Some say that Bitcoin is money. Others say that it is not money. It doesn’t matter. No one should be licensed to use or sell Bitcoin. Ever. Apart from the nauseating and unimaginative use of the prefix “Bit” in yet another context, the idea of a is completely absurd and unethical. It’s also guaranteed that this bad idea will face a robust and successful legal challenge that will remove the possibility of any sort of “BitLicense” from being required anywhere in the United States, potentially causing that country to become the centre of all Bitcoin business for the entire world. “BitLicense” Let me explain why. Some say that Bitcoin is money. Others say that it is not money. It doesn't matter. What does matter are two things; that the Bitcoin network does what it is meant to do completely reliably, and what the true nature of the Bitcoin network and the messages in it are. Bitcoin is a distributed ledger system, maintained by a network of peers that monitors and regulates which entries are allocated to what Bitcoin addresses. This is done entirely by transmitting messages that are , between the nodes in the network, where cryptographic procedures are executed on these to verify their authenticity and the identity of the sender and recipient of the message and their position in the public ledger. The messages sent between nodes in the Bitcoin network are human readable, and printable. There is no point in any Bitcoin transaction that Bitcoin ceases to be It is , all the time. text messages in text text. all text Bitcoin can be printed out onto sheets of paper. This output can take different forms, like machine readable QR Codes, or it can be printed out in the letters A to Z, a to z and 0 to 9. This means they can be read by a human being, just like “Huckleberry Finn”. At the time of the creation of the United States of America, the Founding Fathers of that new country in their deep wisdom and distaste for tyranny, haunted by the memory of the absence of a free press in the countries from which they escaped, wrote into the basic law of that then young federation of free states, an explicit and unambiguous freedom, the “Freedom of the Press”. This amendment was first because of its central importance to a free society. The First Amendment guarantees that all Americans have the power to exercise their right to publish and distribute anything they like, without restriction or prior restraint. Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. This single line, forever precludes any law that restricts Bitcoin I will show you why. in any way. In 1995, the US Government had on the statute books, laws that restrict the export of encryption software products from America without a license. These goods are classified as “munitions”. The first versions of the breakthrough Public Key Encryption software or “ ”, written by Philip Zimmerman had already escaped the USA via Bulletin Board Systems from the moment it was first distributed, but all copies of PGP outside of the United States were “illegal”. In order to fix the problem of all copies of PGP outside of America being encumbered by this perception, an ingenious plan was put into motion, using the first Amendment as the means of making it happen legally. “Pretty Good Privacy” PGP The source code for PGP was printed out .

Bitcoin

Different

Too Long; Didn't Read

Discover Saakuru: Web3 Mass-Adoption with 0-FEES

The “Bitlicense” is a bad idea that must die

Too Long; Didn't Read

Company Mentioned

Coin Mentioned

Beautyon

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

The “Bitlicense” is a bad idea that must die

Too Long; Didn't Read

Company Mentioned

Coin Mentioned

Beautyon

About Author

TOPICS

THIS ARTICLE WAS FEATURED IN...

RELATED STORIES