The post is a part of F# Advent Calendar 2018 . It’s Christmas time! This summer I was hired by the office of Santa Claus. Santa is not just a fairy tale character on his own — he leads a large organization that supplies gifts and happiness to millions of children around the globe. Like any large organization, Santa’s office employs an impressive number of IT systems. As part of its IT modernization effort, North Pole HQ restructured the whole supply chain of Christmas gifts. Many legacy components were moved from a self-managed data center at the North Pole — although the cooling is quite cheap there — to Azure cloud. Azure was an easy sell since Santa’s techy elves use Office 365, SharePoint and the .NET development stack. One of the goals of the redesign was to leverage managed cloud services and serverless architecture wherever possible. Santa has no spare elves to keep reinventing IT wheels. Wish Fulfillment Service My assignment was to redesign the service. The service receives wish lists from clients (they call children “clients”): Wish Fulfillment Christmas Card with a Wish List © my son Tim Luckily, the list is already parsed by some other service, and also contains the metadata about the kid’s background (age, gender, and so on) and preferences. For each item in the list, our service calls the service, which uses machine , Azure Cognitive services, and a bit of magic to determine the actual products (they call gifts “products”) that best fit the client’s expressed desire and profile. For instance, my son’s wish for “LEGO Draak” matches to “LEGO NINJAGO Masters of Spinjitzu Firstbourne Red Dragon”. You get the point. Matching learning There might be several matches for each desired item, and each result has an estimate of how likely it is to fulfill the original request and make the child happy. All the matching products are combined and sent over to the service. Gift Picking selects one of the options based on its price, demand, confidence level, and the Naughty-or-Nice score of the client. Gift Picking The last step of the workflow is to the selected gift in the warehouse and shipping system called “Santa’s Archive of Products”, also referred to as SAP. Reserve Here is the whole flow in one picture: Gift Fulfillment Workflow How should we implement this service? Original Design The Wish Fulfillment service should run in the cloud and integrate with other services. It should be able to process millions of requests in December and stay very cheap to run during the rest of the year. We decided to leverage serverless architecture with on the . Serverless Functions are: Azure Functions Consumption Plan : the cloud provider provisions resources, scales them based on the load, takes care of uptime and reliability; Fully Managed : for each serverless Function you have to define a specific trigger — the event type which causes it to run, be it an HTTP endpoint or a queue message; Event-Driven : it costs nothing to run the application if there is no usage, and the cost of busy applications is proportional to the actual resource utilization. Changed per Execution Here is the diagram of the original design: Workflow Design with Azure Functions and Storage Queues We used Azure Storage Queues to keep the whole flow asynchronous and more resilient to failures and load fluctuation. This design would mostly work, but we found a couple of problems with it: The Functions were manually wired via storage queues and corresponding bindings. The workflow was spread over infrastructure definition and thus was hard to grasp. We had to pass all items of each wish list into a single invocation of Matching Function, otherwise combining the matching results from multiple queue messages would be tricky. Although not in scope for the initial release, there were plans to add manual elf intervention for poorly matched items. This feature would require a change in the flow design: it’s not trivial to fit long-running processes into the pipeline. To improve on these points, we decided to try — a library that brings workflow orchestration to Azure Functions. It introduces several to define stateful, potentially long-running operations, and handles a lot of the mechanics of reliable communication and state management behind the scenes. Durable Functions tools If you want to know more about what Durable Functions are and why they might be a good idea, I invite you to read my article (20 minutes read). Making Sense of Azure Durable Functions For the rest of this post, I will walk you through the implementation of the Wish Fulfillment workflow with Azure Durable Functions. Domain Model A good design starts with a decent domain model. Luckily, the project was built with F# — the language with the richest domain modeling capabilities in the .NET ecosystem. Types Our service is invoked with a wish list as the input parameter, so let’s start with the type : WishList It contains information about the author of the list and recognized “order” items. is a custom type; for now, it's not important what's in it. Customer For each wish we want to produce a list of possible matches: The product is a specific gift option from Santa’s catalog, and the confidence is a number from to of how strong the match is. 0.0 1.0 The end goal of our service is to produce a : Reservation It represents the exact product selection for the specific kid. Functions The Wish Fulfillment service needs to perform three actions, which can be modeled with three strongly-typed asynchronous functions. Note: I use lowercase “function” for F# functions and capitalize “Function” for Azure Functions throughout the article to minimize confusion. The finds matches for each wish: first action The first line of all my function snippets shows the function type. In this case, it’s a mapping from the text of the child’s wish ( ) to a list of matches ( ). string Match list The takes the list of all matches of all wishes and picks one. Its real implementation is Santa’s secret sauce, but my model just picks the one with the highest confidence level: second action combined Given the picked , the reservation is merely , not worthy of a separate action. gift { Kid = wishlist.Kid; Product = gift } The registers a reservation in the SAP system: third action Workflow The fulfillment service combines the three actions into one workflow: The workflow implementation is a nice and concise summary of the actual domain flow. Note that the Matching service is called multiple times in parallel, and then the results are easily combined by virtue of the F# function. Async.Parallel So how do we translate the domain model to the actual implementation on top of serverless Durable Functions? Classic Durable Functions API C# was the first target language for Durable Functions; Javascript is now fully supported too. F# wasn’t initially declared as officially supported, but since F# runs on top of the same .NET runtime as C#, it has always worked. I have a blog post about and have added to the official repository. Azure Durable Functions in F# F# samples Here are two examples from that old F# code of mine (they have nothing to do with our gift fulfillment domain): This code works and does its job, but doesn’t look like idiomatic F# code: No strong typing: Activity Functions are called by name and with types manually specified Functions are not curried, so partial application is hard The need to pass the object around for any Durable operation context Although not shown here, the other samples read input parameters, handle errors, and enforce timeouts — all look too C#-y. Better Durable Functions Instead of following the sub-optimal route, we implemented the service with a more F#-idiomatic API. I’ll show the code first, and then I’ll explain its foundation. The implementation consists of three parts: Functions — one per action from the domain model Activity Function defines the workflow Orchestrator to instruct how to run the application in the cloud Azure Functions bindings Activity Functions Each Activity Function defines one step of the workflow: Matching, Picking, and Reserving. We simply reference the F# functions of those actions in one-line definitions: Each activity is defined by a name and a function. Orchestrator The Orchestrator calls Activity Functions to produce the desired outcome of the service. The code uses a custom computation expression: Notice how closely it matches the workflow definition from our domain model: Async function vs. Durable Orchestrator The only differences are: computation expression is used instead of because multi-threading is not allowed in Orchestrators orchestrator async replaces of direct invocations of functions Activity.call substitutes Activity.all Async.Parallel Hosting layer An Azure Function trigger needs to be defined to host any piece of code as a cloud Function. This can be done manually in , or via trigger generation from .NET attributes. In my case I added the following four definitions: function.json The definitions are very mechanical and, again, strongly typed (apart from Functions’ names). Ship It! These are all the bits required to get our Durable Wish Fulfillment service up and running. From this point, we can leverage all the existing tooling of Azure Functions: Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code for development and debugging to run the application locally and deploy it to Azure Azure Functions Core Tools The latest version of the Core Tools has dedicated commands to manage instances of Durable Functions There is a learning curve in the process of adopting the serverless architecture. However, a small project like ours is a great way to do the learning. It sets Santa’s IT department on the road to success, and children will get better gifts more reliably! DurableFunctions.FSharp The above code was implemented with the library . I created this library as a thin F#-friendly wrapper around Durable Functions. DurableFunctions.FSharp Frankly speaking, the whole purpose of this article is to introduce the library and make you curious enough to give it a try. DurableFunctions.FSharp has several pieces in the toolbox: and computation expression which encapsulates proper usage of -based API of OrchestratorBuilder orchestrator Task DurableOrchestrationContext generic type to define activities as first-class values Activity module with helper functions to call activities Activity Adapters for Azure Functions definition for and Async Orchestrator API of the original Durable Extensions is still available, so you can fall back to them if needed In my opinion, F# is a great language to develop serverless Functions. The simplicity of working with functions, immutability by default, strong type system, focus on data pipelines are all useful in the world of event-driven cloud applications. Azure Durable Functions brings higher-level abstractions to compose workflows out of simple building blocks. The goal of DurableFunctions.FSharp is to make such composition natural and enjoyable for F# developers. is as easy as creating a new .NET Core project and referencing a NuGet package. Getting Started I’d love to get as much feedback as possible! Leave comments below, create issues on the , or open a PR. This would be super awesome! GitHub repository Happy coding, and Merry Christmas! Acknowledgments Many thanks to , , , for reviewing the draft of this article and their valuable contributions and suggestions. Katy Shimizu Devon Burriss Dave Lowe Chris Gillum Originally published at mikhail.io .

Flow

Chain

Microsoft

Super

Target

Twitter

Too Long; Didn't Read

In your car, at home, or at work — Bosch technology shapes many areas of life.

A Fairy Tale of F# and Durable Functions

Too Long; Didn't Read

Companies Mentioned

Coins Mentioned

Mikhail Shilkov

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

A Fairy Tale of F# and Durable Functions

Too Long; Didn't Read

Companies Mentioned

Coins Mentioned

Mikhail Shilkov

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

RELATED STORIES