paint-brush
Objective Mismatch in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: Conclusionby@feedbackloop

Objective Mismatch in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: Conclusion

by The FeedbackLoop: #1 in PM Education
The FeedbackLoop: #1 in PM Education HackerNoon profile picture

The FeedbackLoop: #1 in PM Education

@feedbackloop

The FeedbackLoop offers premium product management education, research papers, and...

January 16th, 2024
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
Print this story
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

This conclusion emphasizes the significance of addressing objective mismatch in RLHF methods, outlining a pathway toward enhanced accessibility and reliability for language models. The insights presented indicate a future where mitigating mismatch and aligning with human values can resolve common challenges encountered in state-of-the-art language models, opening doors for improved machine learning methods.
featured image - Objective Mismatch in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: Conclusion
1x
Read by Dr. One voice-avatar

Listen to this story

The FeedbackLoop: #1 in PM Education HackerNoon profile picture
The FeedbackLoop: #1 in PM Education

The FeedbackLoop: #1 in PM Education

@feedbackloop

The FeedbackLoop offers premium product management education, research papers, and certifications. Start building today!

Learn More
LEARN MORE ABOUT @FEEDBACKLOOP'S
EXPERTISE AND PLACE ON THE INTERNET.

Authors:

(1) Nathan Lambert, Allen Institute for AI;

(2) Roberto Calandra, TU Dresden.

Abstract & Introduction

Related Work

Background

Understanding Objective Mismatch

Discussions

Conclusion

Acknowledgments, and References

6 Conclusion

This paper presents the multiple ways by which objective mismatch limits the accessibility and reliability of RLHF methods. This current disconnect between design a reward model, optimizing it, and the downstream model goals creates a method that is challenging to implement and improve on. Future work mitigating mismatch and the proxy objectives present in RLHF, LLMs and other popular machine learning methods will becomes easier to align with human values and goals, solving many common challenges users encounter with state-of-the-art LLMs.



This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license.


L O A D I N G
. . . comments & more!

About Author

The FeedbackLoop: #1 in PM Education HackerNoon profile picture
The FeedbackLoop: #1 in PM Education@feedbackloop
The FeedbackLoop offers premium product management education, research papers, and certifications. Start building today!

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

Permanent on Arweave
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story in a terminal
 Terminal
Read this story w/o Javascript
Read this story w/o Javascript
 Lite
X REMOVE AD