Creating a Mess

Elasticsearch VS Apache Doris in Log Analysis

Light-Mode

Classic

Newspaper

Dark-Mode

Neon Noir

Minty

HN StartUps