Photo Credit: Jason Henry for the New York Times This answer was originally posted on Quora. . For more trending tech answers from , visit . You can view the answer here Quora HackerNoon.com/quora I think this is something that we are going to struggle with as cryptocurrency becomes more important. . BTC can be incremented to the Sathoshi (1/100,000,000 of a BTC), so even if the value explodes, it can still remain functional. Wealth inequality didn’t change the usefulness of the internet, nor will is change how useful blockchain is. Even if a few people get an overtly out sized benefit, the majority still get a better system, which improves everyone’s lives. On the one hand, there is no technical reason for the concentration of wealth to limit people from using cryptocurrency (assuming we can scale the solution) The truth is that early adopters who did not sell are going to be sitting on top of some very large piles of money, some to the tune of tens of billions of dollars. And there isn’t a lot that can be done about this, at least not without a high level of interventionism. But this does not make it fair. It’s not fair. It will never be fair. There are going to be people 10 years from now flying around in private jets and buying sports teams because they bought BTC and forgot about it. You’ll likely meet a speaker at some conference who’s only real contribution was reading some doffus’ quora posts and buying based on that recommendation (and selling themselves as a trading genius). There will be more imitators to James Altucher than you can imagine, all making more money than people slaving away for years at an honest career. They got lucky and will have all the benefits that come with this. And for some time, they will be plentiful. The good news is that over time, those with unearned power tend to lose unearned power. Most family wealth (and we’re talking billions of dollars of wealth) is lost within three generations. Wealth accumulation is a very fragile process and there are many places where you can lose funds (whether that’s a hack, bad investment, drunk weekend in Vegas, etc). So one way to personally ‘solve’ this problem is to realize that those that got lucky, got lucky. But those that remain lucky (and wealthy) had to earn it to some degree, and that many will lose their fortunes along the way. But I understand that this won’t completely quell feelings of unfairness. That’s a reasonable response to incidents like this. And in many ways, the technology will still allow that, but it also has created massive wealth for very few, seemingly against these intentions. Cryptocurrency was supposed to act as a great equalizer in the world. It is supposed to take down a lot of the institutions that created great barriers to wealth inequality and allow people to create a better future. There is nothing that can be done to change how wealthy someone got, or the luck that got them there. Going in and trying to ‘fix’ this often creates bigger and worse problems then what you currently have. But the biggest risk is the opportunity cost to yourself. Every moment you spend on wondering about past luck and big fortunes will be another day you’re not building your future, in your image. So here’s the answer I operate with: Ignore them. It’s not fair, and you will never make it fair. The technology is still going to change lives, and maybe not as fairly as you imagined. But there is still a better world for you to build.

Bitcoin

Too Long; Didn't Read

Discover Saakuru: Web3 Mass-Adoption with 0-FEES

What are the future consequences of the concentration of Bitcoin wealth in the hands of a few?

Too Long; Didn't Read

Company Mentioned

Coin Mentioned

Brian Schuster

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

What are the future consequences of the concentration of Bitcoin wealth in the hands of a few?

Too Long; Didn't Read

Company Mentioned

Coin Mentioned

Brian Schuster

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

RELATED STORIES