The biggest myth is that JavaScript is special or unique in terms of flexibility, expressiveness, and capabilities because of: dynamic typing lambdas object prototypes asynchronous programming But guess what? It’s not unique at all! Python, Ruby, Perl, PHP, Clojure, and Smalltalk are all dynamically typed. Java, Python, C++, C#, Ruby, Perl, PHP, Scala, Clojure, and Smalltalk all support lambdas. Maple, Self, Lua, REBOL, and Io all have object prototypes. Interestingly, other than JavaScript, nobody else gives a shit about prototypes. Class-based OOP remains, far and away, the most popular and widely used technique in the object space. Asynchronous programming has been with us since the earliest days of computing. It can done in practically any language, including Java, Python, C#, and Smalltalk. What’s the big deal??? you can do in JavaScript, I can do in Smalltalk, for example. If flexibility and expressiveness are the main reasons you’re using JavaScript, then you’re paying a high price for it because . Anything JavaScript is also an execrable language The second biggest myth is that you use JavaScript for writing web browser applications because JavaScript is the only language native to the web browser. While this is technically true, you do have alternatives if you’re willing to accept languages. This means treating JavaScript as a kind of “assembly language” for the web. must transpiled This is no different from using a language like C or Go to compile into x86 assembly language. Here is a list of transpiled alternatives: short Bridge.NET (C#) Cheerp (C++) ClojureScript (Clojure) Dart Elm GopherJS (Go) Haxe JSweet (Java) Kotlin Opal (Ruby) PharoJS (Pharo) Scala.js (Scala) Transcrypt (Python) You have a cornucopia of choice, an embarrassment of riches. The third biggest myth is that JavaScript is easy to learn. Sure, if you limit yourself to a small language subset, then programming language is easy to learn. This applies to C++, C#, Scala, and Swift, as well. any However, JavaScript is a HUGE language with numerous dark corners and weird edge cases. Don’t believe me? Look at ECMAScript 2017. Its language spec is over 885 pages long! This is getting into Tolstoy’s War and Peace territory. Expect future versions of ECMAScript to be even bigger. If you think JavaScript is easy to learn, then you are in for a rude surprise. The fourth biggest myth is that JavaScript is the only language you can use for both front end and back end. Not if you’re willing to accept transpiled languages. From the above list, the only languages that can’t be used for front and back ends are CoffeeScript and Elm. The fifth biggest myth is that JavaScript is used . However, JavaScript is used for front-end web development. It has some traction server-side with Node, and desktop-side with Electron, and mobile-side with React Native (as well as Cordova/PhoneGap). But everywhere else, JavaScript barely enjoys any usage. everywhere primarily It’s actually a similar story for languages like Python and Ruby. Both are quite versatile, but they really are best known for data science/machine learning and Rails, respectively. Python does well in the web space, too. But Python is hardly used for desktop and mobile. Are front end, Node, Electron, and React Native ? Talk about delusions! everywhere

Assembly

Too Long; Didn't Read

In your car, at home, or at work — Bosch technology shapes many areas of life.

What are the biggest myths about JavaScript?

Too Long; Didn't Read

Company Mentioned

Richard Kenneth Eng

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

What are the biggest myths about JavaScript?

Too Long; Didn't Read

Company Mentioned

Richard Kenneth Eng

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

RELATED STORIES