Growth @ Cryptio.co I write about Crypto, blockchain, AI, startups & growth marketing.
The lack of transparency has been a growing problem for crypto-based companies. For most of them, it is a nightmare just to meet basic regulatory needs like finding an accountant, opening a bank account, getting audited and certified compliant. The main challenge lies in the fact that most accounting practices and financial reporting guidelines are formulated for traditional FIAT currency based businesses. There is a lack of clearly defined standards and practices for businesses dealing in tokens and cryptocurrencies.
This regulatory hurdle limits the market penetration and adoption for many crypto projects, as “institutions need to see a focus on compliance, transparency, and governance to comfortably use and transact with crypto” according to Jeff Horowitz, Chief Compliance Officer at Coinbase.
For example, a token company usually has trading accounts on several exchanges (not to mention dealings with OTC desks) and will use several wallets for its operational activity. All these service providers have different formats to report transaction information and history due to the aforementioned lack of standards.
To just name a few, you’ll have to understand what base and quote currencies are. You’ll have to see that a BUY transaction on Kraken is different from a BUY transaction on Bitfinex, then figure out what Bitcoin UTXO are and how to account for them. Therefore, extracting, consolidating, valuing and classifying all this data for different digital assets coming from many different exchanges with different prices is a nightmare.
And now we have a new entrant to add to the confusion - Libra. Given the little information that we have, will it be a new way to evade taxes? How will the transactions be reported? And eventually how will it be taxed?
The capacity of evading taxes is related to the possibility of staying anonymous in the network, which is the great advantage of crypto like ZCash or Monero. The Calibra wallet (the first Libra wallet – developed by Facebook) will however ask for KYC on their platform. If a user wants to buy or sell Libra from the Calibra wallet, he or she will have to share with the company their personal and banking information. But, Calibra won’t be the only wallet provider.
Since Libra is open-source, anyone can decide to build a Libra wallet and cash-in/cash-out solutions. And it will be the network participant’s responsibility to comply, or not, with the local regulation. Though we would definitely, and strongly, recommended to comply. However, every entity that wants to send Libra through mainstream applications like Messenger or Whatsapp will be exposed to regulations and taxes.
As per Facebook, Libra will be backed by a basket of international currencies. Its price will be stable relatively to this basket, but will vary relatively to each currency. It paves the way to capital gains taxes as the value of your Libra holdings might have increased or decreased from the time you acquired them and the moment you used/sold them.
The impact of this is that Libra holders will have to track the historical prices of the asset relatively to their national currency to be able to compute cost basis and gains & losses. For instance, if you buy 10 000 Libra at €0,95/Libra and use them when it is at €1/Libra, you will have to report a gain of €500.
However, it is still not completely clear how these gains are supposed to be reported. Libra argues that given the different nature of the asset (non-speculative, made for payments and money transfers), it will be subject to a ‘light tax treatment’ (Dante Disparte, Head of Policy and Communications at the Libra Association). In other words, a Libra transaction history will be considered as regular payments that are not exposed to capital gains. To be noted that here, you still have to value every Libra transaction based on the price of Libra.
Given the giant 'mainstream' participants in the Libra association (VISA, Stripe, Ebay, Uber), we can imagine that more and more big players will start accepting payments in Libra. Thus, even if it won’t be considered as a regular currency, it will more and more look like one. And like every payment in a regular currency, companies will have to implement a invoicing management system.
It will be even more mandatory given that companies accepting payments in Libra will still have to account for sales tax. This would again mean reconciling the Libra activity with the local currency, valuing every payment in USD/EUR, cashing out some Libra to pay the sales tax, and then showing everything in the accounting reports.
All these options lead to one conclusion: it won’t be easy to account and reconcile Libra transactions with fiat-based accounting and tax declaration. Atleast not any time soon. We expect that some financial services providers will build basic accounting tools on the Libra network to help the participants benefit from it. This is one of many issues that the Libra team will have to tackle in the near future, once they solve their current issues with Libra fitting the AML requirements asked by US regulators.
As governments and regulatory bodies catch up to the new business models created by cryptocurrencies, this space is going to see a lot of action in the coming months and years.
Create your free account to unlock your custom reading experience.