paint-brush
Twitter Lawsuit: The U.S. Federal District Courts to Be the Exclusive Forumby@legalpdf
196 reads

Twitter Lawsuit: The U.S. Federal District Courts to Be the Exclusive Forum

by Legal PDF: Tech Court CasesNovember 22nd, 2023
Read on Terminal Reader
Read this story w/o Javascript
tldt arrow

Too Long; Didn't Read

Unless the corporation consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.

People Mentioned

Mention Thumbnail
featured image - Twitter Lawsuit: The U.S. Federal District Courts to Be the Exclusive Forum
Legal PDF: Tech Court Cases HackerNoon profile picture

PARAG AGRAWAL VIJAYA GADDE, and NED SEGAL v. twitter Court Filing, retrieved on April 10, 2023 is part of HackerNoon’s Legal PDF Series. You can jump to any part in this filing here. This is part 21 of 37.

ARTICLE VIII - FORUM FOR CERTAIN ACTIONS

To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law:


(A) Unless the corporation consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the of Chancery of the State of Delaware (or, if the Court of Chancery does not have jurisdiction, another State court in Delaware or the federal district court for the District of Delaware) shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the corporation, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by, or otherwise wrongdoing by, any director, stockholder, officer or other employee of the corporation to the corporation or the corporation's stockholders, iii) any action arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL or the certificate of incorporation or these bylaws (as either may be amended from time to time), (iv) any action to interpret, apply, enforce or determine the validity of the certificate of incorporation or these bylaws (as either may be amended from time to time), or (v) any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, except for, as to each of (i) through (v) above, any claim as to which such court determines that there is an indispensable party not subject to the jurisdiction of such court (and the indispensable party does not consent to the personal jurisdiction of such court within ten (10) days following such determination), which is vested in the exclusive jurisdiction of a court or forum other than such court, or for which such court does not have subject matter jurisdiction.


For the avoidance of doubt, this Article VIII, Part (A) shall not apply to any action brought to enforce a duty or liability created by the Securities Act of 1933, or any successor thereto (the Securities Act ) or the 1934 Act.


(B) Unless the corporation consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the federal district courts of the United States of America shall be the sole and exclusive forum for the resolution of any complaint asserting a cause of action arising under the Securities Act.



Continue Reading Here.


About HackerNoon Legal PDF Series: We bring you the most important technical and insightful public domain court case filings.


This court case 2023-0409 retrieved on October 4, 2023, from int.nyt.com is part of the public domain. The court-created documents are works of the federal government, and under copyright law, are automatically placed in the public domain and may be shared without legal restriction.


Photo by Aditya Joshi on Unsplash