paint-brush
What Are Large Language Models Capable Of: The Vulnerability of LLMs to Adversarial Attacksby@igorpaniuk
268 reads

What Are Large Language Models Capable Of: The Vulnerability of LLMs to Adversarial Attacks

by Igor PaniukOctober 18th, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Recent research uncovered a vulnerability in deep learning models, including large language models, called "adversarial attacks." These attacks manipulate input data to mislead models. So, I decided to test out a framework that automatically generates universal adversarial prompts.
featured image - What Are Large Language Models Capable Of: The Vulnerability of LLMs to Adversarial Attacks
Igor Paniuk HackerNoon profile picture

Large language models are advanced AI systems designed to understand and generate human-like text and have become a driving force behind numerous applications, from chatbots to content generation.


However, sometimes they avoid giving you the output you need.

Almost got it


Recent research has revealed a vulnerability in deep learning models, including not just large language models but other types as well. This vulnerability is known as adversarial attacks, where input data is subtly manipulated to deceive models into producing incorrect results.


What Are Adversarial Attacs?

Adversarial attacks involve the intentional manipulation of machine learning models through the changes in the input data. These attacks find weaknesses in the models’ decision-making mechanisms, leading to misclassifications or erroneous outcomes.


How Do They Work?

Adversarial attacks in AI work by making tiny, hidden changes to things like pictures or text that confuse AI systems. These changes are specially designed to trick the AI into making mistakes or giving biased answers. By studying how the AI reacts to these tricky changes, attackers can learn how the AI works and where it might be vulnerable.


Can LLMs resist?

LLMs are not immune to these adversarial attacks, often referred to as "jailbreaking" in the context of LLMs. Jailbreaking involves skillfully crafting prompts to exploit model biases and generate outputs that may deviate from their intended purpose.


Users of LLMs have experimented with manual prompt design, creating anecdotal prompts tailored for very specific situations. In fact, a recent dataset called "Harmful Behavior" contained 521 instances of harmful behaviors intentionally designed to challenge LLM capabilities.


So, I decided to test out a framework that automatically generates universal adversarial prompts. These prompts can be added to the end of a user's input. And this suffix can be used across multiple user prompts and potentially across various LLMs.

Explaining the approach

This approach operates as a black-box method, meaning it doesn't go deeply into the inner workings of LLMs and is limited to inspecting only the model's outputs. This aspect is important because, in real-life situations, access to model internals is often unavailable.


The attack strategy is making a single adversarial prompt that consistently disrupts the alignment of commercial models, relying on the model's output.

The result?

It was successful.
And it raises questions regarding the usability, reliability, and ethical aspects of LLMs, in addition to existing challenges, including:


Distortions

These occur when models generate responses that are inaccurate or don't align with user intentions. For instance, they might produce responses that attribute human qualities or emotions, even when it's not appropriate.

Safety

Large language models can unintentionally expose private information, participate in phishing attempts, or generate unwanted spam. When misused, they can be manipulated to spread biased beliefs and misinformation, potentially causing widespread harm.


Prejudice

The quality of training data significantly influences a model's responses. If the data lacks diversity or primarily represents one specific group, the model's outputs may exhibit bias, perpetuating existing disparities.


Permission

When data is collected from the internet, these models can inadvertently infringe on copyright, plagiarize content, and compromise privacy by extracting personal details from descriptions, leading to potential legal complications.


Last thoughts

We’ll see even more frameworks of LLM models in the future. Because they really help you get the outputs you need from a model. However, ethical concerns and sustainability will remain essential for responsible AI deployment and energy-efficient training.


Adapting AI models to specific business needs can enhance operational efficiency, customer service, and data analysis. So, in the end, the potential of AI and LLMs will be democratized, and we’ll get even more access to these technologies in the future.