paint-brush
What the Phillips Curve Tells Us About Inflationby@keynesian

What the Phillips Curve Tells Us About Inflation

by Keynesian TechnologyDecember 10th, 2024
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

This proof derives the state space form of a non-linear model, using the Phillips curve and rational expectations to link inflation and future price equations, ensuring consistency in expectations and marginal cost dynamics.
featured image - What the Phillips Curve Tells Us About Inflation
Keynesian Technology HackerNoon profile picture

Author:

(1) David Staines.

Abstract

1 Introduction

2 Mathematical Arguments

3 Outline and Preview

4 Calvo Framework and 4.1 Household’s Problem

4.2 Preferences

4.3 Household Equilibrium Conditions

4.4 Price-Setting Problem

4.5 Nominal Equilibrium Conditions

4.6 Real Equilibrium Conditions and 4.7 Shocks

4.8 Recursive Equilibrium

5 Existing Solutions

5.1 Singular Phillips Curve

5.2 Persistence and Policy Puzzles

5.3 Two Comparison Models

5.4 Lucas Critique

6 Stochastic Equilibrium and 6.1 Ergodic Theory and Random Dynamical Systems

6.2 Equilibrium Construction

6.3 Literature Comparison

6.4 Equilibrium Analysis

7 General Linearized Phillips Curve

7.1 Slope Coefficients

7.2 Error Coefficients

8 Existence Results and 8.1 Main Results

8.2 Key Proofs

8.3 Discussion

9 Bifurcation Analysis

9.1 Analytic Aspects

9.2 Algebraic Aspects (I) Singularities and Covers

9.3 Algebraic Aspects (II) Homology

9.4 Algebraic Aspects (III) Schemes

9.5 Wider Economic Interpretations

10 Econometric and Theoretical Implications and 10.1 Identification and Trade-offs

10.2 Econometric Duality

10.3 Coefficient Properties

10.4 Microeconomic Interpretation

11 Policy Rule

12 Conclusions and References


Appendices

A Proof of Theorem 2 and A.1 Proof of Part (i)

A.2 Behaviour of ∆

A.3 Proof Part (iii)

B Proofs from Section 4 and B.1 Individual Product Demand (4.2)

B.2 Flexible Price Equilibrium and ZINSS (4.4)

B.3 Price Dispersion (4.5)

B.4 Cost Minimization (4.6) and (10.4)

B.5 Consolidation (4.8)

C Proofs from Section 5, and C.1 Puzzles, Policy and Persistence

C.2 Extending No Persistence

D Stochastic Equilibrium and D.1 Non-Stochastic Equilibrium

D.2 Profits and Long-Run Growth

E Slopes and Eigenvalues and E.1 Slope Coefficients

E.2 Linearized DSGE Solution

E.3 Eigenvalue Conditions

E.4 Rouche’s Theorem Conditions

F Abstract Algebra and F.1 Homology Groups

F.2 Basic Categories

F.3 De Rham Cohomology

F.4 Marginal Costs and Inflation

G Further Keynesian Models and G.1 Taylor Pricing

G.2 Calvo Wage Phillips Curve

G.3 Unconventional Policy Settings

H Empirical Robustness and H.1 Parameter Selection

H.2 Phillips Curve

I Additional Evidence and I.1 Other Structural Parameters

I.2 Lucas Critique

I.3 Trend Inflation Volatility

B.5 Consolidation (4.8)

Here, I derive the state space form of the non-linear model. The proof uses only techniques from basic analysis. The main complexity arises from the non-linear Phillips curve.

B.5.1 Proof of Proposition 4

Proof. Start with the non-linear Phillips curve, formed from substituting the relationship between the optimal relative reset price and inflation derived in Proposition 1 into the left-hand side of (27). Now put (30) and (31) into the right-hand side. Finally, lag the relationship one period to reveal that where W. t are error terms reflecting the difference between expected and true values. They are white noise thanks to the rational expectation hypothesis. Subsequently, dependence on the current shocks will be suppressed. [108]



where the formula is valid whenever the denominator is non-zero. Now rearranging the future price equation



then substituting into the right-hand side and simplifying yields



Moving (207) forward one period and substituting in reveals




To prove this holds with probability one consider



which appears in the denominator of (207) and (210) through (212), setting the expression equal to zero gives the equation of the singularity



We can see that this function is surjective, by evaluating its derivative, which shows that it is strictly increasing.



This means that the singularity can only occur at a point in time t+1, if inflation is equal to one particular value, determined by inflation in the previous period t. We know this must occur with probability zero as inflation is continuously distributed, since it is determined by the reset price that depends non-trivially on the continuously distributed shock processes.


This can be converted into a relationship in expected inflation, by noting that equation (27) and the underlying optimization problems bound inflation above and below as follows



To complete this section of the derivation all that is required is to substitute out terms in marginal costs and lagged income. Present marginal costs can be removed using (19) and (37) as follows



leaving only lagged income which can be substituted out via the Euler equation. To this end let us define the following function



Calling in the policy rule (35), including the output smoothing restriction gives



which allows us to form a function



substituting into (217) gives the appropriate form for the Phillips curve



Finally, we can form the canonical Euler by inverting the Euler using



then substituting in the Phillips curve gives the final section



Lastly, by inverting (34), moving one period into the future and substituting in the Phillips curve and noting the expectation must exist to prevent transversality condition blowing again, which means that



This paper is available on arxiv under CC 4.0 license.


[108] The transversality condition prevents additional non-fundamental terms entering.


[109] ZINSS corresponds to a particular case where both singularities arise simultaneously and "cancel out" from the right hand side of (205). The nature of the cocycle at the singularity is treated in the next section.